Research Article
Austin J Plant Bio. 2024; 10 (3): 1053.
Effect of Intercropping Oats (Avena Sativa L.) With Alfalfa (Medicago Sativa) on Dry Matter Yield and Nutritive Value
Daniel Wana¹*; Metekia Tamiru²; Jane Wamatu³
¹Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Finfinne, Ethiopia, Adami Tulu Agricultural Research center, Ethiopia
²Jimma University, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Ethiopia
³International Centre for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas, Ethiopia
*Corresponding author: Daniel Wana, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Finfinne, Ethiopia, dami Tulu Agricultural Research center, Batu, Ethiopia PO Box 35 Ziway, Ethiopia. Email: danielwana2015@gmail.com
Received: October 03, 2024; Accepted: October 24, 2024 Published: October 31, 2024
Abstract
There is limited information on planting density for oats and alfalfa when intercropped to achieve a mixture of high nutritional quality for use as animal feed. A field experiment was carried out to study the effect of seeding ratio on yield components (TDM and seed yield) and chemical composition (CP, OM, NDF, ADF, ADL, and Ash). The experiment was conducted at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center under irrigation conditions during February–June 2022/2023 in Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Treatments consisted of one adapted oats (bate) variety and one alfalfa (magna 788) variety in an additive design at three plant densities (25%, 50%, and 75% of their recommended sole seed rates of 80 and 15 kg per hectare for oats and alfalfa, respectively) and the recommended 100% plant density of sole oats and sole alfalfa. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with four replications. Data were organized and analyzed with excel and SAS software. Results showed statistically significant differences (P<0.05) in all tested parameters of agronomic yield, and chemical composition of the forage. The highest DMY (14.64 t/ha) was recorded from T4, followed by T3 (14.51 t/ ha). The OM, CP, Ash, NDF, ADF, ADL, and IVDMD revealed significant variation (p<0.05) among the treatments in the forage. The OM and CP content of oats and alfalfa produced in intercrops, particularly from the T4 seed ratio (92.08 and 17.33), tend to be better due to the alfalfa component in the intercrop than that of sole oats (92.03 and 11.53), but lower than that of pure alfalfa (93.53 and 21.2), respectively. Generally, the seeding ratio combinations of T4 and T3 performed the best in most agronomic practices and nutritional values. So they are recommended for fodder production in the studied area and related agro-ecologies. Further studies should be conducted to test by feeding forage produced by inter cropping of oats and alfalfa on animal performance.
Keywords: Alfalfa; Chemical Composition; Oats; Seed ratio
Introduction
Livestock production remains an important industry for feeding the world’s population [69]. Today’s feed industry is working to meet the growing global demand and further enhance its sustainability [68]. Livestock farming represents an important livelihood for the agricultural, agro-pastoral, and pastoral societies that make up over 80% of the Ethiopian population. Despite the large livestock resource base economy, and the sector is very important to millions of small holder farmers, pastoral communities, and the wider national economy, livestock production remains underdeveloped, and the available potential has not been fully exploited. Under nutrition and malnutrition are major factors constraining animal production in Ethiopia. Nutritional stress leads to low growth rates, poor fertility, and high mortality, which is compounded by diseases.
Feed shortages in terms of both quantity and quality are the major problem affecting livestock productivity in Ethiopia [66,67]. The traditional livestock production system is based primarily on poor pastures and crop residues, which are usually insufficient to support reasonable livestock production (Tsige, 2000). Towards the end of the dry season, livestock feed is usually scarce and of poor quality. Residues from cereals are the main source of feed, but these are low in protein and have poor digestibility. The production of adequate quantities of good – quality dry – season forages to overcome the dry – season feed problem that affects livestock production in Ethiopia. Improved forages provide a reasonable source of nutrients for animal production while conserving soil fertility, water resources, and air quality [65].
Improvement in livestock production and productivity requires a concomitant intensification in feed production using improved or cultivated forage crops in addition to efficient utilization of natural pasture and crop residues. The current understanding in the ongoing Economic growth and Transformation plan as regards the livestock sector is to transform the small-scale production system in to a specialized and market-oriented production system that includes high quality cultivated pasture production. Improved forage crops have multiple functions and play an important role in sustaining the livelihoods of farmers, mainly because of their positive effects on livestock production and contribution to economic and environmental sustainability.
Oats are a potential fodder crop for livestock feeding and have been growing in the central highlands of its hardy nature, which makes it perform better under stressful conditions with minimal management inputs. It is used as livestock feed in the form of hay, silage, and grazing or green feed and provides an abundance of excellent forage at a time when other succulent, high – protein feeds are scarce. Similarly, Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is one of the recommended forage legumes with high potential as a fodder crop. Alfalfa refers to the crucial perennial legume forage; it can be used to achieve symbiotic N2 fixation (Dai & Jia, it can also be harvested multiple times in the growing season [64].
