Vaccine against Cardiovascular Disease: Possible and Indispensable

Editorial

Austin Cardio & Cardiovasc Case Rep. 2016; 1(2): 1006.

Vaccine against Cardiovascular Disease: Possible and Indispensable

Veljkovic V*

Biomed Protection, Galveston, USA

*Corresponding author: Veljko Veljkovic, Biomed Protection, Galveston, USA

Received: June 08, 2016; Accepted: June 09, 2016; Published: June 13, 2016

Editorial

Since the 1940s Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) was the leading cause of death in the United States [1] and worldwide. Despite significant progress in therapy and prevention resulting in decline of CVD mortality rates, this trend continues. Several epidemiological studies have suggested that vaccination for seasonal influenza virus infection significantly reduces the risk of major cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome or coronary artery disease [2]. A key question is whether preventing influenza virus infection, particularly by means of influenza virus vaccination, can prevent influenza virus triggered major cardiovascular events, or if the vaccine through an independent mechanism to protect against CVD. Despite plausible evidence for beneficial effects of the vaccination against influenza in CVD patients very limited studies have been carried.

Available data suggest the lack of correlation between an effectiveness of influenza vaccine and its protective effect against CVD. So, during the influenza season 2004/2005, the vaccine effectiveness was only 10% [3] and the virulence of circulating viruses was very high [4]. Despite these unfavorable conditions, the risk for the Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) was significantly decreased in persons who received influenza virus vaccination [5]. Contrary, in the influenza season 1991/1992, which was characterized with the low virulence [6] and the vaccine effectiveness of 58% [7], incidence of MACE was very high [8]. Negative correlation between the effectiveness of influenza vaccine and cardiovascular risk suggests that influenza vaccine may act against CVD through independent pathways.

Knowing of the molecular mechanism underlying the protective effect of influenza vaccine against CVD is the key precondition for its further use as preventive intervention and development of specific CVD vaccine. Prior studies have proposed that some antibodies elicited by influenza vaccines act as agonists, which activate a bradykinin-2 receptors-associated signaling pathway contributing to the protection against CVD [9]. Activation of this pathway would be expected to induce nitric oxide production, vasodilatation, and natriuresis. Vaccine virus strains which could be suited for future investigations to further elucidate the role of influenza vaccines as primary and secondary prevention against CVD, have been also suggested [9].

Despite the fact that CVD still is the leading cause of death worldwide and a strong evidence that that vaccination for seasonal influenza virus infection significantly reduces the risk of major cardiovascular events acting as an independent protective factor against CVD, the interest of biotech industry for development of the CVD vaccine still is disappointedly low. It is hoped that this situation will be changed in the future and that significant research and financial resources will be deployed in development of vaccine against CVD. In the meantime, since there is no safe and efficient vaccine, we encourage patients with or at high risk for CVD receive their annual influenza virus vaccination.

References

  1. Harding MC, Sloan CD, Merrill1 RM, Harding TM, Thacker BJ, Thacker EL. Transition From Cardiovascular Disease to Cancer as the Leading Cause of Death in US States, 1999-2013. Circulation 2016; 133: 67.
  2. Udell JA, Zawi R, Bhatt DL, Keshtkar-Jahromi M, Gaughran F, Phrommintikul A, et al. Association between influenza vaccination and cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2013; 310: 1711-1720.
  3. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness, 2005-2015.
  4. Lai PL, Panatto D, Ansaldi F, Canepa P, Amicizia D, Patria AG, et al. Burden of the 1999-2008 seasonal influenza epidemics in Italy: comparison with the H1N1v (A/California/07/09) pandemic. Hum Vaccin. 2011; 7: 217-225.
  5. Ciszewski A, Bilinska ZT, Brydak LB, Kepka C, Kruk M, Romanowska M, et al. Influenza vaccination in secondary prevention from coronary ischaemic events in coronary artery disease: FLUCAD study. 2008; 29: 1350-1358.
  6. Kuszewski K, Brydak L. The epidemiology and history of influenza. Biomed Pharmacother. 2000; 54: 188-195.
  7. Nichol KL, Margolis KL, Wouremna J, von Sternberg T. Effectiveness of influenza vaccine in the elderly. Gerontology. 1996; 42: 274-279.
  8. Govaert TM, Thijs CT, Masurel N, Sprenger MJ, Dinant GJ, Knottnerus JA . The efficacy of influenza vaccination in elderly individuals. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. JAMA. 1994; 272: 1661-1665.
  9. Veljkovic V, Glisic S, Veljkovic N, Bojic T, Dietrich U, Perovic VR, et al. Influenza vaccine as prevention for cardiovascular diseases: possible molecular mechanism. Vaccine. 2014; 32: 6569-6575.

Download PDF

Citation: Veljkovic V. Vaccine against Cardiovascular Disease: Possible and Indispensable. Austin Cardio & Cardiovasc Case Rep. 2016; 1(2): 1006.

Home
Journal Scope
Online First
Current Issue
Editorial Board
Instruction for Authors
Submit Your Article
Contact Us