Research Article
Austin J Otolaryngol. 2019; 6(1): 1107.
Stage I Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Tongue and Floor of the Mouth: Which Factors can Predict Occult Cervical Lymph Node Metastases?
Dias FL1*, Cernea CR2, Arcury RA3, Logullo AF4, Albuquerque B1, Farias TP1 and Kligerman J1
1Department of Head Neck Surgery, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Brazil
2Department of Head Neck Surgery, São Paulo University, Brazil
3Department of Pathology, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Brazil
4Department of Pathology, São Paulo Federal University, Brazil
*Corresponding author: Fernando L Dias, Chief of the Department of Head Neck Surgery, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de, Janeiro-Brazil
Received: February 25, 2019; Accepted: April 03, 2019; Published: April 10, 2019
Abstract
Background: The prognostic assessment and the therapeutic planning of oral cavity carcinomas are based on TNM classification which makes no reference to certain aspects of tumoral biology. Identification of factors related to aggressive biological behavior would enable a better selection of patients who would benefit from more radical or multidisciplinary treatment.
Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of the impact of various demographic, clinical, and histopathological factors, as well as a molecular factor (p53 expression) in the biological behavior of 49 squamous cell carcinomas of the tongue and floor of the mouth, stage I, treated at the Cancer Hospital I-Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The association of these factors with the development of cervical metastases were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis.
Results: Twelve patients (24.5%) developed neck metastases: 5 (10.2%) had micro metastases identified during elective neck dissection and 7 (14%) developed Lymph Node Metastases (LNM) during the follow-up period. At univariate analysis, the number of mitoses per HPF (p=.029), mode of invasion (p=.025), stage of invasion (p=.017), lymphoplasmocytic infiltration (p=.025), malignancy grading score (p=.040), tumoral thickness (p=.035), perineural invasion (p=.010) and microvascular invasion (p=.001), presented statistical significance for the occurrence of lymph node metastases. The multivariate analysis identified the presence of microvascular invasion (p=.002) as independent predictor of cervical metastases.
Conclusions: The most important predictive factor for occult LNM in stage I SCC of the tongue and floor of the mouth was microvascular invasion. The 24.5% rate of occult cervical metastases suggests the need for elective treatment of the neck in this group of patients.
Introduction
The prognostic assessment and therapeutic planning of oral cavity carcinomas are based on TNM classification. However, this system is based upon clinical information and makes no reference to certain aspects of tumoral biology which ultimately could explain differences in the biological behavior of tumors having the same histology and stages. In fact, a significant fraction of patients with stage I disease, usually presenting unfavorable histologic features, may have a relatively poor prognosis despite the small size of the tumor [1]. Identification of factors related to aggressive biological behavior could provide a better selection of those patients for whom more radical or multidisciplinary treatment would be recommended.
The biological aggressiveness of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC), particularly in its initial stages (stages I and II) is reflected in its ability to metastasize to the regional lymphatic chains. Micrometastases can be found in up to 42% of patients with early T1-2 oral tongue carcinoma, and locoregional recurrences are considered the main cause of treatment failures of oral tongue carcinoma [2-3]. If regional metastases are present in a patient’s initial evaluation or appears subsequently to a primary therapy, the 5-year survival rate can decrease to lower than 20% [3].
It is important to emphasize that micrometastases are not detectable by the best contemporary diagnostic technology making nodal recurrence, as result of undetectable subclinical nodal metastases, the main cause of treatment failure of early stage I OSCC [4-7]. The question of whether the patient with N0 neck should undergo Elective Neck Dissection (END), versus observation remains unanswered, particularly in stage I OSCC.
In this study, our aim was principally to make a retrospective analysis of the impact of various epidemiological, clinical, and histopatological factors, and a molecular factor in the presence of occult LNM in a series of 49 squamous carcinomas of the tongue and Floor of the Mouth (FOM), stage I, treated in a single institution.
Patients and Methods
This is a retrospective cohort study including 49 patients stage I SCC of the Tongue and FOM, treated at the Cancer Hospital I of the Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, between January 1985 and December 1995. Several factors were evaluated: demographic (gender, race, and race), clinical (primary site, and morphological aspect); and histopathological factors classified according the malignancy grading system proposed by Anneroth et al [8]. This classification details the following six items: 1) grade of keratinization, 2) number of mitoses per high powered field [HPF], 3) nuclear polymorphism, 4) mode of invasion, 5) stage of invasion, 6) lymphoplasmocytic infiltration, with the addition of one parameter; degree of differentiation at deep margins. Each tumor was scored on individual items in the classification system using a 4-point rating scale. A composite score also was considered for each tumor as the sum of the individual scores called total malignancy grading score.
