Research Article
Ann Hematol Oncol. 2021; 8(11): 1372.
The Relationship between Use of Low Molecular Weight Heparin during Pregnancy and Risk of Peripartum Adverse Events: A Meta-Analysis
Xiaorong Y1#, Shan L2#, Shengji S1,2#, Tao S2, Dongping L3, Moli Z4* and Junping L3*
1Department of Rehabilitation, Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, University of Electronic Science and technology, Sichuan, China
2Department of Cardiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
3Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Huahsan Hospital North, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
4Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
#Contributed Equally to this Work
*Corresponding author: Li Junping, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Huahsan Hospital North, Fudan University, No. 518 jingbohu Road, Shanghai, China
Zhu Moli, Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Received: July 27, 2021; Accepted: August 28, 2021; Published: September 04, 2021
Abstract
Introduction: To summarize the trials investigated on relationship between low molecular weight heparin use during pregnancy and peripartum adverse events. Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) on maternal and fetal complications.
Methods: Electronic research was performed in Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE through October 2020. The primary outcome was the incidence of maternal and fetal complications during peripartum period. RevMan 5.3 was used for data analysis.
Results: 11 articles were finally included. Meta-analysis showed there was no significant difference in abortion, premature delivery, stillbirth, preeclampsia and postpartum hemorrhage events between pregnant women who used LMWH and those who not.
Conclusion: Using LMWH in pregnant women does not increase pregnancy related maternal and fetal complications.
Keywords: Low molecular weight heparin; Postpartum adverse events; Gestation
Introduction
The risk of thromboembolic diseases is significantly increased during pregnancy, particularly Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) and Pulmonary Embolism (PE). Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) is the main cause of maternal death during pregnancy, while pulmonary embolism is a common cause of maternal death in developed countries [1]. Although the overall risk of VTE events is low, pregnant women are five times more likely to develop VTE events than non-pregnant women of the same age [2]. Many scholars believe that this is caused by venous stasis due to the oppression of pregnant uterus and the imbalance of bleeding and coagulation status during pregnancy [3-5]. Common risk factors for venous thrombosis in pregnant women include age over 35, obesity, multiple pregnancies, genetic susceptibility, surgery or cesarean section, smoking and hormone therapy, pregnancy related diabetes, placental abruption and eclampsia [6]. Hospitalization before or after delivery may also increase the risk of VTE events. Besides, Women with a history of venous thrombosis before pregnancy also have an increased risk of recurrent venous thrombosis during pregnancy [7,8]. Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) is currently the preferred drug for the prevention or treatment of venous thrombosis in pregnant women. LMWH does not cross the placenta and has a more stable anticoagulant effect with a longer half-life and greater bioavailability [9]. LMWH allows daily subcutaneous administration and does not need laboratory monitoring. With the increased use of LMWH in pregnant women and relevant experience accumulation, the worrisome of the effectiveness and safety of LMWH during peripartum period is also increasing. Whether the use of LMWH in pregnant women increases peripartum adverse events in still debatable. Therefore, we did this work to analyze the relationship between use of LMWH during pregnancy and risk of peripartum adverse events, hoping to provide some guidance for the drug use.
Methods
Inclusion criteria
1) Pregnant women who received anticoagulant therapy with LMWH; 2) Anticoagulant therapy is maintained at least 6 weeks postpartum; 3) Study endpoints included pregnancy-related maternal and fetal complications.
Exclusion criteria
1) Combined use of other types of anticoagulants; 2) LMWH was used prior to pregnancy; 3) Studies not included pregnant women who use placebo or did not use anticoagulant drugs as control group; 4) Pregnant women had heparin induced thrombocytopenia; 5) Case reports.
Evaluation of efficiency
In our study, pregnancy related maternal and fetal complications were taken as the primary endpoints. Pregnancy related maternal and fetal complications included abortion, premature delivery, stillbirth, preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, and postpartum hemorrhage. Postpartum hemorrhage was defined as the blood loss of 500mL or more during natural labour, and 1000mL or more during cesarean section.
Search strategy
We performed electronic research in Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CQVIP, CNKI and Wanfang Database through October 2020 with the use of a combination of text words related to “heparin”, “low molecular weight heparin”, “LMWH”, “Anticoagulant drug”, “postpartum OR stegmonth OR puerperium” and “complication”. No restrictions for language or geographic location were applied.
