Review Article
J Bacteriol Mycol. 2020; 7(4): 1140.
Role of Bacteria in Nanoparticle(S) Synthesis and Their Applications
Chauhan V, Gautam P and Kanwar SS*
Department of Biotechnology, Himachal Pradesh University, Summer Hill, 171005, India
*Corresponding author: Shamsher S Kanwar, Department of Biotechnology, Himachal Pradesh University, India
Received: June 01, 2020; Accepted: June 30, 2020; Published: July 07, 2020
Abstract
Nanoparticles are small molecules with size ranging between 1-100nm. Basis of their classification is their properties shapes and size. These find usage in wide range of industries from agricultural, biomedical, environmental and food. There are numerous ways of producing these nanoparticles using chemicals and biological means. Use of various micro-organisms (biological process) is highly effective in producing high quality, toxin free and cost effective nanoparticles. In this context, present article concerns with association of bacteria with nanoparticles. Here “Green Synthesis” of nanoparticles through the use of different bacteria is discussed. Contrasting nanoparticles such as cadmium, silver, copper, zinc, gold, platinum, magnetic, tellurium etc. can be synthesized through various bacterial species like Bacillus cereus, Pseudomonas antarctica, Shewanella algae, Deinococcus radiodurans, Xanthomonas oryzae, Alcaligenes faecalis, Neurospora crassa, Rhodopseudomonas capsulata, Arthrobacter kerguelensis etc.
Nanoparticles and bacteria are used in association for different applications an over view of which is presented in the articles. Also, the association among the two for the drug delivery to the target site has been looked upon.
Keywords: Nanoparticles; Green Synthesis; Nanoparticles-Bacteria Drug Delivery Vehicle
Introduction
Nanoparticles are of size 1-100nm and can be made from carbon, metal oxides or other organic matter [1]. All the nanoparticles have ability to show distinguished biological, physical and chemical properties at Nano-scale. Nanoparticles exhibit properties like increased reactivity and stability in a chemical processes, enhanced mechanical strength etc. [2]. These have gathered much attention because of different and interesting properties, applications and advantages over their bulk counterparts. Nanoparticles are of different shape and sizes like zero dimensional e.g. nanodots, one dimensional e.g. graphene, two dimensional e.g. carbon nanotubes, three dimensional e.g. gold nanoparticles. They can be hollow core, cylindrical, spherical, conical, tubular, spiral, flat or even irregular in shape [3]. They also differ in structure which can range from amorphous to crystalline with one or more crystals [4,5]. Nanoparticles have biomedical applications and thus eco-friendly and nontoxic methods should be used for their synthesis. The preferable way to synthesize nanoparticles is by using micro-organisms, which is the most superior method as well as cost effective [6]. Use of micro-organisms is energy efficient and environmental friendly way to produce nanoparticles which can be used to perform functions like drug carrier for target delivery, gene therapy, DNA analysis, biosensor, MRI [7].
Thus it can be said that different micro-organisms play a vast role in production of industrially important nanoparticles. Taking this into consideration, the present article includes an overview of nanoparticles, used of various micro-organisms (especially bacteria) in production of different kind of nano particles and their applications.
Sources of Nanoparticles
Sources of Nanoparticles are Mainly Classified in 3 Categories
Incidental Nanoparticles: These are incidentally produced materials, which are actually the by-product of different industrial processes. Like Nanoparticles formation from engine exhaust, welding fume, or even some of natural processes may include like forest fire, photochemical reaction, ocean evaporation, volcanic eruptions etc [8]. These naturally originating events can produce high amount of nanoparticles. Likewise some other human activities also lead to nanoparticle synthesis like charcoal burning, dust storm and cosmic dust etc [9].
Engineered Nanoparticles: These are self-designed type of nanoparticles which are engineered to have certain desirable qualities and applications. Many of the anthropogenic activities may be conclude for synthesis of such nanoparticles such as diesel or engine exhaust burning [10], building demolition and cigarette smoke, nanoparticles from biomedical and healthcare. Thus these contain synthetic nanoparticles, which are the new genre of nanoparticles which can completely show suspicious environmental and human health effects.