In addition to the degree of tumor differentiation, tumor thickness (measured from the surface of the tumor to the deepest point of invasion) and depth (meaning the extent of cancer growth into the tissue beneath an epithelial surface) measured in millimeters, as stated by Moore et al [9], a two-dimensional measurement (> diameter vs. thickness, and > diameter vs. depth of invasion) as well as the presence of microvascular and perineural invasion were also analyzed. Perineural Invasion (PNI) was defined as infiltration of the perineural space by tumor cells while Microvascular Invasion (MVI) was defined as the presence of aggregates of tumor cells within endothelial-lined channels or invasion of the media of vessel with ulceration of the overlying intima. A molecular factor, p53 expression tested by immunostaining and scored according to the percentage of positivity (incubated with a monoclonal antibody p53-Dako A/SDenmark cod. M7001) was also evaluated. All slides were reviewed by a single pathologist (RAA) and a senior research fellow (A.F.L.), blinded to the clinical outcomes.
The staging classification used in this study was in accordance with that proposed by the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer, 7th Edition, 2009, for Cancer Staging and End Results Reporting.
All patients were followed for a minimum of 24 months or until the time of death. No patient was lost for follow-up in this series. The follow-up period ranged from 24 to 153 months, with a median of 57 months.
Univariate and multivariate analysis evaluated the association between the factors and cervical metastases as primary outcome. For the univariate analysis, the following methods were employed: Pearson’s chi-square test [10] with Yate’s correction for continuity. The Fischer’s exact test [11] was used when bias existed in chi-square analysis. To evaluate the probability of the development of regional metastases identified at the univariate analysis, a multivariate analysis was employed [12]. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan- Meyer life-table method [13].
Results
Of the 49 untreated stage I, 25 patients underwent resection of the primary tumor alone (RA) and 24 had resection of the primary tumor with elective neck dissection (R+END).
The study included 32 (65%) men and 17 (35%) women. The ages varied from 37 to 92 years, with a median of 59 years. There were 34 (69%) white patients and 15 (31%) non-white patients. Twentyeight (57%) patients had oral tongue cancers and 21 (43%) had FOM cancers. Based on the gross appearance of the tumors, 30 (61%) patients had exophytic lesions and 19 (39%) had endophytic lesions (Table 1).
Metastases
Variable
Category
No
Yes
Total
P
n
%
n
%
Age
=50
10
83.3
2
16.7
12
0.703 (*)
>50
27
73
10
27
37
Gender
Male
22
71
9
29
31
0.494 (*)
Female
15
83.3
3
16.7
18
Race
Caucasian
24
70.6
10
29.4
34
0.298 (*)
Non Caucasian
13
86.7
2
13.3
15
Morphologic
Exophytic
11
68.8
5
31.3
16
0.492 (*)
Aspect
Infiltrative
26
78.8
7
21.2
33
Site
Tongue
22
75.9
7
24.1
29
1.000 (*)
Floor of Mouth
15
75
5
25
20
(*) The values of p were obtained by means of the Fischer’s exact test.
Table 1: Distribution and Univariate Analysis of Epidemological and Clinical Variables for the Occurrence of Regional Lymph Node Metastases.
Of the 25 patients who underwent RA, 8 (32%) had FOM tumors and 17 (68%) had tongue tumors in comparison with 13 (54%) FOM and 11 (46%) tongue tumors in the R+END group. Eightyfour percent (21) of patients in the RA group had exophytic types of tumors and 16% (4) had endophytic tumors, in comparison with 37.5% (9) of exophytic tumors and 62.5% (15) of endophytic tumors in the R+END group. Thirty-five patients (71.5%) had moderately differentiated SCC, 13 (26.5%) had well-differentiated SCC, and only 1 patient (2%) had poorly differentiated SCC.
Tumor thickness varied from 0.7 to 16.7 mm, with a median of 5.36 mm, while DOI varied from 0.7 to 16.7 mm too, with a median of 5.34 mm. Microvascular invasion was found in 32 (65.3%) patients; PNI was found in 28 (57%). With regard to the two-dimensional measurements between highest tumor diameter (HD) and TT, 18 (36.5%) patients had HD < 10 mm vs. T < 4mm, 3 (6%) had HD> 10 mm vs. T < 4 mm, 9 (18.5%) had HD < 10 mm vs. T > 4 mm, and 19 (39%) had HD > 10 mm vs. T > 4 mm. Two-dimensional measurements between HD and DOI, however showed 17 (34.5%) patients with HD < 10mm vs. DOI < 4 mm, 7 (14.5%) with HD > 10 mm vs. DOI< 4 mm, 10 (20.5%) with HD < 10 mm vs. DOI > 4 mm, and 15 (30.5%) with HD > 10 mm vs. DOI > 4 mm (Table 2).
Varible
Category
Metastases
Yes
Total
P
No
N
%
n
%
Tumor lenght
=10mm
21
77.78
6
22.22
27
0.683 (1)
>10 =20mm
16
72.73
6
27.27
22
Tumor
=4mm
19
90.48
2
9.52
21
0.035 (1)
Thickness
>4mm
18
64,29
10
35.71
28
Depth of
=4mm
21
87,50
3
12.5
24
0.056 (1)
Invasion
>4mm
16
64
9
36
25
Tu Lenght vs
TL =10 vs TT =4
16
88.89
2
11.11
18
0.179 (1)
Thickness
TL >10 vs TT =4
3
100
0
0
3
(TT)
TL =10 vs TT >4
5
55.56
4
44.44
9
TL >10 vs TT >4
13
68.42
6
31.58
19
Tu Lenght vs
TL =10 vs DOI =4
15
88.24
2
11.76
17
0.290 (2)
Depth (DOI)
TL >10 vs DOI =4
6
85.71
1
14.69
7
TL =10 vs DOI >4
6
60
4
40
10
TL >10 vs DOI >4
10
66.67
5
33.33
15
Microvasc.
