Research Article
J Bacteriol Mycol. 2021; 8(3): 1170.
Salmonella Infections among Pediatric Population in Qatar: Phenotypic Resistance and Associated Genotypic Determinants
Al Hadidi S1, Abdelrahman H1, Al Thani A1, Ibrahim E1,2, Yassine HM1, Doiphode S2 and Eltai NO1*
1Qatar University, Biomedical Research Center, Doha, Qatar
2Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
*Corresponding author: author: Eltai NO, Biomedical Research Centre, Qatar University, PO-Box 2713, Doha, Qatar
Received: March 29, 2021; Accepted: April 16, 2021; Published: April 23, 2021
Abstract
Salmonella is a significant public health burden worldwide and being the most common bacterial diarrheal illness among infants and young children. In the last few years, Qatar reports a high incidence of salmonellosis outbreaks coupled with a significant increase of Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) among pediatric populations every year. This study aims to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying resistance to ceftriaxone, cefepime, amoxicillinclavulanate tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, and azithromycin among Salmonella isolated from the pediatric population. A total of 246 Salmonella isolates were collected from children under 18 years old admitted to the Pediatric Emergency Center (PEC), Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC) from Jan. 2018 to Dec 2019 with gastroenteritis. Isolates were tested for antibiotic susceptibility against nineteen relevant antibiotics using E-test. Resistance was confirmed using PCR-specific primers for 38 genes. Resistance was detected against 14 antibiotics, and 38.2% of isolates were resistant to at least one antibiotic. Overall, we reported 23.9%, resistance to tetracycline 21.1%, ampicillin 18.7%, AMC, and 13% sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim. Further, 16.2% of the isolates were Multidrug-Resistant (MDR), with 4.1% being Extended-Spectrum Β Lactamase (ESBL) producers. 90% of ESBL producers harbored one of bla CTX-M-Group. Class 1 AMC resistant samples showed the highest resistance to different antibiotics. Our results indicate a high antimicrobial resistance pattern of Salmonella and the presence of Class (1) cassette that involves the transmission and expression of the resistance among AMC resistance isolates, which might lead to increased multi-drug resistance. This study provides evidence guidance to activate and implement the pillars of an antimicrobial stewardship program in human health to reduce MDR salmonellosis.
Keywords: Salmonella; MDR; salmonellosis; pediatric; Qatar
Abbreviations
MDR: Multi-Drug Resistant; NTS: Non-Typhoidal Salmonella; AMR: Antimicrobial Resistance; ESBL: Extended-Spectrum Β Lactamase; FDA: Food Drug Administartion
Introduction
Salmonella is one of the most common etiological agents of foodborne diarrheal illness and typhoid fever worldwide, leading to mortality in complicated cases [1]. Importantly, children less than 5-years old account for approximately a third of deaths attributed to foodborne diseases (WHO, 2015). There is an increasing concern regarding this pathogen due to the emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistance and potentially more pathogenic strains [2]. Drug-resistance among gastrointestinal pathogens preferentially cause illness in persons receiving antimicrobial drugs for any medical condition. Consequently, emerging resistance in foodborne pathogens may result in increased burdens of illness and outbreaks in settings where patients are treated with antimicrobial drugs [3]. Antimicrobial therapy is not indicated in uncomplicated cases of gastrointestinal illness in patients without underlying illness. However, therapy is needed, and maybe lifesaving in selected patients with the prolonged febrile course of suspected underlying invasive illness [3]. Non-Typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) can be invasive and cause paratyphoid fever, which requires immediate treatment with antibiotics. Extended-spectrum cephalosporins being used favorably to treat salmonellosis in children [4]. The treatment of the Enterobacteriaceae family, including Salmonella, has been increasingly complicated by the emergence of resistant strains to firstline antimicrobial agents [5,6].
The gram-negative bacterial genus Salmonella is divided into two species, Salmonella enterica, and Salmonella bongori. Only the Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica is of clinical relevance for humans [7], and is further classified into more than 2,600 serovars. Salmonella can be broadly categorized as typhoidal and Non- Typhoidal Salmonella (NTS). The typhoidal Salmonella includes serovar Typhi, and the closely related serovar Paratyphi (A-C) that cause enteric fever [8]. The much larger NTS group causes infectious diarrhea worldwide and primarily induces acute, self-limiting gastroenteritis [9]. NTS can also cause various other disorders, including bacteremia, meningitis, and osteomyelitis, particularly among immunocompromised patients.
