Introduction of Heterogeneous Catalytic Materials for NOx Treatment


Ann J Materials Sci Eng. 2014;1(3): 2.

Introduction of Heterogeneous Catalytic Materials for NOx Treatment

Akter N1 and Kim TJ1,2*

1Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stony Brook University, USA

2Department of Chemical and Molecular Engineering, Stony Brook University, USA

*Corresponding author: Kim TJ, Department Materials Science and Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA

Received: September 27, 2014; Accepted: October 02, 2014; Published: October 07, 2014

Stringent environmental regulations of the greenhouse gases, such as NOx, emissions have driven extensive research in new and advanced functional materials. Recently, US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) past new regulations on fuel economy and emission standards. The enforced standards are 20mg/ mile for NOx emission and 10mg/mile for non-methane organic gas (NMOG) [1]. European Union legislation also aims to decrease in the NOx emissions down to 0.08 g/km for diesel and 0.06 g/km for gasoline engine [2]. NOx is common term for mono-nitrogen oxides (NO and NO2), which are exhausts from automobiles and stationary sources such as power plants during combustion of fossil fuels in the vehicles engines or coke in the electric power plants. Typically, NOx emission from engine consists of a mixture of 95% NO and 5% NO2 [3]. Although NO decomposition reaction is thermodynamically favorable (Δ G= -86 kJ/mol), it is hindered by the high activation energy of 364 kJ/mol [3]. Thus, in order to decrease the activation energy barrier, advanced heterogeneous catalysts design and different NO decomposition reaction pathways (selective catalytic reduction (SCR) and lean NOx trap (LNT)) have been developed.

The precious metals such as Pt, Pd, and Rh are generally used as three-way catalysts (TWCs) which are dispersed as individual atoms or small clusters of atoms over an oxide support [3]. Non-reducible oxide support like Al2O3 and SiO2 plays a crucial role in catalytic activity and provides the high surface areas which enhance the dispersion of precious metal, while reducible rate-earth oxide like CeO2 can release oxygen to create oxide ion vacancies [3]. Supported vanadium oxide catalysts have been used for stationary application of the SCR with urea (CO(NH2)2) or NH3 [4]. In the case of V2O5- WO3/TiO2 catalyst, vanadium oxide provides an active acid site, while tungsten oxide prevents rutile TiO2 phase formation from anatate one and increases the catalyst acidity [5]. An extensive characterization technique has been undertaken to understand the relationship between vanadium structure and activity by Raman, FTIR, XRD, NH3-TPD, H2-TPR, EXAFS and XPS [6-10]. It was proposed that the SCR rate is an increase with increasing the Brønsted acidic sites and the polymeric vanadate species are the active reaction site [6,11]. Deactivation and sintering of the supported vanadium oxide catalyst can be occurred because of the V atoms valence change and it was observed that V+5 content was increased in the deactivated vanadium oxide catalyst [12]. Zeolite supported catalysts (e.g., Fe-or Cu-ZSM5, SSZ-13, BEA, Y) and mesoporous materials (SBA15) are currently being used and have been extensively investigated for mobile applications [13-16] Kwak et al., observed that Cu/SSZ- 13 catalyst provides a high catalytic activity and thermal stability compared to the Cu/ZSM5 and Cu/BEA catalysts. The active site of Cu/zeolites catalysts can be provided using an in situ or operando experimental method [17,18]. X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) showed that a mixture of Cu(I) and Cu(II) are the active sites in Cu/zeolite catalysts [18]. Using H2-TPR experiment, reduced oxidation state from Cu(II) to Cu(I) was found for Cu/SSZ-13, while Cu(0) was observed for Cu/ZSM5 and Cu/BEA [17]. Over Cu/(CHA or SAPO-34) catalysts, depend on the catalyst preparation methods, different Cu species can be exists within the zeolite pores, such as isolated mononuclear Cu2+ and CuAlO2. It was also confirmed that isolate Cu2+ appears crucial role for catalytic activity, while CuAlO2 species relate to a poor NOx decomposition activity and an undesired byproduct, N2O [19].

As mentioned above, various catalysts materials have been prepared for meeting emission standards in North America. However, current and conventional heterogeneous catalysts are not still meet pollutant emission regulations which was reported by the US Council for Automotive Research (USCAR); 90% conversion of emissions at temperatures around 150OC along with a 20% improvement in engine efficiency [20].

In summary, over the past few decades, extensive research has been conducted to develop new functional materials to remove and decrease nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions from stationary facilities and mobile engine exhaust. To avoid the growing concern in a public health and to satisfy the strict emission regulations, researchers in academia and industry should develop novel heterogeneous catalysts and alternative reaction pathways. In addition to a synthesis and an application of new materials, fundamental catalysis research using several spectroscopic techniques under in situ or operando conditions should be performed at the same time to provide intermediate species and reaction mechanisms.