No
29
90.63
3
9.38
32
<0.001 (2)
Invasion
Yes
8
47.06
9
52.94
17
Perineural
No
25
89.29
3
10.71
28
0.010 (1)
Invasion
Yes
12
57.14
9
42.86
21
Degree of
Well Diff.
9
64.29
5
35.71
14
0.467 (2)
Different.
Mod. Diff.
27
79.41
7
20.59
34
Poorly Diff.
1
100
0
0
1
p53
No
21
77.78
6
22.22
27
0.683 (1)
Yes
16
72.73
6
27.27
22
- The values of p were obtained by means of the Pearson’s chi square test.
- The values of p were obtained by means of the Fischer’s exact test.
Table 2: Distribution and Univariate Analysis of histopatological and molecular variables for the occurrence of regional lymph node metastases.
Malignancy tumor grading (according to Anneroth’s 6 items scale) plus the analysis of the degree of differentiation at deep margins (7o item) and the results are shown in Table 3.
Metastases
Variable
Category
No
Yes
Total
P
n
%
n
%
Degree of Keratinization
1
11
73.33
4
26.7
15
0.343 (*)
2
9
90
1
10
10
3
10
83.33
2
16.7
12
4
7
58.33
5
41.7
12
Degree of Differentiation at Deep Margins
1
2
66.67
1
33.3
3
0.776 (*)
2
20
76.92
6
23.1
26
3
12
80
3
20
15
4
3
60
2
40
5
Nuclear Polymorphism
1
7
87.5
1
12.5
8
0.622 (*)
2
10
71.43
4
28.6
14
3
13
81.25
3
18.8
16
4
7
63.64
4
36.4
11
Number of Mitoses
1
25
83.33
5
16.7
30
0.027 (*)
2
8
80
2
20
10
3
2
28.57
5
71.4
7
4
2
100
0
0
2
Pattern of Invasion
1
4
100
0
0
14
< 0.001 (*)
2
9
75,00
3
25
12
3
9
81.82
2
18.2
11
4
5
7
58.3
12
Stage of Invasion
1
3
100
0
0
3
0.048 (8)
2
15
93.75
1
6.25
16
3
19
63.33
11
36.7
30
Linfoplasmocytic Infiltration
1
6
75
2
25
8
0.039 (*)
2
17
94.44
1
5.56
18
3
13
59.09
9
40.9
22
4
1
100
0
0
1
Malignancy Grading Score
=2,5
28
84.85
5
15.2
33
0.040 (*)
>2,5
9
56.25
7
43.8
16
(*) The values of p were obtained by means of the Fischer’s exact test.
Table 3: Distribution and univariate analysis of histopatological Variables for the occurrence of regional lymph node metastases.
The quantification of p53 expression, evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis (positive staining > 20% of the nuclei of tumor cells), revealed 22 positive tumors and 27 negative tumors, respectively 45% and 55% of all patients tumor samples.
Twelve patients (24.5%) developed LNM. Lymphatic metastases were identified in five patients (10.2%) during the elective treatment of the neck (micrometastases) at the time of the treatment of their primary tumors. Micrometastases occurred at level I in 2 cases (40%), at level III in 2 cases (40%), and at levels I and II in 1 case (20%).
Metastases were ipsilateral in all 5 cases. In one patient with anterior FOM cancer, metastases developed in both sides of the neck. All but one metastases involved only one lymph node. None had extra-capsular spread at histopathologic examination.
Seven patients (14%) developed LNM during the follow-up after the treatment of the primary tumor. Metastases occurred at level I in 3 cases (42%), at levels I and II in 1 case (14.5%), at levels II and III in 1 case (14.5%), at levels II, III, and IV in 1 case (14.5%), and at levels I, II, III, IV, and V in 1 case (14.5%). Metastases were ipsilateral in 5 cases and bilateral in 2 cases with primaries located in the lateral aspect of the oral tongue. Extra-capsular spread was found in 3 patients (42.8%).
Of the 5 patients (10.2%) who died of oral cancer, 4 died of regional recurrence and 1 died of both regional and systemic diseases despite salvage therapy attempted by means of radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy in 3 cases (60%), radical surgery in one case (20%), and radiotherapy in 1 case (20%).
Overall Survival (OS) calculated by the Kaplan-Meyer method was 83% and 68% for periods of 36 and 60 months, respectively. Disease-Free Survival (DFS) was 83% for periods of 36 and 60 months. Uncensored survival, defined as the time from diagnosis to death from oral cancer for 36 and 60 months was, respectively, 91% and 89%. The DFS for RA and R+END were 74% and 97%, respectively.
The 23% difference between the two groups, analyzed by Wilcoxon signed-rank test, was statistically significant (p=.03).
