Is There a Relationship between Serum S100B Protein Level and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome?

Research Article

J Cardiovasc Disord. 2015; 2(3): 1019.

Is There a Relationship between Serum S100B Protein Level and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome?

Ekici B1*, Sahin RO2, Altinsoy M1, Açikgoz S3, Ozdemir S4, Demirtas S4 and Korkmaz FS1

1Department of Cardiology, Ufuk UniversityFaculty of Medicine, Turkey

2Department of EmergencyMedicine, Ufuk UniversityFaculty of Medicine, Turkey

3Department of Cardiology, Kavaklidere Umut Hospital, Turkey

4Department of MedicalBiochemistry, Ufuk UniversityFaculty of Medicine, Turkey

*Corresponding author: Ekici B, Ufuk University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Ankara, Turkey, MevlanaBulvari (Konya Yolu) No:86-88, 06520 Balgat – Ankara, Turkey

Received: July 22, 2015; Accepted: December 30, 2015; Published: December 31, 2015

Abstract

S100, a calgranulin family protein released from white blood cells, is involved in inflammatory cardiovascular disease. Elevated serum S100 protein levels have been reported to be associated with Coronary Artery Disease (CAD).

Objective: Our aim was to determine whether there is a relationship between serum S100B protein levels and severity and complexity of CAD in the Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS).

Methods: A total of 81 patients (aged 61.12±13.57 years,49.4% men) who were admitted to the emergency room for the evaluation of the angina pectoris were enrolled. According to the clinical statusand cardiac enzymes levels coronary an giography was performed. The serum S100B protein (S100 A1B and S100BB) levels were measured 6 hour after admission. The extent and severity of the CAD were evaluated by the Gensini score.

Results: Mean serum S100B protein values were 0.11±0.12 μg/L in the control group, 0.20±0.48 μg/L in the group with non ST segment elevation my cordial infarction, and 0.29±0.79 μg/L in the group with ST segment elevation myo-cardial infarction (p=0.267). No correlation was found between serum S100B protein andGensiniscore (p=0.093, r=0.188). However, a statistically significant positive correlation was found between serum S100B protein and sixth our oftroponin-T levels (p=0.05 r=0.253).

Conclusion: We did not determine any correlation between serum S100B protein levels and severity of CAD. Also, there was no relationship between the type of ACS and serum S100B protein values. But, the results of the S100B levels tend to increase numerically in ACS groups when compared to control group. However, serum s100B protein is positively correlated with serum troponin-T levels in ourstudy. There fore, to clarify this issue, larges calestudies are needed.

Keywords: A Cute Coronary Syndrome: Severity of Coronary Artery Disease: S100B Protein

Abbreviations

CAD: Coronary Artery Disease; ACS: Acute Coronary Syndrome; STEMI: ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction; NSTEMI: Non ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction; CK-MB: Creatine Kinase-Myocardial Band; DM: Diabetes Mellitus; HT: Hypertension; HL: Hyperlipidemia; MPV: Mean Platelet Volume

Introduction

Subgroups of the S100 Ca2+-binding protein family are associated with inflammatory disorders, and their relationship to atherosclerotic process and its complications is emerging [1-3]. S100A12 constitutes ~2–5% of neutrophil cytosolic protein and is induced in monocytes by lipopolysaccharide and TNF-α, and in macrophages by IL-6. S100A12 is a monocyte chemoattractant and activates mast cells, resulting in neutrophil and monocyte recruitment in vivo. Thus, S100A12 may modulate processes that contribute to atherogenesis [4]. Recently, S100B protein expression was found to be induced after myocardial infarction [5], and it has been proposed as a biomarker of poor prognosis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery [6] Therefore, we investigated the relationship between serum S100B protein levels and severity and complexity of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS).

Subjects and Methods

Study population

The sample was derived from a population of 132 consecutive patients who were admitted to the emergency department with chest pain. In total, 51 of them were excluded because they met the exclusion criteria (n: 35) and did not fulfill the inclusion criteria (n: 16). Finally, 81 patients were enrolled (age 61.12±13.57 (mean±SD)), including 40 men (49.4%) and 41 women subjects (50.6%). Our institutional review board approved the study, and we obtained informed consent from all individuals. All patients underwent coronary angiography. The inclusion criteria were age greater than 18 years, patients who were admitted to the hospital because of an acute myocardial infarction [ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) or Non ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI)] or severe angina pectoris, a coronary angiogram clear enough to enable evaluation, and the patient’s consent. The exclusion criteria were current pregnancy, cardiomyopathy, any history of revascularization procedures (whether percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting), congenital heart disease, and any cerebral disorders. Noninvasive stress tests (treadmill exercise test, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, and dobutamine stress echocardiography) were performed for the patients who were admitted to the emergency department with stable angina pectoris or had normal cardiac enzymes and coronary angiography was performed to the patients due to positive stress test results. The control group was identified as those with minimal CAD (Gensini score<20) or normal coronary arteries (Gensini score=0). NSTEMI patiens were identified as in group I and STEMI patients were identified as in group II.

Determining the severity of coronary artery disease

Selective coronary angiography was performed by the femoral approach using the Judkins technique and General Electric In nova 3100 angiographic system (Buc Cedex, France). Multiple views were obtained, with visualization of the left anterior descending and left circumflex coronary artery in at least 4 projections, and the right coronary artery in at least 2 projections. Coronary angiograms were recorded on compact discs in DICOM format. All angiograms were analyzed by two cardiologists blinded to the clinical data. The extent and severity of the CAD were evaluated according to the Gensini score. In this scoring system, a severity score is derived for each coronary stenosis based on the degree of luminal narrowing and its topographic importance. Reduction in the lumen diameter and the roentgenographic appearance of concentric lesions and eccentric plaques are evaluated [7].

Biochemical analyzes

A complete blood count and biochemical examination were performed in all patients at the administration using a vacuum tube. Troponin-T levels and creatine kinase-myocardial band (CKMB) levels were repeated after 6 hours. Serum S100B (S100 A1B and S100BB) testing was performed using the Roche Elecsys® 2010, S100 reagent kit 6 hour after admission (assay duration 18 minutes, measuring range 0.005–39 μg/L, cross reactivity against S100 < 1%). After centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 15 minute, plasma aliquots were stored at -80°C until analyses. Serum S100B protein, CK-MB, and troponin-T levels were assessed by the principles of electro-chemilum inescence immunoassay.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed with the IBM SPSS Statistics 21 for Windows. The normal distribution of variables was verified with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. We used to Kruskal-Wallis test to account for the differences among the groups (Table 1), but in order to analyze the specific sample pairs for significant differences, we used Conover- Inman test (Table 2). Spearman’s rho test was used in order to detect whether there was a correlation among the independent variables. A chi square (X2) test was used to investigate whether distributions of categorical variables differed within groups. Patients’ characteristics are summarized as mean±SD or as percentages. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.