Research Article
J Bacteriol Mycol. 2016; 3(4): 1040.
Leptospira Reservoirs among Small Mammals in Sri Lanka
Yathramullage S and Meegaskumbura S*
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
*Corresponding author: Meegaskumbura S, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
Received: November 03, 2016; Accepted: December 16, 2016; Published: December 19, 2016
Abstract
Leptospirosis is a zoonotic disease with worldwide importance. In Sri Lanka, confirmed leptospirosis cases are ever increasing. Humans contract leptospirosis through Leptospira infected urine-contaminated environments. While all mammals are capable of being reservoirs for this disease, feral and peridomestic rodents are known to play an important role. The objective of this study was to identify small mammal species carrying Leptospira in Sri Lanka. Small mammals were captured from eight localities with high leptospirosis prevalence according to hospital records in Kurunegala district. Blood, urine and kidneys were tested for lipL32 gene of pathogenic Leptospira using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Of the 131 small mammals belonging to six species collected, 14.5% had Leptospira positive blood, urine or kidney. Bandicota bengalensis, Mus cervicolor, Rattus rattus and Suncus murinus were Leptospira carriers. Leptospira was previously reported only from R. rattus and B. bengalensis from the country, M. cervicolor and S. murinus are new carrier reports for Sri Lanka. All sampled locations had infected small mammals, indicating that the reservoirs are widespread in the district. This data could be used to control the disease and to encourage the public to take preventative measures against infection.
Keywords: Leptospirosis; Suncus murinus; Murine rodents; Shrews
Abbreviations
qPCR: quantitative Polymerse Chain Reaction; ELISA: Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay; MAT: Microscopic Agglutination Test
Introduction
Leptospirosis has become a major threat to human health world over. Though it is most common in tropical and subtropical regions, reports of disease incidents are ever increasing from the developed world as well [1,2]. Humans contract leptospirosis through Leptospiracontaminated environments, bacteria entering the body through abraded skin or mucous membranes. Although Leptospirosis can be treated effectively with antibiotics, delay in diagnosis may result in serious complications that even lead to death. Most commonly, Leptospira infections cause asymptomatic seroconversion, but may result in severe disease conditions with jaundice, renal failure, hemorrhage, refractory shock, and myocarditis [3]. Leptospirosis is known to be an occupational disease, commonly occurring among farmers, but reported from veterinarians, abattoir workers and fishermen [4]. The disease has spread to urban areas with unhealthy sanitary practices and poor garbage disposal facilities. Recreational activities such as water sports have also been recognized as a risk factor for this disease in the recent years [1,5].
In Sri Lanka, first confirmed case of leptospirosis was reported in 1959 [6]. Since then, confirmed cases were reported from many districts in the country [7]. Leptospirosis has been reported as a major public health problem from Kurunegala, Kandy, Matele, Rathnapura, Gampaha, Matara and Kegalle districts [7]. The last three outbreaks have been reported in 2003, 2008 and 2011, 2008 outbreak being the worst ever reported from the country and the second highest leptospirosis incidence in the world during recent years [8]. In 2011, disease outbreak also extended to Anuradhapura, a region that is relatively dry and where leptospirosis is never heard of before [9]. Peak incidence of the disease is reported to be associated with the rice paddy-harvesting seasons, wherein an increase in the rodent population is observed. The majority of patients are also farmers who had been exposed in the paddy fields [4].
Animal reservoir of leptospirosis is a key factor concerning the disease control and prevention, however little attention has been given to study the reservoir animals. While any mammal is capable of carrying Leptospira [10], animals that live in close association with humans such as rodents, wild boars and the domesticated animals such as dogs, cattle and pigs play a major role in transmitting the disease to humans [11,12,13]. Many species of murine rodents are recorded as carriers of this pathogen around the world [14,15]. Due to their wide distribution and high abundance in rural areas with farmlands and in urban areas with high density of human population, feral and peridomestic rodents are believed to be most important reservoirs. In Sri Lanka Leptospira is reported only from three small mammal species; murine rodents, B. bengalensis, R. rattus, and shrew Suncus sp. [12,16].
The objective of this study was to identify murine rodents and shrews carrying Leptospira in and around paddy fields in localities with reported high prevalence of leptospirosis in Kurunegala District.