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is one of the best leguminous fodder crops for livestock, especially for dairy production in Ethiopia, due to its superior herbage yield, palatability, nutritional value, wide adaptability, and suitability for irrigated production systems. Its agronomic advantages, including fast growth, persistence under prolonged dry conditions, and versatility in its soil requirements, have made it a popular forage crop for intensive livestock production systems such as dairy production. In Ethiopia, alfalfa exhibits excellent performance over a wide range of altitudes, from 2400m above sea level to warm lowlands below 1000 m.a.s.l., and in a range of soil types. It is often grown in pure stands as a source of protein to supplement low-quality feed or in mixtures with grasses (Sisay, 1975; Astatke Haile, 1977). The chemical composition of forage grass varies with soil type, landscape, management practices, and other environmental factors that influence forage yield and quality [62].
Both oat and alfalfa were adapted in the study area before a long period, and different researchers [51,61] (Nabi et al., 2021) reported their promising performance, especially under irrigation conditions. Oats and alfalfa produce green fodder, which plays an important role in reducing the scarcity of green fodder during the dry season, and they used as multi- cutting forage [51]. Rather than producing their pure stand, their mixture Compensates for the cp reduction in oats [60]. Even though oats produce a large amount of biomass yield, their CP content is very low. Inversely, alfalfa is low in biomass yield but has a higher CP content [54]. Different experiments were done on the effect of oats with alfalfa intercropping, and significant variations in biomass yield and nutritional values were observed.
For instance, Befekadu and Yunus, 2015 reported that oats with different varieties of alfalfa revealed significant (P<0.05) variation on dry matter yield and crude protein contents among the tested treatments. A similar report by Belayneh et al., 2020 on the effect of oats inter cropped with alfalfa on the agronomic yield and nutritional values of the mixture. As indicated by different Scholars, seed ratios significantly affect both dry matter yield and nutritional quality when oats are mixed with alfalfa and other legumes [34,50-55,57]. Inter cropping compatible forage grasses with legumes improves and maintains soil fertility through nitrogen fixation and increases productivity and profitability [49]. Species with different physiological and/or morphological characteristics can complement better use of feed resources. Until now, there is no information on the seeding ratio or density of both oats and alfalfa when they are inter cropping, so further investigation needed to determine the optimum seed ratio to fill the gap. However, management practices such as seeding rate ratio influence the yield and quality of these species as well as their compatibility when grown in mixtures [48]. The benefits of mixed forage species efficiently exploited only if proper management strategies, such as optimum proportions of seeding rates were used. There is limited knowledge on the proportions of seeding rates that influence the yield and quality of most of the cereal-legume mixture, including oats and alfalfa, Under Rift Valley conditions in Oromia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of inter cropping of oats and alfalfa, which could optimize the dry matter yield and nutritional quality of the mixtures.
Objectives
To evaluate the effect of inter cropping of oats and alfalfa on agronomic component, biomass yield and nutritive value.
Materials and Methods
Description of the Study Area
The study was conducted at the Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center under irrigation conditions. Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center is located in the Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha District, which is located in the middle Rift Valley of Oromia, Ethiopia, 167 Kilometers from the capital city of the country (Addis Ababa), in the south eastern part of Oromia between 38o 20’ and 38.5o5’ E and 7o35 and 8o 05’N (Figure 1). It lies in an altitude range of 1500 to 2000 m.a.s.l. The average annual rainfall is 760mm. It has bimodal rainfall from March to April (short rains) and July to September (long rains) with a dry period from May to June that separates short rains from long rains (Figure 2). The average annual minimum and maximum temperature of the area were 11.8oC and 28.3oC (Metrology Station of Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center). The soil consists of clay with a proportion of 44%, 34%, and 22% sand, Silt, and Clay, and the soil PH is 7.88 (Teshome et al., 2012). The chemical properties of EC (0.08mm/Kg), Na (0.21 Cmol/kg), K (4. 45 Cmol/Kg), Ca (15.2 Cmol/ Kg), Mg (2.14 Cmol/Kg), and P(0.2mg/Kg) are reported [34].
Figure 1: Map of the study area. Source: Ethiopian GIS, 2019.
Figure 2: Monthly rainfall distribution and average maximum and minimum temperature variations over the months in the months in the study sites during the experimental (2022/2023).
Figure 3: Total Dry Matter Yield of Oats with Alfalfa both at 1st and 2nd Cutting.
Planting Material
An adapted variety of oats (Avena sativa.L) bate variety and one variety of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) magna 788) were used.