Salmonella is emerging as a priority public health hazard in Qatar, being the most reported bacterial diarrheal illness among infants and young children, alarmingly associated with multiple incidences of salmonellosis outbreaks among this pediatric population each year. Salmonella is listed among the four commonly isolated Enterobacteriaceae from Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC, Personal communication). A previous study showed a high incidence of salmonellosis in Qatar, especially in children less than five years of age, with an overall annual incidence rate ranging between 12.3 and 30.3 per 100,000 population in 2004-2012 [10]. Nonetheless, this previous study does not characterize the molecular level of resistance to understand better the relatedness, typing of different isolates, and understanding their resistance mechanism. Besides, there are no data available after 2012 on salmonellosis incidences in the State of Qatar. The spread of resistant bacteria is linked to the misuse of antibiotics in human and animal populations and the consumption of contaminated food with resistant bacteria [11].
There are limited published data on antibiotic resistance profile and its associated genetic determinants in Qatar among Salmonella for the pediatric population. Therefore, a study is required to define and analyze the antimicrobial resistance and molecular epidemiology of Salmonella. Obtaining such information is crucial to tackle and mitigate the salmonellosis problem at the clinical, public health, and economic levels. The recurrent Salmonella outbreaks in Qatar and the increasing number of salmonellosis cases mandate rapid regulatory and monitoring reforms at the State level. This study aimed to profile the phenotypic resistance of Salmonella to the relevant antibiotics. Furthermore, to elucidate the molecular determinants underlying resistance to the most worldwide used antibiotics, including ceftriaxone, tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, and azithromycin.
This is the first study among Qatar’s pediatric population that demonstrates the correlation between genetic and phenotypic trends of antimicrobial resistance that would influence the development and implementation of stewardship programs to reduce pathogenic resistant bacteria’s burden on the community.
Materials and Methods
Clinical isolates
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Medical Research Centre, HMC, Doha, Qatar, protocol no. MRC-01-17- 198 and Qatar University approval # QU-IBC-2019/008. A total of 246 Salmonella isolates were collected between January 2018 and December 2019 from children (2-18 years of age) of different nationalities presented to the Pediatric Emergency Center (PEC), HMC, the primary provider of healthcare services in Qatar with symptoms mainly, fever and gastroenteritis. For each patient, demographic data such as age, nationality, and gender were reported.
Bacterial culture
Pathogens were isolated from human samples using the standard bacteriological procedure. Briefly, 1 g of the collected stool samples was diluted with 3ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), and 500μl of this dilution was added to 5 ml of Selenite broth (Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK) for the enrichment and incubated at 37°C for 24-48 hr. The enriched samples were sub-cultured into MacConkey agar and incubated at 37°C for 24 hr. The non-lactose fermenter colonies tested negative with oxidase and produced hydrogen sulfide gas were sub-cultured into Hektoen Enteric Agar (Biolife-Italia). Suspected colonies (transparent green colonies with black centers) except S. paratyphi A, whose colonies appear without black centers, were identified by Matrix-Assisted laser Desorption/Ionization, MALDI-TOF, (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Leipzig, Germany). On the other hand, blood culture samples were incubated on automated BACTEC FX blood culturing instrument (B.D., U.S.). Gram stain was performed on blood cultures flagged positive. Then, cultured isolates demonstrating Gram-negative bacteria were inoculated into MacConkey agar and blood agar. Suspected colonies were automatically identified using MALDI-TOF. Salmonella serology was performed using (DifcoTM Salmonella O Antiserum) and (DifcoTM Salmonella H Antiserum).
Phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility testing
The antibiotic susceptibility testing was conducted using Phoenix (the NMIC/ID-5 panel, B. D. Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany) per the manufacturer’s recommendations. This panel includes 15 antibiotics, namely Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid (AMC), Ampicillin (AMP), Ceftriaxone (CRO), Aztreonam (ATM), Cefepime (FEP), Ceftazidime (CAZ), Meropenem (MEM), Imipenem (IPM), Ertapenem (ETP), Piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), Tigecycline (TGC), Ciprofloxacin (CIP), Levofloxacin (LVX) and trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole (SXT). At the same time, E-test (Liofilchem, Germany) was performed for Azithromycin (AZM), Fosfomycin (FOS), Tetracycline (TET), and Chloramphenicol (C) as they were not included in the Phoenix automated panel. MICs were interpreted according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute CLSI (CLSI, 2017). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 strain was used as a quality control organism. Isolates were confirmed as ESBL producers via the Double Disc Synergy Test (DDST) as previously described by Eltai et al. [12] AmpC Β-lactamase production was measured using cefoxitin; a zone diameter of (≥18 mm) was considered as AmpC-positive (CLSI, 2017). All intermediate resistant isolates were considered susceptible.