Materials and Methods
Small mammals were trapped from eight sites in Kurunegala District (Table 1). Traps were placed in and around paddy fields. Sampling was carried out for 4-6 days at each collection site. A sample of voided urine (500-1200 μL/ 100-500 μL from M. cervicolor and S. murinus) and a sample of blood (100-300 μL) from saphenous vein were collected from each small mammal captured. Ethical clearance for sample collection and handling was obtained from the ethical clearance committee of the Postgraduate Institute of Science, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. DNA was extracted from blood cell pellets, collected by centrifugation at 12000rpm for 10min, using Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit, according to the manufacture’s protocol with few modifications. Volume of each blood pellet was adjusted to 300μl by adding PBS. Following modifications were done to the original protocol; Step 3: After adding cell lysis solution samples were centrifuged at 14,000rpm for 1min.; Step 6: samples were incubated at 80°C for 5min. in nuclei lysis solution; Step 15: samples were kept at room temperature over night to rehydrate the DNA after adding DNA rehydration solution; Step 16: DNA Samples were stored at -20°C. Sample processing and DNA Extraction from blood and urine samples were done within one week of collection. Urine samples were pelleted by centrifugation at 12000rpm for 20min at room temperature, pellet was washed once with PBS. DNA was extracted from the pellet using “QIAamp DNA Mini Kit®” (Qiagen Sciences, Maryland, USA) according to manufacturer’s protocol for “Isolation of bacterial DNA from biological fluids”. Two hundred and forty two BP fragment of lipL32 gene present only in pathogenic Leptospira spp. [17] were amplified in Step one Real Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) using Go Taq probe qPCR master mix (Promega) and Taq Man probe. Primers and probe used were; Forward-48F (5’ -AAG CAT TAC CGC TTG TGG TG-3’), Reverse- 286R (5’ -GAA CTC CCA TTT CAG CGA TT-3’) and the Probe- 189P (FAM-5’ -AA AGC CAG GAC AAG CGC CG-3’ -BHQ1). Kidneys were collected only from accidental kills. DNA from kidneys was also extracted employing the same method used for blood pellet. Quantitative PCR mixture consisted of 13μl of Go taq probe qPCR master mix, 2μl of 6.25μM forward and reverse primer and 1μl of 2μM probe, 4.5μl of nuclease free water and 2.5μl of template. Final volume of the PCR mixture was 25μl. The thermal profile of the assay composed of initial holding temperature of 60°C for 30s for Pre PCR read and 95°C for 5min for heat activation, 45 cycles of amplification at 95°C for 15sec and 60°C for 1min and final post PCR read stage of 60°C for 30s. The reactions were performed in Step one Real Time PCR System (Applied Bio systems, USA) and analyzed using Step One software version 2.2.2. All samples were tested in duplicates and an additional run was performed for samples with one positive or one negative result. Samples, which gave positive results with Ct values less than 40 were considered positive and the smaller Ct values of the two positives were used in analysis. A standard curve was generated using tenfold dilution series of 200μl DHL vaccine (Merial) extracted and eluted to 200μl. According to the standard curve we report positives with 88.1% efficiency, R2=0.99, slope=-3.6, Y intercept=40.248.
Locality
Small mammal species
Ct values for positive samples
Blood
Urine
Kidney
Kiwlegedara (07˚23’N, 80˚12’E, elevation 75m)
Bandicota bengalensis
36.046
Suncus murinus
35.886
Malliyagoda (07˚24’N, 80˚28’E, elevation 170m)
B. bengalensis
35.198
S. murinus
27.845
18.531
Udawela (07˚33’N, 80˚02’E, elevation 40m)
Mus cervicolor
34.694
35.1
Rattus rattus
34.861
34.937
27.106
27.943
Polgahawela (07˚19’N, 80˚17’E, elevation 75m)
R. rattus
35.084
Ipalawa (07˚34’N, 80˚27’E, elevation 145m)
R. rattus
35.106
36.835
Bogollagama (07˚47’N, 80˚10’E, elevation 80m)
R. rattus
25.67
31.826
Herathgama (07˚52’N, 80˚25’E, elevation 155m)
R. rattus
35.612
33.662
Minhettiya (07˚35’N, 80˚18’E, elevation 100m)
S. murinus
32.208
33.321
23.571
R. rattus
33.559
Table 1: Positive Blood, urine and kidney samples collected from eight localities in Kurunegala district.
