Historical Overview of the Maastricht Consensus Reports for the Management of Helicobacter Pylori Infection. Where are we Today?

Mini Review

Austin J Infect Dis. 2022; 9(2): 1069.

Historical Overview of the Maastricht Consensus Reports for the Management of Helicobacter Pylori Infection. Where are we Today?

Jukic I1*, Vukovic J1,2, Modun D2, Sundov Z1,2 and Tonkic A1,2

1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Split, Spinciceva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia

2Schoolof Medicine, University of Split, Soltanska 2, 21000 Split, Croatia

*Corresponding author: Jukic I, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Split, Spinciceva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia

Received: August 11, 2022; Accepted: September 02, 2022; Published: September 09, 2022

Abstract

This letter summarizes historical overview of the European guidelines for management of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, from Maastricht I consensus report through to Maastricht V/Florence consensus report. The inadequate application of Maastricht V/Florence consensus report in clinical practice has urged us to send an appeal to all national gastroenterological societies to emphasize the importance of these guidelines.

Keywords: Maastricht consensus report; Helicobacter pylori; Guidelines; Primary care physicians; History

Introduction

This mini review summarizes historical overview of the European guidelines for management of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, from Maastricht I consensus report through to Maastricht V/ Florence consensus report. The inadequate application of Maastricht V/Florence consensus report in clinical practice has urged us to send an appeal to all national gastroenterological societies to emphasize the importance of these guidelines.

Insufficient level of knowledge and lack of adherence of Primary Care Physicians (PCPs) to the guidelines for the management of H. pylori infection has been observed through the last three decades. European H. pylori study group was established in 1987. Experts in the field of H. pylori, primary care physicians and representatives of National Societies of Gastroenterology from Europe have organized a meeting in Maastricht to establish consensus guidelines on the management of H. pylori at the primary care and specialist level.

Historical Overview of the Maastricht Consensus Reports

According to the first Maastricht consensus report published in 1997. recommended 1st-line therapy was triple therapy for 7 days, and indication for eradication H. pylori were: all H. pylori positive patients with peptic ulcer disease, past or present; bleeding peptic ulcer; infected patients with low grade gastric MALT lymphoma; in cases with advanced and progressively worsening forms of gastritis, such as in patients with intestinal metaplasia, glandular atrophy and those with erosive or hypertrophic forms of gastritis; after resection of early gastric cancer or precancerous lesions. Advisable eradication of H. pylori was for: functional dyspepsia (after full investigation), family history of gastric cancer, long term treatment with proton pump inhibitors for gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD), planned or existing NSAID therapy, following gastric surgery for peptic ulcer, if the patient’s wishes [1] (Table 1).

Table 1: Brief summary of Maastricht Consensus Reports.










  


    
Name of    consensus, year of production and structure of the meeting


    
Recommended    1st-line therapy


    
Recommended    2nd-line therapy


    
Indication    for eradication H. pylori +


    -Strongly recommended


    
Recommended    diagnostic tests


    
Confirmation    of eradication


  


  


    
Maastricht    Consensus Report, 1996, 63 participants from 19 European countries as well as    observers from Canada, Japan and the USA.


    
triple    therapy for 7 days, using a proton pump inhibitor and two of the following:    clarithromycin, a nitroimidazole (metronidazole or tinidazole) and    amoxycillin


    
re-treatment    regimen should be selected after consideration of previous treatment or    microbial sensitivities, or both. Additionally, quadruple therapy (omeprazole    plus classic bismuth based triple therapy) can be used in the event of    failure of triple therapy.


    
Peptic    ulcer disease (whether active or not) Bleeding peptic ulcer Low grade gastric    MALT lymphoma; Gastritis with severe abnormalities Following early resection    for gastric cancer


    
13C-urea breath test (UBT) Laboratory serology is also strongly    recommended, It is strongly recommended, that patients over 45 years who have    severe dyspeptic symptoms, and those with alarm symptoms (irrespective of    age) should be referred to a specialist for endoscopy.


    
The    "gold standard" is the 13C-UBT; no earlier than 4 weeks    after cessation of treatment; in complicated peptic ulcer disease,gastric    ulcer, cases of low grade gastric MALT lymphoma, where treatment is    incomplete and when compliance is poor.