Natural Nanoparticles: These are very easily found and can be synthesized from bodies of organisms, insects, plants, animals and even human beings [11]. Unlike incidental and engineered nanoparticles, natural nanoparticles are present in living organisms ranging from microorganisms like bacterial, algae, virus to complex organisms like plants, insects, animals, birds and humans. This knowledge of presence of nanoparticles in microorganisms can be important because of their further use in biomedical applications [12,13].
Sr No.
Type Of Nps
Sub Type Of Nps
Example
1
Carbon
Fullerenes
TiO2
Graphene
Carbon Nanotubes
Carbon Nanofibres
Carbon Black
2
Organic
Dendrimers
CdSe
Liposomes
Micelles
3
Inorganic
Metal Based
Gold, Silver
Metal Oxide Based
ZnO, TiO2
4
Composite
Simple Hybrid
SiO2
Core or Shell Structured
Multifunctional Quantam Dots
Table 1: Classification of nanoparticles.
Classification of Nanoparticles
Carbon based Nanoparticles: These types of nanoparticles are mainly formed of carbon. Examples of its morphology are hollow tubes, ellipsoids etc. These could be further classified into Carbon Nano Tubes (CNT), carbon black, fullerenes, graphene, carbon nanofibers and activated carbon in nano size [14].
Organic Nanoparticles: These nanoparticles unlike carbon based nanoparticles are made up of organic matter. Non covalent interactions (being weak) are helpful for self-assembly and design of molecule in transformation of organic nanoparticles into desired structure such as dendrimers, micelles, liposomes, ferritin etc [15]. These nanoparticles are mostly biodegradable and non-toxic, among which some form hollow core (such as micelles and liposomes) also known as nanocapsules and they become sensitive to electromagnetic and thermal radiation such as heat and light. This characteristic makes such nanoparticles as ideal choice for drug delivery mechanism [4,16].
Inorganic Nanoparticles: Inorganic nanoparticles are highly stable compared to their organic counterparts. They are biocompatible, non-toxic and hydrophilic materials. These are the metal and metal oxide based nanoparticles. These nanoparticles have certain types into which they can be synthesized, out of which metals may include Au, Ag nanoparticles [17], similarly metal oxides may include TiO2, ZnO and even some semiconductors like silicon and ceramics [18].
Composite Nanoparticles: These are nanoparticle of composite structures, including core shell structure, onion like structure and gladiate composition. These nanoparticles are multiphased with one of their phase on nanoscale dimension which can be helpful in combining one nanoparticle with other such as hybrid nanofibres or even complicated structures such as metal organic frameworks. These type of composites may be formed of any combinations be it metal-based, organic-based or carbon-based with any form of metal, ceramic, or polymer bulk materials [12,19].
There are 4 material based categories in which nanoparticles and nano sized materials can be organised (Table 1).
Bacterial Association of Nanoparticles
Production of Nanoparticles
Green nanotechnology makes use of various biological entities for nano-particles production. Use of bacteria for nanoparticle biosynthesis is popular among the scientific community and is gaining importance for because of various beneifits it offers. Various bacteria have been employed for production of nano-particles (Table 2). One of the important factors of green synthesis is that microbial emissary has a tendency of acting as a template for synthesizing as well as organizing the nanoparticles into precise structure. Bacteria in particular are capable of immobilization and mobilization of diffrerent metals and in cases, it can reduce metal ions and precipitate metals at a nanometer scale. Optimising the process of production is easied with used of bacteri which can lead to synthesis of nanoparticles with the desired size and morphology.
Bacteria have ability to reduce heavy metal ions which makes them desirable candidates for synthesis of nanoparticle. It was found in a study that P. stutzeri and P. aeruginosa are able to survive and grow in high metal ion concentration [20,21]. Previous studies have reported bacteria like Thiobacillus thiooxidans, Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, and Sulfolobus acidocaldarius are capable of reducing ferric ion to its ferrous state when sulfur is used as an energy source. Other bacteria were also found to be beneficial such as enzymatic reduction of Tc (VII) using Geobacter metallireducens and Shewanella putrefaciens cells in their resting phase, Escherichia coli K12 utilized for tellurium (Te) formation [22], and used of by Rhodospirillum rubrum, Desulfovibriode sulfuricans, Enterobacter cloacae for reduction of selenite to selenium [23]. Mullen et al. [24] studied the capability of E. coli, Bacillus subtilis, P. aeruginosaand Bacillus cereusin removing La3+,Cd2+, Ag+ and Cu2+ from solution. Some of the bacteria even synthesize inorganic materials, example being magnetotactic bacteria, which results in synthesis of intracellular magnetite nanoparticles [25].