Results
A total of 131 small mammals: Rattus rattus (98), Bandicota indica (9), B. bengalensis (7), Mus cervicolor (4), Mus musculus (2) and Suncus murinus (11) were collected. Fourteen point five percent (19/131) of small mammals had Leptospira positive blood, urine or kidney. Of these 5% (6/120) blood, 9% (11/117) urine and 28% (5/18) kidney were positive for Leptospira spp. Of the small mammals, 29% (2/7) B. bengalensis, 25% (1/4) M. cervicolor, 12% (12/98) R. rattus and 36% (4/11) S. murinus were positive for any of the samples. Bandicota indica and Mus musculus were not infected. Least Ct value was from a kidney sample (18.531) collected from a S. murinus indicating a high infection. Urine from same S. murinus and 4 other R. rattus specimens had Ct values between 25.0-28.0, while rest of the samples had Ct values between 30.0-37.0 (Table 1). Of the sampled locations, all had at least one infected small mammal, with Udawela having the highest number. None of the specimens were positive for both blood and urine but there were 3 kidney positives with blood or urine positives. Two samples were only positive for kidney. For 9 small mammals with all three samples available, 6 were negative for all 3 sample types, 2 kidneys were positive along with urine and 1 kidney was positive along with blood.
Discussion
Evaluation of gold standard testing for detection of Leptospira have defined qPCR as the most sensitive test for the diagnosis of leptospirosis over other tests such as Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT) [18,19]. Hence, we used qPCR to detect Leptospira. This is the first attempt to use qPCR for detection of Leptospira in reservoir hosts in the country.
Here we report 29% (2/7) B. bengalensis, 25% (1/4) M. cervicolor, 12% (12/98) R. rattus and 36% (4/11) S. murinus positives with an overall infection of 14.5%. Another single study reported small mammal reservoirs in Sri Lanka, where they used MAT for serum and conventional PCR for kidney samples [16]. They reported 17.5% (13/74) serum samples collected from rodents [20.3% (11/54) of B. bengalensis and 10.0% (2/20) of R. rattus] positive for anti leptospiral antibodies but zero positives for kidney samples. Though prevalence of the pathogens is similar in the two studies they cannot be directly compared due to the different testing methods used.
Mus cervicolor and S. murinus are not reported as Leptospira carriers from Sri Lanka before. Outside Sri Lanka, Leptospira are reported from many rodent and shrew species [20]. Rattus rattus, R. norvegicus, B. indica, B. bengalensis, M. musculus, M. cervicolor and shrew S. murinus are among them, which also occur in Sri Lanka [8,9,21,22]. None of the B. indica or Mus musculus collected during this study were infected. We intended to sample small mammals nondestructively, hence kidney samples were collected only from accidental kills. From the small mammals with all three types of samples (blood, urine and kidney), it can be deduced that kidney is the best sample to detect the presence of Leptospira in small mammals. However, it is equally effective if both urine and blood are tested.
Detecting Leptospira in reservoirs is an effective environmental monitoring method [23]. In the present study, all sampled localities had Leptospira infected small mammals, indicating that the pathogen is widespread in the Kurunegala district. Since leptospirosis is a life threatening disease, prevention of infection is most important. This data could be used by public health authorities to control the disease by increasing public awareness of the disease and encouraging them to take preventive measures against infection.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Higher Education for the Twenty First Century Quality and Innovation grant, Window 3.
References
- Pappas G, Papadimitriou P, Siozopoulou V, Christou L, Akritidis N. The globalization of leptospirosis: worldwide incidence trends. Int J Infect Dis. 2008; 12: 351-357.
- Cachay ER, Vinetz JM. A Global Research Agenda for Leptospirosis. J Postgrad Med. 2005; 51: 174-178.
- Bharti AR, Nally JE, Ricaldi JN, Matthias MA, Diaz , Lovett MA, et al. Leptospirosis:A zoonotic disease of global importance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003; 3: 757-771.
- Victoriano AF, Smythe LD, Gloriani-Barzaga N, Cavinta LL, Kasai T, Limpakarnjanarat K, et al. Leptospirosis in the Asia Pacific region. BMC Infect Dis. 2009; 9: 147.
- Agampodi SB, Karunarathna D, Jayathilala N, Rathnayaka H, Agampodi Tc, Karunanayaka L. Outbreak of leptospirosis after white-water rafting: sign of ashift from rural to recreational leptospirosis in Sri Lanka? Epidemiol Infect. 2013; 1-4.
- Rajasuriya K, Somasunderam M, Nagaratnam N. Leptospirosis in Ceylon. Journal of Trop Med Hyg. 1959; 62: 205-210.