Treatments and Experimental Design
The experiment was undertaken in a randomized complete block design with four replications. The alfalfa and oat varieties adapted to the study area were arranged according to the following treatments:
T1 100% oats (sole oats of bate variety)
T2 100% alfalfa (sole alfalfa of magna 788)
T3 75% oats + 25% alfalfa (magna 788)
T4 50% oats + 50% alfalfa (magna 788)
T5 25% oats + 75% alfalfa (magna 788)
The seed proportions were calculated based on the recommended sole seed rates of 80 and 15 kg per hectare for oats and alfalfa, respectively (Dawit et al., 2015). The plot size was 4 m x 4 m (16 m2). A total of 15 rows per plot with a row spacing of 30 cm apart from each other was alternatively used [48]. The spacing between replications and plots was 1m. A germination test was done for both forages before sowing in order to adjust the seeding rates. The seeds were established in rows on a well-prepared seedbed and covered with soil. The forage was watered two times per week. All other cultural practices, including weeding, were kept normal and uniform across all treatments.
Data Collection
Data on yield and yield-related traits such as date of emergence, plot coverage (%), plant height (cm),fresh weight, sample weight, leaf to stem ratio, number of tillers per plant, flowering date, biomass yield and Leaf to stem ratio is an important trait in the selection of appropriate forage cultivar as it is strongly related to forage quality (Juan et al., 1993; Kratchunov and Naydenov, 1995; Julier et al., 2000; Sheaffer et al., 2000). yield was collected from each treatment. The forage was harvested for biomass yield determination when 50% of the oats reached heading and alfalfa reached flowering stage. Days to forage harvest were recorded from the planting date to the date when alfalfa plants reached the 50% flowering stage and oats reached the heading stage (Aklilu and Alemayehu, 2007). Biomass yield determination was made when 50% of the oats had reached heading and 50% of alfalfa had reached flowering stage.
Land Equivalent Ratio (LER)
The Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) was used to assess the advantage of forage production in the mixture. LER was defined as the relative area of a mono crop plant required for the same yield obtained from its inter cropping. The LER was calculated using the formula given below.
When LER is greater than 1, mixed growing favors the growth and yield of the mixture species. In contrast, when LER is lower than 1, mixed growing negatively affects the growth and yield of plants grown in mixtures (Dhima et al., 2007).
Dry Matter Yield Determination
The DM yield of each botanical component in each plot was determined by drying a representative sample in an oven at 60°C for 72 hours for partial DM determination. DM yields were determined at the Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, Animal Feed Laboratory. The DM yield of each leaf and stem of both oats and alfalfa were calculated separately and added together to provide the total DM yield of the plot, and the final DM yields were reported in tons per hectare. The DM production (ton/ha) was calculated as
(10 x TotFW x (DWss/FWss xHa))
Where TotFW = total fresh weight, DWss = dry weight sub sample, FWss = fresh weight sub sample, and HA = harvesting area (Tarawali et al., 1995).
Seed Yield (t/ha) Determination
Seed yield was determined by harvesting both alfalfa and oats from each plot when the seeds were mature and after cautiously separating the seed from the straw. Then, the seed yield (t/ha) was determined by weighing the seed and expressed at 10% moisture content for vetch and 12.5% for oats using the following formula [60].
Chemical Analysis
The feed sample was taken from each treatment and dried in an oven at 60°C for 72 hours to a constant weight and Willey mill to pass through a 1mm sieve. The ground samples were kept in airtight plastic bags prior to analysis for chemical composition. The Dry Matter (DM) was determined by an oven drying at 105°C overnight and ash content was determined by ground in a
Igniting the dry samples in a muffle furnace at 550°C for 6 hours to burn off all the organic material. The inorganic material, which does, not volatilized at that temperature is ash. The difference between sample DM and ash gives the Organic Matter (OM). Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF) and Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF) was analyzed (Van Soest and Robertson, 1985). For Nitrogen (N) analysis, the Kjeldhal method was used and Crude Protein (CP) content was estimated from the N content by use of a multiplier of 6.25.
Statistical Analysis
Collected data was organized, summarized and analyzed by using SAS. LSD test at 0.05 probability levels was used to compare the treatment means (Steel and Torrie, 1984). The treatment means were separated by Least Significant Difference (LSD).
The model used for data analysis was Yij = μ + Ti + Bj +Eij Where; Yij = Response variable, μ = Overall mean, Ti = Treatment effect, Bj = Block effect, Eij = Random error.
Results and Discussion
The Effect of Oat – Alfalfa Inter Cropping on Agronomic Performance
The result of all agronomic performances in both the first and second cuttings of this experiment is shown in Table 1 & 2. Except for plant height, leaf length, and leaf stem ratio, all other evaluated agronomic parameters have statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). The analysis of variance revealed a significant difference for all the parameters studied (Table 1 & 2). The findings of Ninama, 2020 indicated that this variance difference was due to the effect of different ratios of oats and alfalfa under an intercropping. In this trial, the number of tillers of alfalfa and oats plants grown in the seed proportion T4 (50% oats and 50% alfalfa) was statistically significantly higher (P<0.05) than all other treatments both at the first and second cuttings, which reveals that there was no competition for space.