In the univariate analysis, variables found to be strongly associated with the occurrence of neck metastases were: TT (p=.035, number of mitoses per HPF (p=.029), mode of invasion (P=.025), stage of invasion (p=.017), lymphoplasmocitic infiltration (p=.025), total malignancy grading score (p=.040), PNI (p=.010), and MVI (p‹.001) (Table 4).
Variables
P
Tumor Thickness
0.035
Number of Mitoses
0.029
Pattern of Invasion
0.025
Stage of InvasIon
0.017
Lymphoplasmocytic Infiltrataion
0.025
Malignancy Grading Score
0.04
Microvascular Invasion
<0.001
Perineural Invasion
0.01
Table 4: Variables selected at univariate analysis for the occurrence of regional lymph node metastases.
At multivariate analysis, MVI was the only variable independently and significantly associated with the risk of neck metastases (p=.002; Odds ratio=10.875, 95% CI 2.37 to 49.87) (Table 5).
Metastases
Variable
Estimate
Default errors
P
Odds Ratio
CI
Intercepto
-2.67
0.61
<0.001
Microvascular
2.39
0.78
0.002
10.875
2.371; 49.879
Invasion
p: Descriptive level associated with the null parameter test. IC: Confidence Interval with 95% for Odds Ratio.
Table 5: Interpretation of the variables selected at the logistic regression model for the risk of regional lymph node metastases.
Discussion
The incidence of occult LNM in early stages of OSCC ranges from 21% to 42% [2,3,7,8,14]. For those individuals who undergo close observation of the neck and develop lymphatic metastases, 77% may develop either N2 or extra-capsular extension requiring radical neck dissection as surgical salvage procedure [15].
Overall salvage in our study, by means of surgery, radiotherapy or a combination of these two methods was 37.5% (3/8 recurrences), including 1 patient with local recurrence (12.5%). These results are comparable with the 35% salvage rates found in most series published [3,6,7,14,17-19].
Neither age, gender, or race seemed to be significant predictors of biological behavior in our study (p=.703, p=.494, and p=.298). Although some authors have found an aggressive behavior in young patients with oral cancer [22,23], male sex [22,23], and non-white patients [22,28,29], our results are similar to others published in the literature [16,17,24,25].
We were also unable to identify any significant statistic difference when we evaluated the impact of the clinical factors (primary site, and morphological aspect) in the development of LNM in our study (p=.1 and p=.492).
The anatomic location of the lesion could also be considered as a prognostic indicator, since the tumors behave differently depending on anatomic location. Shaw et al, in 2009 [30] examined 482 consecutive OSCC patients and concluded that the primary site had little influence on prognosis. Chen et al [22] and Ulrist et al. [31], on the other hand, found that SCC of the tongue and FOM generally have poor prognosis due to the frequent presence of LNM, which has an impact in survival rates. Regarding the morphologic aspect of the primary tumor, our results are conflicting with the majority of the reports in the literature. Authors also consider that predominantly infiltrative or endophytic tumors carry a higher risk of the involvement of lymphovascular micro-channels and of the development of LNM [3,19,20,32,33]. The fact that our series included only stage I tumors, with limited depth of invasion (median of 5.34 mm) may explain our results.
Tumor Thickness (TT) and DOI have been studied extensively as a predictor of occult cervical metastases. Most studies support a cutoff value of 2-6 mm for TT and 4-5 mm for DOI [3,9,14,17,18,32-35].
Mohit-Tabatabai et al [36] and Spiro et al [18] were the first authors to apply Breslow’s hypothesis of the relationship between nodal involvement and TT to OSCC. They found that a TT of 1.5mm and 2.0mm should be utilized as cut-off points to indicate the elective treatment of the neck in early OSCC.
In this study we considered the cut-off value of 4mm, because Kligerman et al [18] had already used it in a prospective study published from our Institution. They used the median of the TT of all T1-2 OSCC accrued as the cut-off value in their analysis.
Huang et al, in 2009, [34] published a meta-analysis from 16 studies and a pooled total of 1136 patients with the aim of evaluated the optimal cut-off for TT in OSCC. They were able to find a metastases rate of 4.5% for a TT of 4 mm, rising rapidly to 16.6% for a TT of 5 mm. They concluded that TT was a strong predictor for cervical LNM and that the optimal TT cut-off point was 4 mm.
We found similar results with metastases found in 9.52% of patients with TT < 4mm in comparison with 35.71% of patients with TT > 4 mm (p=.035). Interestingly, results were marginal when we analyzed the same aspect utilizing DOI, with metastases found in 12.5% of patients with DOI < 4 mm in comparison with 36% of patients with DOI > 4 mm (p=.056). This is in line with the results of Moore et al (1986) [9], Ambrosch et al (1995) [32], Asakage et al (1998) [37], and Mücke et al (2016) [39]. Only a few authors failed to find an association between TT and LNM [38,40,41].
Several authors suggested that association of Tumor length and thickness (or depth) could offer a better evaluation of the biological behavior of OSCC in comparison with TNM stage in the past [42-44]. Recent data published by van der Schroeff et al [45], and Mücke et al [46] also suggested that Tu Volume (TV) is an important factor to predict the biologic aggressiveness of OSCC. Others also found MRImeasured TV as a predictor of 2 year DSS and DFS, as well as occult cervical LNM in lingual cancer [27,47].