  


  


    
Maastricht    2-2000 Consensus Report, 2000. 76 participants from 28 countries. Maastricht    III Consensus Report, 2005, 50 experts from 26 countries


    
triple    therapy using a proton pump inhibitor or ranitidine bismuth citrate, combined    with clarithromycin and amoxicillin or metronidazole for a minimum of 7 days    PPI-clarithromycin-amoxicillin or metronidazole treatment remains the    recommended first choice treatment in populations with less than 15–20% clarithromycin resistance prevalence. In populations with less than 40%    metronidazole resistance prevalence PPI-clarithromycin-metronidazole is    preferable.Quadruple therapies are alternative first choice treatments.


    
quadruple    therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, metronidazole and    tetracycline/ minimum 7 days. Where bismuth is not available, 2nd-line    therapy should be with proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy    Bismuth-based quadruple therapies remain the best second choice treatment, if    available. If not, a PPI, amoxicillin or tetracycline and metronidazole are    recommended.


    
Peptic    ulcer disease (active or not, including complicated ulcer); MALToma; Atrophic    gastritis; post-gastric cancer resection; Patients who are first-degree    relatives of gastric cancer patients; Patients’ wishes (after full    consultation with their physician) Duodenal/gastric ulcer (active or not,    including complicated PUD) MALToma Atrophic gastritis After gastric cancer resection; Patients    who are first degree relatives of patients with gastric cancer Patient’s    wishes (after full consultation with their physician)


    
urea    breath test or stool antigen test UBT and the stool antigen tests; Certain    kits for serology with high accuracy can also be applied


    
Always    test for successful eradication, by urea breath test or endoscopy-based test    if endoscopy is clinically indicated. Stool antigen test is the alternative    if urea breath test is not available UBT if available. when a UBT is not    available, a stool test can be used. Confirmation of H pylori eradication    should be performed at least four weeks after treatment


  


  


    
Maastricht    IV/ Florence Consensus Report, 2010, 44 experts from 24 countries


    
In    areas of low clarithromycin resistance:    clarithromycin-amoxicillin/metronidazoletherapy (10-14 days) or bismuth-containing quadruple treatment. In    areas of high clarithromycin resistance: bismuth-containing quadruple    treatments, sequential treatment or concomitant treatment.


    
bismuth    containing quadruple therapy orlevofloxacin containing triple therapy


    
All H.    pylori positive patients


    
UBT and    the stool antigen tests.There is no role for serology.


    
The UBT    or a laboratory-based validated monoclonal stool test are both recommended as    non-invasive tests. The time for testing the success of H pylori eradication    after the end of treatment should be at least 4 weeks.


  


  


    
Maastricht    V/ Florence Consensus Report, 2015,43 experts from 24 countries


    
In    areas of low clarithromycin resistance, triple therapy. In areas of high    (>15%) clarithromycin resistance: bismuth quadruple(BQT) or concomitant    therapies. In areas of high dual clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance,    BQT is the recommended.Duration: 14 days, unless 10days therapies are proven    effective locally.


    
bismuth-containing    quadruple therapy or a fluoroquinolone-containing triple or quadruple therapy


    
All H.    pylori positive patients


    
UBT is    the most investigated and best recommended non-invasive test in the context    of a ‘test-and-treat strategy’. Monoclonal SAT can also be used.


    
UBT and    the stool antigen tests, at least 4 weeks after completion of therapy.


  


















Table 1: Brief summary of Maastricht Consensus Reports.

The Maastricht 2-2000 Consensus Report was produced in 2000. Recommended first-line therapy by the guidelines was triple therapy using a proton pump inhibitor or ranitidine bismuth citrate, combined with clarithromycin and amoxicillin or metronidazole for a minimum of 7 days. Second-line therapy was quadruple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, metronidazole and tetracycline for a minimum of 7 days [2] (Table 1).

The Maastricht III Consensus Report was produced in 2005 and published in 2007. The strength of recommendations (A, B, C, D) and evidence (level from 1-5) to support them were graded. H. pylori eradication is an appropriate option for patients infected with H. pylori and investigated non-ulcer dyspepsia (A, 1a). Routine testing for H. pylori is not recommended in GERD (A, 1b). PPIclarithromycin- amoxicillin or metronidazole treatment remains the recommended first choice treatment in populations with less than 15–20% clarithromycin resistance prevalence. PPI-clarithromycinmetronidazole is preferable in populations with less than 40% metronidazole resistance prevalence. Quadruple therapies are alternative first choice treatments. The same first choice H. pylori treatments are recommended worldwide, although different doses may be appropriate [3].