Table 1: Descriptions of oats and alfalfa varieties used for the trial.
Dry Matter Yield (t/ha)
The total forage dry matter yield of harvested from T1(11.91 t/ha), T2(5.05 t/ha), and T5(11.69 t/ha) was lower (P<0.05) than T3(14.15 t/ ha) and T4(14.41 t/ha) at the first cutting, and T1(10.92 t/ha), T2(5.99 t/ha), and T5(12.18 t/ha) were lower (P<0.05) than T3(14.51 t/ha) and T4(14.64 t/ha) at the second cutting. The TDMY t/ha of T3 (14.15 t/ ha, 14.51 t/ha) and T4 (14.41 t/ha, 14.64 t/ha) were not significantly different, respectively, at the first and second cuttings. The highest total dry matter yields of 14.64 t/ha and 14.41 t/ha were recorded from a seeding ratio of 50:50 T4 at the second and first cuttings, respectively. The lowest dry matter yield was recorded from the sole alfalfa treatment at the two cuttings. The combined analysis result also showed that significantly (p<0.05) the highest dry matter yield was obtained from a seeding ratio of 50% oat: 50% alfalfa (T4), followed by a seeding ratio of 75% oat: 25% alfalfa (T3), both at the first and second cutting.
The higher biomass yield obtained from these seeding ratios could be due to the fact that the proportion of oats produced much more forage yield through increased number of tiller productions than the other mixtures and sole oats. As the result shows, the biomass of the inter crop was superior and advantageous compared to their pure stands. This may be due to higher fertility levels and suitable seed ratios under intercropping system, where both crops behave as component crops. The addition of the legume crop to cereals leads to increased availability and absorption of nutrients by the plants, which results in more vegetative growth and helps increase plant height and tillers on account of enlargement of cells and enhanced photosynthesis, which results in a higher total dry matter yield. The results are in conformity with the findings of [24,36,37,46,47] number of tiller productions than the other mixtures and sole oats.
As the result shows, the biomass of the intercrop was superior and advantageous compared to their pure stands. This may be due to higher fertility levels and suitable seed ratios under the intercropping system, where both crops behave as component crops. The addition of the legume crop to cereals leads to increased availability and absorption of nutrients by the plants, which results in more vegetative growth and helps increase plant height and tillers on account of enlargement of cells and enhanced photosynthesis, which results in a higher dry matter yield. The results are in line with the findings of [24,36,37,46,47]. In line with this study, scholars emphasized the advantages of a grass-legume mixture [34,45]. It was also reported that the total dry matter yield of mixed grass and legume pastures was greater than that of grass-based pastures, and the overall feed value was better maintained throughout the grazing season when pastures included legumes (Lusture et al., 2014).
This revealed that the overall yield is not affected by the competition effects of oats as the companion crop (Table 1 & 2). The analysis of this trial has suggested that the total dry matter yield of alfalfa grown without oats was greater (P<0.05) than that grown with oats. However, this difference was not associated with the effect of companion plants on the performance of alfalfa; rather, it could largely be attributed to the proportion of land used and seed proportions for growing this plant. The land area used for growing alfalfa with companion plants was about half of the land used for growing alfalfa without companion plants, indicating that the dry matter yield per area of land was greater for alfalfa grown without oats than alfalfa grown with oats. This result was supported by Befekadu and Yunus, 2015, who reported that the total dry matter yield of alfalfa grown without companion was greater (P<0.05) than that of those grown with companion plants.
On the other hand, the lowest performance of the seeding ratio (25% oats and 75% alfalfa) as compared to the other mixtures could be due to the fact that alfalfa dominates and suppresses the growth of oats in terms of light and nutrient utilization. Other findings also indicated that mixtures gave higher green forage yields than pure stands (Karadau, 2003). In addition, other scholars who reported that a higher mean biomass yield was obtained from the mixture as compared to its components grown in monoculture [42]. Generally, the result shows that a seeding ratio of 50% oats: 50% alfalfa and 75% oats: 25% alfalfa showed the highest total biomass yields.
