The Effect of Chicken Spleen Transfer Factor on Intestinal Mucosa Immunity Barrier of Laying Hens

Research Article

Austin J Anal Pharm Chem. 2021; 8(2): 1133.

The Effect of Chicken Spleen Transfer Factor on Intestinal Mucosa Immunity Barrier of Laying Hens

Yu J1#, Ma B2#, Li J1, Chen Y1, Wang Z1, Cao J1 and Dong Y1*

¹Key Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Ministry of Education, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China

²China Animal Husbandry Group, Beijing, China

#Contributed Equally to this Work

*Corresponding author: Yulan Dong, Key Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Ministry of Education, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China

Received: July 15, 2021; Accepted: July 31, 2021; Published: August 07, 2021

Abstract

Chicken spleen Transfer Factor (TF) is a low-molecular-weight lymphocyte extract composed of polypeptide and nucleotide. However, its role in regulating intestinal structure and function in laying hens has remained largely unknown.

100 one-day-old laying hens were randomly divided into five groups and administered with different doses of TF (0.00 [control], 0.05mL, 0.10mL, 0.25mL and 1.00mL). The results showed that the high dose of TF (1.00mL) improved the intestinal mucosa morphology and strengthened the digestive and absorption function. Furthermore, the histology analysis revealed an increase in the number of intraepithelial lymphocytes and goblet cells. Similarly, the results from ELISA demonstrated an increase in the content of IL-10 in the intestinal tract, while the content of TNF-a showed a decrease in this regard. The RT-PCR assay also demonstrated the upregulation of the relative mRNA expressions of Muc2, TLR-2, and TLR-4 genes. The intestinal antioxidant function was significantly enhanced. In conclusion, high-dose of TF can improve the intestinal mucosa morphology and structure, enhance digestion and absorption functions, enhance the intestinal mucosal barrier immune function and antioxidant function, and up-regulate Muc2, TLR-2 and TLR-4 gene relative expression.

Keywords: Chicken spleen transfer factor; Intestinal, immune; TLR, Antioxidant function

Abbreviations

TF: Transfer Factor; Muc2: Mucin 2; PAS: Periodic Acid-Schiff; IELs: Intra-Epithelial Lymphocyte; TLR: Toll like Receptor; IEC: Intestinal Epithelial Cell; VH: Villus Height; CD: Crypt Depth; SOD: Superoxide Dismutase; CAT: Catalase; GSH-PX: Glutathione Peroxidase

Introduction

Nowadays, rapid developments in biotechnology, biopharmaceuticals, peptides, and proteins have emerged with a host of new applications in diagnosis and therapy [1,2]. In contrast to small molecules, peptides and proteins have the advantages of high efficiency and selectivity, as well as low toxicity [3]. In addition to direct antibacterial activity, antimicrobial peptides also have immunomodulatory properties [4]. The antimicrobial peptide cecropin AD improves the immune status, as well as nitrogen and energy retention, thereby reducing intestinal pathogens in weaned piglets [5]. Other studies have shown that fungal-derived macromolecular substance includes a blend of yeast-derived nucleotides, inositol, and protein as immunomodulators to promote the pathogenic microbe control [6,7].

Transfer Factors (TF) are low-molecular-weight lymphocyte extracts consisting of polypeptide and nucleotide which transmit the ability to express delayed-type hypersensitivity and cell-mediated immunity from high responder animals to low responder animals while the reverse is not true [8]. At present, since TF is a complex group composed of many low molecular weight proteins, the exact chemical properties and molecular mechanism of TF have not been clarified. Nevertheless, several studies have shown that TF is a potential immunotherapeutic agent.

In a recently conducted study, TF has been used successfully as adjuvant or primary therapy for various immune dysfunctions. Moreover, several clinical and experimental studies have demonstrated the role of TF in the treatment of different diseases in patients [9]. In this regard, it should be emphasized that TF can enhance the existing cell-mediated immune responses and affect the activity of various immune components. In addition, it induces immune, rapid, and sensitive responses to the recipients that could be demonstrated within 24-48 h [9]. The caprine serum-derived TF improved the ability to survive high-risk infectious challenges by altering the mice’s cytokine response profile [10]. In the course of solid tumor therapy, the TF of human promoted the activation of white blood cells, as well as total lymphocytes and their subsets, thereby stimulating the immune response, especially when used for 12 months in patients [11]. Pineda et al. reported that TF in the adjuvant immunotherapy of experimental glioma, can obviously reduce the tumour size, increased CD2+, CD4+, CD8+ and NK cell counts, it also increased the percentage of apoptotic tumour cells [12]. In Allergy therapy, Transfer factor may restore the Th1/Th2 balance and improve immune regulatory mechanism in patients [13].

