Chitosan Membranes for Sustainable Packaging

Editorial

Austin Biomol Open Access. 2016; 1(2): 1008.

Chitosan Membranes for Sustainable Packaging

Clara Casado Coterillo*

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Universidad de Cantabria, Spain

*Corresponding author: Clara Casado Coterillo, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Universidad de Cantabria, Spain

Received: August 24, 2016; Accepted: November 07, 2016; Published: November 10, 2016

Editorial

Food packaging is the ambassador in the search of materials with improved barrier permeation properties to O2, CO2, water and aroma vapours, responsible of degradation of perishable products’ shelflife, together with increasing functionalities such as antimicrobial, transparency, prevention and control of pollutants, biodegradability, to make the active intelligent packaging of the future. The urgency of developing bio-based environmentally friendly economic materials with improved barrier properties, transparent, biodegradable, thermal, mechanical and moisture resistance, another intelligent features [1] leads the research focus biopolymers and nanotechnology. In particular, chitosan is continuous object of research in food packaging [2,3] due to its biodegradable, non-toxic, transparent, hydrophilic and antimicrobial character, together with a cation ion exchange capacity of 0.57meq/g [4]. The high hydrophilicity limits the mechanical strength. This hydrophilicity can be correlated to the degree of deacetylation of chitosan [5]. The density and crystallinity of the chitosan polymer is related to the functional properties of the films [6]. The control of hydrophilicity helps controlling the degradation rate of the material, which is of paramount importance in the present research effort of biomass based and environmentally friendly polymers [5]. Thus, it is usual to mix chitosan polymer with cellulose fibers [7], blends with other polymers such as PVA or PVP [8] or cellulose acetate where chitosan provides the functional groups to open up the potential for pervaporation separation, metal [9] and toxic pollutants removal from waste waters [10]. Chitosan also shows potential as sustainable packaging material in comparison with the environmental impacts of conventional systems [11].

Most unique properties of chitosan derive from the ion exchange capacity of this biopolymer, achieved by derivatization of the amino and hydroxyl groups, either for tuning the flux and selectivity in the pervaporation separation of organic-water mixtures [12] or mucoadhesive applications in pharmaceutical industry [13]. The addition of plasticizers is usually needed to improve flexibility in dry state. The use of PEG-plasticizers in chitosan films for pharmaceutical applications has been recently reviewed [14]. PEG reduced the toxicity of the films but increases membrane permeation, thus the use as barrier films is limited, although it opens up the field to other membrane separations. The main challenge of mixed matrix or composite membranes is the compatibility between the components, and this has been attempted in nanocomposite technology by attempting the similarity of composition using carbon nanotubes [15], graphene oxide [16] as fillers of chitosan-based matrices, or similar hydrophilicity [17] or compatible ion exchange capacity [18,19] to improve the mechanical and thermal properties of chitosan biopolymer without costly or toxic organic plasticizers or additives. This could improve the sustainability of the production of novel plastic packaging [20], in agreement with the consumers demand on ecological transparency [21].