The basic reason for higher forage biomass productivity might be due to the utilization of symbiotically fixed nitrogen (whitehead, 1995), more enhanced interception of light [41], Allelopathic and synergistic effect (Pudnam & Duke, 1978), and some other effects. These factors created a microenvironment that favored higher yields than those obtained from sole legume or grass stands [40] Besides, Legumes can cover the N2 demand of grasses from atmospheric N2, and therefore legumes inter cropped with grasses compete for less soil mineral N2. Eskandari et al., 2009a indicated that there was an increase in forage quality compared to cereal monoculture and an increase in dry matter in comparison to legume monoculture. Several studies showed that the dry matter yield increased with the increasing rate of oats in mixtures with legumes [35,38].
Plant Height
The average plant height of alfalfa and oats grown in a sole was not different (P > 0.05) from those grown in an inter crop on the same plot both at the first and second cuttings under this experiment (Table 1). The non-significant (p > 0.05) differences observed for alfalfa and oat plant height illustrate the mutual benefits of the forage crops from inter crop establishment. This indicates that alfalfa grown with oats on the same plot was not affected by the height and root of oats used as companion crops to obtain sun light and nutrients, respectively, if oats were seeded at 30cm intervals in a row with alfalfa. Dawit et al., 2022 reported that a non-significant (p > 0.05) effect was observed on plant heights for the mixture of alfalfa among the tested seeding ratios. However, Meyer and Nudell, 2008 indicated that companion crops compete with under-seed alfalfa, which can affect the stand that can be established. In contrast to this study, plant height recorded at different forage growth stages showed significant differences between inter cropping treatments of alfalfa and oats [33]. The data also indicated that all seed ratios of oats and alfalfa showed a yield advantage over sole oats and sole alfalfa. The increase in total dry matter yields in the intercropping systems might be owing to better utilization of space and light interception, coupled with the nutrient contribution of leguminous fodder to cereal. The results are in agreement with those of Kumar, 2005, sharma et al., 2009, and Deore et al., 2013.
Total seed yield (q/ha)
The total seed yield (table 1) has a statistically significant difference (P<0.05), which indicates an increment order of T1 (24.33). T3(21.2 )>T4(20.37)>T5(16.38)>T2(9.88) at first, and T1(22.98)>T3(20.8)>T 4(19.97)>T5(15.98)>T2(10.83) at second cutting. In this experiment, the seed yield of sole oats was significantly higher than that of oats inter cropped with alfalfa. The highest seed yields were obtained from sole oats (T2) with 24.33 t/ha, followed by T3 (75% oats + 25% alfalfa) with an average yield of 21.2 t/ha. The lowest mean seed yields (10.83 t/ha and 15.98 t/ha) were recorded from T2 (sole alfalfa) and T5 (25% oats + 75% alfalfa) seed ratios, respectively. The sole oats were significantly different from the sole alfalfa and them inter crop groups and produced the highest seed yield in the present study. The yield differences between the treatments might be due to the effective tiller in oats attributed to the differences.
Land Equivalent Ratio (LER)
LER’s values were calculated for inter cropping treatments in two consecutive cuttings (Table 2). All the inter crops showed LER greater than one except T3 of the first cutting. The maximum LER values were obtained from T4 (50% oats + 50% alfalfa) seed proportion of oats + alfalfa inter cropping system, followed by T5 (25% oats + 75% alfalfa) and T3 (75% oats + 25% alfalfa) both at first and second cutting. The reason for the higher LER values for the seeding ratio of 50% oats and 50% alfalfa could be due to the better benefit of the oats from the fixed nitrogen through the alfalfa. The values of LER greater than one from the results show that inter cropping is advantageous. Inter cropping systems that constantly give LER ranged from 0.95 to 1.14 in the first cutting and from 1.02 to 1.15 in the second cutting.
Treatment
PH
LL
Tillers
LSR
TDM (ton/ha)
SY(q/ha)
LER
oats
alfalfa
oats
oats
alfalfa
oats
alfalfa
total
Oats
alfalfa
total
T1
105.65
44.9
11b
1.37
11.91ab
11.91b
24.33a
24.33a
T2
92.9
12.68a
1.29
5.05a
5.05d
9.88a
9.88e
T3
105.25
93.83
45.4
10.75b
9.83b
1.33
12.13a
2.02c
14.15a
19.79b
1.41d
21.2b
0.95
T4
105
97.23
45.58
13.18a
8.5c
1.4
11.38b
3.04b
14.41a
17.06c
3.31c
20.37c
1.14
T5
103.58
93.9
46.75
10.83b
9.65b
1.48
8.82c
2.88bc
11.69b
9.74d
6.64b
16.38d
1.07
Mean
104.87
94.46
45.66
11.44
10.16
1.37
11.06
3.25
11.24
17.73
5.31
18.43
1.06
CV
1.75
7.07
5.19
8.84
6.74
16.87
3.46
18.33
6.36
2.29
5.41
2.17
LSD
2.83
10.28
3.65
1.56
1.05
0.35
0.59
0.92
1.08
0.63
0.44
0.6
P-value
0.44
0.8
0.73
*
***
0.2
***
***
***
***
***
***
T1–-Sole oats, T2- sole alfalfa, T3- 75% oats + 25%alfalfa, T4- 50% oats + 50% alfalfa, T5- 25% oats + 75% alfalfa, PH: Plant Height, LL: Leaf Length, TDM: Total Dry Matter, SY: Seed Yield, CV: Coefficient Variation, LSD: Least Significant Deference, PH: Plant Height, LL: Leaf Length, LSR: Leaf Stem Ratio, TDM: Total Dry Matter, SY: Seed Yield, Land Equivalent Ratio
Table 2: The agronomic performance of oats inters cropped with alfalfa at the first cutting.