- Agampodi SB, Nugegoda DB, Thevanesam V. Determinants of leptospirosis in Sri Lanka: Study Protocol. BMC Infect Dis. 2010; 10: 1-9.
- Agampodi SB, Peacock SJ, Thevanesam V, Nugegoda DB, Nugegoda S, Thaipadungpanit J, et al. Leptospirosis Outbreak in Sri Lanka in 2008: Lessons for Assessing the Global Burden of Disease. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011; 85: 471–478.
- Agampodi SB,Dahanayaka NJ, Bandaranayaka Ak, Perera M, Priyankara S, Weerawansa P, et al. Regional Differences of Leptospirosis in Sri Lanka: Observations from a Flood-Associated Outbreak in 2011. 2014.
- Desvars A, Naze F, Cardinale VE, Picardeau M, Michaul A, Bourhy P, et al. Similarities in Leptospira Serogroup and Species Distribution in Animals and Humans in the Indian Ocean Island of Mayotte. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012; 87: 134-140.
- Vinodkumar G, Rajeshwari YB, Shivaraj, Krishnamoorthy U, Kamran A. Leptospires in field Rats in and around the laboratory animal facilities of Banglore, India. Vet World. 2011; 4: 410-412.
- Gamage CD, Koizumi N, Perera AKC, Muto M, Nwafor-Okoli C, Ranasinghe S, et al. Carrier Status of Leptospirosis Among Cattle in Sri Lanka: A Zoonotic Threat to Public Health. Trans and Emerg Dis. 2014; 61: 91–96.
- Balamurugan V, Gangadhar NL, Mohandoss N, Thirumalesh SRA, Shome R, Krishnamoorthy P, et al. Characterization of Leptospira isolates from animals and humans: phylogenetic analysis identifies the prevalence of intermediate species in India. SpringerPlus. 2013; 2: 362.
- Rahelinirina S, Le´on A, Harstskeerl RA, Sertour N, Ahmed A, Raharimanana C, et al. First isolation and direct evidence for the existence of large smallmammal reservoirs of Leptospira sp. in Madagascar. 2010.
- Gangadhar NL, Rajasekhar M, Smythe LD, Norris MA, Symonds ML, Dohnt MF. Reservoir hosts of Leptospira inadai in India. Rev Sci Technol. 2000; 19: 793-799.
- Gamage CD, Koizumi N, Muto M, Nwafor-Okoli C, Kurukurusuriya S, Rajapakse JRPV, et al. Prevalence and Carrier Status of Leptospirosis in Smallholder Dairy Cattle and Peridomestic Rodents in Kandy, Sri Lanka. Vector-borne zoonotic dis. 2011; 11: 1-7.
- Stoddard RA, Gee JE, Wilkins PP, McCaustland K, Hoffmaster AR. Detection of pathogenic Leptospira spp. through TaqMan polymerase chain reaction targeting the LipL32 gene. Diagn microbiol infect dis. 2009; 64: 247-255.
- Agampodi SB, Matthias MA, Moreno AC, Vinetz JM. Utility of quantitative polymerase chain reaction in leptospirosis diagnosis: association of level of leptospiremia and clinical manifestations in Sri Lanka. Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 54: 1249–1255.
- Agampodi SB, Dahanayaka NJ, Nöckler, K, Anne NS, Vinetz JM., Redefining Gold Standard Testing for Diagnosing Leptospirosis: Further Evidence from a Well-Characterized, Flood-Related Outbreak in Sri Lanka. Am j trop med hyg. 2016; 95: 531–536.
- Scholl M, Hammerl JA, Schmidt S, Ulrich RG, Pfeffer M, Thomas A, et al. Leptospira spp. in Rodents and Shrews in Germany Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2014; 11: 7562-7574.
- Webster JP, Ellis WA, Macdonald DW. Prevalence of Leptospira spp. in wild brown rats (Rattus norvegicus) on UK Farms. Epidemiol Infect. 1995; 114: 195-201.
- Cosson JF, Picardeau M, Mielcarek M, Tatard C, Chaval Y, Buchy P, et al. Epidemiology of Leptospira Transmitted by Rodents in Southeast Asia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014.
- Ivanova S, Herbreteau V, Blasdell K, Chaval Y, Buchy P, Guillard B, et al. Leptospira and Rodents in Cambodia: Environmental Determinants of Infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012; 86: 1032-1038.