References

  1. Rhim JW, Park HM, Ha CS. Bio-nanocomposites for food packaging applications. Prog. Pol. Sci. 2013; 38: 1629-1652.
  2. Lorevice MV, Otoni CG, Moura MRd, Mattoso LHC. Chitosan nanoparticles on the improvement of thermal, barrier, and mechanical properties of high- and low-methyl pectin films. Food Hydrocoll. 2016; 52: 732-540.
  3. Hosseini SF, Rezaei M, Zandi M, Farahmandghavi F. Development of bioactive fish gelatin/chitosan nanoparticles composite films with antimicrobial properties. Food Chem. 2016; 194: 1266-1274.
  4. Darder M, Colilla M, Ruiz-Hitzky E, Biopolymer-Clay Nanocomposites Based on Chitosan Intercalated in Montmorillonite. Chem. Mater. 2003; 15: 3774-3780.
  5. Clasen C, Wilhelms T, Kulicke WM, Formation and characterization of chitosan membranes. Biomacromol. 2006; 7: 3210-3222.
  6. Tsai HA, Chen WH, Kuo CY, Lee KR, Lai JY, Study on the pervaporation performance and long-term stability of aqueous iso-propanol solution through chitosan/polyacrylonitrile hollow fiber membrane. J Membr Sci. 2008; 309: 146-155.
  7. Fernandes SCM, Oliveira L, Freire CSR, Silvestre AJD, Neto CP, Gandini A, Desbriéres J, Novel transparent nanocomposite films based on chitosan and bacterial cellulose. Green Chem. 2009; 11: 2023-2029.
  8. Abdelrazek EM, Elashmawi IS, Labeeb S, Chitosan filler effects on the experimental characterization, spectroscopic investigation and thermal studies of PVA/PVP blend films. Phys B. 2010; 405: 2021-2027.
  9. Batista CL, Villanueva ER, Amorim RVS, Tavares MT, Campos-Takaki GM, Chromium (VI) Ion Adsorption Features of Chitosan Film and Its Chitosan/Zeolite Conjugate 13X Film. Molecules. 2011; 16: 3569-3579.
  10. Boricha G, Murphy ZVP. Preparation of N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan/cellulose acetate blend nanofiltration membrane and testing its performance in treating industrial wastewater. Chem Eng J 2010; 157: 393-400.
  11. Leceta, Uranga J, Arana P, Cabezudo S, Caba K d l, Guerrero P. Valorisation of fishery industry wastes to manufacture sustainable packaging films: modelling moisture-sorption behavior. J Clean Prod. 2015; 91: 36-42.
  12. Zhang W, Li G, Fang Y, Wang X, Maleic anhydride surface-modification of crosslinked chitosan membrane and its pervaporation performance. J Membr Sci. 2007; 295: 130-138.
  13. Ayensu, Mitchell JC, Boateng JS. In vitro characterisation of chitosan based xerogels for potential buccal delivery of proteins. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012; 89: 935-941.
  14. Casettari L, Vllasaliu D, Castagnino E, Stolnik S, Howdle S, Illum L. PEGylated chitosan derivatives: Synthesis, characterizations and pharmaceutical applications. Prog Pol Sci. 2012; 37: 659-685.
  15. Aroon MA, Ismail AF, Montazer-Rahmati MM, Matsuura T. Effect of chitosan as a functionalization agent on the performance and separation properties of polyimide/multi-walled carbon nanotubes mixed matrix flat sheet membranes. J Membr Sci. 2010; 364: 309-317.
  16. L García-Cruz, Casado-Coterillo C, Irabien Á, Montiel V, J Iniesta. High Performance of Alkaline Anion-Exchange Membranes Based on Chitosan/Poly (vinyl) Alcohol Doped with Graphene Oxide for the Electrooxidation of Primary Alcohols. C-Journal of Carbon Research. 2016; 2: 10
  17. Casado-Coterillo, Andrés F, Téllez C, Coronas J, Irabien A. Synthesis and Characterization of ETS-10/Chitosan Nanocomposite Membranes for Pervaporation. Sep Sci Technol. 2014; 49: 1903-1909.
  18. Casado-Coterillo C, Fernández-Barquín A, Zornoza B, Téllez C, Coronas J, Irabien A. Synthesis and characterisation of MOF/ionic liquid/chitosan mixed matrix membranes for CO2/N2 separation. RSC Adv. 2015; 5: 102350-102361.
  19. Casado-Coterillo C, López-Guerrero MdM, Irabien A. Synthesis and Characterisation of ETS-10/Acetate-based Ionic Liquid/Chitosan Mixed Matrix Membranes for CO2/N2 Permeation. Membranes. 2014; 4: 287-301.
  20. Conte A, Cappelletti GM, Nicoletti GM, Russo C, Nobile MAD. Environmental implications of food loss probability in packaging design. Food Research International. 2015; 178: 11-17.
  21. Magnier L, Schoormans J, Consumer reactions to sustainable packaging: The interplay of visual appearance, verbal claim and environmental concern. J Environ Psychol. 2015; 44: 53-62.

Download PDF

Citation: Casado-Coterillo C. Chitosan Membranes for Sustainable Packaging. Austin Biomol Open Access. 2016; 1(2): 1008.

Home
Journal Scope
Online First
Current Issue
Editorial Board
Instruction for Authors
Submit Your Article
Contact Us