Therefore, 0.05% to 14% of the first cutting and 2% to 15% more land should be used in mono cropping in order to obtain the same yield as inter cropping, which indicated the advantage of intercropping over mono cropping in terms of the use of water, nutrients, carbon dioxide, and light for plant growth. It was found that LER greater than one was primarily due to nutrient cycling and an increase in nitrogen content [29]. The present study result is in line with the report of Ganvit et al., 2018, which ranged between 1.24 and 1.44). In addition, legume-grass mixtures generally provide more consistent and greater forage yields across a range of environments than grass or legume monoculture [28]. Hence, the value of LER for seeding ratios shows that inter cropping of alfalfa and is more advantageous than sole cropping. Where it was more than 1, indicating the suitability of the practice in the quantitative term. The present findings are in accordance with those of patel and Rajgopal, 2003, Kumar et al., 2005, Surve et al., 2012, and Ganvit et al., 2018.
The Chemical Composition and Variability of the Forage
The results of the analysis of the nutrient contents of oats and alfalfa with different seeding ratio combinations are indicated in Table 3 and 4. The result indicated that the combinations of different seeding ratios did not significantly (P> 0.05) influence the percent of dry matter under both mixtures and pure stands in DM content. However, numerically, the DM percent ranged from 89.9% to 90.48% and 84.18% to 87.98%, with an overall mean of 90.18% and 86.28% for both the first and second cuttings, respectively, under pure stand and mixture. The result of the current study is lower than the result of Tesfaye et al., 2020, who reported that DM % was between 91.8% and 93.78% in both mixtures and pure stands, respectively.
Treatment
PH
LL
Tillers
LSR
TDM (ton/ha)
Sy (q/ha)
LER
oats
Alfalfa
oats
oats
alfalfa
oats
alfalfa
total
Oats
alfalfa
total
T1
109.5
46.75
13b
1.07
10.92ab
10.92c
22.98a
22.98a
T2
94
12.75c
1.19
5.99a
5.99c
10.83a
10.83e
T3
109.25
93.75
48.75
12.75b
13.83b
1.18
11.55a
2.96c
14.51a
18.44b
2.38d
20.8b
1.02
T4
107.5
97.75
48.75
14.93a
16.43a
1.06
10.66b
3.98b
14.64a
15.71c
4.26c
19.97c
1.15
T5
107.75
94.75
49
12.75b
13.65b
1.15
8.36c
3.82bc
12.18b
8.39d
7.59b
15.98d
1.07
mean
108.5
95.06
48.31
13.36
14.17
1.13
10.37
4.19
11.65
16.38
6.27
18.11
1.08
CV
1.91
4.77
6.77
7.89
5.15
16.86
4.99
14.21
6.17
2.48
4.59
2.2
LSD
3.19
6.98
5.04
1.63
1.12
0.29
0.78
0.92
1.08
0.63
0.44
0.6
P-value
0.44
0.5
0.75
*
***
0.79
***
***
***
***
***
***
T1„- Sole oats, T2- sole alfalfa, T3- 75% oats + 25%alfalfa, T4- 50% oats + 50% alfalfa, T5- 25% oats + 75% alfalfa, PH: Plant Height, LL: Leaf Length, TDM: Total Dry Matter, SY: Seed Yield, CV: Coefficient Variation, LSD: Least Significant Deference, PH: Plant Height, LL: Leaf Length, LSR: Leaf Stem Ratio, TDM: Total Dry Matter, SY: Seed Yield, Land Equivalent Ratio
Table 3: The agronomic performance of oats inters cropped with alfalfa at the second cutting.
