The Influence of Magnetic Resonance on the Microstructure and Shear Bond Strength of Silver Palladium Dental Alloy and Feldspathic Porcelain

Research Article

J Dent App.2016; 3(1): 297-302.

The Influence of Magnetic Resonance on the Microstructure and Shear Bond Strength of Silver Palladium Dental Alloy and Feldspathic Porcelain

Sakrana AA¹*, El-Bediwi AB², Al-Ragaei D² and Özcan M³

¹Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Egypt

²Metal Physics Laboratory, Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Egypt

³Dental Materials Unit, University of Zurich, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science, Switzerland

*Corresponding author: Amal Abdelsamad Sakrana, Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

Received: February 17, 2016; Accepted: March 18, 2016; Published: March 21, 2016

Abstract

Chipping and delaminating of veneering ceramics of metal-ceramic restorations are the long dilemma for the patients and dentists. Therefore, this study aimed to detect the effect of Magnetic Resonance Imagining (MRI) signals on the microstructure and mechanical properties of silver-palladium dental alloys and its bond strength to ceramic veneer.

Materials and Methods: 60 self-cured acrylic resin discs (15 X 1 mm) used to prepare silver-palladium specimens. The specimens were airborne abraded with 110 μm Al2O3 then cleaned for 3 minutes and divided into two groups. The first group (N=30) was used for Vickers hardness test, X-ray diffraction analysis and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) for microstructure evaluation of metal specimens without MRI exposure and after 15 and 30 minutes exposure. Ceramic veneer was applied to the second group (N=30) then were subjected to 6000 thermocycles in distilled water between 5°C and 55°C. The veneered alloy specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups according to MRI exposure time; no exposure (control), 15 and 30 minutes. The specimens were subjected to continuous shear loading till failure. One way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the mean of variables at different MRI exposure times.

Results: Increasing exposure time to MRI for 30 minutes significantly decreased the shear bond strength (20.74±0.31) compared to the control group (33.51±0.25). Vickers hardness of silver-palladium alloy was significantly decreased after 30 minutes MRI exposure compared to control group (334.66±0.28 and 233.13±0.36), respectively. SEM analysis showed a considerable changes after MRI exposure that proved by the X-ray diffraction analysis.

Conclusion: Shielding of silver-palladium metal-ceramic restorations with non magnetic material is recommended before exposure to MRI signals.

Keywords: Silver-palladium; Magnetic resonance imaging; Shear bond strength; Dental ceramic

Introduction

Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) is a non-invasive medical device because it does not use ionizing radiation (X-Ray) [1]. It provides a high resolution image that helps physicians to diagnose and treat medical conditions. MRI is widely used in dentistry as a standard assessment of TMJ disorder and in the oral and maxillofacial field [2-3]. Recently, it is applied for endodontic treatment to obtain the correct and precise topographical images of the root canals and carry out precise mapping of the shape of dental cavities. MRI can be used to visualize the dental surface geometry of decayed teeth and distinguish between soft tissue “pulp” and mineralized tissues enamel, dentine, and root cement [4-5]. Bracher et al. [6] reported that the effectiveness of ultra-shot echo time MRI in caries assessment.

Nowadays different dental alloys have been widely used in fixed prosthodontics, complete denture, removable partial denture and dental implants. Tayamaet et al. [7] suggested that periodical evaluation of these materials using MRI is a very essential method of investigation. Taking MRI images while these alloys exists within human body represent a problem, since they induce heating and magnetic field interactions which lead to artifacts and misrepresentation [8]. Chen et al. [9] reported that metal-ceramic crowns caused moderate artifacts in the MRI and could influence the diagnostic interpretation of MRI locally. There is also possibility of changing the implant orientation, failure of magnets used in over dentures and magnetic keepers and deflection of orthodontic wires are possible. Moreover, minute fracture or crack at surface of the fixed prostheses and dislodgement may happen [10].

