Austin J Gastroenterol. 2014;1(2): 1010.
Srinivas R Puli1*, Nikhil R Kalva2, Smitha R Pamulaparthy1, Matthew L Bechtold4, Micheal D Cashman1, Fritz-Henry Volmar1, Sonu Dhillon1, Michael F Shekleton1, Norman C Estes
1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, USA
2Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine, USA
3Department of Surgery, University of Illinois, USA
4Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri-Columbia, USA
5Department of Digestive Diseases, Beth Israel Medical Center, USA
*Corresponding author: :Srinivas R Puli, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of llinois Peoria, IL 61614, USA
Received: July 13, 2014; Accepted: July 23, 2014; Published: July 25, 2014
Background: Metallic or plastic stents are used for palliating inoperable malignant hilar obstruction. It is unclear if there is a difference between metallic versus plastic stenting in these patients.
Aim: To compare metallic and plastic stents for malignant hilar obstruction.
Method: Study Selection Criteria: Studies using metallic or plastic stents for stenting of malignant hilar obstruction were selected.
Data collection & extraction: Articles were searched in Medline, Pubmed, Ovid journals, CINAH, International pharmaceutical abstracts, old Medline, Medline non indexed citations, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials & Database of Systematic Reviews. Two reviewers independently searched and extracted data. Any differences were resolved by mutual agreement.
Statistical Method: Pooled proportions were calculated using both Mantel- Haenszel method (fixed effects model) and DerSimonian Laird method (random effects model).
Results: 1630 reference was identified, of which 159 relevant articles were selected and reviewed. 8 studies (N=575) for unilateral metallic stents, 7 studies (N=850) for unilateral plastic stents, 13 studies (N=340) for bilateral metallic stents and 8 studies (N=367) for bilateral plastic stents which met the inclusion criteria were included in this analysis. Pooled data are shown in Table 1 and 2. The pooled estimates calculated by fixed and random effect models were similar. The p for chi-squared heterogeneity for all the pooled accuracy estimates was > 0.10.
Conclusion: For unilateral stenting, metallic stents have lower complication rate and cholangitis when compared to plastic stents. Metallic stents have a higher mean survival, patency rate, and 30 day mortality. For unilateral stenting in malignant hilar obstruction, metallic stents are superior to plastic stents. For bilateral stenting, metallic stents have lower complication rate and early cholangitis when compared to plastic stents. Metallic stents have a higher mean survival, patency rate, and 30 day mortality. For bilateral stenting in hilar malignant obstruction, metal stents are superior to plastic stents.
Keywords: Plastic Stent; Metal Stent; Cholangiocarcinoma; Hilar; Meta-analysis; Systematic Review
This meta-analysis and systematic review was written in accordance with the proposal for reporting by the QUOROM (Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses) statement . The study design for this meta-analysis and systematic review conformed to the guidelines of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative .
Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor) is a malignant neoplasm arising from the epithelial lining of the biliary tree, near the confluence of the right and left hepatic duct. The tumor histology is that of adenocarcinoma in > 90% of the confirmed cases. The overall incidence is about 3000 new cases each year in the United States as noted in the data base registries Surveillance Epidemiology End Results, SEER . The incidence for extra hepatic cholangiocarcinoma has remained unchanged over the last few years despite the increase in the incidence of intra hepatic cholangiocarcinomas [4,3].
Clinical presentation of hilar obstruction includes painless jaundice with purities, dark urine and stools. The risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma include conditions that predispose to chronic biliary inflammation and cholestasis, which eventually promote malignant transformation. In the US and Europe, primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is the major risk factor followed by congenital biliary disorders such as choledocyal cysts and biliary atresia. The cumulative prevalence of cholangiocarcinoma among patients with PSC ranges between 5-15% among various series  and is independent to the duration of the illness with the highest incidence within the first 2 years of diagnosis. Elsewhere, in the Far East Asia (Thailand) Liver flukes namely Opisthorchis viverrini and Clonorchissinensis are associated with cholangiocarcinoma. The relative risk of Cholangiocarcinoma is 4.8 when it is associated with liver flukes . Thorotrast, a 25 % colloid solution of thorium dioxide (ThO2), which was used as contrast agent, is also strongly associated with cholangiocarcinoma. It has radio nucleotide property with half-life of 14 billion years. It deposits in various tissues resulting in prolonged Alfa radiation exposure resulting in cirrhosis and cholangiocarcinoma . Despite many known risk factors, a specific identifiable risk factor may not be known in many individuals at diagnosis.