Molecular characterization of antibiotic resistance
Whole- genomic DNA was extracted from Salmonella bacterial cultures using QIAamp® UCP pathogen Minikit (QIAGEN, Germany). Extracted DNA was then used to run PCR for 32 genes using previously published primers [11-21]. The conditions used for reactions were as follows: PCR mixture was made in the volume of 20μl containing 0.5μM of each primer, 1μl of DNA, 1× master mix (Hot star Taq plus master mix (QIAGEN, Germany) and H2O up to 20μl. The reaction was amplified in Biometra TAdvanced Thermal cycler (Analytik Jena, Germany) under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min.; followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 1 min at 44-63 °C and 90 s at 72°C and a final extension step of 5 min at 72°C.
The 32 genes that responsible for the resistance of the most prescribed antibiotics were amplified. These genes include tet A, B, C, D, E and G (Tetracycline resistant isolates), catA, cmlA and floR (Chloramphenicol-resistant isolates), sul1, sul2 and sul3 (Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole-resistant isolates), ESBL genes blaTEM, blaCTX-M groups and blaSHV (Third generation cephalosporines), mphA, mphB, ermA, ermB, ereA, mefA, and msrA (Azithromycin-resistant isolates) and ampC, CMY2 and Class 1 gene cassette (Amoxicillin-clavulanate resistant isolates).
The only clear bands were considered for the further fingerprinting scoring. The scores’ ‘1’ and ‘’’0’ were given for the presence and absence of genes ‘ ‘amplicon’s band, respectively. The data obtained by scoring the Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) genes were subjected to cluster analysis. A similarity matrix was constructed using Jaccard’s coefficient, where the similarity values were used for cluster analysis. Sequential Agglomerative Hierarchical Non-overlapping (SAHN) clustering was performed using the Unweighted Pair Group Method with the Arithmetic Averages (UPGMA) method. Data were then analyzed using Past software version 3.26 [22] based on Hamming similarity index with 100 bootstraps.
Statistical analysis
Data were introduced into Microsoft Excel 2010 (Microsoft Corporation, New York, USA) to generate figures and run the initial analysis. The relation between the resistance, nationality, age, and gender grouping was calculated using the Pearson test (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, USA). A probability value (P-value) less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Past software, version 1.91 was used to construct a hierarchical clustering dendrogram, and Jacquard’s coefficient was applied to generate the similarity values for the cluster analysis.
Results
Demography of the study population
In this study, we tested 246 Salmonella isolates from children between 2-18 years of age. Among these, 220 (89.4%) were isolated from stool and 26 (10.6%) from blood. The demographic profile of the studied population was summarized in Table 1. The male: female ratio was 1.4:1 and 194 (78.9%) were under five years of age. The Qatari patient comprises 37.4% (n=92) of this study population, while other nationalities 62.6%. The typhoidal Salmonella among Qatari patient was 30.4%/28 (23 Paratyphi B, 2 Paratyphi A and 3 Typhi) and 38.3%/59 (38 Paratyphi B, 5 Paratyphi A and 16 Typhi) among non-Qatari. On the other hand non-typhoidal Salmonella isolates include 64.6% n= 159 (64 Qatari and 95 non-Qatari) including Salmonella group B (n=61), Salmonella group C1 (n=5), Salmonella group C2 (n=9), Salmonella group D (n=29), Salmonella group E (n=7), Salmonella Choleraesuis (n=8), Salmonella Enteritidis (n=13), Salmonella Typhimorium (n=12) and Salmonella group O (n=13).
Author, year, country of study and PEDro scores
Mean age of participants (y); sample size
Study groups and dosage of intervention and control
Outcome measure(s)
Results: Time points of assessment; Mean (SD) (or) n/N
Liebergall- Wischnitzer et al. [28], 2005
Israel
PEDro: 5/10Age range: 20-65*
(mean age not reported)Exp: n = 30
Con: n = 29Exp: PE
Con: PFMTPE: 12 weeks (45 min session/ week).
