Metastasis to the Submandibular Gland in Patients Presenting with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Research Articled

Austin Oncol. 2020; 5(1): 1021.

Metastasis to the Submandibular Gland in Patients Presenting with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Ahmed S1*, Salim Z2, Shaikh AH1, Iqbal SN2 and Ali A2

¹Dow International Dental College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Pakistan

²Dr Ishratulebad Khan Institute of Oral and Health Sciences, Dow University of health sciences, Pakistan

*Corresponding author: Shaheen Ahmed, Dow International Dental College, Dow University of Health Sciences, OMFS, Karachi, Pakistan

Received: July 20, 2020; Accepted: August 07, 2020; Published: August 14, 2020

Abstract

Background: Approximately one third of patients undergoing neck dissection procedure that includes gland resection experience xerostomia, particularly nocturnal xerostomia. Metastasis to level 1b lymph nodes in patients presenting with OSCC is considered frequent, however, submandibular gland invasion is rare and preservation of the gland offers multiple benefits.

Objective: The objective is to study the prevalence of submandibular gland involvement in patients presenting with oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods: It’s a cross sectional analytical study consisting of 90 patients presenting with biopsy proven OSCC. All patients presenting to centers of Dow University of health sciences are included in the study. Data entry and analysis was carried out on SPSS version 21. Results are expressed in frequencies and percentages. Chi squared test was applied to analyze the relationship between submandibular gland involvement and patient’s sociodemographic and tumor related variables.

Results: A total of 90 participants were a part of the study. 71.1% were male whereas 28.9% were female. The median age is 48. The most common tumor site among our patients is buccal mucosa (63.3%). The depth of invasion ranged from 0.2cm to 5cm (median 0.95cm) with round 55.6% patients presenting with depth of invasion <1cm. Majority of the patients (48.9%) presented with stage IVa (AJCC). 71.1% had level 1b negative nodes, whereas 28.9% patients demonstrated positive level 1b nodes. 50% of the patients presented with stage IVa. Number of patients with submandibular gland involvement were 5.

Conclusion: Based on the results of our study, due to rare involvement of submandibular gland, it should be persevered wherever possible and decision to preserve should be based on determinants, such as, primary tumor site, level 1b involvement and depth of invasion.

Keywords: Oral squamous cell carcinoma; Xerostomia; Submandibular gland

Abbreviations

OSCC: Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma; AJCC: American Joint Committee on Cancer; SMg: Submandibular gland; CI: Confidence Interval; H&E Staining: Hemotoxylin and Eosin Staining.

Background

Approximately 72% of the unstimulated saliva is secreted by submandibular glands and 28% from minor salivary glands [1,2]. These mucin secreting glands are removed on regular basis along with sublevel Ib when selective neck dissection is carried out [3,4]. There are two reasons that justify the gland excision; for dissection of lymph nodes in level 1b and for SMg invasion. SMg involvement in oral cavity tumors is extremely rare and ranges between 0.6 and 4.5% in the literature [5,7]. Regional metastasis is common in floor of the mouth tumors and tongue tumors and makes up about 5-7% [8].

The standard procedure carried out for management of metastatic cervical lymphadenopathy is neck dissection [9]. Approximately one third of patients undergoing neck dissection procedure that includes gland resection experience xerostomia, particularly nocturnal xerostomia [10-12]. Patients experience alteration in taste, chewing and swallowing inconveniency, loss of appetite and weight loss [3]. Secondly, unilateral SMG excision may lead to asymmetric lower inclination of the ipsilateral neck below the mandible. Third, hypoglossal (2.9%) and lingual nerve injury (1.4%) is still at-risk during SMG excision despite attempts to avoid it [13]. This results in swallowing difficulty, dysgeusia, and tongue paresthesia to some degree [14]. Radiotherapy, as a post-surgical treatment further affects the healthy tissues by altering the barrier function of the gland [15]. A radiation dose as little as 35 Gyleads to permanent salivary gland dysfunction [7,16]. These all adversely affect the quality of patient’s life [3].