Methods of literature quality evaluation
All the studies included were non-randomized controlled trials. And the MINORS Scale was used to evaluate the study quality. The features of the included literatures and research objects are shown in Table 1 and 2.
Study Location
Type of study
Study features
Indication for LMWH use
Study duration
Funding agencies
[16]
Italy
A single center retrospective cohort study
- Number of included women: 88
- LMWH type: Unknown
- LMWH dose: Preventive dose: LMWH 40mg/d, If body weight > 60kg, 60mg/d; Treatment dose: the dose was adjusted according to patient’s weight and was given twice daily
Women with type I antithrombin deficiency
Between Jan 1, 1980 and Jan 1, 2018
No
[4]
Russia
A multi-center retrospective cohort study
- Number of included women: 68
- Group: Group I (n=50) received prophylaxis with LMWH±aspirin (50-100 mg/day) in preconception period or from the 1st trimester, during pregnancy and at least 6 weeks postpartum. Group II (n=18) received LMWH±aspirin from the II to III trimester.
- LMWH type: Enoxaparin
- LMWH dose: The dose was adjusted according to patient’s weight (<50kg: 20mg LMWH, 50-70 kg: 40mg LMWH, 71-90kg: 60mg LMWH, 91-110 kg: 80mg LMWH, >110kg: 0.6mg/kg LMWH). The last dose of LMWH was used the day before of labor, at least 12h before the c/s or onset of labor and resumed in 6-8 h after delivery for a minimum of 6 weeks under the control of the hemostasis system.
Women with thrombophilia and a history of thrombosis
From 2009 to 2016
Unknown
[10]
Denmark
A cohort study
- Number of included women:166
- Group: 1. LMWH-treated:166; 2. LMWH-untreated:18020
- LMWH type: Tinzaparin (95.2%), dalteparin (4.8%)
- LMWH dose: The majority (86.1%) was treated with tinzaparin 4,500 IU subcutaneously once daily or dalteparin 5,000 IU subcutaneously once daily.
- LMWH usage: In half the cases (50.9%), treatment was commenced in the first trimester, but the time of initiation varied from 3rd to 39th gestational week. Treatment was discontinued at induction or onset of spontaneous labor, resumed 12 hours after delivery and generally continued until six weeks postnatally (75.3%; n=125).
- Prior or current VTE with or without thrombophilia;
- Prior adverse obstetric event and thrombophilia;
- Thrombophilic disorder;
- Habitual abortion and thrombophilia;
- Other reasons for treatment (prolonged immobilization, elevated D-dimer, impaired venous function and/or prior, adverse obstetric outcome).
From January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2005
Research grant from Hillerød Hospital
[14]
Turkey
A single-center retrospective cohort study
- Number of included women: 57; Number of pregnancies: 72;
- Groups: 1) OAC warfarin (1-6w)-LMWH (6-12w)-OAC (12-36w)-LMWH (36-38w); 2) OAC warfarin + ASA (1-36w); 3) No anticoagulation; 4) LMWH treatment throughout pregnancy.
Pregnant women who underwent mechanical heart valve replacement
From January 1990 to December 2015
No
Carolina Arbuthnot. 2016
UK
A single-center retrospective cohort study
- Number of pregnancies: 16469.
- Group: 1) Using LMWH (n=115): among them, 66 women received a prophylaxis dose of LMWH and 47 received a therapeutic dose of LMWH; 2) Control group (n=16415): no anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy.
- LMWH usage: LMWH was stopped 12h (for prophy-lactic LMWH) and 24h (for therapeutic LMWH) prior to delivery.
- VTE;
- Thrombophilia;
- Recurrent miscarriage
- Recurrent VTE;
- Multiple risk factors
From 2009 to 2013
No
[13]
Netherlands
A single-center retrospective cohort study
- Group: 1) LMWH treatment: 88; 2) No LMWH treatment: 352;
- LMWH type: Fondaparinux, danaparoid or acenocoumerol;
- LMWH usage: LMWH or another preparation was stopped at the start of spontaneous or induced labor and restarted 4-8 hours after delivery (when blood loss was normal) and stopped six weeks postpartum.