Sr No.
Bacteria Used
Nanoparticles
Size(Nm)
References
1
Bacillus cereus
Silver
20-40
[26]
2
Kocuriaflava
Copper
5-30
[27]
3
Bacillussubtilis
Gold
20-25
[28]
4
Shewanellaloihica PV-4
Platinum
2-7
[29]
5
Sinomonasmesophila MPKL 2
Silver
4-50
[30]
6
Xanthomonasoryzae
Silver
14.86
[31]
7
B.subtilis
TiO2,ZnO
66-67
[32]
8
E.coli
CdO
22-25
[33]
9
Rhodopseudomonas capsulata
Gold
10-20
[34]
10
Shewanella algae
Platinum
~5
[35]
11
Deinococcus radiodurans
Gold
~43.75
[36]
12
Bacillus cecembensis
Silver
6-13
[37]
13
Pseudomonasantarctica
Silver
6-13
[37]
14
Magnetotactic
Magnetic
-
[38]
15
Alcaligenesfaecalis
Silver
30-50
[39]
16
Ochrobactrum sp. MPV
Tellurium
2-5
[40]
Table 2: Bacteria utilized for production of nanoparticles.
SrNo.
Bacteria Used
Nanoparticles
Applications
References
1
Bacillus cereus
Silver
Antibacterial Activity
[26]
2
Alcaligenes faecalis
Silver
Antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity
[38]
3
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Cadmium
Removal of Cadmium Pollutant
[43]
4
Shewanella loihica PV-4
Palladium and Platinum
Degradation of Methyl Orange Dye
[29]
5
Ochrobactrum sp. MPV
Tellurium
Reduction of Toxic compounds
[39]
6
Bacillussubtilis
Gold
Degradation of Methylene Blue
[28]
7
Klebsiellapneumonia
Silver
Antimicrobial
[44]
8
Nostoc sp. strain HKAR-2
Silver
Antimicrobial effect on Ralstonia solanacearum, Xanthomonas campestris, Aspergillus niger,
[45]
9
Halomonas maura
MR
Antiangiogenic, Anti-inflammatory, Anti- viral activities
[46]
10
Anabaena dolium
Silver
Antimicrobial effect on K.pneumonia and S.aureus
[47]
11
Brevibacterium frigoritolerans
Silver
Antimicrobial effect on Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Bacillus anthracis, Salmonella enterica.
[48]
Table 3: Applications of bacterially synthesized nanoparticles.
In a study E. coli was used for production of DH5α gold nano particles using AuCl4 ions aqueous bio-reduction with bacterium. A study reported, platinum group metals undergo reductive deposition carrying out heterogenous reaction for synthesis of platinum nanoparticles on bacterium Shewanella algae [41]. It is an environment friendly method termed as “green chemistry” for production of nanoparticles. Certain thermophilic bacteria are utilized in a great extent for extracellular production of the metal nanoparticles like gold or silver. Thermophillus microorganisms as Geobacillus stearothermophilus have shown the properties of formation nanoparticles [42]. Geobacillus sp. was cultivated for obtaining a wet biomass, and then was exposed to metal salts. The complete reaction process led to production of nanoparticles. Nanoparticles produced by this process accompanied with presence of capping proteins which suggests that nanoparticles formed are of highly stable in nature. Also this technique leads to production of toxin free nanoparticles and highly recommended for large scale synthesis [42].
Applications of Nanoparticles
The applications of nanoparticle are as diverse as its characteristics. Today, nanoparticles are used in different fields as biomedical, agriculture, environment and industires. Though here we are concerned with different applications of nanoparticles in association with bacteria. The interaction of various bacteria and nanoparticles have been used to perform various fnctions. Many studies have shown that depending upon their characteristics various nanoparticles can penetrate the outer membranes of bacterial cells and form an association with the latter. This association enhances the characteristics of both which can now be used for various applications. An overview of applications of bacteria syntesized nanoparticles is mentioned in the Table 3.