Objective

The objective is to study the prevalence of submandibular gland involvement in patients presenting with oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Methodology

This is a cross sectional analytical studies consisting of participants presenting to multiple centers of Dow university of health sciences. Using Pass version 11, test for one sample proportion with 95% CI, 80% power of the test, 90 was the calculated sample size. All participants with biopsy proven OSCC and undergoing surgical excision of the lesion along with neck dissection were included in the study through non-probability purposive sampling technique. However, we excluded those patients who were previously treated for OSCC (surgical treatment or radiotherapy).

The submandibular gland sent for biopsy was divided by the pathologist and the fat containing nodes was separated. The tissue sections of level 1b lymph nodes and the submandibular gland were submitted for biopsy.

Apart from the submandibular gland involvement, primary parameters of the tumor including primary site, depth of invasion, tumor staging (AJCC) and level Ib nodal involvement were also recorded.

Data was collected and analyzed using H & N staining. Collected data was entered and analyzed on SPSS, ver.21 and results are reported in percentage& frequency. Chi squared test was applied to analyze the relationship between submandibular gland involvement and patient’s gender and tumor related variables.

Results

A total of 90 participants were included in the study. 71.1% were male and 28.9% were female. The median age is 48. The most common tumor site among our patients is buccal mucosa (63.3%), followed by mandible (12.2%), maxilla (11.1%), tongue (8.9%), floor of the mouth (3.3%) and lip (1.1%).The depth of invasion ranged from 0.2cm to 5cm (median 0.95cm) with round 55.6% patients presenting with depth of invasion <1cm. Majority of the patients (48.9%) presented with stage IVa (AJCC), followed by stage III (21.1%), stage II (20%), stage I (8.9%) and stage IVb (1.1%). 71.1% had level 1b negative nodes, whereas 28.9% patients demonstrated positive level 1b nodes. 49% of the patients presented with stage IVa. Number of patients with submandibular gland involvement were 5.

Fisher’s exact test was applied to observe the association between submandibular gland involvement and various tumor related variables including, primary site, depth of invasion, tumor stage and level 1b nodal involvement. The results demonstrated significant relation between submandibular gland involvement and primary site of the tumor, depth of invasion and level 1b involvement. However, non- significant association was observed between submandibular gland involvement and gender and tumor stage (Table 1).

Table 1: Submandibular gland involvement.



TABLECREATED







Table 1: Submandibular gland involvement.

Discussion

Tumor seeding to the submandibular gland can take place via three courses: hematogenous, lymphatic and direct extension [1]. Around 66-100% of metastasis occurs by direct invasion by the primary tumor which ranges between 0.6 and 3% [17]. Spread through metastatic cervical lymph nodes constitutes 0-1.5% of cases in the literature [17]. Metastasis to level 1b lymph nodes in patients presenting with OSCC is considered frequent, however, submandibular gland invasion is rare [17].

Metastasis by hematogenous route occurs more frequently from primaries that do not originate from the head and neck region, which includes breast, genitourinary system and lung [1,7].

Head and neck tumors majorly spread to the parotid gland while tumors originating below the clavicles metastasize to submandibular gland (breast, kidney, and lung) [18]. The fibrous capsule enclosing the submandibular gland offers effectual impediment to the spread of cancer in previously untreated patients. The spread to the glandular parenchyma is seldom observed even though the gland may be compressed by massive metastatic disease [19].

The decision for submandibular gland resection must be made during the surgical procedure on the basis of inspection and frozen sections [17]. However, the reliable modality for detection of metastasis to submandibular gland is ultrasonography [18].

Preservation of submandibular gland offers multiple potential benefits [20]. Hyposalivation which increases the risk of oral infections can be avoided in patients who do not undergo radiotherapy [20,21]. This results in undiminished basal salivary flow that is primarily mucinous, and is responsible for the sensation of mucosal lubrication [20]. Furthermore, basal salivary flow is vital for maintaining good oral hygiene [22]. Secondly, submandibular glands are more responsive to therapeutic agents at minimizing xerostomia both during and after radiation therapy [23]. A number of therapies for xerostomia include medications, acupuncture, synthetic saliva, gustatory stimulus, electrostimulation and autologous saliva storage. Some of these therapies have side effects and none of them have proved to improve patient’s quality of life [10,24].

Finally, preserving the gland maintains the external contour of the superior neck region, along with lowering the risk of injury to the lingual and hypoglossal nerves [25].