- History of VTE
- Recurrent fetal loss
- Asymptomatic Thrombophilic defects
- VTE in current pregnancy
From 1999 to 2009
No
[17]
Netherlands
A single-center retrospective cohort study
- Group: 1) LMWH treatment: 95; 2) No LMWH treatment: 524
- LMWH type: Enoxaparin, Dalteparin, Nadroparin, Danaparoid, Tinzaparin;
- LMWH usage: Discontinue LMWH as soon as either contractions started, membranes ruptured or to administer the last injection the morning before the day that induction of labour or a caesarean section was planned
- Current or history of VTE and thrombophilia;
- Recurrent thrombophlebitis and thrombophilia;
- Antiphospholipid syndrome;
- Preeclampsia;
- Prosthetic heart valve with or without heart thrombosis;
- Current cerebrovascular accident.
From 1995 to 2008
No
[15]
UK
A case-control study
- Group: 1) LMWH treatment: 55; 2) No LMWH treatment: 110;
- LMWH type: Enoxaparin;
- LMWH usage: Twice daily
- Current or history of DVT and/or PE and a thrombophilia;
- Prophylaxis for a thrombophilia;
- Mitral valve replacement;
- History of sagittal sinus thrombosis and a thrombophilia
- Coronary aneurysm and nephrotic syndrome
From 2001 to 2005
No
[19]
Finland
A single-center retrospective cohort study
- Group: 1) LMWH treatment: 648; 2) No LMWH treatment: 626;
- LMWH dose: 1) Normal prophylactic doses were enoxaparin 40mg/day or dalteparin 5000IU/day; 2) Intermediate (50% of treatment doses, i.e. enoxaparin 1mg/kg/day or dalteparin 100IU/kg/day); 3) Adjusted doses were defined as weight adjusted full treatment doses of LMWH (dalteparin 200IU/kg once daily or enoxaparin 1 mg/kg twice daily);
- LMWH usage: Women with hereditary thrombophilias (Factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin mutation, protein C/S deficiencies) and APLAs without a history of VTE received LMWH prophylaxis from the late third trimester (gestational weeks 34–36) until 6 weeks postpartum ; Women with combined thrombophilias or antithrombin (AT) deficiency, even without a history of VTE, received LMWH prophylaxis from gestational week 6 until 6 weeks postpartum; The median time of LMWH initiation was 17 gestational weeks and the mean duration was 22 weeks.
- Prior or current VTE;
- Prior adverse obstetric outcome;
- Mechanical heart valve;
- Prior stroke;
- Thrombophilia without any other indication;
- Other reasons (immobilization, impaired venous function, cardiac disease etc.).
From February 1994 to January 2007
No
Joyce Lai. 2017
Canada
A single-center retrospective cohort study
- Group: 1) Anticoagulation with heparin: 137; 2) No anticoagulation: 1233
- Thrombosis history;
- Hereditary thrombophilia;
- Medical disorders associated with thrombosis
From March 2013 to March 2014
An educational grant from Sanofi.
HENRIK. 2000
Denmark
A population-based cohort study
- Group: 1) LMWH anticoagulation: 66; 2) No LMWH anticoagulation: 17259;
- LMWH type: Enoxaparin, dalteparin, tinzaparin
Unknown
From 1991 to 1998
Danish Medical Research Council (grant no. 9700677) and EU BIOMED program (Contract No. BMH4-CT97–2430); Danish National Research Foundation
Table 1: Characteristics of included studies.
Pregnant age (year)
Gestational age (week)
BMI (kg/m2)
Birth weight (g)
Mode of delivery
Maternal or fetal complications
[16]
26 (22-31)
Unknown
23 (20-26)
Unknown
Natural labor: 86
Caesarean section: 2Miscarriages, late obstetrical complications (preterm delivery; small for gestational age newborns; preeclampsia, eclampsia, HELLP syndrome; placental abruption, stillbirth), and terminations (voluntary abortions).