Treatment
DM
OM
Ash
CP
NDF
ADF
ADL
IVDMD
T1
90.3
92.03b
7.97a
11.53e
46.59a
30.94a
4.79a
62.28d
T2
90.23
93.53a
6.47b
21.2a
39.29d
22.65e
2.14c
73.3a
T3
89.98
92.28b
7.72a
13.65d
44.84b
28.52b
3.85b
62.73d
T4
90.48
92.08b
7.92a
17.33c
42.27c
26.11c
2.39c
65.81c
T5
89.9
92.85ab
7.15ab
18.55b
39.98d
23.64d
2.19c
68.47b
mean
90.18
92.55
7.45
16.45
42.59
26.37
3.07
66.52
CV
0.38
0.65
8.02
3.63
1.67
1.58
5.54
0.56
LSD
0.51
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.07
0.63
0.26
0.57
P-value
0.15
0.01(*)
0.01(*)
***
***
***
***
***
Means with the same letter are not significantly different at P<0.05. T1–-Sole oats, T2- sole alfalfa, T3- 75% oats + 25% alfalfa, T4- 50% oats + 50% alfalfa, T5- 25% oats + 75% alfalfa, DM: Dry Matter, OM: Organic Matter, CP: Crude Protein, NDF: Neutral Detergent Fiber, ADF: Acid Detergent Fiber, ADL: Acid Detergent Lignin, IVDMD: in vitro Dry Matter Digestibility, ME: Methabolizable Energy, CV: Coefficient of Variation, LSD: Least Significant Deference.
Table 4: The Chemical composition of oats and alfalfa inter cropped forage with different seed ratios at first cutting.
Treatment
DM%
OM
Ash
CP
NDF
ADF
ADL
IVDMD
T1
86.78
94.1b
5.91a
13.02e
39.91a
29.44a
3.62a
63.96d
T2
84.18
95.65a
4.35b
22.8a
30.67e
20.01e
2.02c
74.99a
T3
87.1
94.27b
5.73a
14.27d
39.15b
27.29b
3.47a
64.28d
T4
87.98
94.06b
5.95a
18.27c
35.8c
25.35c
2.89b
67.42c
T5
85.55
94.91ab
5.09ab
19.19b
32.62d
21.82d
2.63b
70.03b
mean
86.28
94.59
5.4
17.51
35.63
24.78
2.93
68.14
CV
2.64
0.62
10.82
1.92
1.01
1.82
7.36
0.62
LSD
3.43
0.88
0.88
0.5
0.54
0.68
0.32
0.77
P-value
0.21
0.04(*)
**
***
***
***
***
***
Means with the same letter are not significantly different at P<0.05. T1–-Sole oats, T2- sole alfalfa, T3- 75% oats + 25% alfalfa, T4- 50% oats + 50% alfalfa, T5- 25% oats + 75% alfalfa, DM: Dry Matter, OM: Organic Matter, CP: Crude Protein, NDF: Neutral Detergent Fiber, ADF: Acid Detergent Fiber, ADL: Acid Detergent Lignin, IVDMD: in vitro Dry Matter Digestibility, ME: Methabolizable Energy, CV: Coefficient of Variation, LSD: Least Significant Deference.
Table 5: The Chemical composition of oats and alfalfa inter cropped forage with different seed ratios at second cutting.
The DM percentage recorded in the first cutting being higher than that of the second cutting may be due to the maturation effect. On the other hand, the different seeding ratios of oats and alfalfa inter cropped showed a significant (P<0.05) variation among the values of OM%, Ash%, CP%, NDF%, ADF%, ADL%, and IVDMD both at first and second cutting. The highest OM% (93.53%, 95.65%) was observed from the pure stand of alfalfa both at the first and second cuttings, respectively. The percentage content of OM % is directly related to the protein content, which means that when OM% increases, the CP% content will also increase.
Total ash content of oats and alfalfa: Total ash content was affected (P>0.05) both at the first and second cuttings (Tables 3 & 4). A higher ash content was recorded at the first cutting. The ash content of the first cutting mean data is higher than that of the second cutting, which may be due to the maturation stage difference between the first and second cutting, which may be due to the maturation stage difference between the first and second cutting periods. The ash content obtained in this study was in agreement with the results of Yehalem, 2004, who reported an increase in total ash contents with advancing plant maturity. However, the results of the current study disagree with those of Diriba and Vaars, 2000, who reported that the mineral contents of plants declined during the maturing process due to the natural dilution and translocation of nutrients from the vegetative part to the root system. McDonald et al., 2002 also reported that mineral concentration declines with age and is influenced by soil type, soil nutrient levels, and seasonal conditions. In general, variation in the concentration of minerals in forages can be induced by factors like varies, plant developmental stage, morphological fractions, climatic conditions, soil characteristics, and fertilization regime [20,21].
