Conventional Treatment Integrated with Chinese Herbal Medicine Improves the Survival of Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Research Article

Austin Intern Med. 2018; 3(6): 1043.

Conventional Treatment Integrated with Chinese Herbal Medicine Improves the Survival of Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Wang CY1, Chuang CJ1,2,3, Su YC2,4,5, Tu CY6,7, Hsia TC6,7 and Huang ST1,2,3*

1Department of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

2School of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

3Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

4Management Office for Health Data, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

5Graduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

6Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

7School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

*Corresponding author: Sheng-Teng Huang, Department of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University Hospital; School of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 2 Yude Rd, North District, Taichung 40447, Taiwan

Received: March 23, 2018; Accepted: April 27, 2018; Published: May 04, 2018

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of research to evaluate the effectiveness of Chinese Herbal Medicine (CHM) as an adjunct therapy in patients with advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

Objective: The main objective of this study was to assess whether the advanced NSCLC patients treated by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), when combined with CHM, can improve the five-year survival rate compared to those treated by EGFR-TKIs alone.

Methods: A nationwide population-based study of advanced NSCLC patients receiving EGRF-TKIs, combined with or without CHM treatment, was conducted in Taiwan. The study is based on information in the sub-dataset of the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) from 2000 to 2010, during which time a total of 14,244 patients were diagnosed with NSCLC. After selection of exclusion criteria and matching process, 2,616 NSCLC patients were included in the study. Statistical analysis was utilized to evaluate the differences in characteristic distribution, and to compare the survival rates between the CHM cohort and non-CHM cohort.

Results: Patients with advanced NSCLC using CHM as an adjunct therapy exhibited a significantly improved survival rate [Hazard Ration (HR) =0.8; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.73-0.87, p value<0.001], compared with non-CHM users. Based on a survival analysis by Kaplan-Meier method, the 5-year survival rate of CHM users increased 4.9%, with the most notable difference being an increase of the 2-year survival rate by up to 12.75%. In addition to survival rate analysis, we provide the ten most used single herbs and herbal formulas prescribed for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Conclusions: This nationwide retrospective cohort study provides evidence supporting CHM as an effective adjunct modality to ameliorate the side effects of target therapy and prolong the five-year survival rate of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Keywords: Chinese herbal medicine; Non-small cell lung cancer; Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors; 5-year survival rate; Retrospective cohort study

Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of all cancer deaths in the world, whether in developed or developing countries. The diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer have made significant progress recently, however, the 5-year survival rate remains less than 15% [1,2]. According to a statistical analysis of cancer deaths in 2016 by the Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) in Taiwan, the number of lung cancer deaths increased 5.7-foldover the prior three decades; meanwhile, lung cancer had the highest mortality rate for ten consecutive years, accounting for 25.4% of cancer deaths in 2016. It is generally believed that the particularly highly invasive nature of lung cancer cells is responsible for the high mortality rate of lung cancer, with nearly 90% of patient’s dying with metastasis [3]. Meanwhile, despite advances in treatment modalities, the overall 5-year survival rate of lung cancer patients has increased by only 4% (from 12% to 16%) over the past four decades [4]. Lung cancer may be subdivided into two categories: small cell lung cancer and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), accounting for approximately 13% and 87% of all lung cancers, respectively [5]. NSCLC can further be divided into three major cell types: adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma, of which adenocarcinoma has the highest proportion, accounting for approximately 55% of incidence.

The development of Multi-Drug Resistance (MDR) to chemotherapy treatment has been cited as the primary cause of clinical failure in NSCLC treatment cases [6,7]. Gefitinib is the first generation of reversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), which has become a standard first-line treatment for patients with EGFR mutations of NSCLC. In Taiwan, erlotinib has been used as the second generation of EGFR-targeted therapy since 2006. These EGFR-TKI drugs have demonstrated more effectiveness in treating patients with NSCLC than other targeted cancer therapies, and are consequently more commonly applied. The incidence rate of EGFR mutations are as high as 51.4% in patients with lung adenocarcinoma in Asia [8], where the application of EGFR-TKI drugs for the treatment of patients with advanced and metastatic NSCLC has exhibited therapeutic effects. Moreover, in comparison with platinum-based dual chemotherapy, gefitinib has shown Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in patients, and importantly, improved Quality of Life (QoL) [9,10]. However, many patients initially sensitive to gefitinib or erlotinib treatments have exhibited tendencies to develop drug resistance after six to twelve months [11]. Consequently, drug resistance and cytotoxicity are presently the two most significant therapeutic challenges facing targeted cancer therapies in clinical practice [12]; therefore, the discovery of effective drugs with limited toxicity remains a matter of urgency.