Cholangiocarcinoma has grave prognosis and surgical resection with or without liver transplantation offers the only long-term clear survival benefit when detected at an early stage. Predictors of long-term survival include lower tumor stage, clear margins, absent lymph node disease, no loca-regional invasion or distant metastasis . Palliation in late or unresectable stage is to minimize symptoms related to cholestasis (intense jaundice and purities), minimizing cholangitis and relief of pain with or without additional adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
The options of optimal palliation for obstructive jaundice depend on the local expertise and can include surgical bypass and stenting either endoscopic or percutaneous. Head to head comparison of surgical bypass versus endoscopic stenting showed significantly lower early major complications and procedure related mortality, though there was no clear long term survival advantage favoring endoscopic palliation . When percutaneous stenting is compared to endoscopic bile duct decompression, the evidence is conflicting with discordant results with one showing benefit from endoscopic approach  and the other favoring percutaneous approach . In general, most centers resort to percutaneous biliary decompression with stenting second only to endoscopic stenting due to quality of life issues.
There are many variables that are considered in optimizing endoscopic palliation taking into account the disease stage and extension, type of stent (plastic or metal) and unilateral versus bilateral stenting is better. However, negotiating hilar obstruction is quite challenging when compared to distal biliary obstruction and should ideally be performed by endoscopists with significant case volume and expertise to achieve acceptable results . There is still no consensus regarding the issue of plastic or metal and also whether unilateral or bilateral stenting offer superior palliation for malignant hilar obstruction.
The aim of this meta-analysis is to systematically review the medical literature and compare the efficacy of metal versus plastic stents whether placed unilateral or bilateral in achieving acceptable palliation from symptoms related to obstructive jaundice. Also to look for early and late procedure related complication. We also looked at sustained and durable stent patency.
Studies using metallic or plastic stents for stenting malignant hilar obstruction were selected.
Articles were searched in medline (through PubMed, an electronic search engine for published articles and Ovid), Pubmed, Ovid Journals, embase, Cumulative Index for Nursing & Allied Health Literature, ACP Journal Club, dare, old Medline, Medline non-indexed citations, ovid Healthstar, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials & Database of Systematic Reviews(central). The search was performed from January 1966 to January 2014. Abstracts were manually searched in the major Gastroenterology journals for the past 3 years. Study authors were contacted when the required data could not be determined from the publications. The search terms used were Plastic Stent, Metal Stent, Cholangiocarcinoma, Hilar, Meta-analysis, and Systematic Review. Two authors (SRP and NRK) independently searched and extracted the data into an abstraction form. Any differences were resolved by mutual agreement. The agreement between reviewers for the collected data was quantified using the Cohen’s κ .
linical trials designed with a control and treatment arms can be assessed for quality of the study. A number of criteria have been used to assess this quality of a study (e.g. randomization, selection bias of the arms in the study, concealment of allocation, and blinding of outcome) [13,14]. There is no consensus on how to assess studies designed without a control arm. Hence, these criteria do not apply to studies without a control arm . Therefore, for this meta-analysis and systematic review, studies were selected based on completeness of data and inclusion criteria.
The studies that reported specific outcomes including successful stenting, improvement in bilirubin, procedure complications, ascending cholangitis and 30 day mortality. We defined success of stenting as placement of stent across the stricture with flow of either contrast or bile through the stent. Improvement of jaundice is defined as reduction in the total bilirubin by 75% in 1 month. Cholangitis was defined as present of fever or evidence of increase in bilirubin. Procedure related complication was further defined as early (< 30 days) and late (> 30 days).
This meta-analysis was performed by calculating pooled proportions. First the individual study was transformed into a quantity using Freeman-Tukey variant of the arcsine square root transformed proportion. This was done to give a weight to each individual proportion. The pooled proportion is calculated as the back-transform of the weighted mean of the transformed proportions, using inverse arcsine variance weights for the fixed effects model and DerSimonian- Laird weights for the random effects model [15,16]. Forrest plots were drawn to show the point estimates in each study in relation to the summary pooled estimate. The width of the point estimates in the Forrest plots indicates the assigned weight to that study. More width means more weight was give to a study. Larger studies get more weight and small studies get less weight. The heterogeneity among studies was tested using Cochran’s Q test based upon inverse variance weights . If p value is > 0.10, it rejects the null hypothesis that the studies are heterogeneous. The effect of publication and selection bias on the summary estimates was tested by both Egger bias indicator  and Begg-Mazumdar bias indicator . Also, funnel plots were constructed to evaluate potential publication bias using the standard error and diagnostic odds ratio [12,19-21].