Most of previous researches focused on the artifacts happened from dental materials. However, El Bediwi et al. [11-12] studied the effect MRI on the microstructure and physical properties of Ni-Cr, Co-Cr dental alloys and pure dental titanum. The effect of MRI on the shear bond strength of Ni-Cr dental alloy and commercial pure titanium to feldspathic dental porcelain after exposure to MRI signals were also evaluated. There are significant effects were recorded but there is lack of research work in this area.

Metal ceramic prosthesis recorded many advantages during their application for improving clinical performances and mechanical properties. Among the variety of metal ceramic dental alloys, silverpalladium alloys that developed by Heraeus Kulzer in 1931 [13], which contain little or no gold, a minimum of 25% palladium and its properties are similar to type III gold. These alloys offer a suitable alternative to gold alloys and far less costly than gold alloys. On the other hand, they have high sagging resistance during porcelain firing and are very rigid so they are good for long span bridge. They are also easier to solder and easier to work than the base metal alloys [14].

MRI safety and the biocompatibility of dental alloys must be considered before an MRI procedure [15]. Effect of MRI on the microstructure and physical properties of dental materials that have been recently developed and introduced to the dental market were not investigated. It is interesting to evaluate the effect of MRI on the microstructure and physical properties of silver-palladium dental alloys. Moreover, the shear bond strength between silver-palladium alloy and veneering ceramic. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of MRI signals on the microstructure, mechanical properties and metal ceramic adhesion of commercial silverpalladium alloy. X-ray diffraction pattern analysis, Vickers hardness test, shear bond strength test and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) were used for these evaluations. Moreover, hardness of veneered ceramic was also evaluated at the same exposure times.

Materials and Methods

Specimen preparation

Sixty self-cured acrylic resin discs (DuraLay, Reliance Dental Manufacturing Co., Worth, IL, USA), 1 mm in thickness and 15 mm in diameter were prepared in a split cylindrical stainless steel mold. The material was inserted into the mold and covered with a glass plate in order to obtain a flat surface. After complete curing, the discs were removed from the mold, attached to the wax sprue and invested with investment material (Castrate® all speed, Dent aurum, Germany) then burnout in furnace (Vulcan 3-1750, Dentsply, USA). Casting was done using Silver Palladium Universal alloy (BioUniversal® E, IvoclarVivadent, USA). After divesting, the metal specimens were airborne-particle abraded with 110 μm Al2O3 powder (Korox 110, BEGO, Germany) under 30 pounds of air pressure. using (Zhermack®, Technical, S24R, Zhermack Sp, Badia Polesine (RO), Italy). Before ceramic veneering, the metal specimens were once more airborne-particle abraded with 110 μm Al2O3 powder for 10 seconds, at a distance of 2 cm under pressure 60 psi and with an angle of 45 degrees. Then the metal specimens were cleaned ultrasonically in (JELENKO, Germany) with distilled water followed by isopropyl alcohol for 3 minutes each.

Sixty discs were randomly divided into two groups. The first group (N=30) metal discs used for microstructure evaluation, Vickers hardness test and X-ray diffraction analysis. These evaluations were done without exposure to MRI signals as control specimens and after exposure to MRI signals (1.5 T MR scanner) for 15 and 30 minutes. Ceramic veneer was applied to the second group of metal discs (N=30).

Ceramic layer application

Two layers of opaque ceramic (VITA VM®13, VITA Zahnfabrik, Säckingen, Germany) (total thickness: 0.2 mm) were applied with a thin brush onto the air abraded metallic surface by the same operator for standardization. Each layer was fired into furnace (Programat P500/G2, Ivoclar Vivadent AG Bendererstr, Liechtenstein) according to manufacture’`1s direction and the thickness of the opaque layer was carefully measured using a digital caliper (StarrettR 727, Starrett, and Itu, Brazil).