In the present study, the two-dimensional measurements utilizing Tumor Length vs. TT and DOI did not show statistical significance (p=.179, and p=.290, respectively) with the development of LNM.
There has been an ongoing debate about the predictive value of histopathological parameters in OSCC. In the past decades, the most commonly used histopathological grading system is the one introduced by Broders and modified by the World Health Organization (WHO) [48]. In 1973, Jakobsson et al. developed a multi-factorial malignancy grading system to obtain a more precise morphologic evaluation of the growth potential of SCC’s in the head and neck region [49]. To make the morphologic criteria more precise, Anneroth and Hansen modified the grading system Jakobsson et al. developed for application to SCCs in the tongue FOM [50].
In our study we evaluated the six parameters of Anneroth’s classification [16,50] due to various reasons: it is a standard method for OSCC, is easy to understand by a lab technician, gives more specific result, predicts the prognosis and guides the surgeon about the proper treatment plan.
Among the parameters evaluated at the univariate analysis, with predictive value for the development of LNM, we found: the number of mitosis per HPF (p=.029), pattern of invasion (p=.025), stage of invasion (p=.017), lymphoplasmocytic infiltration (p=.025), and the composite score of malignancy grading (p=.040). These results reflecting the evaluation of the tumor/host interaction are, partly, in line with the results of several authors in the literature [16,17,19,33,37,48]. More recently, Li et al, in 2013 [51] utilized the Risk Model originally proposed in 2005 by Brandwein-Gensler et al [52], found that the risk model was significantly predictive of LRR (p=.001), and DSS (P=.0005).
Tumor invasion into lymphatic and/or blood vessels has long been postulated to be an important pathologic factor [17]. However, its impact on the development of lymph node metastases remains to be elucidated [49,53-55].
Poleksic et al first linked MVI to aggressive tumor characteristics in head and neck SCC.
Other studies reported the association of MVI with tumor site, thickness, PNI, and status of resection margin [17,54]. Additionally, many previous studies also found an association between MVI and cervical LNM [17,54-57]. The reported incidence of MVI/ lymphovascular involvement in Head and Neck (H&N) cancer varies with histopathology, and it has been reported in 8-35% of head and neck SCC [17,58,59]. MVI in OSCC series can be remarkably variable, ranging from 3% to 81% [53,55,60]. This wide range of percentage of MVI may be explained by the heterogeneity of the study populations (all intraoral sites and T stages) as well as by the criteria utilized for the definition of MVI. Close et al [55] classified vascular invasion in: small vessel invasion and venous invasion, observing different correlations with LNM rates. Adel et al [60] suggested that the use of immunohistochemistry techniques could increase the rates of identification of MVI. In this study, microvascular invasion was evaluated only with H&E staining, based on Woolgar et al criteria [23].
In the present study, MVI appeared to be strongly associated with metastases to the lymphatic chains in early OSCC (p‹.001), at univariate analysis.
Perineural Invasion (PNI) describes a malignant tumor’s affinity for neural tissue and is associated with adverse outcome in many types of cancer. It is well known that PNI in oral carcinoma is associated with poor outcomes [39]. Remarkably, not only the risk of local recurrence, but also the risk of regional recurrence is increased [61,62]. According to the protocol of the College of American Pathologists (CAP), PNI status is a required feature of the pathology report for OSCC [63]. The incidence of PNI in H&N cancer varies with histopathology, and it has been reported in 27-82% of H&N SCC [58,59,61,62]. We found that 57% (28/49) of our patients had PNI associated with their tumors. Tai et al [62], in 2013, found that, not only the presence of PNI correlated with the T stage (17.1% in T1 and 36.6% in T2, p‹.001), but also independently predicted cervical LNM (p‹.001), neck recurrence and poor DSS. Binmadi and Basile, in 2011 [64], performed a review of the literature with the aim of reviewing the relationship of PNI with patient’s outcome. They found that the preponderance of evidence in the literature suggests that PNI is a significant prognostic indicator in the ability of OSCC to spread to cervical lymph nodes, in addition to other factors such as TT and other histopathological factors.
In our study, we found that PNI was present in 28 (57%) patients. PNI was significantly associated with the development of LNM in our population of T1 OSCC (P=.01), at univariate analysis.
Several studies have focused on the p53 protein. The expression of p53 protein in OSCC varies from 27%-61%, according to the international literature [65-67]. Significant association between p53 expression and poor patient outcome in OSCC patients was found as an indication of impending malignant development in oral premalignant lesions [65], and with a correlation with LNM and survival in a few studies [66,67]. A few reports have dedicated their analysis to the correlation between p53 protein expression and LNM in OSCC.