According to our study, out of 90 patients, 5 patients were positive for submandibular gland involvement. Tumor related variables primary site and depth of invasion were found to have statistically significant association with submandibular gland involvement. Participants presenting with OSCC of buccal mucosa (2/57), mandible (1/11) and floor of the mouth (2/3) demonstrated submandibular gland involvement by tumor cells. This coincides with the results of a study which showed submandibular gland invasion in similar sites including buccal mucosa (5/35), floor of the mouth (5/13) and tongue (11/178) [26]. Another study that was conducted to evaluate the oncological safety to leave the ipsilateral submandibular gland also supports the results of this study in terms of primary site involvement, demonstrating submandibular gland involvement in just one patient out of 107 with buccal mucosa being the primary tumor site [1].

According to a study which evaluated the submandibular gland metastasis in the head and neck cancer, excision of submandibular gland should be done in patients presenting with head and neck cancer and in patients with level I nodes invasion [16]. In the current study, level Ib nodes were positive in 26 patients. However, submandibular gland involvement was observed in only 4 patients. Statistically significant association was also observed between positive level Ib and submandibular gland involvement. This is supported by results of another study which demonstrated only four patients with extra nodal extension to level Ib lymph nodes and had submandibular gland involvement which makes it look like involvement of submandibular gland takes place by direct spread with extra nodal extension and not via lymphatics [27]. A retrospective study evaluated 229 salivary glands and found malignancy in only 3 patients [3]. All these cases were positive for level Ib involvement (3).

As a part of our study depth of invasion was recorded. It ranged from 0.2cm to 5cm with 0.95cm being the median value. This was compared to median value (10.0 cm) reported in another study which was closer to the median reported in our study [27]. Statistical test was applied to test the association between submandibular gland involvement and depth of invasion. A highly significant association was observed between the two variables (p= 0.02).

Around 50% of the participants presented with stage IV tumor. Submandibular gland involvement was observed in all the patients. 2 participants with stage III tumor and 3 participants with stage IV tumor demonstrated submandibular gland involvement. However, a non- significant association was observed between tumor stage and submandibular gland involvement.

Conclusion

Due to rare involvement of submandibular gland in OSCC, conservation of submandibular gland is recommended wherever achievable for reducing complications post-neck dissection. Based on the results of our study, decision to preserve the gland should be based on determinants, such as, primary tumor site, level 1b involvement and depth of invasion. However, regular follow-up is required to comment on the oncological safety.

