Research Article

Austin J Earth Sci. 2021; 4(1): 1023.

# Extended Elastic Impedance Inversion for Better Delineation of Gasbearing Sand Reservoir, Saffron Gas Field, Offshore Nile Delta, Egypt

Ali A. S.²*, Othman AAA¹, Ali MF¹ and Metwally F³

¹Geology Department, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt

²Qarun Petroleum Company, Cairo, Egypt

***Corresponding author: **Ahmed Saied Ali, Qarun
Petroleum Company, 1 street No. 315, New Maadi, Cairo
1160, Egypt

**Received: **March 09, 2021; **Accepted: **April 08, 2021; **Published: **April 15, 2021

## Abstract

Extended Elastic Impedance (EEI) is a very useful seismic reconnaissance attribute. EEI logs can directly correspond to the petrophysical properties of the reservoir and the seismic. EEI reflectivity volumes can be obtained directly from the pre-stack seismic data. Better discrimination between the seismic anomaly caused by either lithology or fluid content can be utilized by applying this approach.

The concept of extended elastic impedance is used to derive the petrophysical properties and distribute the reservoir facies. The study area was a Pliocene gas field, that lies in the deep marine, Offshore Nile Delta, Egypt. The workflow is simple, efficient, and uses very few inputs. We started with the fluid/ lithology logs and investigated the optimum projection in the intercept/gradient domain. Then, we used the conditioned angle stacks, to calculate the intercept/ gradient volumes, using Shuey’s two-term Approximation. The intercept and gradient volumes are converted directly to the fluid and lithology 3D volumes, without any of the pre-stack inversion constraints. The outputs were tested using a blind well and the correlation exceeds 80%. The results show that the EEI is a worthy effort to highlight the difference between the reservoir and nonreservoir sections, to identify the hydrocarbon area.

**Keywords:** Extended Elastic impedance; Seismic inversion; Wwater saturation, Saffron field, Nile delta

## Introduction

The area of interest includes Saffron field, which lies in the West Delta Deep Marine (WDDM) concession, 60-120 km offshore in the deepwater of the present-day Nile Delta [1] (Figure 1). Saffron field is a Pliocene submarine delta slope canyon system, with complex turbiditic channel-levee reservoirs [2].

**Figure 1:**Location map of the Saffron field (in yellow) in the West delta deep marine concession WDDM (in red) (modified from Google Earth).

Figure 1:Location map of the Saffron field (in yellow) in the West delta deep marine concession WDDM (in red) (modified from Google Earth).

The Nile Delta lies within the unstable shelf, which is characterized by a thick sedimentary section covering the high basement relief due to block faulting. It is affected by minor compression folds trending (NNE-SSW) which is related to the Laramide phase of the Alpine Orogeny. The sedimentary succession of the Nile Delta is characterized by the cyclicity that began in the Miocene time with a very thick section of Late Tertiary-Quaternary sediments indicating a rapid and continuous deposition in a subsiding basin. This section consists mainly of shale with thin sandstone intercalations (Figure 2).

**Figure 2:**Stratigraphic succession of the Nile Delta and the hydrocarbon system for the main fields. Modified from [3].

Figure 2:Stratigraphic succession of the Nile Delta and the hydrocarbon system for the main fields. Modified from [3].

Saffron field was discovered by the Saffron-1 exploration well in 1998 by BG and appraised by Saffron-2.

The reservoir consists of a succession of sandstones and mudstones, organized into a composite upward-fining profile. Sand bodies include laterally amalgamated channels, sinuous channels, channels with frontal splays, and leveed channels, and are interpreted to be the products of deepwater gravity-flow processes [2]. The Saffron channel system is oriented NNWSSE to N W-SE (Figure 3) and its width ranges from 5 km to 10 km and is approximately 25 km in length. There are almost 40 m of pay gas sand, out of 150 m gross thickness of the reservoir, with an average porosity of 25% and an average Sw of 37%.

**Figure 3:**Reflector strength attribute extracted below the top of the channel and illustrates the orientation of the channel and the available well data.

Figure 3:Reflector strength attribute extracted below the top of the channel and illustrates the orientation of the channel and the available well data.

## Methodology

The available data are classified into well logs and pre-stack 3D seismic volume data. The obtained well logs include Gamma-Ray
(GR), Resistivity (Rt), P-wave velocity (V_{P}), S-wave velocity (V_{S}), and
density (p) logs, in addition to the calculated Petrophysical logs which
are water saturation (Sw), and shale volume (v_{shale}) logs. three wells
will be involved in this study, and another one will be used as a blind
QC well. Figure 4 illustrates an example of our data.

