Determination of Hatching Performances and Yolk Sac Absorptions in Black Sea Trout (<em>Salmo trutta</em> labrax Pallas, 1811)

Research Article

Austin Biol. 2016; 1(1): 1003.

Determination of Hatching Performances and Yolk Sac Absorptions in Black Sea Trout (Salmo trutta labrax Pallas, 1811)

Kocabas M¹, Basçinar N², Sahin SA² and Kutluyer F³*

¹Department of Wildlife Ecology & Management, Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey

²Department of Fisheries Technology Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey

³Department of Fisheries, Tunceli University, Turkey

*Corresponding author: Filiz Kutluyer, Department of Fisheries, Tunceli University, Tunceli, Turkey

Received: March 09, 2016; Accepted: April 01, 2016; Published: April 05, 2016

Editorial

The goal of this study was to evaluate hatching performance, body and yolk weight at hatching, the growth rate and yolk conversion efficiency during the yolk absorption in Black Sea trout (Salmo trutta labrax, Pallas 1811) larvae. In addition, the relationships between length, total wet weight, dry yolk body weights of alevins and degree-days were determined in this study. Our results indicated that the mean dry weights of the body and yolk sac were 2.85 ± 0.87 and 23.92 ± 1.04 mg at hatching and 14.95 ± 1.45 and 1.04 ± 0.90 mg at swimup stages while the mean wet weight was 17.17 ± 1.67 mg (n = 30) at hatching and reached 104.16 ± 8.18 mg just before the swim-up stage, respectively. The mean body dry matter and water content of the larvae were 46.98% and 53.02% at hatching and 14.84% and 85.16% at swim-up stages, respectively. The growth of larva, yolk sac absorption and yolk conversion efficiency were calculated as 0.49 mg/day, 0.99 mg/day and 0.53, respectively. Data here reported also demonstrated that dry yolk and total larval weights and dry matter of the larvae decreased while dry body weight and water content increased with degree-days. In conclusion, the data will provide benefits for production of Black Sea trout.

Keywords: Black sea trout; Salmo trutta labrax; Hatching performances; Yolk conversion efficiency; Growth

Introduction

The Black Sea trout (Salmo trutta labrax) is an endemic species of the Eastern Black Sea coast and rivers and also a new species for aquaculture [1]. Recently, S. t. labrax were described by Turan et al. [2] as S. coruhensis [3,4]. On-going debate notwithstanding, S. t. labrax is one of five ecotypes within Turkey. However, it has been cultured on a commercial scale in the North America, Europe and Eastern Black Sea region of Turkey in trout farms [5].

The first feeding activities from the outside start at swim-up stage of the larvae. In addition, there is a vestige of yolk at the swimming up stage. The first external feeding in hatcheries starts when over 30% percent larvae reached to swim-up stage. Development and transition stages in fish are important due to sensibility to pathogens, diseases, fasting and environmental factors. Despite all, increase in survival and growth rates could be provided through applicative hatchery management at critical stages [5,6].

Most studies to date have focused on larval development of salmonid species, namely, sea trout [7], brown trout [8,9], Atlantic salmon [10,11], rainbow trout [6,12], brook trout [8,13], brook trout and Arctic charr and their hybrids [14]. On the other hand, there are a few studies about hatching and yolk sac absorption on the Black Sea trout and their hybrids [6,15,16].

The purposes of the present study were to investigate hatching performance, body and yolk weight, the yolk absorption and yolk conversion efficiency of Black Sea trout (S. t. labrax). In addition, the specific objective was to assess the correlations between these different parameters.

Material and Methods

S. t. labrax (73 females and 30 males) was obtained from the trout hatchery in the Faculty of Marine Sciences, Karadeniz Technical University (Trabzon, Turkey). The sperm and egg were collected by a gentle abdominal massage. The eggs were incubated in a vertical incubator in triplicate using temperature-controlled. After hatching, about 3000 larvae were randomly divided into triplicate batches. Aerated water in the batches was recirculated and 20% of the water was replaced daily. Temperature was recorded two times a day (8:00- 9:00, 16:00-17:00). Monitoring of the eggs and alevins was made. In the eyed-egg stage, the eyes were evidently visible as black spots. In the swim-up stage, 50% of the alevins were started to feed and vigorously swimming up in order to food intake. The dead eggs and larvae were removed and counted each day. Ten larvae were randomly sampled at each sampling period (11 times) at 3 or 4 day intervals from the 133th degree-day (ST: sum of daily mean temperatures) when 50% of the larvae had hatched i.e. a total of 110 larvae were used during the study at each cross-types. Thus, larvae were sampled at the 228, 257, 287, 316, 346, 405, 435, 465, and 495 degree-days. Larvae were anesthetized with a benzocaine solution (30mg/l) and fixed in 10% formaldehyde. After a minimum three-week interval, preserved larvae were dissected to separate the yolk sac. Body and yolk were dried at 60°C for 48 h and weighed individually after 48 h [7]. Yolk sac efficiency was calculated as YCE = (Lt - L0)/ (Y0 - Yt) as per Hodson and Blunt [12], where L is dry larvae weight, Y is yolk sac dry weight, and t is day. The dry yolk sac consumption rate (mg/day) was determined as YCR = (Y0 - Yt)/t, daily length growth rate (mm/day), LGR = (lengtht - length0)/t, daily weight growth rate (mg/day), WGR = (wtt - wt0)/t; and development index as KD = 10(wet wt1/3)/length [11].

Results and Discussion

Egg size of Black Sea trout was 4.67 ± 0.46 mm. Incubation water temperature was 9.5 ± 0.5°C (8.6-10.2°C). The eggs were eyed at 233 day degree (25 days) and hatched after 39 days (366 day degree) (Table 1). Length and total wet weight (Figure 1), dry larva weights (Figure 2), and dry yolk weights (Figure 2) of Black Sea trout showed linear relationship with degree-days (ranged 228-495). Dry yolk weight decreased although length, total wet weight and dry body weight increased. Among the linear regression parameters were significantly differences, excluding length slope.