1630 reference were identified, of which 159 relevant articles were selected and reviewed. 8 studies (N=575) for unilateral metallic stents [22-29] and 7 studies (N=850) for unilateral plastic stents [24,30-35], which met the inclusion criteria, were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled data are shown in Table 1. The pooled estimated by fixed and random effect models were similar. Figure 1 shows the success of unilateral metal stent placement in a for rest plot. The p for chi-squared heterogeneity for all the pooled accuracy estimates was > 0.10. For unilateral metal stenting, Begg-Mazumdar bias indicator gave a Kendall’s tau = 0.071 (p = 0.91) and Egger bias was 1.32 (95% CI = -7.79 to 5.14, p = 0.63). Begg-Mazumdar bias caclulations for the unilateral plastic stenting gave a Kendall’s tau = -0.07 (p = 0.72) and Egger bias for unilateral plastic stents gave a value of -5.81 (95% CI = -10.85 to -0.78, p = 0.03). These indicate that there was no clear publications bias. Funnel plot to look at publication also showed no bias. Figure 2, shows the funnel plot for unilateral metal stent.
Figure 1: Forrest plot showing summary estimates for success of placing unilateral metal stents.
Figure 2: Funnel plot showing no publication bias for included unilateral metal stent placement.
Unilateral Metallic Stents (95% CI)
Unilateral Plastic Stents� (95% CI)
Success of Placement
95.00% (91.90 to 97.38)
88.34% (77.91 to 95.74)
Decrease in Bilirubin
81.95% (71.96 to 90.14)
60.96% (44.93 to 75.85)
24.53% (14.67 to 35.98)
35.14% (13.39 to 60.80)
11.27% (5.25 to 19.22)
18.82% (14.39 to 23.68)
21.15% (16.06 to 26.74)
39.33% (32.12 to 46.77)
145.04 days (121.64 to 168.44)
127.22 days (84.51 to 169.92)
Mean Stent Patency
158.75 days (114.09 to 203.42)
18.97 days (5.40 to 32.54)
18.11% (10.38 to 27.42)
20.81% (10.18 to 34.01)
7.90% (3.99 to 12.98)
11.92% (7.42 to 17.32)
15.66% (10.18 to 22.08)
18.44% (8.86 to 30.54)
30 Day Mortality
1.44% (0.38 to 3.19)
14.23% (4.78 to 27.62)
Table 1: Pooled proportion of unilateral metallic and unilateral plastic stents with 95% CI for malignant hilar obstruction.
1640 reference articles were identified, of which 169 relevant articles were selected and reviewed. 13 studies (N=340) for bilateral metallic stents [28,36-47] and 8 studies (N=367) for bilateral plastic stents [ 31,32,35,37,45,46,48,49], which met the inclusion criteria, were included in this analysis. Pooled data are shown in table 2. The pooled estimated by fixed and random effect models were similar. The p for chi-squared heterogeneity for all the pooled accuracy estimates was > 0.10. Figure 3 shows for rest plot for bilaterally placed metal stents. For bilateral metal stenting, Begg-Mazumdar bias indicator gave a Kendall’s tau = -0.02 (p = 0.86) and Egger bias was -1.25 (95% CI = -4.23 to 1.74, p = 0.36). Begg-Mazumdar bias caclulations for the bilateral plastic stenting gave a Kendall’s tau = -0.24 (p = 0.38) and Egger bias for bilateral plastic stents gave a value of -3.42 (95% CI = -7.42 to 0.58, p = 0.1). These indicate that there was no clear publications bias. Funnel plot to look at publication bias also showed no bias. Figure4, shows the funnel plot for bilateral metal stent. The change adjusted agreement analysis between the reviewers for data collected separately gave a kappa value of 1.0 (Table 2).
Figure 3: Forrest plot showing summary estimates for success of placing bilateral metal stents.
Figure 4: Funnel plot showing no publication bias for included bilateral metal stent placement.
