Improvements in Sleep Disordered-Breathing after Surgical Removal of Adenoids and/or Tonsils

Research Article

Austin J Otolaryngol. 2015; 2(7): 1053.

Improvements in Sleep Disordered-Breathing after Surgical Removal of Adenoids and/or Tonsils

Motiee-Langroudi M, Saedi B*, Safavi A, Amali A and Jahandideh H

Department of Otolaryngology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran

*Corresponding author: Babak Saedi, Department of Otolaryngology, Otolaryngology Research Center, Imam Khomeini Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Bagherkhan Street, Chamran Highway, Postal Code: 141973141, Tehran, Iran

Received: November 07, 2014; Accepted: September 08, 2015; Published: September 11, 2015

Abstract

Introduction: Sleep disordered-breathing, with snoring as a problem in this category, is caused by elevated upper airways resistance, which is usually due to airways narrowing or collapse. Adenoid and tonsils, as lymphoid components of nasopharynx and oropharynx respectively, can narrow airways while hypertrophied and this may cause obstruction. In this study we aimed to investigate that how effectively the surgical removal of these components would improve sleep disordered-breathing.

Materials and Methods: Ninety-six children, all positive for snoring and/ or mouth breathing due to adenotonsillar hypertrophy that have indication of adenoidectomy or tonsillectomy entered to the study. A VAS (visual analogue scale) with scoring from 0 (for no snoring) to 10 (severe snoring that can be heard from next room) was used for snoring evaluation while mouth-breathing was evaluated based on the frequency of presence (0 for negative, 1 for occasional and 2 if it is permanent). The patients were assessed for their symptoms once at the pre-op visit and twice at three weeks and three months after operation and the results were compared. Their baseline-characteristics, presenting symptoms, the surgical procedures, complications and days of hospitalization were also taken into account.

Results: With a mean age of 5.84 (SD=1.2) and a 1.6:1 male to female ratio, the surgical removal of adenoids/tonsils could significantly improve both snoring and mouth-breathing (p=0.023) and (p=0.037) at 3 months after operation, averagely making a six unit improvement in snoring scores and reducing mouth-breathing from over 70% positive cases to less than 34%. Of course improvement of snoring happened sooner (p=0.031 at 3 weeks for snoring, but mouth breathing needed more time to reduced (p=0.247 at 3 weeks).

Conclusion: Surgical removal of adenoids/tonsils in symptomatic patients can significantly improve both snoring and mouth-breathing in sleep disorderedbreathing children.

Keywords: Sleep disordered-breathing; Surgical removal; Adenoids; Snoring; Tonsils

Introduction

“Snoring”, defined as the noise made by the vibration of upper airways components [1] during sleep, represents a problem from a variety of sleep-related respiratory problems known as “sleep disordered-breathing”. In sleep disordered-breathing, the resistance of upper airways is elevated [2] which disturbs the normal airflow, and according to the location where the airflow is disturbed [3], patients may present with a wide range of symptoms from simple snoring to severe forms of obstructive sleep apnea [4]. Although simple snoring may not cause serious physical health issues [5] in adults, more severe forms of sleep disordered-breathing have been reported to have deleterious effects on general health and leading to multiorgan morbidity [2,6]. That’s while snoring in children is suspicious to cause neurocognitive deficits, language and verbal skills problems, impaired attention, low memory and intelligence, and also raising concerns about successful academic and developmental progress [4,7-9]; furthermore, children who snore are at increased risk for pulmonary hypertension [10]. Thus, with these vast morbidities, sleep disordered-breathing seems to be of enough importance to undergo detailed investigation. Pathophysiologically, two general processes are addressed to alter breathing during sleep:

Airway collapse: In oropharynx, as a unique anatomical feature in humans [11], with a muscular wall, soft palate and intra-luminal components like the tongue and uvula [12], the airway sustainment requires a specific muscular tonus all the time. This tonus is usually preserved while awake, maybe via a conscious process; but the fact that these problems occur during sleep [13] implies that there may be a problem in non-conscious airways sustainment. There are mechanical receptors in the upper airways [13,14] to sense the pressure, and while stimulated, with a certain delay, they activate the reflex muscles. This keeps the upper airways open. Accordingly, impairments in detection of mechanical stimuli [14], increased latency of the reflex muscle activation, reduced strength of the reflex [13], and inability of muscular control [15], all can lead to airway collapse which represents ineffective neuromuscular functioning during sleep.

