Raising the Bar When Assessing Cardiovascular Disease Outcome When Studies with Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus are Constructed: Revisiting ASCEND

Review Article

Austin J Endocrinol Diabetes. 2021; 8(2): 1083.

Raising the Bar When Assessing Cardiovascular Disease Outcome When Studies with Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus are Constructed: Revisiting ASCEND

Nashawi M¹*, Ahmed MS¹, Jarrar Y¹, Abualfoul M², Issa O³ and Chilton R¹

1Department of Medicine-Cardiology, UT Health San Antonio, Texas

2Department of Internal Medicine, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Texas

3Department of Biology, The University of Texas at Arlington, Texas

*Corresponding author: Mouhamed Nashawi, Department of Medicine, MC 7870 UT Health San Antonio 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., San Antonio-78229-3900, Texas

Received: April 03, 2021; Accepted: May 01, 2021; Published: May 08, 2021

Abstract

The emergence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) as a clinical syndrome deviating from rudimentary models including “glucose-insulin” disparities to a clinical syndrome impinged upon hyperactivation of inflammatory-mediated signaling pathways, maladaptive pathophysiological changes, and pleiotropic sequelae has not only changed the nature of discussions regarding diabetes in academic circles, but also the treatment of T2DM clinically. The new challenges faced in preventing the advancement of T2DM coupled with the management of associated chronic disease states have impelled avenues for innovative treatments for T2DM sequelae while also ensuring glycemic control. For example, Sodium-Glucose Transport 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist (GLP-1RA), in addition to passing mandated Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Cardiovascular Outcome Trials (CVOT), have displayed positive outcomes with respect to cardiorenal considerations in patients with T2DM. Such performances have recently elevated these pleiotropic medications to higher tiers of recommendations by medical societies such as the American Diabetes Association and the American College of Cardiology. Moreover, the tandem of the notion that pleiotropic pharmacotherapeutic options with an expanded understanding of T2DM on the epigenetic, molecular, and cellular domains have galvanized researchers to explore pharmacologic mechanisms in the context of our ever-changing model in T2DM. In this communication, we would like to use lessons from the “Effects of aspirin for primary prevention in persons with diabetes mellitus” (ASCEND) trial to implore aspiring researchers and practitioners to explore, or at least consider external factors of the T2DM patient populous when reporting findings of cardiovascular clinical endpoints for proper context.

Keywords: Ascend; Statin; T2dm; Aspirin; Vascular; Mace; Heart; Cardiovascular

Background

The intimate association between uncontrolled T2DM and macrovascular complications culminating in Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) has been well studied. Evidence for this can be appreciated in a longitudinal study of 29,863 patients (5,501 diagnosed with T2DM and 24,632 control patients). In this study, a statistically significant relative risk afflicting T2DM patients was shown, elucidating a 1.10, 1.53, 1.58, and 2.12 fold increase for lifetime disease burden of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Myocardial Infarction (MI), stroke, and Heart Failure (HF), respectively [1,2]. A substantial amount of disease burden associated with cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality occurs by why of deficits in vascular biology, which are compromised across multiple axes in T2DM [3]. These deficits in vascular biology have deleterious ramifications such as the mitigation of oxygen flux (with consequences in tissue metabolism and subsequent maladaptive phenotype acquisition), serving the role as the nidus for atherosclerosis with concomitant complications (coronary artery disease or CAD, stroke, etc.), or hypertension [4-8]. All of the latter are implicated in one form in another in the cardiovascular deficits studied by Straka et al. A visual reference to illustrate the importance of the vasculature as the interface of cardiovascular disease can be found in Figure 1.

Citation: Nashawi M, Ahmed MS, Jarrar Y, Abualfoul M, Issa O and Chilton R. Raising the Bar When Assessing Cardiovascular Disease Outcome When Studies with Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus are Constructed: Revisiting ASCEND. Austin J Endocrinol Diabetes. 2021; 8(2): 1083.