Association of Bacteria with Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery
Due to the characteristics of nanoparticles they are considered as ideal molecules for delivery of many drugs to their desired destination. Many bacteria help nanoparticles in this process. The nanoparticles become leaped on the surface of bacterium and this combined form can be used as applications for gaining direct knowledge about electrochemistry of proteins. Nanoparticles in association with bacteria are being employed for constructing bacteria-nanoparticle vehicles. Patinum (nano- Pt) and gold (nano-Au) nanoparticles in association with Listeria monocytogenes Salmonella enteritidis and is one such bacteria-nanoparticle vehicles which can be used for drug delivery. Series of experiments led to conclusion that nano-Au and nano-Pt can disrupt the cell wall and membrane of the Salmonella enteritidis and Listeria monocytogenes and gets combined with the DNA material thus making it a desirable vehicle for drug transfer [49].
Likewise, Halomonas maura (ATCC 700995) is another bacterium species which helps in formation of Mauran (MR) or Chitosan (CH) nanoparticles [46]. These are highly halophile bacteria which can produce highly sulphated Exo-Polysaccharides (EPS) residues. Halomonas Maura bacterium is grown and cultivated along with the EPS. After carrying out of the complete Reaction Process (MR) based nanoparticles were formed. Various techniques like FTIR, XRD, TEM & SEM confirms the presence of these MR nanoparticles. These produced nanoparticles also bear the drug delivery mechanism. These records depict that these MR nanoparticles have advantage of sustained delivery of drug for period of about 10-12 days. Also as these nanoparticles have tendency for encapsulated anticancer drug; they have a high potential of fighting against tumorous cells. Along with the mechanism of encapsulating anticancer drugs, these nanoparticles bear property of sustained and controlled drug release, under optimum conditions like high acidic pH, making them favourable for cancer chemotherapy [46].
Conclusion
There is an immense scope of using bacteria for production of nanoparticles. As various nanoparticles find used in many different industries, it is ideal to find cheaper and effective ways for their production. Conventional used of various chemicals nanoparticles productions is costly as well as accompanied with many toxic by-products. Using micro-organism especially bacteria can be the possible solution to this problem. Not only the production process is cost effective and toxin free but also the process can be optimised leading to the production of nanoparticles with the desired characteristics. Nanoparticles produced using bacteria are used for various applications and an association among them can be helpful in drug delivery. Further studies need to be conducted to make this association beneficial for mankind. For instance, studies suggest that many nanoparticles can disrupt outer walls of bacterial to integrate with the genetic material of the host cell; this mode of interaction can be exploited to kill pathogens.
Acknowledgment
This work has been funded by Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi. The authors are thankful to CSIR, New Delhi as well as DBT, New Delhi for continuous financial support to the Department of Biotechnology, Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla (India).
Declaration of Competing Interest
Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest amongst themselves or with parental institute.
References
- Hasan S. A Review on Nanoparticles Their Synthesis and Types. Bio. Synth. : Mech. 2015; 4: 9-11.
- Smita S, Gupta SK, Bartonova A, Dusinska M, Gutleb AC, Rahman Q. Nanoparticles in the environment: assessment using the causal diagram approach. Env. Hlth. 2012; 11.
- Machado S, Pacheco JG, Nouws HPA, Albergaria JT, Delerue-Matos C. Characterization of green zero-valent iron nanoparticles produced with tree leaf extracts. Sci Total Environ. 2015; 533: 76-81.
- Anu S, Ealia M, Saravanakuma MP. A review on the classification, characterisation, synthesis of nanoparticles and their application. IOP Conference series: Materials, science and engineering. 2017; 263 032019.
- Hasan S. A Review on Nanoparticles: Their Synthesis and Types. Res. J. Recent Sci. 2014; 4: 9-11.
- Zhang X, Yan S, Tyagi RD, Surampalli RY. Synthesis of nanoparticles by microorganisms and their application in enhancing microbiological reaction rates. Chemo. 2011; 82: 489-494.
- Li X, Xu H, Chen Z, Chen G. Biosynthesis of Nanoparticles by Microorganisms and Their Application. J. Nanomater. 2011; 2011: 16.
- Buzea C, Pacheco II, Robbie K. Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: Sources and toxicity. Biointer. 2007; 2: 17-71.
- Yano MDE, Yokoyama Y, Higashi H, Nishii DS, Maeda K, Koizumi A. Health Effects of Volcanic Ash: A Repeat Study. Arch. Environ. Health. 1990; 45: 367-373.