Bilateral Metallic Stents (95% CI)
Bilateral Plastic Stents (95% CI)
Success of Placement
91.06% (83.92 to 96.26)
87.57% (77.89 to 94.75)
Decrease in Bilirubin
90.42% (83.02 to 95.88)
73.92% (65.48 to 81.54)
12.51% (4.46 to 23.84)
41.83% (25.43 to 59.21)
16.17% (5.86 to 30.30)
27.71% (21.15 to 34.79)
204.49 days (181.77 to 227.22)
151.92 days (128.79 to 175.04)
Mean Stent Patency
114.64 days (23.12 to 72.94)
8.09 days (7.19 to 9.00)
20.54% (10.69 to 32.58)
25.49% (18.43 to 33.26)
8.06% (1.19 to 20.20)
17.49% (6.30 to 32.74)
13.93% (4.39 to 27.68)
18.15% (0.40 to 65.55)
30 Day Mortality
3.92% (0.51 to 10.34)
13.64% (9.27 to 18.69)
Table 2: Pooled proportion with 95% CI for Bilateral Metallic and Bilateral Plastic Stents for Malignant Hilar Obstruction.
For unilateral stenting, metal stents have a higher success rate of placement (95%) when compared to unilateral plastic stent placement (88%). This might be due to the smaller deployment system of the metal stents compared to plastic stents, making it easier to maneuver through tight strictures. It is not clear from the included papers if dilation of the stricture was performed to improve success of plastic stent placement. When it comes to patency of a stent, unilateral metal stents showed a markedly longer period of patency (159 days) when compared to plastic stents (19 days). This prevents repeat endoscopic treatments to exchange stents in these patients. The overall complication rate of unilateral metal stents was lower than unilateral plastic stents. This difference was seen both in early and late complications. More specifically, the percentage of patients with cholangitis was lower with unilateral metal stents (18%) when compared to plastic stents (21%). A closer look into early or late cholangitis, unilateral metal stents seem to be better than unilateral plastic stents. The 30 day mortalities was markedly lower for unilateral metal stent (1 day) compared to unilateral plastic stents (14 days). These differences might be due to the larger size of the metal stents. The overall survival was better with unilateral metal stents (145 days) compared to unilateral plastic stents (127 days). From this data it is not clear if placing two plastic stents unilaterally is better than one unilateral metal stent.
When considering bilateral stents, metal stents again have a higher success rate of placement (91%) when compared to plastic stents (87%). As discussed earlier, this is probably due to the smaller deployment system of the metal stents compared to plastic stents. It is not clear from the included papers if dilation of the stricture was performed to improve success of plastic stent placement. Comparing the patency of bilateral stenting, metal stents showed a markedly longer period of patency (115 days) when compared to plastic stents (8 days). This prevents repeat endoscopic treatments to exchange stents in these patients. The overall complication rate of bilateral metal stents was lower (13%) than bilateral plastic stents (42%). This difference was seen both in early and late complications. Looking at cholangitis after placing bilateral stents: metal stents had a lower percentage (21%) compared to plastic stents (25%). A closer look into early or late cholangitis, bilateral metal stents seem to be better than bilateral plastic stents. The 30 day mortality was markedly lower for bilateral metal stent (4 day) compared to bilateral plastic stents (14 days). These differences might be due to the larger size of the metal stents. The overall survival was better with bilateral metal stents (204 days) compared to bilateral plastic stents (152 days).
Hilar malignancies are classified using Bismuth Classification. One of the draw backs of this meta-analysis is that subgroup analysis according to the Bismuth class cannot be done.
Studies with statistically significant results tend to be published and cited. Smaller studies may show larger treatment effects due to fewer case-mix differences (e.g. patients with only early or late disease) than larger trials. This publication and selection bias may affect the summary estimates. This bias can be estimated by Egger bias indicators and construction of Funnel plots. Bias among studies can affect the shape of the Funnel plot. In this meta-analysis and systematic review, bias calculations using both Egger bias indicator  and Begg-Mazumdar bias indicator  showed no statistically significant bias. Furthermore, analysis using Funnel plots showed no significant publication bias among the studies included in this analysis.
In conclusion, unilateral metal stents have lower complication rate and cholangitis when compared to plastic stents. Also, unilateral metallic stents have a higher mean survival, patency rate, and 30 day mortality. For bilateral stenting, metallic stents have lower complication rate and early cholangitis when compared to plastic stents. Metallic stents have a higher mean survival, patency rate, and 30 day mortality. Patient with unilateral of bilateral metals stents have a higher survival compared to plastic stents. When looking at unilateral or bilateral stenting for hilar malignancy, metal stents seem to be superior to plastic stents.
Presented as a poster presentation, at the Annual scientific meeting of the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Conjunction with the Digestive Disease Week in Chicago May-June 2009.
- Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. quality of reporting of meta-analyses. Lancet. 1999; 354: 1896-1900.
- Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group. Croat Med J. 2003; 44: 635-638.