[4]
28±7.7
Unknown
BMI >30; n=17
Unknown
Group I: Caesarean section: 21; Natural labor: 29;
Group II: Caesarean section:8; Natural labor: 10;Premature delivery, preeclampsia, severe preeclampsia, critical placental insufficiency, Placental abruption
[10]
LMWH treatment group: 20-43;
No LMWH treatment group: 15-49Unknown
LMWH treatment group: 16-46;
No LMWH treatment group: 14-54LMWH treatment group: 3280;
No LMWH treatment group: 3540LMWH treatment group: Caesarean section: 52; Natural labor: 114;
No LMWH treatment group: Caesarean section: 3458; Natural labor: 14562Miscarriage after 16th week, Stillbirth, Placental abruption, Preeclampsia, Preterm delivery, intrauterine growth restriction infant
[14]
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Postpartum valve thrombosis, Premature delivery, Low-birth-weight, Abortions, Stillbirth
Carolina Arbuthnot. 2016
25 (19-49)
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
LMWH treatment group: Caesarean section: 32; Natural labor: 83;
No LMWH treatment group: Caesarean section: 4559; Natural labor: 11856Postpartum hemorrhage
[13]
30
39
Unknown
3360
LMWH treatment group: Caesarean section: 17; Natural labor: 71;
No LMWH treatment group: Caesarean section: 68; Natural labor: 284Postpartum hemorrhage
[17]
LMWH group: 32 (21-43);
No LMWH group: 31 (18-44)LMWH group: 39;
No LMWH group: 39Unknown
LMWH group: 3150 (365-4290);
No LMWH group: 3235 (555-5035)LMWH treatment group: Caesarean section: 22; Natural labor: 73;
No LMWH treatment group: Caesarean section: 52; Natural labor: 472;Postpartum hemorrhage
[15]
LMWH group: 27.4±6.3;
No LMWH group: 26.7±6.9LMWH group: 37.4 ± 2.5;
No LMWH group: 8.3 ± 2.6Unknown
Unknown
LMWH treatment group: Caesarean section: 20; Natural labor: 35;
No LMWH treatment group: Caesarean section: 40; Natural labor: 70;Postpartum hemorrhage
[19]
LMWH group: 31.6 (17-45);
No LMWH group: 31.4 (17–44)Unknown
LMWH group: 24.5 (17-76);
No LMWH group: 23.4 (16-49)LMWH group: 3439 (340-4970);
No LMWH group: 3518 (365-4790)LMWH treatment group: Caesarean section: 138; Natural labor: 530;
No LMWH treatment group: Caesarean section: 119; Natural labor: 507Bleeding, preeclampsia, foetal growth restriction, allergic skin reactions, thrombocytopenia, preterm delivery, stillbirth, osteoporotic fractures.
Joyce Lai. 2017
LMWH group: 34.0 (31.0-38.0);
No LMWH group: 34.0 (31.0-37.0)Unknown
LMWH group: 32.6 (28.3-42.2);
No LMWH group: 29.2 (26.6-32.5)Unknown
All women received Caesarean section
Spontaneous abortion, therapeutic abortion, ectopic pregnancy, intrauterine death, preeclampsia, heart disease, hemorrhage, and transfusion.
HENRIK. 2000
LMWH group: 29.1 (19-40);
No LMWH group: 28.5 (13-47)LMWH group: =37 weeks: 59; 34-36 weeks: 4; <34 weeks: 3;
No LMWH group: =37 weeks: 16268; 34-36 weeks: 682; <34 weeks: 309Unknown
LMWH group: 3.514 ± 712;
No LMWH group: 3.483 ± 590Unknown
Malformations, low birth weight, pre-term deliveries, stillborn
Table 2: Characteristics of the study population.
Statistical Analysis
The RevMan5.3 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration was used for statistical analysis. Heterogeneity test was performed using Chi-square test, and P >0.1 was considered as no statistical heterogeneity between studies. If there was no heterogeneity in studies, meta-analysis was described by fixed effect model. And if there was heterogeneity in studies, then random effect model was used.
Metrological data was described as weighted mean difference and its 95% CI, and the counting data were expressed as the odds ratio (OR) and its 95% CI.
Results
Study selection and study characteristics
A total of 1,631 literatures were retrieved, and 128 articles were included after preliminary screening. 117 articles were excluded according to the exclusion criteria: 1) The adverse outcome events of the study were not relevant to our meta-analysis; 2) No control group; 3) Concomitant use with other anticoagulation drugs except LMWH. Finally 11 literatures were included in our meta-analysis (Figure 1) [10-20].
Figure 1: Literature inclusion and exclusion process.
Synthesis of results
Abortion: Four studies were analyzed and heterogeneity test showed P <0.1, meaning these studies were not homogenous, so random effect model was used. The meta-analysis results showed using LMWH during pregnancy did not increase the risk of abortion as compared to women who did not use LMWH (OR=3.77, 95% CI: 0.77-18.35, Z=1.64, P>0.05) (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Abortion incidences in pregnant women treated with LMWH and pregnant women without anticoagulant therapy.