- Soto KF, Carrasco A, Powell TG, Garza KM, Murrl LE. Comparative in vitro cytotoxicity assessment of some manufactured nanoparticulate materials characterized by transmission electron microscopy. J Nanopart RES. 2005; 7: 145-169.
- Gong T, Xie J, Liao J, Zhang T, Lin S, Lin Y. Nanomaterials and bone regeneration. Bone Res. 2015; 3.
- Jeevanandam J, Barhoum A, Chan YS, Dufresne A, Danquah MK. Review on nanoparticles and nanostructured materials: history, sources, toxicity and regulation. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018; 9: 1050-1074.
- Buzea C, Blandino IIP, Robbie K. Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: Sources and toxicity. Biointerphases. 2007: 2: MR17-MR172.
- Kumar N, Kumbhat S. Carbon-Based Nanomaterials. Essentials in Nanosci and Nanotech. 2016; 1: 189-236.
- Tiwari DK, Behari J, Sen P. Application of Nanoparticles in Waste Water Treatment. World Appl. Sci. J. 2008; 3: 417-433.
- Khan I, Saeed K, Khan I. Nanoparticles: Properties, application and toxicities. Arab. J. Chem. 2017; 12: 908-931.
- Salavati-niasari M, Davar F, Mir N. Synthesis and characterization of metallic copper nanoparticles via thermal decomposition. Polyhedron. 2008; 27: 3514-3518.
- Tai YC, Tai C, Chang M, Liu H. Synthesis of Magnesium Hydroxide and Oxide Nanoparticles Using a Spinning Disk Reactor. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007; 46: 5536-5541.
- Rane AV, Kanny K, Abhita VK, Thomas S. Methods for Synthesis of Nanoparticles and Fabrication of Nanocomposites. Syn. Ino. Nanomat. 2018; 121-139.
- Haefeli C, Franklin C, Hardy K. Plasmid-determined silver resistance in Pseudomonas stutzeri isolated from a silver mine. J. Bacteriol. 1984; 158: 389-392.
- Bridges K, Kidson A, Lowbury EJL, Wilkins MD. Gentamicin- and silver-resistant Pseudomonas in a burns unit. BMJ. 1979; 1: 446-449.
- Taylor DE. Bacterial tellurite resistance. Trends Microbiol. 1999; 7: 111-115.
- Kessi J, Ramuz M, Wehrli E, Spycher M, Bachofen R. Reduction of selenite and detoxification of elemental selenium by the phototrophic bacterium Rhodospirillum rubrum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999; 65: 4734-4740.
- Mullen MD, Wolf DC, Ferris FG, Beveridge TJ, Flemming CA, Bailey GW. Bacterial sorption of heavy metals. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989; 55: 3143-3149.
- Lovley DR, Stolz JF, Nord GL, Phillips EJP. Anaerobic production of magnetite by a dissimilatory iron-reducing microorganism. Nature. 1987; 330: 252-254.
- Shankar S, Nachiyar CV. Biogenesis of antibacterial silver nanoparticles using the endophytic bacterium Bacillus cereus isolated from Garcinia xanthochymus , Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2012; 2: 953-959.
- Kaur H, Dolma K, Kaur N, Malhptra A, Kumar N, et al. Marine microbe as nano-factories for copper biomineralization. Biotechnol Bioproc E. 2015; 20: 51-57.
- Srinath B, Namratha K, Byrappa K. Eco-Friendly Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles by Bacillus subtilis and Their Environmental Applications. Adv Sci Lett. 2018; 24: 5942-5946.
- Ahmed E, Kalathil S, Shi L, Alharbi O, Wang P. Synthesis of ultra-small platinum, palladium and gold nanoparticles by Shewanella loihica PV-4 electrochemically active biofilms and their enhanced catalytic activities. J Saudi Chem Soc. 2018; 22: 919-92.
- Manikprabhu D, Cheng J, Chen W, Sunkara AK, Mane SB, et al. Sunlight mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles by a novel actinobacterium (Sinomonas mesophila MPKL 26) and its antimicrobial activity against multi drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Photoch Photobio. 2016; 158: 202-205.
- Narayanan KB, Sakthivel N. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles by phytopathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae strain BXO8. Enzyme Microb Tech. 2013; 23: 1287-1292.