Chinese Herbal Medicine (CHM) is one of the most common complementary and alternative types of medicine used in the treatment of various ailments today. As such, CHM is gaining wider acceptance as an adjunct strategy for cancer treatment in particular. Traditional Chinese medicine has a long history of development, with roots tracing back thousands of years to China and other parts of East Asia, where it is commonly used in the treatment of cancer. It is applied to relieve clinical symptoms originating from cancer, and the related complications or side effects induced by chemotherapy or radiotherapy, having been shown to improve quality of life (QoL) and even prolong the five-year survival rate [13-15]. CHM can furthermore be used as an effective component of combined therapies to increase the efficacy of anti-cancer drugs [16-18]. With its long history of effective application in clinical practice, and reasonable cost, CHM is attracting the interest of scholars and researchers globally, further investigating its advantages in the treatment of cancer patients.

The National Health Insurance (NHI) system was launched in Taiwan in 1995, and the use of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) as a treatment modality in itself, or as an adjunct therapy integrated with western medicine, has been reimbursed by the NHI since 1996. As of 2015, the NHI program covered 99.6% of the population of Taiwan [19]. The CHM granules supported by the NHI system in Taiwan, including single Chinese herbs and multi-herbal Chinese formulas, are produced by pharmaceutical companies in accordance with the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) certification mark. The purpose of this study is to analyze the NHI database from 2000 to 2010, to identify the frequency and prescription patterns of CHM as used in the treatment of NSCLC cancer patients, in combination with gefitinib or erlotinib treatment.

We here in conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study to evaluate and compare the cumulative five-year survival rates between CHM users and non-users in patients diagnosed with NSCLC; furthermore, this study explored the pharmacological prescription patterns of TCM practitioners.

Materials and Methods

Data source

The National Health Insurance (NHI) has provided affordable medical access to residents of Taiwan since 1995, currently registering over 99% of the population. The medical care data of the NHI are organized and released in the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) for medical research proposes after encryption of patient identification records. The Registry for Catastrophic Illness Patient Database (RCIPD) is a sub-dataset of the NHIRD, which contains the medical care data of patients with the catastrophic illnesses included therein. This study was approved by the Review Board and Ethics Committee of China Medical University Hospital, Taiwan (CMUH104-REC2-115(CR-2)).

Study population and covariates

This study investigated the usage patterns of CHM among patients with NSCLC. The lung cancer population was identified by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code 162 from the RCIPD. We further defined the NSCLC patients as those lung cancer patients receiving erlotinib or gefitinib. The CHM users were defined as the population recorded as having a CHM clinical visit with code 162 after having been diagnosed with lung cancer. The non-CHM users were the lung cancer population without any CHM clinical visit recorded after being diagnosed with lung cancer. The various job types were classified under the category of office worker, manual worker, or other. Any record of alcohol-related illness (ICD-9-CM: 291, 303, 305, 571.0, 571.1, 571.2, 571.3, 790.3, A215 and V11.3), cirrhosis (ICD-9-CM: 571 and A347), anemia (ICD-9-CM: 280-285), asthma (ICD-9-CM: 493), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, ICD-9-CM: 491, 492, 493 and 496), diabetes mellitus (ICD-9-CM: 250 and A181), hypertension (ICD-9-CM: 401-405, A260 and A269), coronary artery disease (CAD, ICD-9-CM: 410-414), rheumatoid arthritis (RA, ICD- 9-CM: 714), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, ICD-9-CM: 710.0), and stroke (ICD-9-CM: 430-438 and A29) before the diagnosis of lung cancer was considered as a comorbidity. Treatment of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy was also included as covariates. Each CHM user was matched with one non-CHM user, according to the criteria of sex and age by frequency matching.

Statistical analysis

The Chi-square test and two-sample Student’s t-test were utilized to evaluate the characteristic distribution differences between the CHM cohort and non-CHM cohort. The risk of mortality was displayed by Hazard Ratios (HRs). The HR was calculated by Cox proportional hazards regression with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The variables of sex, age, job type, comorbidities, and treatments were considered in the multivariable Cox model. Network analysis was conducted by open-sourced freeware Node XL (http://nodexl. codeplex.com/) and utilized to analyze the relationship between two Chinese herbal products. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the survival rate between CHM users and non-CHM users. Statistical analyses in this study were carried out by the statistical software package, SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) with significant level a = 0.05.

Results

For initial application in the present study, there were 14,244 NSCLC patients recorded within the RCIPD (Figure 1). After selection of exclusion criteria and matching process, 2,616 NSCLC patients were enrolled in this study. Those patients were classified into two groups, according to CHM using and non-using status. Among the CHM and non-CHM cohorts, approximately 53% of patients were male (Table 1), a majority of the individuals were older than 40 years of age, while approximately half of the NSCLC patients were manual workers. Of note, 96% and 70% of patients included in the study had received chemotherapy and radiotherapy, respectively. All covariates exhibited no significant differences between the two cohorts.