Sustainable Anesthesia: State of Knowledge and Practices of Moroccan Anesthesiologists

Research Article

Austin J Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2024; 12(1): 1123.

Sustainable Anesthesia: State of Knowledge and Practices of Moroccan Anesthesiologists

Hamza Kassimi*; Hassane Alaoui; Abderrahmane Elwali; Khalil Abou Elalaa; Mustapha Bensghir; Mohammed Meziane

Anesthesiology Department, Department of Anesthesia Resuscitation, Mohammed V Military Hospital Rabat, Morocco

*Corresponding author: Hamza Kassimi, Anesthesiology Department, Department of Anesthesia Resuscitation, Mohammed V Military Hospital Rabat, Morocco. Email: black-angelhk@hotmail.fr

Received: November 05, 2024; Accepted: November 25, 2024; Published: December 02, 2024

Abstract

Sustainable anesthesia is critical in reducing healthcare’s environmental impact, as anesthetic gases significantly contribute to hospitals’ carbon footprints. The healthcare sector is responsible for over 4% of global CO2 emissions, prompting guidelines from organizations like the WFSA to support eco-friendly practices, including low-flow anesthesia and alternative agents. Emphasizing education and policy reform, these efforts aim to align clinical effectiveness with environmental stewardship, fostering a sustainable healthcare approach for future generations.

A professional survey was carried out via a questionnaire to doctors/nurses in anesthesia. Analysis of the survey results showed that nitrous oxide and Desflurane are used less by anesthesiologists and that this reduction has led to an increase in the consumption of Sevoflurane and Isoflurane. We also note that the use of anesthetic gases with a low flow of fresh gas is common practice. Furthermore, our survey highlighted a lack of knowledge of the environmental impact and atmospheric lifetimes of volatile anesthetics and that the notions of eco-design and eco-responsibility are little known.

Our results show that raising practitioners’ awareness of the environmental impact is essential to move towards a more sustainable and eco-responsible practice.

Keywords: Sustainable anesthesia; Greenhouse gas anesthesia; Ecoresponsible anesthesia

Introduction

Sustainable anesthesia is emerging as a vital component of environmentally responsible healthcare practices. The anesthesia sector is a significant contributor to the carbon footprint of hospitals, largely due to the use of volatile anesthetic agents, which are potent greenhouse gases [1]. As the healthcare industry grapples with its impact on climate change accounting for over 4% of global carbon dioxide emissions [2], there is an urgent need for the implementation of sustainable practices in anesthesia to mitigate environmental harm [3].

The growing awareness of climate change has prompted various international organizations, including the World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists (WFSA), to issue guidelines that promote environmentally sustainable practices in anesthesia (WFSA, 2022). These guidelines encourage the adoption of low-flow anesthesia techniques, the use of alternative anesthetic agents with lower global warming potential, and the reduction of waste generated in operating rooms [4]. By fostering education and advocating for policy changes, the anesthesia community can play a pivotal role in the broader movement towards sustainability in healthcare [5].

As we move forward, it is crucial to assess current practices, identify barriers to implementation, and develop strategies that align clinical efficacy with environmental stewardship, ensuring a healthier planet for future generations [1].

To better understand the current state of knowledge and practice in this area, we conducted a survey among Moroccan anesthesiologists. By analyzing their attitudes, knowledge, and practices concerning sustainable anesthesia, we aim to contribute to the ongoing global efforts to integrate sustainability into healthcare.

Materials and Methods

A professional survey was conducted among 150 anesthesia professionals (physicians and nurses) practicing in the Rabat-Salé region. The survey period lasted for two weeks. The link to the questionnaire was distributed to participants via email or WhatsApp.

Questionnaire

The anonymous questionnaire comprised 22 questions divided as follows:

• 5 questions regarding the demographic and professional characteristics of the participants,

• 2 questions on the general knowledge of sustainable development and environmental concepts,

• 15 questions related to the practices concerning the use of anesthetic gases and their environmental impact.

Participants could only complete the questionnaire once. The questions were organized into logical blocks grouped by topic to facilitate comprehension and enhance the flow of responses.

Data Collection and Analysis

Responses were collected and analyzed using the Google Form platform, which provided visual results and graphs expressed in percentages or absolute numbers.

Study Objectives

The primary objective of this study was to assess the perception of anesthesia professionals regarding the ecological impact of their practice, particularly concerning the use of anesthetic gases. To achieve this, we defined three research axes:

1. To identify the criteria influencing the choice of halogenated agents and nitrous oxide.

2. To estimate the role of the ecological factor in selecting anesthetic gases.

3. To evaluate the knowledge of healthcare professionals about the environmental impact of anesthetic gases.

Results

The Demographic and Professional Characteristics

82 anesthetists who participated in the survey, reflecting a participation rate of approximately 54.66%. The majority of respondents were male (82.9%), while females constituted 17.1% of the sample.

The age distribution highlights a diverse group of professionals, with the most represented age group being 30 to 39 years, comprising 50% of the respondents. This suggests a relatively younger cohort among the anesthetists surveyed.

In terms of professional categories, a range of roles is represented, including anesthesia nurses (25.6%), specialist anesthesia physicians (20.7%), and residents in training (20.7%).

This diversity indicates a broad spectrum of perspectives within the field, enhancing the study's relevance and depth in assessing the ecological impacts of anesthesia practices.

Overall, the demographic profile of the participants is crucial in understanding the varying attitudes, knowledge, and practices regarding sustainable anesthesia, as it allows for insights into how different factors, such as age and professional role, may influence perceptions of ecological impacts within this specialty (Table 1).