Prevalence and Control of Tuberculosis in the Nilgiris District: A Two Years Retrospective Study

Research Article

Austin J Pharmacol Ther. 2015; 3(3).1075.

Prevalence and Control of Tuberculosis in the Nilgiris District: A Two Years Retrospective Study

Sushanta Kr. Das¹, Saurabh Gupta²*, Kranthi Guthikonda³, Anand Vijayakumar PR4, Kranthi Sirisha G4, Srikala Patha4 and Sarah Thampy4

¹Department of Pharm D, CMR College of Pharmacy, India

²Department of Pharmacology, Indore Institute of Pharmacy, India

³School of Public Health, University of Memphis, USA

4Department of Pharmacy Practice, J.S.S. College of Pharmacy, India

*Corresponding author: : Saurabh Gupta, Department of Pharmacology, Indore institute of Pharmacy, Pithampur road, Opp. IIM, Rau, Indore -453331, Madhya Pradesh, India

Received: May 15, 2015; Accepted: September 08, 2015; Published: September 09, 2015

Abstract

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the world. Almost two million people develop TB in India. WHO recommends a directly observed treatment-short course (DOTS) strategy to achieve treatment goal, in which surveillance of treatment outcome makes an essential contribution to assess the effectiveness of control programs.

Objective: To measure the incidence and control of TB in the Nilgiris district

Methodology: This retrospective study was conducted between November 2009 and April 2010 in the Nilgiris, Tamilnadu. TB cases of 2008 and 2009 were collected from district Revised National Tuberculosis Program Center (RNTCP) and analyzed using statistical package SPSS V.13 to study the epidemiological trend and to evaluate favorable and unfavorable outcomes.

Results: A total of 951 TB patients were registered for the study period. Among 473 cases in 2008, 431(91.12%) were newly diagnosed and remaining 42(8.88%) were re-treatment cases. 245(51.79%) were pulmonary sputum positive, 94(19.87%) pulmonary sputum negative and 134(28.32%) extrapulmonary TB. Among the 478 cases in 2009, 427(89.33%) were newly diagnosed and 51(10.77%) were re-treatment cases. 216(45.18%) were pulmonary sputum positive, 110 (23.01%) pulmonary sputum negative and 152(31.79%) extra-pulmonary TB. Favorable outcomes show a significant (p=0.01) difference in patients who received category-III treatment in 2008 (43.76%) and 2009 (34.85%) respectively, where majority of them were treatment completers. Unfavorable outcomes show no significant difference (p>0.05) between patient receiving three categories of anti-TB treatments in 2008 and 2009 respectively.

Conclusions: Treatment success rate of DOTS during 2008 was 80.76% whereas in 2009 it was 77.77% which did not achieve the WHA 1991 criteria for monitoring TB control program.

Keywords: TB; Prevalence; Control

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, has affected mankind since 5000 years. In India each year almost two million people develop TB. It is estimated that annually around 330,000 Indians die due to TB [1,2]. There were an estimated 9.4 million incident cases (equivalent to 139 cases per 100000 population) of TB globally in 2008 which was an increase from the 9.3 million reported in 2007 and in 2010, there were 8.8 million (range, 8.5–9.2 million) incident cases of TB. Estimated epidemiological burden of TB in the year 2010 was found to be in the different countries population (thousands) were China 1,341,335, India 1,224,614 Brazil 194,946 and Pakistan 173, 593 [3,4]. Patient non-adherence to the treatment is interpreted as a failure, according to the stop TB partnership, the ultimate goal of eliminating TB is defined as ‘the occurrence of less than 1 case per million populations per year by 2050 [5-7]. To achieve this goal, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a directly observed treatment-short course (DOTS) strategy, in which surveillance of treatment outcome makes an essential contribution to the assessment of effectiveness of control programs. [6]. DOTS also lead to significant reductions in the frequency of primary drug resistance, acquired drug resistance and relapse [7]. Globally, rate of treatment success for new smear-positive cases treated in the 2007 cohort was 86%. This is first time that the treatment success rate has exceeded the global target of 85%, which was set by the World Health Assembly (WHA) in 1991. Three regions such as; the Eastern Mediterranean (88%), Western Pacific (92%) and South-East Asia (88%) regions has exceeded the target, as did 53 other countries [1]. Main objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and control of tuberculosis in the Nilgiris district for the year 2008 and 2009.

Methodology

In this retrospective case analysis study conducted between November 2009 and April 2010 after obtaining permission from Institutional Ethics Committee, JSS College of Pharmacy, Ooty and district Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program (RNTCP) centre, the Nilgiris. Retrospective cases of all TB patients registered from January 2008 to December 2009 in TB registers of different RNTCP centers of the Nilgiris district at; Ootacamund, Coonoor and Pandhalur were collected along with complete patient profile and treatment outcome. A structured case documentation form was prepared for documentation of each case.

Data collection

Patient demographic, medical and treatment information such as; patient’s age, sex, address, tuberculosis type, type of patient, category of treatment and treatment outcome were collected from the TB registers. Demographics of the patients were studied to find out the Prevalence of TB. Clinical history regarding present and past history of anti-Tubercular treatment (ATT), family history of TB and any other associated disease were collected from TB register. Incidence, prevalence and mortality of TB were also calculated.

Statistical analysis

All the data were analyzed by using the statistical package SPSS for windows, version 13. For categorical data, considering 95% confidence intervals with Odds ratio and compared with different groups. Multivariate analysis using linear regression model was used to analyze the association between treatment outcome and potential predictor variables, considering p value < 0.05 as statistically significant.

Results

A total of 951 TB patients were registered at different RNTCP units of the Nilgiris district from January 2008 to December 2009. Out of 951 cases, 473 cases were registered in 2008 and remaining 478 in 2009. Average age of TB patients reported in 2008 were 33.85(± 18.67) years, out of which 287(60.68%) male and 186 (39.32%) were females. 431(91.12%) cases were newly diagnosed and remaining 42 (8.88%) were re-treatment cases. 245(51.79%) were pulmonary sputum positive, 94(19.87%) pulmonary sputum negative and 134(28.32%) were extra-pulmonary TB. In 2009 reported cases average age of the patients were 34.71(±17.63) years, out of 478 cases, 263(55.02%) male and 215(44.98%) female. 427(89.33%) cases were newly diagnosed and 51(10.77%) re-treatment cases. It was observed that 216(45.18%) cases were pulmonary sputum positive, 110(23.01%) pulmonary sputum negative and 152(31.79%) were extra-pulmonary TB. Out of 478 cases registered in 2009, out come were documented only for 355 cases.

Outcome of different disease category

Disease categorization was done based on diagnosis as pulmonary sputum positive (PSP), pulmonary sputum negative (PSN) and extra pulmonary TB (EPTB). Outcomes of treatment given to various disease classes were evaluated separately. Overall favorable and unfavorable treatment outcomes were not significantly varied (p=0.9) between the years 2008 and 2009 among different disease classes. Details of treatment outcome are shown in Table 1. In 2008, unfavorable outcomes of PSP patients were significantly higher (p<0.001) than the favorable outcomes, whereas in PSN patients, the favorable outcome were significantly higher (p<0.001) than the unfavorable outcome. The treatment outcomes are illustrated in the Table 2. In 2009, the unfavorable outcome of PSP patients were significantly higher (p=0.005) than the favorable outcome and in case of EPTB. The favorable outcomes were significantly higher (p<0.001) than the unfavorable outcome. Outcome of PSN was similar to PSP but not statistically significant (p>0.05). Treatment outcomes are illustrated in the Table 2.