Airway narrowing: Narrowing of upper airways may be due to abnormalities of upper airways [16]. Many factors can impact on the upper airways calibrations. The supine position that significantly reduces retro-palatal space [17]; the para-pharyngeal fat pads affect on the airways calibration [18], the respiration process itself alters the airways, while narrowing of the airways (predominantly lateral walls) at the end of expiration and beginning of inspiration has been thought to have a role in snoring [18]. By the way specific areas of the pharynx (particularly the tip of soft palate and 1cm distal to it) have been reported to be significantly associated with snoring [17]. Pharyngeal masses, on the other hand, with any origin, like tonsils, adenoids, malignancies, etc., basically narrow the upper airways unless compensatory processes overcome the space shortage.

Based on the pathological processes, the appropriate treatments may be indicated. Oral appliances or implant-retained appliances in edentulous patients [19,20] (sometimes with orofacial complications) [12,21], electrical stimulation of mouth floor muscles, reconstructive surgeries, radiofrequency, uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP), laser assisted uvuloplasty (LAUP), palatal implants, NCPAP (nasal continuous positive airway pressure), hyoid suspension, mandibular osteotomy, and multi-level surgery concepts [3,5,22] in adults; while adenotomies, tonsillotomies, tonsillectomies or adenotonsillectomies are the treatments with most benefits for children [23,24].

Although surgical removal of adenoids and tonsils are accepted or even indicated treatments in children with symptomatic hypertrophies of these structures [23,24] and these treatments have been reported to appropriately resolve majority of their symptoms [23,25], there are suggestions that tonsillectomy (with or without adenoidectomy) does not necessarily reduce the likelihood of snoring and their effect on mouth breathing is unclear [24]. In this study, we conducted a large prospective survey in which snoring children with hypertrophied adenoids and tonsils underwent surgical removal of these components, and were evaluated at intervals for improvements in their baseline symptoms, so that we could investigate the shortterm efficacy of these surgeries to improve sleep disordered-breathing.

Materials and Methods

Through a prospective cross-sectional study from 2010 to 2011, 96 children – aged 3 to 15 yrs - with symptomatic hypertrophy of adenoids and/or tonsils were selected among those referred to ENT clinic of Imam Khomeini hospital (a tertiary healthcare center and an affiliate of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS)) and entered to the study. All the participants had positive history of severe snoring and/or mouth breathing and indicated to undergo surgical resection of their adenoids/tonsils. Cases with reactive adenitis/tonsillitis responding to medical treatments, upper airways malignancies, prior surgical manipulations of adenoids/tonsils, patients with Down’s syndrome or Mucopolysaccharidosis and those beyond the qualified age limits of the study (3-15y) were excluded. The study was approved by ethics board of the TUMS and all the aspects were conducted according to declaration of Helsinki. Patients’ parents also agreed that their children participate in the study by signing our printed informed consent. A 0 to 10 scoring scale was presented to the participants or their parents and they were asked to appropriately give a score to the severity of their snoring. In this scale, 0 stood for the absence of snoring (which according to our inclusion criteria no one would earn that), and 10 stood for the most severe form of snoring which had to be audible by parents from a next-door room. Mouth-breathing was also evaluated based on the frequency of its presence. The patients were categorized into three groups: those without (score 0), those with occasional presence (score 1) and those with permanent presence of mouth-breathing (score 2). Adenoidectomy, tonsillectomy, or adenotonsillectomy due to hypertrophy of their adenoids/tonsils; was performed in patients. By the way, further procedures were indicated in some patients (like myringotomy …) in addition to their adenoids/tonsils removal. Both snoring scores and mouth-breathing severity were evaluated at three weeks and three months postoperative sessions. The patients were evaluated for both intra-operative and post-operative complications. The data were analyzed using SPSS 19. Comparative results were tested by (t-test and Chi-2) and P-values of or less than 0.05 were considered to be significant.

Results

A total of 96 children, aged 3 to 15 yrs (mean=5.84; SD=1.2) entered to the study; of them, 60 (62.5%) were male and 36 (37.5%) were female. Majority of our patients were aged less than five, as 67 (69.8%) were between three and five; 17 (17.7%) were between six to 10; and 12 (12.5%) were over 10. Snoring history was positive in all participants, while mouth-breathing and recurrent pharyngitis were the next frequent complaints. Figure 1 shows the variety of presenting symptoms. Eighty one patients (84.3%) had only adenoidectomy, tonsillectomy, or adenotonsillectomy procedures, while 15 (15.7%) had further operations in addition to their adenoids/tonsils removal. Table 1 outlines the scope of procedures performed on our caseseries.