Tatemoto et al, in 1998 [68] found that of 62 patients with regional LNM, 45 (72.6%) were positive for p53 while 45 (52.9%) of 88 without metastasis expressed p53 protein (p ‹0.02). Lymph node and distant metastasis were also comparatively studied in 225 OSCC using clinical and immunohistopathological approaches by Osaki et al, in 2000 [69]. They found that the expression of p53 protein was correlated with LNM. De Vicente et al, in 2004 [70] found strong relationship between p53 immunoexpression and poor prognosis in patients with OSCC without LNM. Baltaziak et al, in 2006 [71], found a statistically significant relationship between p53 expression in primary oral cancers and its expression in LNM (P‹0.02) as well as an increased expression of Bcl-xL, Bax, and p53 in metastatic sites compared with primary tumors.
We were unable to find a statistically significance association between the expression of p53 protein and LNM in our patients with stage I SCC of the tongue and floor of the mouth (p=.683) at univariate analysis.
The multivariate analysis identified the presence of MVI (p=.002) as the only independent factor significantly associated with increased risk of LNM in our study.
In conclusion, this study has confirmed the predictive value of MVI in the development of lymph node metastases in our group of patients, as demonstrated by multivariate analysis (p=.002). Additionally the 24.5% rate of LNM emphasizes the need for elective treatment of the neck in stage I SCC of the Tongue and FOM.
References
- Bundgaard T, Bentzen SM, Wildt J, Sorensen FB, Sogaard H, Nieisen JE. Histopathologic, stereologic, epidemiologic, and clinical parameters in the prognostic evaluation of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Head Neck. 1996; 18: 142-152.
- Amaral TM, Freire ARS, Carvalho AL, Pinto CA, Kowalski LP. Predictive factors of occult metastasis and prognosis of clinical stages I and II squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue and floor of the mouth. Oral Oncol. 2004; 40: 780-786.
- Teichgraeber JF, Clairmont AA. The incidence of occult metastasis for cancer of the oral tongue and floor of the mouth: treatment rationale. Head Neck. 1984; 7: 15-21.
- Van den Breckel MWM, Casteljins JA, Snow GB. Diagnostic evaluation of the neck. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1998; 31: 601-620.
- Schroder H, Carlson DL, Kraus DH, Stambuk HE, Gönen M, Erdi YE, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting nodal metastases in patients with oral cancer staged N0 by clinical examination and CT/MRI. J Nucl Med. 2006; 47: 755- 762.
- Furukawa M, Dillon JK, Futran ND, Anzai Y. The prevalence of lymph node metastases in clinically N0 necks with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: is CT good enough for nodal staging? Acta Radiologica. 2014; 55: 570-578.
- Dias FL, Kligerman J, Sá GM, Arcuri RA, Freitas EQ, Farias T, et al. Elective neck dissection versus observation in stage Isquamous cell carcinomas of the tongue and floor of the mouth. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001; 125: 23-29.
- Anneroth G, Batsakis J, Luna M. Review of the literature and a recommended system of malignancy grading in oral squamous cell carcinomas. Scand J Dent Res. 1987; 95: 229-249.
- Moore C, Kuhns JG, Greenberg RA. Thickness as prognostic id in upper aero digestive tract cancer. Arch Surg. 1986; 121: 1410-1414.
- Fleiss JL. Statistical method for rate and proportion. 2nd ed. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1981; 138-143.
- Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 2nd ed. Massachusetts, PWS Publishers, 1986; 326-332.
- Hosmer DW, Jr; Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York, John Wiley & Sons. 1976; 75-118.
- Lee ET. Statistical methods for survival data analysis. California, Lifetime Learning Publications, 1980; 75-130.
- Kligerman J, Lima RA, Soares JR, Prado L, Dias FL, Freitas EQ, et al. Supraomohyoid neck dissection in the treatment of T1/T2 squamous carcinoma of oral cavity. Am J Surg. 1994; 168: 391-394.
- Andersen PE, Cambronero E, Shaha AR, Shah JP. The extent of neck disease after regional failure during observation of the N0 neck. Am J Surg. 1996; 172: 689-691.
- Bryne M. Prognostic value of various molecular and cellular features in oral squamous cell carcinomas: a review. J Oral Pathol Med. 1991; 20: 413-420.
- Woolgar JA, Scott J. Prediction of cervical metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue / floor of mouth. Head Neck. 1995; 17: 463-472.
- Spiro RH, Huvos AG, Wong GY, Spiro JD, Gnecco CA, Strong EW, et al. Predictive value of tumor thickness in squamous carcinoma confined to the tongue and floor of the mouth. Am J Surg. 1986; 152: 345-350.
- Hiratsuka H, Miyakawa A, Nakamori K, Kido Y, Sunakawa H, Kohama G. Multivariate analysis of occult lymph node metastasis as a prognostic indicator for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Cancer. 1997; 80: 351-356.
- Habbous S, Harland LTG, La Delfa A, Fadhel E, Xu W, Liu FF, et al. Comorbidity and prognosis in head and neck cancers: differences by subsite, stage, and human papillomavirus status. Head Neck. 2014; 36: 802-810.
- Pulte D, Brenner H. Changes in survival in head and neck cancers in the late 20th and early 21st century: a period analysis. Oncologist. 2010; 15: 994-1001.
- Chen PH, Shieh TY, Ho PS, Tsai CC, Yang YH, Lin YC, et al. Prognostic factors associated with survival of oral and pharyngeal carcinoma in Taiwan. BMC Cancer. 2007; 7: 101-112.