PFMT: 4 weeks (30-min sessions/ week).
PE: Contraction and relaxation of pubococcygeal muscles, anals sphincter, and eyelids. Open and close mouth and press each finger of hands to thumbs.
PFMT: NR
→Pad test: Urinary leakage in grams
12 weeks
Exp: 5.4 (8.8)
Con: 9.5 (16.0)Liebergall-Wischnitzer et al. [10], 2009
Israel
PEDro: 5/10Exp: 47.3 (8.4)
Con: 47.9 (9.3)EA: n = 91
SA: n = 86Exp: PE
Con: PFMTPE: 12 weeks (45 minutes session/ week).
PFMT: 4 weeks (30 minutes session/ week). After 4 weeks, 2 more sessions 3 weeks apart.
PE: Contraction and relaxation of pubococcygeal muscles, anals sphincter, and eyelids. Open and close mouth and press each finger of hands to thumbs.
PFMT: Raising the vagina and anus.
→Pad test: Urinary leakage (grams)
→Self-reported leakage amountLeakage (grams); 12 weeks
Exp: 3.0 (7.2)
Con: 2.8 (4.3)Leakage amount; 12 weeks
Exp: 74/91
Con: 39/86Liebergall-Wischnitzer et al. [36], 2012
Israel
PEDro: 5/10Exp: 46.7 (8.0)
Con: 46.6 (8.9)Exp: n = 65
Con: n = 59Exp: PE
Con: PFMTPE: 12 weeks (45 minutes session/ week).
PFMT: Once a week for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks, 2 more sessions 3 weeks apart for a total of 6 sessions over 12 weeks
PE: Contraction and relaxation of the eyelids; raising the upper lip to the nose as the nose is lowered to the upper lip; contraction and relaxation of the levator any muscles alone or in conjunction with a “sh” sound.
PFMT: Raising the vagina from the chair (levator any) in sitting. 10s rest between Contractions. Each contraction performed 1–2 minutes apart.
→Urinary leakage in grams
→Self-reported leakage amountLeakage (grams); 12 weeks
Exp: 2.9 (7.1)
Con: 2.4 (4.4)Leakage amount; 12 weeks
Exp: 31/65
Con: 28/59Liebergall-Wischnitzer et al. [39], 2013 Israel
PEDro: 4/10Exp: 48.5 (7.6)
Con: 47.8 (8.6)Exp: n = 64
Con: n = 78Exp: PE
Con : PFMTPE: 12 weeks (45 min session/ week).
PFMT: 4 weeks (30 min session/ week). After 4 weeks, 2 more sessions 3 weeks apart for a total of 6 sessions over 12 weeks.
PE: Opening and closing the mouth (and feeling the contraction in the face, PFMs and anus) and palms (and feeling the contraction in the shoulders and PFMs).
PFMT: Raising the vagina from the chair (levator any) in sitting. 10s rest between contractions. Each contraction performed 1–2 minutes apart.
→Self-reported leakage amount
12 weeks
Exp: 49/64
Con: 55/79Huang et al. [38], 2014
USA
PEDro: 5/10Exp: 60.5 (8.4)
Con: 62.4 (8.3)Exp: n = 9
Con: n = 9Exp: Yoga (group-based)
Con: Wait-listYoga: 6 weeks (supervised, 90 minutes/ session, twice weekly)
Con: Yoga classes at a local yoga studio.
Yoga: Hatha yoga program consisting of 8 yoga postures.
Con: $180 gift certificate for yoga classes at a local yoga
Studio.→Number of incontinence episodes
6 weeks
Exp: 0.71 (0.8)
Con: 0.21 (1.1)Huang et al. [34], 2019
USA
PEDro: 8/10Exp: 65.5 (9.1)
Con: 66.6 (6.8)Exp: n = 28
Con: n = 28Exp: Yoga (group-based)
Con: Attention12 weeks (supervised, 90 minutes/ session, twice weekly)
Yoga: Hatha yoga program consisting of 15 yoga postures.
Con: Non-specific stretching and strengthening exercises.
→Number of incontinence episodes
12 weeks (change scores)
Exp: 0.8
Con: 0.4Note: Con: Control group; Exp: Experimental group; NR: Not Reported; PE: Paula Exercise; PFM: Pelvic Floor Muscle; PFMT: Pelvic Floor Muscle Training. *Age reported as mean and SD unless specified.