In a mouse model infection with larvae cestode Mesocestoides vogae, the TF of human origin enhanced the therapeutic effect of anthelmintic albendazole, reduced serum TGF-β1 and IL-17 levels, and regulated Th1/Th2 immune-related cytokines [14].

Although the abovementioned results strongly indicate an association between TF and immunotherapy, the effect of TF on intestinal mucosal immunity remains to be explored. Therefore, the present study aimed to explore the effect of TF on intestinal mucosal immunity and related signaling pathways. Moreover, it was attempted to provide a scientific theoretical basis for its application in poultry breeding and treatment.

Materials and Methods

TF

Chicken spleen transfer factor was prepared by Jian Mu Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd., in which effective concentration was 1 mg/mL, nucleic acids are 300μg/mL, and the purity is 95%.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol and all animal procedures were approved by the China Agricultural University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (AW11050202-2).

Animals and experimental design

A total of 100 laying hens (one-day-old) were raised under the standard conditions. Water and feed were provided ad libitum. The illumination time was 19h at 5 days of age and then decreased by 2h every day until it reached 8h. The ambient temperature was kept at approximately 28-30 °C during 4-7 days, which was then reduced by 2°C every week until it reached 18-20 °C. The animals were randomly divided into a control group and experimental groups (20 laying hens per group) treated with different doses of TF 0.05mL, 0.10mL, 0.25mL, and 1.00mL via oral administration from the 5th day to the 12th day. Immediately, the tissues were harvested on the 12th day (n=10) or continued to raise a week without TF. Subsequently, the tissues were harvested on the 19th day (n=10). The experimental animals were weighed and euthanized under anesthesia using 10% chloral hydrate. Following that, the samples of the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and rectal tissues were collected and divided into two parts. One part of the intestinal tissue was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for histologic observation, and the other part was quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen for protein or RNA extraction. Furthermore, the whole lymphoid organs (splenic, thymus, and bursa) were harvested and weighed to record the organ index (Organ index = organ weight (g)/body weight (g)×100%).

Intestinal histological analysis

Small intestines samples (n=6) were immediately fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1M phosphate-buffered saline for 48h and embedded in paraffin for sectioning (5μm, cross-section), then stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS). For H&E staining, at least 10 tissue sections were cut from each sample and photographed at 400×magnifications using a BX51 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Five longest villi in each tissue section and a total of 300 longest villi were analysed in each treatment group. Subsequently, Image-Pro Plus 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, USA) software was used to measure the Villus Height (VH), Crypt Depth (CD) and the V/C ratio. The VH and CD were measured from the opening of the intestinal gland to the top of the villus and muscularis mucosa, respectively. The number of intraepithelial lymphocyte per 100 enterocytes was calculated by Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software. For the analysis of PAS-staining, at least 30 random fields in 6 sections were photographed for each sample, and a total of 180 fields were analysed per treatment group. The number of goblet cells per 100 enterocytes was calculated.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Prior to Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) analysis, the total protein concentrations of the intestinal tissue lysates were determined using a Bicinchoninic Acid (BCA) assay kit (CW0014, Beijing Co Win Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The detection range for this assay was from 20 to 2000 μg/mL. The IL-10 and TNF-a levels in the intestinal tissues were measured using a biotin labeling double-antibody sandwich ELISA (LBTR-EL-1648, LBTR-EL-1643, Beijing Limbo Terry Technology Development co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Detection ranges for IL-10 and TNF-a were 5pg/mL~1500pg/ mL and 5ng/L~1000ngL, respectively. Six samples were used in each group, with each sample tested in triplicate. All tests were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Results were quantified by measuring Optical Density (OD) at 450nm wavelength. The intraand inter-assay variations were <10% and <12%, respectively.

Total RNA extraction, reverse transcription, and quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and rectal sections of each treatment (n=6) using a Trizol Reagent (CW0580A, Beijing Co Win Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The mRNA was then reverse transcribed to cDNA using a GoScriptTM Reverse Transcription System (A5000, Promega, USA). The cDNA was used as a template for quantitative real-time PCR analysis, and the sequences for Muc2, TLR-2, and TLR-4 primers were obtained from GenBank (Table 1). The RT-qPCR was performed in a 10μL mixture containing 5μL Go Taq Green Master Mix (Promega, USA), 0.1μL of forward, 0.1μL of reverse primer, 3.8μL RNAase-free water, and 1μL cDNA. The PCR reaction conditions were as follows: denaturation at 94°C for 30s, annealing at 56°C for 30s, and extension at 72°C for 60s. PCR products were electrophoresis in a 2% agarose gel containing Ethyl Ingot Bromide (EB), The results were analyzed using a Gel- Pro Analyzer v4.0 (Media Cybernetics, USA), and each sample was assayed in triplicate.