- Beenken SW, Krontiras H, Maddox WA, Peters GE, Soong S, Urist MM, et al. T1 and T2 squamous carcinoma of the oral tongue: prognostic factors and the role of elective lymph node dissection. Head Neck. 1999; 21: 124-130.
- Camisasca DR, Silami MA, Honorato J, Dias FL, de Faria PA, Lourenço Sde Q. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: clinicopathological features in patients with and without recurrence. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2011; 73: 170- 176.
- Honorato J, Rebelo MS, Dias FL, Camisasca DR, Faria PA, Azevedo e Silva G, et al. Gender differences in prognostic factors for oral cancer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 44: 1205-1211.
- Gluckman JL, Zlato PP, Welbororsky HJ, Mann W, Stambrook P, Gleich L, et al. Prognostic indicators for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: a clinicopathologic correlation. Laryngoscope. 1997; 107: 1239-1244.
- Massona J, Regateiro FS, Janurio G, Ferriera A. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: Review of prognostic and predictive factors. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 102: 67-76.
- Franco EL, Dib LL, Pinto DS, Lombardo V, Contesini H. Race and gender influences on the survival of patients with mouth cancer. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993; 46: 37-46.
- Hoffman HT, Karnell L, Funk GF, Robinson RA, Menck HR. The National Cancer Data Base report on cancer of the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998; 124: 951-962.
- Shaw RJ, McGlashan G, Woolgar JA, Lowe D, Brown JS, Vaughan ED, et al. Prognostic importance of site in squamous cell carcinoma of bucal mucosa. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 47: 356-359.
- Ulrist MM, O’Brien CJ, Soong SJ, Visscher DW, Maddox WA. Squamous cell carcinoma of buccal mucosa: analysis of prognostic factors. Am J Surg. 1987; 154: 411-414.
- Ambrosch P, Kron M, Fischer G, Brinck U. Micrometastases in carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: detection, risk of metastasizing, and prognostic value of depth of invasion. Head Neck. 1995; 17: 473-479.
- Fukano H, Matsuura H, Hasegawa Y, Nakamura S. Depth of invasion as a predictive factor for cervical lymph node metastasis in tongue carcinoma. Head Neck. 1997; 19: 205-210.
- Huang SH, Hwang D, Lockwood G, Goldstein DP, O’Sullivan B. Predictive value of tumor thickness for cervical lymph-node involvement in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Cancer. 2009; 115: 1489-1497.
- Imai T, Satoh I, Matsumoto K, Asada Y1, Yamazaki T, Morita S, et al. Retrospective observational study of occult cervical lymph-node metastasis in T1N0 tongue cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017; 47: 130-136.
- Mohit-Tabatabai MA, Sobel HJ, Rush BF, Mashberg A. Relation of thickness of floor of mouth stage I and II cancers to regional metastases. Am J Surg. 1986; 152: 351-353.
- Asakage T, Yokose T, Mukai K, Tsugane S, Tsubono Y, Asai M, et al. Tumor thickness predicts cervical metastasis in patients with stage I / II cancers of the tongue. Cancer. 1998; 82: 1443-1448.
- Kurokawa H, Yamashita Y, Takeda S, Zhang M, Fukuyama H, Takahashi T. Risk factors for late cervical lymph node metastases in patients with stage I-II carcinoma of the tongue. Head Neck. 2002; 24: 731-736.
- Mücke T, Kanatas A, Ritschl LM, Koerdt S, Tannapfel A, Wolff KD, et al. Tumor thickness and risk of lymph node metastasis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Oral Oncol. 2016; 53: 80-84.
- Brown B, Barnes L, Mazariegos J, Taylor F, Johnson J, Wagner RL. Prognostic factors in mobile tongue and floor of mouth carcinoma. Cancer. 1989; 64: 1195-1202.
- Morton RP, Fergusson CM, Lambie NK, Whitlock RM. Tumor thickness in early tongue cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994; 120: 717-720.
- Marchetta FC, Sako K. Results of radical surgery for intraoral carcinoma related to tumor size. Am J Surg. 1966; 112: 554-557.
- Platz H, Fries R, Hudec M. Retrospective DöSAK study on carcinomas of the oral cavity: results and consequences. J Maxillofac Surg. 1985; 13: 147-153.
- Howald HP, Frenz M, Pitz H. Proposal for a modified T-classification for oral cancer. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1992; 21: 96-101.
- Van der Schroeff MP, Baatemburg de Jong RJ. Staging and prognosis in head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol 2009; 45: 356-360.
- Mücke T, Mitchell DA, Ritschi LM, Tannapfel A, Wolff KD, Kesting MR, et al. Influence of tumor volume on survival in patients with oral squamous carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015; 141: 1007-1011.
- Boland PW, Watt-Smith SR, Pataridis K, et al. Evaluating lingual carcinoma for surgical management: what does volumetric measurement with MRI offer?. Br J Radiol. 2010; 83: 927-933.