References

  1. Ebrahim A, Loock J, Afrogheh A, Hille J. Is it oncologically safe to leave the ipsilateral submandibular gland during neck dissection for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma? The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 2011; 125: 837-840.
  2. Wang ZH, Yan C, Zhang ZY, Zhang CP, Hu HS, Tu WY, et al. Impact of salivary gland dosimetry on post-IMRT recovery of saliva output and xerostomia grade for head-and-neck cancer patients treated with or without contralateral submandibular gland sparing: a longitudinal study. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics. 2011; 81:1479-1487.
  3. Okoturo E, Trivedi N, Kekatpure V, Gangoli A, Shetkar G, Mohan M, et al. A retrospective evaluation of submandibular gland involvement in oral cavity cancers: a case for gland preservation. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2012; 41: 1383-1386.
  4. Kinch MCA, Kim HM, Vineberg KA, Ship JA, Eisbruch A. Dose-effect relationships for the submandibular salivary glands and implications for their sparing by intensity modulated radiotherapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics. 2008; 72: 373-382.
  5. Manola M, Aversa C, Moscillo L, Villano S, Pavone E, Cavallo C, et al. Status of level IIb lymph nodes of the neck in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue in patients who underwent modified radical neck dissection and lymph node sentinel biopsy. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica. 2011; 31: 130.
  6. Moretti A, Vitullo F, Augurio A, Pacella A, Croce A. Surgical management of lip cancer. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica. 2011; 31: 5.
  7. Byeon HK, Lim YC, Koo BS, Choi EC. Metastasis to the submandibular gland in oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas: pathologic analysis. Acta otolaryngologica. 2009; 129: 96-100.
  8. Iype EM, Sebastian P, Mathew A, Balagopal P, Varghese BT, Thomas S. The role of selective neck dissection (I-III) in the treatment of node negative (N0) neck in oral cancer. Oral oncology. 2008; 44: 1134-1138.
  9. Ferlito A, Robbins KT, Silver CE, Hasegawa Y, Rinaldo A. Classification of neck dissections: an evolving system. Auris nasus larynx. 2009; 36: 127-134.
  10. Chen TC, Lo WC, Ko JY, Lou PJ, Yang TL, Wang CP. Rare involvement of submandibular gland by oral squamous cell carcinoma. Head & Neck: Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck. 2009; 31: 877-881.
  11. Jaguar G, Lima E, Kowalski L, Pellizon A, Carvalho A, Alves F. Impact of submandibular gland excision on salivary gland function in head and neck cancer patients. Oral oncology. 2010; 46: 349-354.
  12. Pajukoski H, Meurman JH, Halonen P, Sulkava R. Prevalence of subjective dry mouth and burning mouth in hospitalized elderly patients and outpatients in relation to saliva, medication, and systemic diseases. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2001; 92: 641-649.
  13. Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C. Morbidity associated with removal of the submandibular gland. Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery. 1992; 20: 216- 219.
  14. Chen TC, Lou PJ, Ko JY, Yang TL, Lo WC, Hu YL, et al. Feasibility of preservation of the submandibular gland during neck dissection in patients with early-stage oral cancer. Annals of surgical oncology. 2011; 18: 497-504.
  15. Woolgar JA, Triantafyllou A. Pitfalls and procedures in the histopathological diagnosis of oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and a review of the role of pathology in prognosis. Oral oncology. 2009; 45: 361-385.
  16. Kruse A, Grätz KW. Evaluation of metastases in the submandibular gland in head and neck malignancy. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2009; 20: 2024- 2027.
  17. Basaran B, Ulusan M, Orhan K, Gunes S, Suoglu Y. Is it necessary to remove submandibular glands in squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity? Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica. 2013; 33: 88.
  18. Okura M, Harada T, Iida S, Aikawa T, Kogo M. Metastasis to the submandibular gland in oral cavity carcinoma. Oral Oncology Extra. 2006; 42: 308-310.
  19. Takes RP, Robbins KT, Woolgar JA, Rinaldo A, Silver CE, Olofsson J, et al. Questionable necessity to remove the submandibular gland in neck dissection. Head & neck. 2011; 33: 743-745.
  20. Dhiwakar M, Ronen O, Malone J, Rao K, Bell S, Phillips R, et al. Feasibility of submandibular gland preservation in neck dissection: A prospective anatomic-pathologic study. Head & neck. 2011; 33: 603-609.
  21. Beech N, Robinson S, Porceddu S, Batstone M. Dental management of patients irradiated for head and neck cancer. Australian dental journal. 2014; 59: 20-28.
  22. Bruce SD. Radiation-induced xerostomia: how dry is your patient? Clinical journal of oncology nursing. 2004; 8: 61-67.
  23. Chambers MS, Rosenthal DI, Weber RS. Radiation-induced xerostomia. Head & Neck: Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck. 2007; 29: 58-63.
  24. Spiegel JH, Brys AK, Bhakti A, Singer MI. Metastasis to the submandibular gland in head and neck carcinomas. Head & neck. 2004; 26: 1064-1068.
  25. Razfar A, Walvekar RR, Melkane A, Johnson JT, Myers EN. Incidence and patterns of regional metastasis in early oral squamous cell cancers: feasibility of submandibular gland preservation. Head & Neck: Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck. 2009; 31: 1619-1623.
  26. Subramaniam N, Balasubramanian D, Reddy R, Rathod P, Murthy S, Vidhyadharan S, et al. Determinants of level Ib involvement in oral squamous cell carcinoma and implications for submandibular gland-sparing neck dissection. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2018; 47: 1507-1510.
  27. Yang S, Su J-Z, Gao Y, Yu G-Y. Clinicopathological study of involvement of the submandibular gland in oral squamous cell carcinoma. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2020; 58: 203-207.

Citation: Ahmed S, Salim Z, Shaikh AH, Iqbal SN and Ali A. Metastasis to the Submandibular Gland in Patients Presenting with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Austin Oncol. 2020; 5(1): 1021.