- Khan SA, Toledano MB, Taylor-Robinson SD. Epidemiology, risk factors, and pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2008; 10: 77-82.
- Khan SA, Thomas HC, Davidson BR, Taylor-Robinson SD. Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet. 2005; 366: 1303-1314.
- Chapman RW. Risk factors for biliary tract carcinogenesis. Ann Oncol. 1999; 10: 308-311.
- Shin HR, Oh JK, Masuyer E, Curado MP, Bouvard V, Fang YY, et al. Epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma: an update focusing on risk factors. Cancer Sci. 2010; 101: 579-585.
- Lipshutz GS, Brennan TV, Warren RS. Thorotrast-induced liver neoplasia: a collective review. J Am Coll Surg. 2002; 195: 713-718.
- Klempnauer J, Ridder GJ, Werner M, Weimann A, Pichlmayr R. What constitutes long-term survival after surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma? Cancer. 1997; 79: 26-34.
- Smith AC, Dowsett JF, Russell RC, Hatfield AR, Cotton PB. Randomised trial of endoscopic stenting versus surgical bypass in malignant low bileduct obstruction. Lancet. 1994; 344: 1655-1660.
- Speer AG, Cotton PB, Russell RC, Mason RR, Hatfield AR, Leung JW, et al. Randomised trial of endoscopic versus percutaneous stent insertion in malignant obstructive jaundice. Lancet. 1987; 2: 57-62.
- Piñol V, Castells A, Bordas JM, Real MI, Llach J, Montañà X, et al. Percutaneous self-expanding metal stents versus endoscopic polyethylene endoprostheses for treating malignant biliary obstruction: randomized clinical trial. Radiology. 2002; 225: 27-34.
- Brennan P, Silman A. Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. BMJ. 1992; 304: 1491-1494.
- Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996; 17: 1-12.
- Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000; 283: 2008-2012.
- Stuart A, Ord JK. Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics (6th edition). London: Edward Arnold 1994.
- DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7: 177-188.
- Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. In: Systematic Reviews in Health Care. BMJ Publishing Group 2001. 2008; 248-282.
- Harbord RM, Egger M, Sterne JA. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Stat Med. 2006; 25: 3443-3457.
- Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994; 50: 1088-1101.
- Sterne JA, Egger M, Smith GD. Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. BMJ. 2001; 323: 101-105.
- Brennan P, Silman A. Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. BMJ. 1992; 304: 1491-1494.
- De Palma GD, Pezzullo A, Rega M, Persico M, Patrone F, Mastantuono L, et al. Unilateral placement of metallic stents for malignant hilar obstruction: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 58: 50-53.
- Sheth SG, Howell DA, Mazzaglia PRJ, David SL, Desilets, Portland ME. The new spiral z-stent for malignant biliary obstruction of the hepatic bifurcation: preliminary experience. Endoscopy. 2002; 55: AB168.
- Hu B, Zhou D, Gong B. The evaluation of endoscopic biliary drainage for 288 patients with malignant hilar obstruction. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 1997; 35: 73-76.
- Kim MH, Bang S, Park YS, Park SW, Chung JB, Song SY. Efficacy of metallic stent placement in patients with malignant hilar obstruction. GastrointestEndosc. 2005; 61: AB209.
- Kongkam P, Rerknimitr R. Outcome of biliary drainage by metallic stent: Hilar versus non-hilar malignant biliary obstruction. GastrointestEndosc. 2005; 61: AB210.
- Ben-Soussan E, Lefebvre J, Pauphilet C, Bonnel D, Liguory C. Endoscopic treatment of malignant hilar strictures: Plea for unilateral drainage with a single expandable metallic stent. GastrointestEndosc. 2008; 67: AB170-171.
- Paik WH, Park YS, Hwang JH, Lee SH, Yoon CJ, Kang SG, et al. Palliative treatment with self-expandable metallic stents in patients with advanced type III or IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a percutaneous versus endoscopic approach. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69: 55-62.
- Peters RA, Williams SG, Lombard M, Karani J, Westaby D. The management of high-grade hilar strictures by endoscopic insertion of self-expanding metal endoprostheses. Endoscopy. 1997; 29: 10-16.
- Polydorou AA, Chisholm EM, Romanos AA, Dowsett JF, Cotton PB, Hatfield AR, et al. A comparison of right versus left hepatic duct endoprosthesis insertion in malignant hilar biliary obstruction. Endoscopy. 1989; 21: 266-271.