- Weijers M, Snow GB, Benzemer, PD, van der Waal I. Malignancy grading is no better than conventional histopathological grading in small squamous cell carcinoma of tongue and floor of mouth: a retrospective study in 128 patients. J Oral Pathol Med. 2009; 38: 343-347.
- Jakobsson PA, Eneroth CM, Killander D, Moberger G, Mårtensson B, et al. Histologic classification and grading of malignancy in carcinoma of the larynx (a pilot study). Acta Radiol Ther Phy Biol. 1973; 12: 1-8.
- Anneroth G, Hansen LS. A methodological study of histologic classification and grading of malignancy in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Scand J Dent Res. 1984; 92: 448-468.
- Li Y, Bai S, Carroll W, et al. Validation of the Risk Model: High-Risk Classification and Tumor Pattern of Invasion Predict Outcome for Patients with Low-Stage Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Head and Neck Pathol. 2013; 7: 211-223.
- Brandwein-Gensler M, Lewis C, Lee B, Rolnitzky L, Hille JJ, Genden E, Urken ML, et al. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: histological risk assessment, but not margin status, is strongly Predictive of local disease-free and overall survival. 2005; 20: 167-178.
- Poleksic S, Kalwaic HJ. Prognostic value of vascular invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978; 61: 234-240.
- Woolgar JA. Histopathological prognosticators in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2006; 42: 229-239.
- Close LG, Burns DK, Reisch J, Schaefer SD. Microvascular invasion in cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987; 113: 1191-1195.
- Yeh CF, Li WY, Yang MH, Chu PY, Lu YT, Wang YF, et al. Neck observation is appropriate in T1-2, cN0 oral squamous cell carcinoma without perineural invasion or lymphovascular invasion. Oral Oncol. 2014; 50: 857-862.
- Goldson TM, Han Y, Knight KB, Weiss HL, Resto VA. Clinicopathological predictors of lymphatic metastasis in HNSCC: implications for molecular mechanisms of metastatic disease. J Exp Ther Oncol. 2010; 8: 211-221.
- Fagan JJ, Collins B, Barnes L, D’Amico F, Myers EN, Johnson JT. Perineural invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 1998; 124: 637-640.
- Chen TC, Wang CP, Ko JY, Yang TL, Hsu CW, Yeh KA, et al. The impact of perineural invasion and /or lymphovascular invasion on the survival of early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20; 2388-2395.
- Adel M, Kao HK, Hsu CL, et al. Evaluation of Lymphatic and Vascular Invasion in Relation to Clinicopathological Factors and Treatment Outcome in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Medicine. 2015; 94: 1-7.
- D’Cruz AK, Siddachari RC, Walvekar RR, Pantvaidya GH, Chaukar DA, Deshpande MS, et al. Elective neck dissection for the management of the N0 neck in early cancer of the oral tongue: need for a randomized controlled trial. Head Neck. 2009; 35: 214-221.
- Tai SK, Li WY, Yang MH, Chu PY, Wang YF. Perineural invasion in T1 oral squamous cell carcinoma indicates the need for aggressive Elective neck dissection. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013; 37: 1164-1172.
- Kurtz KA, Hoffman HT, Zimmerman MB, Robinson RA. Perineural and vascular invasion in oral cavity squamous carcinoma: increased incidence on re-review of slides and by using immunohistochemical enhancement. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005; 129: 354-359.
- Binmadi NO, Basile JR. Perineural invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a discussion of significance and review of the literature. Oral Oncol. 2011; 47: 1005-1010.
- Yuen PW, Chow V, Choy J, Lam KY, Ho WK, Wei WI, et al. The Clinicopathologic Significance of p53 and p21 expression in the Surgical Management of Lingual Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001; 116: 240-245.
- Kaur, J, Srivastava, A, Ralhan, R. Prognostic significance of p53 protein overexpression in betel- and tobacco-related oral oncogenesis. Int J Cancer. 1998; 79: 370-375.
- Staibano, S, Mignogna, MD, Muzio LL, Di Alberti L, Di Natale E, Lucariello A, et al. Overexpression of cyclin-D1, bcl-2, and bax proteins, Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA), and DNA-ploidy in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Hum Pathol. 1998; 29: 1189-1194.
- Tatemoto Y, Osaki T, Yoneda K, Yamamoto T, Ueta E, Kimura T. Expression of p53 and p21 Proteins in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Correlation with Lymph Node Metastasis and Response to Chemo radiotherapy. Pathology Research and Practice. 1998; 194: 821-830.
- Osaki T, Kimura T, Tatemoto Y, Yamamoto T, Yoneda K. Risk Factors of Metastasis in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas. Oncology. 2000; 58: 137- 143.
- Vicente JC, Gutierrez LMJ, Zapatero AH, Fresno Forcelledo MF, Hernandez- Vallejo G, Lopez Arranz JS. Prognostic Significance of p53 expression in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas without neck metastases. Head Neck. 2004; 26: 22-30.
- Baltaziak M, Duraj E, Koda M, Wincewicz A, Musiatowicz M, Kanczuga-Koda L, et al. Expression of Bcl-xL, Bax, and p53 in primary tumors and lymph node metastases in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006; 1090: 18-25.