Table 1: Demographic profile of the study population (n = 246) with Salmonella among pediatric (2 to 18 years old) in the State of Qatar.
Phenotypic profile of Salmonella isolates
The antibiotic resistance profile of 246 Salmonella isolates is depicted in Figure 1. Resistance was detected against 14 antibiotics. 38.2% of isolates were resistant to at least one antibiotic. Overall, the highest resistance was reported to tetracycline (23.9%) followed by (21.1%) ampicillin, (18.7%) AMC, and (13%) trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole. The highest phenotypic combination of resistance was detected against AMC, AMP, TE & C (4.5%). Furthermore, 16.2% of the isolates were Multidrug-Resistant (MDR), with 4.1%being ESBL producers (Table 2).
SUI: Paula exercise compared to PFMT
Outcomes
Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)
Relative effect
(95% CI)No of Participants (studies)
Quality of the evidence
(Grade)Assumed risk
Corresponding risk
Amount of urine leak in grams
The mean pad test leaks in the intervention groups was 0.47 higher (1.79 lower to 0.84 higher)
360 (3 studies) [10,11,28]
⊕⊝⊝⊝ very lowa,b
SUI: Paula exercise compared to PFMT
Outcomes
Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)
Relative effect
(95% CI)No of Participants
(studies)Quality of the evidence
(Grade)Assumed risk
Corresponding risk
Number of women reporting small leaks
Study population
RR 1.26
(0.88 to 1.80)443
(3 studies) [10,11,29]⊕⊝⊝⊝
very lowb,c545 per 1000
692 per 1000
(485 to 986)Moderate
475 per 1000
603 per 1000
(423 to 860)SUI: Yoga compared to control
Outcomes
Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)
Relative effect
(95% CI)No of Participants
(studies)Quality of the evidence
(Grade)Assumed risk
Corresponding risk
Control
Intervention
Number of incontinence episodes
The mean frequency of incontinence episodes in the intervention groups was 0.83 lower
(1.64 to 0.02 lower)
74
(2 studies) [34,38]⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowdNote: CI: Confidence interval; PFMT: Pelvic Floor Muscle Training; RR: Risk ratio; *The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
Grade Working Group grades of evidence.
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.
aLack of concealed allocation in two studies (Libergall-Wischnitzer 2012 and Libergall-Wischnitzer 2005), lack of assessor blinding in one study (Libergall-Wischnitzer 2005), >15% dropout in two studies (Libergall-Wischnitzer 2012 and Libergall-Wischnitzer 2009), and lack of intention-to-treat analysis in three studies (Libergall-Wischnitzer 2012, Libergall-Wischnitzer 2009, and Libergall-Wischnitzer 2005).
bWide CI.
cLack of concealed allocation in two studies (Libergall-Wischnitzer 2012 and Libergall-Wischnitzer 2013), lack of assessor blinding in one study (Libergall-Wischnitzer 2013) and >15% dropout, lack of intention-to-treat analysis in three studies (Libergall-Wischnitzer 2012, Libergall-Wischnitzer 2013, and Libergall-Wischnitzer 2009).
dAllocation concealment, assessor blinding and intention-to-treat analysis not done in one study (Huang 2014).
Table 2: Phenotypic resistant profiles of Salmonella isolates from hospitalized pediatric in Qatar (n=246).
Molecular genotyping profile of Salmonella isolates
The detected phenotypic resistance was verified by molecular detection of relevant genetic determinants. Tetracycline resistance has been confirmed by the existence of tetA, tetB, tetC, tetD, tetE & tetG gene (Figure 2A). TetA gene (64.4%) recorded the highest percentage of all other tet genes followed by tetC (8.4%), tetA, tetG & tetA 6.8%.
Ten genes underlying ESBL resistance were detected, including blaTEM, blaSHV, blaCTX-M-G-1, 2, 3, 8, 9 & 25, and blaCTX-M-14 &15 (Figure 2B). Nineteen percentage of ESBL isolates harbored blaCTXM- Group genes. blaCTX-M-G-8 & 25 and blaSHV were not detected among ESBL isolates. While 60% of ESBL isolates were encoded by blaTEM gene.
Sul1, sul2, and sul3 were identified among the trimethoprim– sulfamethoxazole-resistant isolates (13%, n=32), Figure 2C. Among these isolates the most common detected gene was sul2 (84.4%, n=27), followed by sul2 (53.1%, n=18), then sul3, (15.6%, n=5/32). These sul genes are present as one type or in combination.
