Acquired Factor V Inhibitors: A Review of Literature

Review Article

Ann Hematol Oncol. 2017; 4(9): 1168.

Acquired Factor V Inhibitors: A Review of Literature

Boland F¹* and Shreenivas AV²

¹Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine, New York

²Division of Hematology-Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine, USA

*Corresponding author: Boland F, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai St. Luke’s and Mount Sinai West, New York

Received: June 20, 2017; Accepted: August 08, 2017; Published: August 30, 2017

Abstract

Objective: The implications of inhibitor formation can vary from an asymptomatic prolonged APTT and PT to a life threatening hemorrhage. We are still trying to understand why there are such variable clinical phenotypes and how we might best risk stratify patients. The focus of this review is to dissect the literature on this topic and offer recommendations to managing this rare affliction in the clinical setting.

Evidence Review: We conducted a search on PubMed, Scopus, web of science from 2010 until 2016 using different combinations of the following terms ‘’factor V inhibitors’’, ‘’factor V autoantibodies’’, ‘’FV inhibitors’’, ‘’Factor V and spontaneous inhibitors’’. We cross referenced the bibliographies for additional reports. 47 cases were included in final review.

Findings: The most common bleeding presentations included hematuria 23% (n=11) and gastrointestinal bleed 21% (n=10). 23% (n=11) of patients were asymptomatic at the time of presentation. 34% of cases were associated with infection and 31% with drugs. The median inhibitor titer and FVa (Factor V activity) was 9 Bethesda units and 2% respectively. The median PT and aPTT at presentation was 50 and 100 seconds respectively. To eliminate the inhibitor, steroids were generally used a first line therapy. 88% who received steroids alone for immunosuppression achieved remission. Other agents used included rituximab, IVIG, plasmapheresis, thalidomide and cyclophosphamide. The time for inhibitor disappearance was documented in 22 cases with a median time of 3.5 weeks.

Conclusion: Diagnosis and treatment of factor V inhibitors remains a challenge for clinicians. Because of its rare presentation and expertise required in diagnosing this disorder at present there are no trials to compare treatment options to analyze both acute bleeding control and inhibitor eradication.

Keywords: Factor V inhibitors; Factor V deficiency

Introduction

Factor V inhibitor is one of the rare forms of factor inhibitors and is an infrequent cause of factor V deficiency. Factor V is an integral part of the coagulation cascade. Synthesized in the liver, it acts as a cofactor in the prothrombinase complex. It is cleaved by thrombin into a 2-chain molecule and serves to activate prothrombin. It also has important anticoagulant properties by participating in the inactivation of factor VIII (FVIII). The first case was documented in 1955 in Germany [1]. The development of inhibitors against Factor V is an extremely rare occurrence with an estimated incidence of 0.09- 0.023 for 1 million persons per year, based on studies in Singapore and Australia [2]. There are five incidences when FV inhibitors develop: following exposure to bovine proteins, post-operatively in those not exposed to bovine proteins, inhibitors associated with other medical conditions, in congenital factor deficiency after replacement therapy and idiopathic formation of FVI. Historically FVI occurred most commonly due to bovine proteins. During surgical procedures topical bovine preparations were often used. This initiated the production of autoantibodies against bovine proteins including bovine FV which cross reacted with human FV. Though bovine thrombin has since been replaced by human and recombinant thrombin formulation which exhibit less antigenicity, there is still an association with surgical procedures and the formation of autoantibodies against FV. This may be due to prior exposure to bovine proteins causing a low titer of these antibodies which may then be stimulated by human or recombinant thrombin. Although 3 mechanisms, namely spontaneous autoantibodies, alloantibodies, and cross-reacting anti bovine factor V antibodies, have been hypothesized, the precise mechanisms of inhibitor development remain unknown. Normally, factor V acts by binding to the procoagulant phospholipid -phosphatidylserine -on activated platelets and endothelial cells through its C2 domain of its light chain. This complex binds to von Willebrand factor and enhances the coagulation process by acting as a cofactor to activated factor X, which cleaves prothrombin to thrombin. Factor V inhibitors are polyclonal IgG antibodies that attack the C2 domain of light chain of factor V resulting in loss of function, by decreasing the procoagulation effect of factor V [3].

Purpose of study

The implications of inhibitor formation can vary from an asymptomatic prolonged APTT and PT to a life threatening hemorrhage. We are still trying to understand why there are such variable clinical phenotypes and how we might best risk stratify patients. Therefore, the recognition, work up, diagnostics and management of this condition is of extreme importance. The focus of this review is to dissect the literature on this topic and offer recommendations to managing this rare affliction in the clinical setting.

Search methods

To focus this review specifically on inhibitors to FV, we examined the literature for recent review articles on this topic. A comprehensive systematic review on acquired factor V inhibitors was carried out by Franchini and Lippi in 2011 which analyzed data from 74 cases up to 2010. To avoid redundancy, we conducted a search on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science from 2010 until 2016 using different combinations of the following terms ‘’factor V inhibitors’’, ‘’factor V autoantibodies’’, ‘’FV inhibitors’’, ‘’Factor V and spontaneous inhibitors’’. We cross referenced the bibliographies for additional reports. Only articles in English were included.

Literature Results and Discussion

94 cases of AFVD were documented in the literature. As illustrated in Figure 1, 47 cases were excluded. Cases in which inhibitors formed secondary to bovine thrombin were excluded given this less clinically relevant. A case series conducted by the Mayo clinic in which patients with MPN (myeloproliferative neoplasm) were found to have low levels of Factor V was excluded given there were no inhibitors detected, though it was noted that 3 out of the 33 patients did have clotting studies suggestive of an inhibitor though none was detected, which was also discovered in 2 of our case reports [4]. This is an interesting caveat when establishing a diagnosis of acquired factor V deficiency due to an inhibitor, which we shall discuss further on. An additional 2 cases were associated with congenital factor V deficiency which was excluded given the different mechanism of action of inhibitors in this setting. These patients given their history of bleeding disorder undergo a different specialized approach which will not be discussed in this review. The 47 remaining cases were reviewed which is outlined in Table 1.