Preterm birth: Five studies were analyzed and heterogeneity test showed P<0.1, meaning these studies were not homogenous, so random effect model was used. The meta-analysis results showed using LMWH during pregnancy did not increase the risk of preterm birth as compared to women who did not use LMWH (OR=1.58, 95% CI: 0.90-2.77, Z=1.59, P>0.05) (Figure 3).
Figure 3: Preterm birth incidences in pregnant women treated with LMWH and pregnant women without anticoagulant therapy.
Still birth: Five studies were analyzed and heterogeneity test showed P <0.1, meaning these studies were not homogenous, so random effect model was used. The meta analysis results showed using LMWH during pregnancy did not increase the risk of still birth as compared to women who did not use LMWH (OR=1.45, 95% CI: 0.10-21.95, Z=0.27, P>0.05) (Figure 4).
Figure 4: Still birth incidences in pregnant women treated with LMWH and pregnant women without anticoagulant therapy
Preeclampsia: Three studies were analyzed and heterogeneity test showed P <0.1, meaning these studies were not homogenous, so random effect model was used. The meta-analysis results showed using LMWH during pregnancy did not increase the risk of preeclampsia as compared to women who did not use LMWH (OR=1.23, 95% CI: 0.16-9.28, Z=0.20, P>0.05) (Figure 5).
Figure 5: Preeclampsia incidences in pregnant women treated with LMWH and pregnant women without anticoagulant therapy.
Fetal growth restriction: Three studies were analyzed and heterogeneity test showed P=0.48, meaning these studies were homogenous, so fixed effect model was used. The meta-analysis results showed using LMWH during pregnancy could reduce the risk of fetal growth restriction as compared to women who did not use LMWH (OR=1.54, 95% CI: 1.01-2.35, Z=2.02, P=0.04) (Figure 6).
Figure 6: Fetal growth restriction incidences in pregnant women treated with LMWH and pregnant women without anticoagulant therapy.
Postpartum hemorrhage: Seven studies were analyzed and heterogeneity test showed P=0.19, meaning these studies were homogenous, so fixed effect model was used. The meta-analysis results showed using LMWH during pregnancy did not increase the risk of postpartum hemorrhage as compared to women who did not use LMWH (OR=1.17, 95% CI: 0.95-1.43, Z=1.47, P>0.05) (Figure 7).
Figure 7: Postpartum hemorrhage incidences in pregnant women treated with LMWH and pregnant women without anticoagulant therapy.
Discussion
Nowadays, the management of pregnancy-related thrombosis remains a challenge. Anticoagulants available to prevent and treat VTE include warfarin, Unfractioned Heparin (UFH), Low-Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH), factor Xa inhibitors, and direct thrombin inhibitors. LMWH is widely used due to its more predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics [21]. It is important to evaluate the benefit of LMWH for thromboprophylaxis in pregnant women. The results of this study showed that there were no statistically significant differences in the risk of abortion, preterm birth, stillbirth, preeclampsia, or postpartum hemorrhage between pregnant women who used LWMH as anticoagulant and those who did not use LWMH. Besides, LMWH use in pregnant women reduced the incidence of fetal growth restriction. This suggests that the use of LMWH does not increase the incidence of pregnancy-related maternal and fetal complications. Previous retrospective studies and meta-analysis also showed that prophylactic or therapeutic doses of LMWH could significantly reduce the risk of recurrent thrombosis during pregnancy and postpartum [22-24].
Conclusions
Our analysis demonstrates that the use of LMWH in pregnant women reduces the risk of thromboembolism without increasing the incidence of relevant adverse outcomes. For pregnant women who meet the anticoagulant treatment criteria, the use of LMWH may bring more benefits to them.
Limitation of this Study
Heterogeneity existed in the selected studies may result in our analysis conclusion more influenced by large sample studies. Moreover, considering the ethical requirements, all the included studies were non-randomized controlled studies which may affected the accuracy of the results to some extent.
Declaration
Funding Sources: This work was supported by grants from Fudan University Fuxing Nursing Research Fund (FNF201949).
Author Contributions: Yang Xiaorong, Lin Shan and Sun Shengjia wrote the manuscript together. Lin Shan, Li Junping and Sun Tao performed the statistical analysis. Li Junping, Zhu Moli, Sun Tao and Li Dongping performed the literature search and review.