Among chloramphenicol resistant isolates (11%, n=27), the most predominant gene was floR 44. 4% (n=12), whereas the other genes catA and cmlA detected in 37% (n=10) and 11.1% (n=3), respectively. (Figure 2D). In addition to two combination, namely cmlA & floR and catA & floR, which detected among 3.7% (n=1).
For azithromycin-resistant, seven genes have been detected among the isolates mphA, mphB, ermA, ermB, ereA, mefA, and msrA. PCR results depicted that 1 of the 11 isolates (MIC ≥ 256 μg/mL) harbored mphA genes. The mphB, ermA, ermB, ereA, mefA, and msrA genes were negative among all azithromycin-resistant isolates. Class (1) gene cassette spotted in (78.5%) isolates. Whereas class 2 gene cassette was not detected. Among AMC resistant isolates, 25% (n=12) harbored ampC, while only two isolates (4.3%) had CMY2 gene.
Statistical correlation
There was no significant relationship among all the studied isolates, between antibiotic resistance, age, gender, and nationality variables, through the Pearson test of independence, probability value (P>0.05) using (GraphPad Prism version 9.0.2 for Windows, GraphPad Software, San Diego, California USA). Calculated using the Pearson test, followed by multiple comparisons test was performed using Probability value (P>0.05) No significant differences were detected by nationality, age, and gender (P>0.05) in relation to resistance.
Clustering AMR genes of Salmonella isolates
Cluster analysis was used to study similarity among individual of Salmonella isolates that harbored at least one of the studied genes (n=73) based on the presence and absence of 24 genes (amp C, CMY 2, sul 1, sul 2, sul 3, tet A, tet B, tet C, tet D, tet E, tet G, cat A, cml A, floR, mph A, bla TEM, bla CTX-M-G1, bla CTX-M-G2, bla CTXM- G3, bla CTX-M-G8, bla CTX-M-G9, bla CTX-M-G14, bla CTX-M-G15 & bla CTX-M-G25). Data were analyzed using an agglomerative hierarchical algorithm that revealed forty-three clonal clusters among the 73 tested Salmonella isolates. Clonally related strains of cluster G1 that harbors only tet A (23.3%, n=17/73) were responsible for the predominant tetracycline resistance, followed by A16 (8.2%, n=6), which produces a combination of tetA and sul2 type genes that express tetracycline and sulfamethoxazole resistance, respectively. Sixteen clonal clusters were detected among group A with the main cluster A16 followed by cluster A1 producing a combination of three genes, sul 1, sul2, and cat A concurrently, then cluster A5 had two combination sul1 & sul2. Group B includes 2 clusters that express a combination between tetA, β lactamase and/or ESBL genes. Group C consists of four clusters with a combination of tetA, sul, and chloramphenicol genes. Group D had seventeen clusters that mainly express different tet and chloramphenicol genes.
Discussion
Out of 246 Salmonella isolated from blood and stool samples obtained from pediatric patients (2-18 years) who presented with gastroenteritis symptoms, 61.8% (n=152) of the isolates exhibit no resistance against the tested antibiotics. While 13% (n=32) were resistance to only one antibiotics, 4.1% (n=10) were ESBL producers and 16.2% (n=40) were MDR.
Tetracycline resistance was the highest observed (24%) among the isolates investigated in this study. 64.4% of tetracycline resistance isolates harbor the gene tetA, which is often considered part of transposon Tn1721. This gene can be associated with conjugative and transmissible plasmids with a high capability of moving from one bacteria to the other, contributing to the spreading and increase of tetracycline resistance [23,24]. Among the 11% (n=27) chloramphenicol resistant isolates, floR gene was the most detected gene (44.4%, n=12) followed by cat A (37%, n=10) and cmlA gene (11.1%, n=3). This agrees with Nogrady et al. [25], who reported that (46.4%) of Salmonella isolated from humans in their study harbored the floR gene.
Besides, we reported resistance of 21% and 18.7% to ampicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanic, respectively. These two antibiotics are hugely prescribed to treat respiratory infectious diseases in chickens and cattle [26]. This use of antibiotics for therapeutic purposes in veterinary medicine and as growth promoters in food-producing animals is speculated to be a significant cause of the development of resistance in Salmonella, presenting a potential risk to public health [27]. The most common genetic determinant of trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole resistant isolates was the sul2 gene, which was detected among (84.4%, n=27/32), followed by the sul1 gene 53.1% (n=18/32) then sul3 15.6% (n=5/32). In contrast to our findings, Antunes et al. reported that the sul1 gene was the most prevalent gene among Salmonella resistant to sulfamethoxazole [28]. This is probably endorsed to the variance in the source of samples wherein the previous study; the samples were collected from environmental Portuguese Salmonella enterica. The same study reported that 7% of Salmonella isolates harbored sul3 gene being the lowest reported as in our study.