- Adams LK, Lyon DY, McIntosh A, Alvarez PJJ. Comparative toxicity of nano-scale TiO2, SiO2 and ZnO water suspensions. Water Sci Technol. 2006; 54: 327-334.
- Hossain ST, Mukherjee SK. CdO Nanoparticle toxicity on growth, morphology, and cell division in Escherichia coli. Langmuir. 2012; 28: 16614-16622.
- Shiying H, Zhirui G, Yu Z, Song Z, Jing W, Ning G. Biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles using the bacteria Rhodopseudomonas capsulate. Mater let. 2007; 61: 3984-3987.
- Konishi Y, Ohno K, Saitoh N, Nomura T, Nagamine S, et al. Bioreductive deposition of platinum nanoparticles on the bacterium Shawenella algae. J Biotechnol. 2007; 128: 648-653.
- Li J, Li Q, Ma X, Tian B, Li T, et al. Biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles by the extreme bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans and an evaluation of their antibacterial properties. Int J Nanomedicine. 2016; 11: 5931-5944.
- Shivaji S, Madhu S, Singh S. Extracellular synthesis of antibacterial silver nanoparticles using psychrophilic bacteria. Process Biochem. 2011; 46: 1800-1807.
- Jin X, Kai C, Xiaoyuan C. Production, Modifi cation and Bio-Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles Gestated by Magnetotactic Bacteria. Nano Res. 2009; 2: 261-278.
- Divya M, George SK, Hassan S, Selvin J. Biogenic synthesis and effect of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) to combat catheter-related urinary tract infections. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2018; 18: 101037.
- Zonaro E, Piacenza E, Presentato A, Monti F, Dell'Anna R , et al. Ochrobactrum sp. MPV1 from a dump of roasted pyrites can be exploited as bacterial catalyst for the biogenesis of selenium and tellurium nanoparticles. Microb cell fact. 2017; 16: 215.
- Ogi T, Saitoh N , Nomura T, Konishi Y. Room-temperature synthesis of gold nanoparticles and nanoplates using Shewanella algae cell extract. J Nanopart Res. 2010: 12: 2531-2539.
- Fayaz AM, Girilal M, Rahmanb M, Venkatesanc R, Kalaichelvan PT. Biosynthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles using thermophilic bacterium Geobacillus stearothermophilus. Process Biochem. 2011; 46: 1958-1962.
- Naik MM, Prabhu MS, Samant SN, Naik PM, Shirodka S. Synergistic Action of Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized from Silver Resistant Estuarine Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strain SN5 with Antibiotics against Antibiotic Resistant Bacterial Human Pathogens. Thalassas. 2017; 33: 73-80.
- Kalpana D, Lee YS. Synthesis and characterization of bactericidal silver nanoparticles using cultural filtrate of simulated microgravity grown Klebsiella pneumoniae. Enzyme Microb Tech. 2013; 52: 151-156.
- Sonker AS, Richa JP, Rajneesh VK. Characterization and in vitro antitumor, antibacterial and antifungal activities of green synthesized silver nanoparticles using cell extract of Nostoc sp. strain HKAR-2. Can J Biotech. 2017; 1: 26-37.
- Raveendren S, Poulose AC, Yoshida Y, Maekawa T, Kumar DS. Bacterial exo polysaccharides based nanoparticles for sustained drug delivery, cancer chemotherapy and bioimaging. Carbohydr Polym. 2013; 19: 22-32.
- Singh G, Babele PK, Shahi SK, Sinha RP, Tyagi MB, Kumar A. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using cell extracts of Anabaena doliolum and screening of its antibacterial and antitumor activity. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014; 24: 1354-1367.
- Singh P, Kim YJ, Singh H, Wang C, Hwang KH, et al. Biosynthesis, characterization, and antimicrobial applications of silver nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015; 10: 2567-2577.
- Sawosz E, Chwalibog A, Szeliga J, Sawosz F, Grodzik M, et al. Visualization of gold and platinum nanoparticles interacting with Salmonella enteritidis and Listeria monocytogenes. Int J Nanomedicine. 2010; 5: 631-637.
- Sieniawska E, Maciejewska-Turska M, Świątek L, Xiao J. Plant-based Food Products for Antimycobacterial Therapy. eFood. 2020.