Microsurgical Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Report of a Series of Cases in a Single Cuban Hospital

Case Report

Austin J Clin Case Rep. 2018; 5(2): 1132.

Microsurgical Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Report of a Series of Cases in a Single Cuban Hospital

Angel Jesus Lacerda Gallardo*

Doctor of Medical Science, Titular Professor, Titular Investigator. Diploma in Adult Intensive Care. Member of the Vascular Surgery Chamber of the Cuban Society of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Cuba

*Corresponding author: Dr. C. Angel Jesus Lacerda Gallardo, Professor of Neurosurgery, Roberto Rodríguez Hospital, Morón, Ciego de Ávila, Cuba

Received: April 30, 2018; Accepted: June 05, 2018; Published: June 21, 2018

Abstract

Introduction: Over various decades, microsurgery has been the most used method for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, but in the beginning of 90s, the improvement in endovascular treatment technique informed by Guglielmi, and after that, the improvement of materials used for the obliteration represented a new era in the treatment of these patients and a controversy for the search of an ideal method which is maintained till nowadays.

Method: A descriptive study was done with all the patients admitted in the neurosurgery department of Roberto Rodriguez hospital in Moron, Ciego de Avila, Cuba, who presented the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysm and were intervened with the microsurgical technique, excluding the aneurysm from circulation, in the period between January of 1997 and December of 2016.

Results: 170 patients were studied, of which 167 (98.24%) were found with aneurysms in the anterior circulation and only 3 (1.76%) in the posterior circulation. A total of 210 aneurismal sacs were intervened, of which 133 (63.33%) were ruptured and 77 (36.67%) were not ruptured. A 74.11% of cases recovered without any type of symptoms or sequelae and the mortality was of 1.76%.

Conclusions: The microsurgery is a procedure with high rate of efficiency for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in our setting, till when another treatment method can be implemented, such as the endovascular treatment method which is widely used in the world

Keywords: Intracranial aneurysms; Microsurgery; Treatment

Introduction

It is calculated that the risk of suffering from intracranial aneurysm for human being is 1 to 2% [1], 80% of patients with intracranial aneurysms present with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), which incidence varies considerably from one geographical area to another, it is estimated at 2 cases among 100000 habitants in China and 22.5/100000 in Finland [2]. In USA 14.5/100000 admissions were reported due to this cause in the year 2003 [3].

The principal objective of intracranial aneurysm treatment is to exclude the aneurysm from the circulation; this can be achieved through two ways, microsurgical treatment or endovascular obliteration.

During various decades microsurgery has been the most used method, but in the beginning of 90s, the improvement in endovascular treatment technique informed by Guglielmi, and after that, the improvement of materials used for the obliteration, represented a new era in the treatment of these patients and a controversy for the search of an ideal method, which is maintained till nowadays [4-6].

The International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) [4], was published in 2002. In that trial, the coil-treated cohort had better clinical outcomes after 1 year of follow-up compared with patients who had undergone surgical clipping. However, concerns have persisted regarding the applicability of ISAT, which excluded almost 80% of eligible aneurysms from the study population. The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial (BRAT) was published in 2013 [5], in that study the outcomes of all patients assigned to coil embolization showed a favorable 5.8% absolute difference compared with outcomes of those assigned to clip occlusion, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.25). Patients in the clip group had a significantly higher degree of aneurysm obliteration and a significantly lower rate of recurrence and retreatment. In post hoc analysis examining only anterior circulation aneurysms, no outcome difference between the 2 treatment cohorts was observed at any recorded time point.

In the year 2017, Bender, et al. [6] published an article in which they revised a database that had information about the patients that were admitted due to SAH during the time between the year 1991 and 2016, with 1306 patients obtainable among 1562 who suffered from the disease, in which it is found that 72% of the cases were treated with microsurgery, 22% of the patients were treated with endovascular treatment and 5.7% were not treated. Also it is revealed that there is an exponential increment per quinquennium of the latter procedure with its percentage reaching 41.9% between the years 2012 and 2016, which shows that many neurosurgeons prefer the endovascular modality. However, an assay that was published recently, in which 104 patients with the diagnosis of aneurysms that were not ruptured were studied, 48 were treated with microsurgery and 56 with the endovascular technique, the study concluded that there were no significant differences when it comes to morbidity and mortality as both procedures are compared [7].

The objective of the current report is to spread the experience acquired for more than 20 years by the neurosurgery department of the Roberto Rodriguez provincial hospital with the use of microsurgical obliteration of intracranial aneurysms.

Method

This is a descriptive study that includes all the patients admitted to the neurosurgery department, that presented a diagnosis of intracranial aneurism and who were intervened with the microsurgery technique in order to exclude the aneurysms from the circulation, in the period between January 1997 and December 2016.

On their arrival at the emergency department, all the patients were treated according to the designated algorithms for the treatment of hemorrhagic cerebrovascular disease in the hospital and were admitted to the critical care units (Intermediate care and intensive care units), depending on their neurologic state at the moment of admission, determined using the Word Federation of Neurologic Surgeons (WFNS) scale [8] and the Intracerebral Hemorrhage Score (ICH score) in case if it was accompanied by the intraparenchymal hemorrhage [9].

To all the patients, the vascular opacification imaging investigations through cerebral angiography of four vessels, Multi slice-Angio- Computerized axial tomography (Multi slice Angio-CT) or Angio magnetic resonance imaging were done. The results were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team made of at least two specialists in neurosurgery and one specialist in neuroradiology. The presence of at least one aneurysm was considered an essential condition to decide the surgical treatment. The surgical timing depended completely on this condition.

The information was obtained from the questionnaire and clinical files and passed to a database created by the author using the 15th version of Windows SPSS system.

The considered variables were: Age: which was divided in groups of 18-30 years, 31-50, 51-60 and more than 60 years. Sex: Male or Female. Skin color: Whites, blacks, mixed race and brown. Provenance: The cases were divided in nine categories depending on the municipality of the province from which they came. Clinical state on admission: Was determined using the WFNS scale [8]. On admission and follow up results of neurological imaging. Through the simple brain CT scan on admission and subsequent investigations, the presence of intracranial blood was evaluated, according to the classification of Columbia (Fisher’s modified) [10]. Vascular opacification imaging: The aneurismal sacs were classified in micro aneurysms, small aneurysms, median aneurysms, big aneurysms and gigantic ones, also were divided according to their number in unique and multiple aneurysms, and distributed according to their localization, the ones in the anterior segment and posterior segment of the Willis’ circle. Complications: Were divided into preoperatories, Tran’s operatories and post operatories. Results: Were evaluated using the modified Rankin scale for the results [10]. Some variables were correlated in order to get to more precise conclusions.

The non parametric Chi square goodness of fit test is used to evaluate the hypothesis about the relationship between the two variables. The values of p=0.05 are considered to be significant. The results are expressed in figures so that they can be well analyzed and comprehended.

Results

170 patients were studied of which 167 (98.24%) had aneurysms in the anterior circulation and only 3 (1.76%) had in the posterior circulation. A total of 210 aneurismal sacs were handled, of which 133 (63.33%) were ruptured and 77 (36.64%) were not ruptured. The general characteristics of the sample are shown in Table 1.