In this study, 90% (n=10) of the extended cephalosporinresistant isolates harbored blaCTX-M genes, in which blaCTX-M-G-1, blaCTX-M15, and blaCTX-M-G-3 (50%) were the most common gene. However, the bla CTX-M-1 and bla CTX-M -9 groups have also been dominant in S. Typhimurium isolates in Shanghai [1]. Our results showed that bla CTX-M -9 and 14 were demonstrated by 20% and 10%, respectively, among ESBL isolates. Most of the ESBL genes are usually harbored in a bacterial plasmid, which gives them the ability to distribute easily among different bacteria species contributing to the increase of antibiotic resistance [29].
Our findings reveal that 11 (4.47%) of the isolates were resistant to azithromycin. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommended using azithromycin to treat invasive Salmonella infections [30] because this antibiotic proved an excellent ability to accumulating at high intracellular concentrations [31]. Resistant to azithromycin were also recorded in other countries [1,30,32]. One high-level azithromycin-resistant isolate (MIC ≥256 μg/mL) that harbored the mphA gene was identified in our study. This is in line with Phuc Nguyen et al. [19], who detected mphA in 34 of 190 Escherichia coli isolated from human feces with MICs 256 mg/L to >1,024 mg/L. The resistance against azithromycin among the other ten isolates in this study can be underlined by other possible mechanisms, such as mutations in the rlpD and rlpV genes [33].
The most common isolated serovar was Salmonella serotyping GroupB and Salmonella Paratyphi (24.8%), followed by Salmonella serotyping group D (11.8%). This finding contrasts with Iyer et al. [34], who reported that Salmonella Typhi was the most abundant type of Salmonella spread between children of less than five years but in concordance with Ochaia et al. [35], who stated the overall ratio of disease caused by Salmonella Typhi to that caused by Salmonella Paratyphi is about 10 to 1.
Conclusion
This is the first study to elucidate the genotypic determinants of resistance among Salmonella isolates from Qatar’s pediatric population. The highest resistance was depicted against tetracycline, ampicillin, and amoxicillin-clavulanate. We identified various transferrable antimicrobial-resistance genes among the MDR isolates, such as ESBLgenes, sul, tet, ampC, cat, cml A & floR genes, and some isolates harbored a combination of these genes. The presence of these genes poses a considerable threat to the control of Salmonella infection locally and globally. Overall, this work provides baseline data for the Prevalence of the genetic determinants underlying the phenotypic resistance among Qatar’s pediatrics populations. These findings can help update the local antimicrobial policy and inform the antimicrobial stewardship program to be implemented in health facilities.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by Qatar University collaborative grant no.: QUCG-BRC-19/20.
References
- Wang J, et al. Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in Shanghai, China. Frontiers in microbiology. 2017; 8: 510.
- Molbak K, et al. An outbreak of multidrug-resistant, quinolone-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium DT104. N Engl J Med. 1999. 341: 1420-1425.
- Flint JA, et al. Estimating the burden of acute gastroenteritis, foodborne disease, and pathogens commonly transmitted by food: an international review. Clinical infectious diseases. 2005; 41: 698-704.
- Threlfall EJ. Antimicrobial drug resistance in Salmonella: problems and perspectives in food-and water-borne infections. FEMS microbiology reviews. 2002; 26: 141-148.
- Rahbar M, M Deldari, M Hajia. Changing prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of different Shigella species in Tehran, Iran. The Internet J Microbiol, 2007.
- Wellington EM, et al. The role of the natural environment in the emergence of antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria. The Lancet infectious diseases, 2013; 13: 155-165.
- Nataro JP, et al. Escherichia, shigella, and salmonella, in Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 10th Edition. 2011, American Society of Microbiology. 2011; 603-626.
- Crump JA, Heyderman RS. A perspective on invasive Salmonella disease in Africa. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2015; 61: S235-S240.