References
- Clutton-Brock T. Maternal deaths from anaesthesia. An extract from Why Mothers Die 2000-2002, the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom: Chapter 17: Trends in intensive care. Br J Anaesth. 2005; 94: 424-429.
- Heit JA, Kobbervig CE, James AH, Petterson TM, Bailey KR, Melton LJ 3rd. Trends in the incidence of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or postpartum: a 30-year population-based study. Ann Intern Med. 2005; 143: 697-706.
- Hellgren M. Hemostasis during normal pregnancy and puerperium. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2003; 29: 125-130.
- Bremme KA. Haemostatic changes in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2003; 16: 153-168.
- Greer IA. Thrombosis in pregnancy: maternal and fetal issues. Lancet. 1999; 353: 1258-1265.
- Greer IA. The special case of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy. Haemostasis. 1998; 28: 22-34.
- Pabinger I, Grafenhofer H, Kaider A, et al. Risk of pregnancy-associated recurrent venous thromboembolism in women with a history of venous thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2005; 3: 949-954.
- Brill-Edwards P, Ginsberg JS, Gent M, et al. Safety of withholding heparin in pregnant women with a history of venous thromboembolism. Recurrence of Clot in This Pregnancy Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 1439-1444.
- Bates SM. Treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy. Thromb Res. 2002; 108: 97-106.
- Andersen AS, Berthelsen JG, Bergholt T. Venous thromboembolism in pregnancy: prophylaxis and treatment with low molecular weight heparin. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010; 89: 15-21.
- Mardy AH, Siddiq Z, Ananth CV, Wright JD, D'Alton ME, Friedman AM. Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis during Antepartum Admissions and Postpartum Readmissions. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 130: 270-278.
- Arbuthnot C, Browne R, Nicole S, Erb SJ, Farrall L, Borg A. A double center retrospective study into rates of postpartum haemorrhage in women on low molecular weight heparin. Br J Haematol. 2017; 176: 141-143.
- Knol HM, Schultinge L, Veeger NJ, Kluin-Nelemans HC, Erwich JJ, Meijer K. The risk of postpartum hemorrhage in women using high dose of lowmolecular- weight heparins during pregnancy. Thromb Res. 2012; 130: 334- 338.
- Iscan HZ, Hanedan MO, Özen A, et al. Anticoagulation therapy in pregnant women with mechanical heart valve. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2018; 26: 38-44.
- Kominiarek MA, Angelopoulos SM, Shapiro NL, Studee L, Nutescu EA, Hibbard JU. Low-molecular-weight heparin in pregnancy: peripartum bleeding complications. J Perinatol. 2007; 27: 329-334.
- Abbattista M, Gianniello F, Novembrino C, et al. Risk of pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism and obstetrical complications in women with inherited type I antithrombin deficiency: a retrospective, single-centre, cohort study. Lancet Haematol. 2020; 7: e320-e328.
- Roshani S, Cohn DM, Stehouwer AC, et al. Incidence of postpartum haemorrhage in women receiving therapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin: results of a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2011; 1: e000257.
- Akinshina S, Makatsariya A, Bitsadze V, Khizroeva J, Khamani N. Thromboprophylaxis in pregnant women with thrombophilia and a history of thrombosis. J Perinat Med. 2018; 46: 893-899.
- Galambosi PJ, Kaaja RJ, Stefanovic V, Ulander VM. Safety of low-molecularweight heparin during pregnancy: a retrospective controlled cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012; 163: 154-159.
- Lai J, Venu I, Malinowski AK, et al. Thromboembolism following cesarean section: a retrospective study [published correction appears in Hematology. 2018; 23: 865]. Hematology. 2018; 23: 351-356.
- Thomson AJ, Walker ID, Greer IA. Low-molecular-weight heparin for immediate management of thromboembolic disease in pregnancy. Lancet. 1998; 352: 1904.
- Romualdi E, Dentali F, Rancan E, et al. Anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism during pregnancy: a systematic review and a metaanalysis of the literature. J Thromb Haemost. 2013; 11: 270-281.
- Hellgren M, Mistafa O. Obstetric venous thromboembolism: a systematic review of dalteparin and pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019; 39: 439-450.
- Sirico A, Saccone G, Maruotti GM, et al. Low molecular weight heparin use during pregnancy and risk of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019; 32: 1893-1900.