The Maastricht IV/ Florence Consensus Report was produced in 2010 and published in 2012. According to this consensus 13C urea remains the best test to diagnose H. pylori infection. The diagnostic accuracy of the Stool Antigen Test (SAT) is equivalent to the UBT if a validated laboratory-based monoclonal test is used. In areas of low clarithromycin resistance, clarithromycin- containing treatments are recommended for first-line empirical treatment. Bismuth-containing quadruple treatment is also an alternative. In areas of high clarithromycin resistance, bismuth containing quadruple treatments are recommended for first-line empirical treatment. If this regimen is not available sequential treatment or a non-bismuth quadruple treatment is recommended. The use of high-dose (twice a day) PPI increases the efficacy of triple therapy. Extending the duration of PPI-clarithromycin-containing triple treatment from 7 to 10-14 days improves the eradication success by approximately 5% and may be considered. PPI-clarithromycin-metronidazole and PPI-clarithromycin-amoxicillin regimens are equivalent. According to the guidelines, H. pylori eradication to prevent gastric cancer was considered in the following: first-degree relatives of family members with a diagnosis of gastric cancer; patients with previous gastric neoplasia already treated by endoscopic or subtotal gastric resection; patients with a risk of gastritis: severe pan-gastritis, corpus-predominant gastritis, severe atrophy; patients with chronic gastric acid inhibition for more than 1 year; patients with strong environmental risk factors for gastric cancer (heavy smoking, high exposure to dust, coal, quartz, cement and/or work in quarries); H. pylori-positive patients with a fear of gastric cancer. [4].

The last Maastricht V/Florence consensus Report was produced in 2015 and represents the current guidelines [5]. (Table 1). According to the consensus clarithromycin triple therapy as 1st line-therapy is not recommended for countries with a high rate of resistance to clarithromycin such as Croatia. Unfortunately, this was the choice of 66.3% Croatian PCPs [6]. All previous studies found that triple therapy with amoxicillin and clarithromycin was the most commonly prescribed therapy which is not in accordance with the consensus. The knowledge of some physicians is at the level of Maastricht I consensus. The first attempt to eradicate H. pylori infection is the most important one since the rate of resistance to antibiotics clarithromycin and metronidazole increases with each successive attempt of H. pylori eradication. Insufficient level of knowledge in regards to the first line therapy is also a factor of secondary resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazol.

Conclusion

H. pylori infection is a global problem and poor adherence to the guidelines is an alarming problem. With this article we want to point out the importance of better engagement of national gastroenterological societies in the EU and the world as well as to encourage better cooperation with associations of family physicians. The publication of guidelines is an important measure. However, the publication of the guidelines in itself does not guarantee the application of its principles in clinical practice. Maastricht Consensus Reports are extensive scientific reports about H. pylori infection. National gastroenterology societies should present to PCPs shorter overview of the key points and the most important recommendations of the guidelines depending on the regional resistance rate of H. pylori to antibiotics.

We are looking forward to new guidelines and recommendations for H. pylori infection.

Acknowledgment

This article does not include any additional contributors to acknowledge.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Malfertheiner P, Mégraud F, O’Morain C, Bell D, Porro GB, Deltenre M, et al. Current European concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection-the Maastricht Consensus Report. The European Helicobacter Pylori Study Group (EHPSG). European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology. 1997; 9: 1-2.
  2. Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’Morain C, Bazzoli F, El-Omar E, Graham D, et al. Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht III Consensus Report. Gut. 2007; 56: 772-781.
  3. Malfertheiner P, Mégraud F, O’Morain C, Hungin AP, Jones R, Axon A, et al. Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection-the Maastricht 2-2000 Consensus Report. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002; 16: 167-80.
  4. Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’Morain CA, Atherton J, Axon ATR, Bazzoli F, et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection–the Maastricht IV/ Florence Consensus Report. Gut. 2012; 61: 646-664.
  5. Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’Morain CA, Gisbert JP, Kuipers EJ, Axon AT, et al. European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group and Consensus panel. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection-the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report. Gut. 2017; 66: 6-30.
  6. Jukic I, Vukovic J, Rusic D, Bozic J, Bukic J, Leskur D, et al. Adherence to Maastricht V/Florence consensus report for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection among primary care physicians and medical students in Croatia: A cross-sectional study. Helicobacter. 2020; 26.

Citation: Jukic I, Vukovic J, Modun D, Sundov Z and Tonkic A. Historical Overview of the Maastricht Consensus Reports for the Management of Helicobacter Pylori Infection. Where are we Today?. Austin J Infect Dis. 2022; 9(2): 1069.