- Chang WH, Kortan P, Haber GB. Outcome in patients with bifurcation tumors who undergo unilateral versus bilateral hepatic duct drainage. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998; 47: 354-362.
- De Palma GD, Galloro G, Siciliano S, Iovino P, Catanzano C. Unilateral versus bilateral endoscopic hepatic duct drainage in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction: results of a prospective, randomized, and controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 53: 547-553.
- Ducreux M, Liguory C, Lefebvre JF, Ink O, Choury A, Fritsch J, et al. Management of malignant hilar biliary obstruction by endoscopy. Results and prognostic factors. Dig Dis Sci. 1992; 37: 778-783.
- Polydorou AA, Cairns SR, Dowsett JF, Hatfield AR, Salmon PR, Cotton PB, et al. Palliation of proximal malignant biliary obstruction by endoscopic endoprosthesis insertion. Gut. 1991; 32: 685-689.
- Rerknimitr R, Kladcharoen N, Mahachai V, Kullavanijaya P. Result of endoscopic biliary drainage in hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004; 38: 518-523.
- Dumas R, Demuth N, Buckley M, Peten EP, Manos T, Demarquay JF, et al. Endoscopic bilateral metal stent placement for malignant hilar stenoses: identification of optimal technique. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000; 51: 334-338.
- Rerknimitr R, Kullavanijaya P, Kladjareon N, Mahachai V, Bangkok, Thailand. Is ercp with bilateral biliary drainage always safe and effective in patient with advanced hilar tumor? Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2002; 55: AB166.
- Nugent S, Stone A, Gilford J, Benson M. Placement of bilateral self expanding metal stents for complex hilar obstruction due to cholangiocarcinoma. Gastrointestinal endoscopy; 2002.
- Eum JS, Kang DH, Park CH, Kim KY, Ha Ti, Choi CW, et al. Endoscopic bilateral metal stent placement with a Y-configured stent for advanced hilarcholangiocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67: AB159.
- Lee JH, Kang DH, Kim JY, Lee SM, Kim do H, Park CW, et al. Endoscopic bilateral metal stent placement for advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a pilot study of a newly designed Y stent. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 66: 364-369.
- Moon JH, Cha SW, Cheon YK, Kim YS, Cho YD, Lee JS, et al. Endoscopic palliation using non-foreshortening zilver self-expandable metal stents for patients with biliary obstruction caused by nonresectablehilarcholangiocarcinoma: A pilot study. GastrointestEndosc. 2007; 65: AB227.
- Kim JH, Yoo BM, Choi JH, Lee KM, Lee KJ, Hahm KB, et al. Y-shaped endoscopic bilateral stenting with new wider-mesh biliary stent in malignant hilar obstruction: Long-term results. GastrointestEndosc. 2005; 61: AB193.
- Hookey LC, Le Moine O, Deviere J. Use of a temporary plastic stent to facilitate the placement of multiple self-expanding metal stents in malignant biliary hilar strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 62: 605-609.
- Kawamoto H, Tsutsumi K, Harada R, Fujii M, Kato H, Hirao K, et al. Endoscopic deployment of multiple JOSTENT SelfX is effective and safe in treatment of malignant hilar biliary strictures. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008; 6: 401-408.
- Wagner HJ, Knyrim K, Vakil N, Klose KJ. Plastic endoprostheses versus metal stents in the palliative treatment of malignant hilar biliary obstruction. A prospective and randomized trial. Endoscopy. 1993; 25: 213-218.
- Perdue DG, Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, Fennerty MB, Lee JG, et al. Plastic versus self-expanding metallic stents for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a prospective multicenter observational cohort study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008; 42: 1040-1046.
- Kin H, Kubota Y, Sumitomo Y, Kiriya K, Agawa H, Shimatani M, et al. Endoscopic bilateral hepatic drainage with self-expandable metallic stents for malignant hilar stricture. Digestive Endoscopy. 1999; 11: 225-230.
- Deviere J, Baize M, de Toeuf J, Cremer M. Long-term follow-up of patients with hilar malignant stricture treated by endoscopic internal biliary drainage. Gastrointest Endosc. 1988; 34: 95-101.
- Liu CL, Lo CM, Lai EC, Fan ST. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic endoprosthesis insertion in patients with Klatskin tumors. Arch Surg. 1998; 133: 293-296.
Citation: Puli SR, Kalva NR, Pamulaparthy SR, Bechtold ML, Cashman MD et al. Plastic Versus Metal Stents for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Austin J Gastroenterol. 2014;1(2): 1010. ISSN:2381-9219