- Haeusler GM, Curtis N. Non-typhoidal Salmonella in children: microbiology, epidemiology and treatment. Hot Topics in Infection and Immunity in Children IX. 2013; 764: 13-26.
- Farag E, et al. A retrospective epidemiological study on the incidence of salmonellosis in the State of Qatar during 2004-2012. Qatar Medical Journal. 2016; 2016.
- Rowlands REG, et al. Prevalence of drug resistance and virulence features in Salmonella spp. isolated from foods associated or not with salmonellosis in Brazil. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo. 2014; 56: 461-467.
- Eltai NO, Al Thani AA, Al-Ansari K, Deshmukh AS, Wehedy E, Al-Hadidi SH, et al. Molecular characterization of extended spectrum β-lactamases enterobacteriaceae causing lower urinary tract infection among pediatric population. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control. 2018; 7: 90.
- White DG, et al. The isolation of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella from retail ground meats. New England journal of medicine. 2001; 345: 1147-1154.
- Feria C, et al. Patterns and mechanisms of resistance to β-lactams and β-lactamase inhibitors in uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from dogs in Portugal. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2002; 49: 77-85.
- Van Pelt W, et al. Explosive increase of Salmonella Java in poultry in the Netherlands: consequences for public health. Eurosurveillance. 2003; 8: 31- 35.
- Hudson CR, et al. Genetic Relatedness of SalmonellaIsolates from Nondomestic Birds in Southeastern United States. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2000; 38: 1860-1865.
- Ng LK, et al. Multiplex PCR for the detection of tetracycline resistant genes. Mol Cell Probes, 2001; 15: 209-215.
- Bernal-Bayard J, Ramos-Morales F. Salmonella type III secretion effector SlrP is an E3 ubiquitin ligase for mammalian thioredoxin. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2009; 284: 27587-27595.
- Nguyen MCP, et al. Escherichia coli as reservoir for macrolide resistance genes. Emerging infectious diseases. 2009; 15: 1648-1650.
- Bora AR. Identification of a single selective enrichment media for the simultaneous recovery of Salmonella and E. coli O157 on beef hide swabs and fecal samples. 2018.
- Woodford N. Biological counterstrike: antibiotic resistance mechanisms of Gram-positive cocci. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2005; 11: 2-21.
- Hammer O, Harper DA, Ryan PD. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia electronica, 2001; 4: 1-9.
- Girgis NI, et al. Azithromycin versus ciprofloxacin for treatment of uncomplicated typhoid fever in a randomized trial in Egypt that included patients with multidrug resistance. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1999; 43: 1441-1444.
- Frenck RW, et al. Azithromycin versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of uncomplicated typhoid fever in children. Clinical infectious diseases, 2000; 31: 1134-1138.
- Nogrady N, et al. Antibiotic resistance and class 1 integron patterns of nontyphoidal human Salmonella serotypes isolated in Hungary in 2002 and 2003. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005. 26: 126-132.
- Lu Y, et al. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among Salmonella isolates from chicken in China. Foodborne pathogens and disease. 2011; 8: 45-53.
- Fernandes SA, et al. CTX-M-2–producing Salmonella Typhimurium isolated from pediatric patients and poultry in Brazil. Microbial Drug Resistance. 2009; 15: 317-321.
- Antunes P, et al. Dissemination of sulfonamide resistance genes (sul1, sul2, and sul3) in Portuguese Salmonella enterica strains and relation with integrons. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005; 49: 836-839.
- Arlet G, et al. Salmonella resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins: Prevalence and epidemiology. Microbes Infect. 2006; 8: 1945-1954.
- Sjolund-Karlsson M, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility to azithromycin among Salmonella enterica isolates from the United States. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2011; 55: 3985-3989.
- Panteix G, et al. In-vitro concentration of azithromycin in human phagocytic cells. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 1993; 31: 1-4.
- Kalonji LM, et al. Invasive Salmonella infections at multiple surveillance sites in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2011-2014. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2015; 61: S346-S353.
- Roberts MC. Update on macrolide–lincosamide–streptogramin, ketolide, and oxazolidinone resistance genes. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2008; 282: 147- 159.
- Iyer R, et al. Prevalence and trends in the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A among children in a pediatric tertiary care hospital in South India over a period of ten years: a retrospective study. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2017; 36: 2399-2404.
- Ochiai RL, et al. Salmonella paratyphi A rates, Asia. Emerging infectious diseases. 2005; 11: 1764-1766.