A Study on School Health Regarding the Management and Practices during the Covid-19 Pandemic at Hisar School in the 2021-2022 Academic Period

Research Article

Austin J Microbiol. 2024; 9(1): 1049.

A Study on School Health Regarding the Management and Practices during the Covid-19 Pandemic at Hisar School in the 2021-2022 Academic Period

Kardas AM1*; Akhan S2; Günver MG3; Öncül O4

1Hisar School Health Sciences Director, Istanbul, Turkey

2Kocaeli University, Faculty of Medicine Infectious Diseases Department, Kocaeli, Turkey

3Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine Biostatistics Department, Istanbul, Turke

4Istanbul Faculty of Medicine Infectious Diseases Department, Istanbul, Turkey

*Corresponding author: Kardas AM Hisar School Health Sciences Director, Istanbul, Turkey. Email: muge.kardas@hisarschool.k12.tr

Received: February 19, 2024 Accepted: April 01, 2024 Published: April 04, 2024

Abstract

Objective: This study examined an educational institution with 1521 students aged 4-18 and 330 employees that continuously maintained protective measures against COVID-19 between September 1, 2021-June 15, 2022, and how the total number of cases changed, the breakdown of cases by age groups, variants and the presence of vaccination, correlation between such data and overall data for Turkey, and how it changed over time were analyzed retrospectively.

Methods: Periods were named by the dominant Covid-19 variant (Delta/Omicron).

Results: The students with confirmed cases of COVID-19 were 520 (34%), and teachers and staff was 138 (42%). COVID- 19 incidence density was 2873/1000 school days for students and 762/1000 school days for teachers/staff. The highest COVID-19 ratio and incidence density was in Group-3 (middle school students) (45% -1116 cases / 1000 school days).

Conclusions: The difference between positive cases among vaccinated and unvaccinated persons in Group 3 was found to be significant (p=0.000001) and that being vaccinated immensely reduces the risk of Covid-19 disease. Implementation of continuous and regular preventive measures and the importance of surveillance is essential according to our study. As PCR and rapid antigen tests’ ratios of detecting positive values are quite similar, we think that rapid antigen testing saves time and labor, while playing a facilitating role in pandemic management as a practical and viable method at school.

Keywords: COVID-19; Pandemic; COVID-19 Vaccine

Preamble and Purpose

COVID-19 has already taken its place in the pages of history as one of the most devastating pandemics humanity has ever faced. The disease has so far affected 772 million people and caused 6,9 million deaths. Following the advice of WHO, many restrictions have been imposed in all areas of life especially in travel and education since the beginning of the pandemic.

As knowledge increased about the disease, more successful diagnosis, treatment and vaccination procedures implemented, returning to the basics of normal life began in a controlled manner.

A milestone for normalization efforts was the introduction of face-to-face education with preventive measures from 1 September 2021 to 15 June 2022. However, the level of exposure of pre-school and primary school students, who have not yet been vaccinated and are in close contact with each other, and their potential role in the spread of the disease was a major concern. Therefore, in our study, we analyzed an educational institution with 1521 students between the ages of 4-18 and 330 employees, which has been implementing protective measures against COVID-19 without interruption. We retrospectively examined the change in the total number of cases since the start of face-to-face education, the distribution of cases according to age groups, variants and vaccine administration, the time-dependent change of all these and the correlation of these data with the general data of Turkey.

Materials and Method

The study was conducted in a private school in Istanbul, the largest city of Turkey with a population of 20 million people, and the recorded data on COVID-19 were retrospectively evaluated. Students aged 4-18 years, teachers and school staff were included in the study. The study was conducted with data collected between 01 September 2021-15 June 2022, which determined the 2021-2022 academic year. The study was conducted in two periods: Delta Variant Period (01 September 2021- 01 January 2022) and Omicron Variant Period (02 January - 15 June 2022).

In the 2021-2022 academic year, when the study was conducted, at least two doses of Covid-19 vaccine were recommended for all teachers and school staff in line with the recommendations of the Ministry of Health. The Ministry of National Education made it mandatory for unvaccinated individuals to have a PCR test twice a week (the statement of the Ministry of National Education dated 21 August 2021).

Formation of Study Groups

Our study was conducted on five groups. Group-1 consisted of preschool students (4-5 years), Group-2 of primary school students (6-9 years), Group-3 of middle school students (10-13 years), Group-4 of high school students (14-18 years) and Group-5 of teachers and school staff.

Preventive measures: With the start of face-to-face education, universal precautions recommended by WHO and the Ministry of Health were applied [1,2]. Mask use, physical distancing, hand hygiene, and implementation of plexiglass in office/classroom desks were obligatory. Collective activities and sports competitions were cancelled. Lunch was served to high school students in the dining hall and other students in the classrooms. All ventilation systems were maintained and HEPA filters were installed in necessary areas.

School visits were prevented, new online communication lines for meetings/seminars were established, and quick access was provided for suspicious cases and new infection notifications. A hybrid/online program was implemented for those who are reported as in isolation due to Covid-19 infection/close contact, or who have chronic diseases.

Monitoring and Evaluation of Patients and Close Contacts

During the study, the history of close contact with infected individuals, risky behaviors, symptoms and signs of the patients and vaccination data were recorded in an electronic system “Hisarnet-Infirmary” where all cases in this database could be easily tracked. Rapid antigen testing was provided to those with typical COVID-19 symptoms and signs, and additional PCR testing was performed for those found positive (COBAS, SARS-CoV-2 Roche Diagnostic, UK). Close contacts with negative antigen tests were retested after 5-7 days. Those with positive serological and PCR tests were rested for 7-14 days after diagnosis. All diagnosed cases were defined as "active cases" [1].

Patients with respiratory distress or pneumonia were hospitalized in accordance with the recommendations of the guidelines published by the Ministry of Health, General Directorate of Public Health [2,3]. Patients who completed the isolation period did not require testing before returning to school.

Vaccination

Students and school staff were vaccinated with inactivated virus vaccines (Coronavac- Sinovac, China) and vaccines with genetic mRNA technology (BioNTech, Germany) in line with the recommendations of the Ministry of Health.

Statistics

Values showing the ratio of COVID-19 patients to uninfected people are shown as a percentage. In this study, the frequency of infection per 1000 school days for each group was determined as the incidence density [(Covid-19 Cases / Number of school days) x 1000]. The number of school days (181) refers to the number of face-to-face education days in the 2021-2022 academic year, and "Active Case" refers to the cases between the start and end days of the isolation period defined by the Ministry of Health. Chi-square tests were used in the vaccinated-unvaccinated/ COVID-19 (+) - COVID-19 (-) evaluations and statistical relevance was determined as 5% (Alpha).

Findings

Covid-19 Results

A total of 1851 people, including 1521 students and 330 school staff, were included in this study. 50% of the students and 36% of the staff were male. Group 1: included 144 (8%), Group 2: 440 (24%), Group 3: 445 (24%) and Group 4: 492 students (26%) (Table 1). Group 5: consisted of 239 teachers (72%) and 91 school staff (28%). With the exception of one student (0.06%), all students continued their education except for periods when they were infected or under quarantine.