  1. Emission Standards Reference Guide. EPA.
  2. EU Emission Standards for Passenger Cars. DieselNet.2007.
  3. Roy S, Hegde MS, Madras G. Catalyst for NOx abatement. Applied Energy. 2009; 86: 2283–2297.
  4. Wu X, Yu W, Si Z, Weng D. Chemical deactivation of V2O5-WO3/TiO2 SCR catalyst by combined effect of potassium and chloride. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2013; 7: 420-427.
  5. Chen JP, Yang RT. Role of WO3 in mixed V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalysts for selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide with ammonia. Applied Catalysis A: General. 1992; 80: 135–148.
  6. Choo ST, Lee YG, Nam IS, Ham SW, Lee JB. Characteristics of V2O5 supported on sulfated TiO2 for selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2000; 200: 177–188.
  7. Due-Hansen J, Boghosian S, Kustov A, Fristrup P, Tsilomelekis G, Sthl K, et al. Vanadia-based SCR catalysts supported on tungstated and sulfated zirconia: Influence of doping with potassium. J. Catal. 2007; 251: 459-473.
  8. Amiridisa MD, Duevelb RV, Wachs IE. The effect of metal oxide additives on the activity of V2O5/TiO2 catalysts for the selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide by ammonia. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 1999; 20: 111-122.
  9. Kobayashi M, Kuma R, Masaki S, Sugishima N. TiO2-SiO2 and V2O5/TiO2-SiO2 catalyst: Physico-chemical characteristics and catalytic behavior in selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2005; 60: 173–179.
  10. Marshneva VI, Slavinskaya EM, Kalinkina OV, Odegova GV, Moroz EM, Lavrova GV, et al. The influence of support on the activity of monolayer vanadia-itania catlaysts for selective catalytic reduction of NO with ammonia. J. Catal. 1995; 155: 171-183.
  11. Lietti L, Nova I, Ramis G, Dall’Acqua L, Busca G, Giamello E, et al. Characterization and Reactivity of V2O5–MoO3/TiO2 De-NOx SCR Catalysts. J. Catal. 1999; 187: 419-435.
  12. Yu YK, He C, Chen JS, Meng XR. Deactivation mechanism of de-NOx catalyst (V2O5-WO3/TiO2) used in coal fired power plant. J. Fuel Chem Technol. 2012; 40: 1359-1365.
  13. Kwak J, Tran D, Burton S, Szanyi J, Lee J, Peden C. Effects of hydrothermal aging on NH3-SCR reaction over Cu/Zeolites. J Catal. 2012; 287: 203-209.
  14. Kwak J, Tran D, Szanyi J, Peden C, Lee J. The effect of copper loading on the selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide by ammonia over Cu-SSZ-13. Catal Lett. 2012; 142: 295-301.
  15. Zhu H, Kwak J, Peden C, Szanyi J. In situ DRIFTS-MS studies on the oxidation of adsorbed NH3 by NOx over a Cu-SSZ-13 zeolite. Catal. Today. 2013; 205: 16-23.
  16. Liu X, Jiang Z, Chen M, Shi J, Shangguan W, Teraoka Y, et al. Characterization and performance of Pt/SBA-15 for low-temperature SCR of NO by C3H6. J Environ Sci (China). 2013; 25: 1023-1033.
  17. Szanyi J, Kwak JH, Zhu H, Peden CH. Characterization of Cu-SSZ-13 NH3 SCR catalysts: an in situ FTIR study. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2013; 15: 2368-2380.
  18. Kispersky VF, Kropf AJ, Ribeiro FH, Miller JT. Low absorption vitreous carbon reactors for operando XAS: a case study on Cu/Zeolites for selective catalytic reduction of NO(x) by NH3. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2012; 14: 2229-2238.
  19. Deka U, Lezcano-Gonzalez I, Warrender SJ, Picone AL, Wright PA, Weckhuysen BM, et al. Changing active sites in Cu–CHA catalysts: deNOx selectivity as a function of the preparation method. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2013; 166: 144–152.
  20. Future Automotive After treatment Solutions: The 150OC Challenge Workshop Report. USCAR HQ, Southfield, MI. 2012; 29-30.

Download PDF

Citation: Akter N and Kim TJ. Introduction of Heterogeneous Catalytic Materials for NOx Treatment. Ann J Materials Sci Eng. 2014;1(3): 2. ISSN:2471-0245

Journal Scope
Online First
Current Issue
Editorial Board
Instruction for Authors
Submit Your Article
Contact Us