**Figure 4:**Extended Elastic impedance workflow Othman et al., [3].

Figure 4:Extended Elastic impedance workflow Othman et al., [3].

The Workflow for the Extended Elastic Impedance (EEI) is shown in (Figure 3). The first step is to load and QC input 3D seismic data and water saturation logs, then perform EEI log correlation at each well to determine the best chi angle at which we got an optimal correlation of EEI log and the Sw log. Figure 4 shows that the high correlation for Sw is associated with approximately specific chi for all wells and the average correlation is 80% observed at a chi angle of approximately 28°. Conditioning the seismic data should be applied carefully, to give a meaningful result. After conditioning, first, we created the intercept and gradient volumes, applying the two-term AkiRichard approximation, because there is no wide-angle range. Second, we created a reflectivity volume at the chi angle, that obtained previously from the well data, by applying the following equation:

*R _{s}*=

*Acosx*+

*Bsinx*

where R_{s} is the scaled reflectivity, A is the intercept, B is the gradient and x: is the chi angle.

Third, we estimated the wavelet from the created reflectivity volume, before creating the synthetic trace, to make a well-to-seismic tie at the optimized chi angle, with the corresponding trace at the reflectivity volume, which is considered as a good measure of the wavelet and chi angle estimations. Then, we built an initial model, using the EEI logs created at angle 28° to invert that volume, to get a 3D cube for the water saturation property distribution for the reservoir.

## Results

For QC purposes, we kept one well away in our study, to use it as a QC well for the results. The blind well is SaffronDf, which lies to the south of the study area. The correlation coefficient between the actual Sw log and the calculated water saturation is 0.71, we compared the results of the 3D water saturation volume at the blind well location as can be seen in Figure 5, where the distribution of the saturation will give an insight to the charged sand bodies (Figure 6 and 7).

**Figure 5:**Illustrates the correlation coefficients between the Sw curve and EEI log, for a range of values of χ, the highest correlation occurs at χ=28°, is 88% at Saffron –Dp while the lowest correlation is 72% at Saffron-2, and 80% and 75% at Saffron-1 and saffron –Dn, respectively.

Figure 5:Illustrates the correlation coefficients between the Sw curve and EEI log, for a range of values of χ, the highest correlation occurs at χ=28°, is 88% at Saffron –Dp while the lowest correlation is 72% at Saffron-2, and 80% and 75% at Saffron-1 and saffron –Dn, respectively.

**Figure 6:**Seismic section passing through the resulted EEI at χ=28° volume of (Sw), as comparing its results to the calculated Sw log at the blind well.

Figure 6:Seismic section passing through the resulted EEI at χ=28° volume of (Sw), as comparing its results to the calculated Sw log at the blind well.

**Figure 7:**Minimum Amplitude extraction on reservoir zone on Sw impedance volume showing the distribution of the gas saturation.

Figure 7:Minimum Amplitude extraction on reservoir zone on Sw impedance volume showing the distribution of the gas saturation.

## Conclusion

Saffron field has a complex largely channelized fill, with multiple phases of re-incision, and was probably active over a considerable period. The Extended Elastic Impedance (EEI) has successfully predicted the 3D volume of water saturation, which is considered as one of the required elements for reservoir modeling.

The EEI workflow was straightforward and non-complicated, which starts with identifying the Chi angle that corresponds to the water saturation, to produce reflectivity volume of the property. The last step is to invert the latter volume into the required petrophysical property (Sw). Results show a good correlation to the actual saturation, which encourages to be applied on the same slope channel systems of clastic reservoirs.

## Acknowledgment

The authors thank the Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation (EGPC) and Rashid Petroleum Company (RASHPETCO) for permission to publish this study and for providing the data.

## References

- Mohamed IA, Shenkar O, Mahmoud H. Understanding reservoir heterogeneity through water-saturation prediction via neural network-A case study from offshore Nile Delta: The Leading Edge. 2017; 36: 298-303.
- Cross NE, Cunningham A, Cook RJ, Taha A, Esmaie E, Swidan NE. Threedimensional seismic geomorphology of a deep-water slope-channel system: The Sequoia field, offshore West Nile Delta, Egypt: AAPG Bulletin. 2009; 93: 1063-1086.
- Rio D, Sprovieri R, Thunell R. Pliocene-lower Pleistocene chronostratigraphy: A reevaluation of Mediterranean type sections. GSA Bull. 1991; 93: 1049- 1058.