A specially designed split Teflon mold (6 mm in diameter and 4 mm in thickness) was used to apply veneering ceramic onto metal disc, this mold was fabricated with a circular area on one side and the other side has a centralized area for the metal surface to be adapted to create a standardized area for the ceramic application over the center of each disc. Firing of the veneering ceramics was accomplished and second firing was performed to compensate the sintering contraction of the ceramics. The veneered specimens were subjected to 6000 thermocycles in distilled water between 5°C and 55°C then randomly assigned to three groups according to exposure time to MRI nonionizing radio frequency (RF) (1.5 T, Magnetom Vision, Siemens, Germany): a) no MRI exposure (control group), b) 15 minutes of MRI exposure, and c) 30 minutes of MRI exposure.

Ceramic specimen preparation for microhardness

To study the effect of MRI signals on the hardness of veneered ceramic without metal substrate. 30 disc specimens (6 mm in diameter and 4 mm in thickness) were prepared from ceramic (VITA VM®13, VITA Zahnfabrik, and Säckingen, Germany) according to manufacturer’s direction in stainless steel split mold. All specimens were fired in a programmable and calibrated porcelain furnace and the entire specimens were glazed then fired. Specimens were randomly assigned to three groups according to MRI exposure time; no exposure, 15 and 30 minutes.

The tested groups (N=10 each) are distributed as the followings;

Metal (M), Metal-Ceramic (MC) and Ceramic (C)

Group (M1): Control (no exposure to MRI signals).

Group (M2): Specimens were subjected to MRI signals for 15 minutes.

Group (M3): Specimens were subjected to MRI signals for 30 minutes.

Group (MC1): Control (no exposure to MRI signals).

Group (MC2): Specimens were subjected to MRI signals for 15 minutes.

Group (MC3): Specimens were subjected to MRI signals for 30 minutes.

Group (C1): Control (no exposure to MRI signal).

Group (C2): Specimens were subjected to MRI signals for 15 minutes.

Group (C3): Specimens were subjected to MRI signals for 30 minutes.

The direction of the applied magnetic field was normal to the longitudinal direction of the specimen.

X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD)

Microstructure analysis of each specimen was performed on the flat surface of all metal specimens using X–ray diffractometer (Dx–30, Shimadzu, Japan) of Cu–Ka radiation with l=1.54056 Å at 45 kV and 35 mA and Ni–filter in the angular range 2q ranging from 0 to 90° in continuous mode with a scan speed 5 degree/min.

Vickers hardness test

Microhardness test was conducted for each specimens using digital Vickers microhardness (Model FM–7, Tokyo, Japan), with a load of 100 g for 5 seconds via a Vickers diamond pyramid. Each microhardness value quoted is the average of five indentations.

Scanning electron microscope evaluation

The metal specimens were prepared for SEM examination using (JSM-6510 LV, JEOL Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) at 20 kv.

Shear bond strength testing

Each metal ceramic specimen was embedded in self-cured acrylic resin (Acrostone, USA) inside a plastic ring (25 mm in diameter and 20 mm height). Shear bond strength test was carried out at room temperature and performed in a universal testing machine (Lloyd Model TT-B, Instron Corp., Canton, MA, USA). The specimens were mounted in a V-shaped holding device and sheared with a 30° mono beveled chisel edged blade which was aligned 0.1 mm away from the bonded interface. The bonded porcelain specimens were placed under sustained, continuous loading with 25 KN capacities and under a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/s at 0.5 mm/min until fracture occurred. The shear bond strength (MPa) was calculated by dividing the fracture load (F) in Newton by the surface area (A) in mm2.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 11.0 software for windows (SPSS; Chicago, IL, USA). One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the mean of variables at different MRI exposure time. P-values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant in all tests.

Results

Shear bond strength

Means and standard deviations of the shear bond strength of the tested specimens were shown in (Table 1), MRI exposure for 30 minutes significantly decreased the shear bond strength of ceramic/ silver-palladium interface (20.74±0.31 MPa) compared to the control specimens (no MRI exposure) (33.51±0.25 MPa).