Crude Protein Yield of Oats-Alfalfa Inter Cropping
The highest CP% content (21.2%, 22.8%) was recorded from the pure stand of alfalfa (T2), followed by the seeding ratios T5 (25% oats: 75% alfalfa) (18.55%, 19.19%), T4 (50% oats: 50% alfalfa) (17.33%, 18.27%), and T3 (75% oats: 25% alfalfa) (13.35%, 14.27%), while the pure stand of oats produced the least T1 (11.53%, 13.02%) CP value both at the first and second cutting, respectively. The CP content of the intercropped groups in the present study is similar to the report of Ninama SD et al., 2020, 16.72% from oats and alfalfa. The average values of CP content were directly related to the alfalfa seeding ratios in the intercrop. The CP content of oats-alfalfa produced in a mixture is much improved due to the alfalfa component in the intercrop. Similarly, alfalfa is an excellent forage because of its high yield, rich content and high quality of protein, abundant vitamins and minerals, good palatability, and high digestibility [19], and because it produces more protein per unit area than other forage legumes [18].
The current result agrees with Diriba and Vaars, 2000 who suggested a higher CP% as indicative of the importance of the forages. The CP% result of the present study similar to the report of Shoaib et al., 2014, crude protein yield was significantly influenced by the seed proportions of inter crops. Studies also indicated that the production of grass- legumes inter crop increased fresh fodder yield and protein contents, as well as enhanced fodder palatability [15,16]. Even though the value of CP% content in 25% oats: 75% alfalfa seeding ratio was higher than other seeding ratios in the intercrop, the high proportion of alfalfa in this ratio is undesirable since these normally have a low dry matter yield.
Fiber and Lignin Contents
Of the tested seeding ratios, the pure stand of oats had the highest NDF (46.59%, 39.91%), ADF (30.94%, 29.44%), and ADL (4.79%, 3.62%) content, followed by the seeding ratios of 75% oats and 25% alfalfa, which produced NDF (44.84%, 39.15%), ADF (28.52%, 27.29%), and ADL (3.85%, 3.47%) both at the first and second cutting, respectively (tables 3 and 4). The lowest values of NDF (39.29%, 30.67%), ADF (22.65%, 20.01%), and ADL (2.14%, 2.02%) were recorded from the pure stands of alfalfa, both at the first and second cuttings, respectively. The fiber result of the present study is lower than the previous finding reported [11]. The NDF, ADF, and ADL concentrations in forage were directly proportional to the oats percentage in the intercrop. As the seeding ratios of the oats increased in the intercrop, the content of NDF, ADF, and ADL increased. Findings from Paulson et al., 2008 also suggested that the grass contains higher fiber content than the legumes.
The present study shows that the DM, NDF, and ADF contents increased with advancing maturity for first-cutting forage. This is due to the moisture and leaf-to-stem ratio decreasing and the cell wall content in the stem increasing with advancing maturity. Grasses tend to increase the fiber fractions, such as NDF and ADF, of mixtures owing to the abundant cell wall materials [2], and legumes are usually richer in CP than grasses due to their substantial biological fixation of N from the atmosphere [13]. Similar to the current study, increasing the alfalfa proportion in mixtures increased CP and decreased NDF, ADF, hemicelluloses, and cellulose concentrations, Similar to the current study, increasing the alfalfa proportion in mixtures increased CP and decreased NDF, ADF, hemicelluloses, and cellulose concentrations, suggesting that forage mixtures improved nutritive values and reduced the need for purchased protein supplements in ruminant rations [1]. Other studies also showed significant positive correlations between legume inclusion in pastures and forage quality traits like crude protein and negative correlations with NDF, ADF, and ADL [12]. In other ways, the fiber content of the first cutting is higher than that of the second cutting, as supported by NinamaSD, 2020), who stated that there was an increase in fiber content with the advancement of the growth stage.
The in vitro dry matter digestibility of oats was significantly affected by the treatment. The highest IVDMD (73.3, 74.99) was observed from the pure stand of alfalfa (T2) both at the first and second cuttings. The IVDMD result observed from the second cutting was higher than that of the first cutting due to the regrowth at the second cutting, which implies the best result of IVDMD. On the other hand, the lowest IVDMD (62.28, 63.96) was observed from the pure stand of oats (T1) sole oats both at first and second cutting. The IVDMD results of the three inter cropped groups (T3, T4 and T5) were higher than those of the pure stand of oats but lower than those of the pure stand of alfalfa, which revealed an improvement in digestibility. Similarly, inter cropping improved the forage yield of dry matter, crude protein, and dry matter digestibility (Metekia et al., 2023).
In the present study, the increase in the alfalfa proportion in the mixtures increased the IVDMD and OMD compared with that from sole oats for both harvests. In agreement with a previous study [10], IVDMD increased when the proportion of alfalfa increased in axonopus – alfalfa and tall fescue- alfalfa mixtures. The present study indicates that digestibility could be increased when alfalfa is mixed with other crops [7-9]. This may be because balanced digestibility nutrients from oats and alfalfa silage mixtures set off a ruminal synergistic effect on the fractional rate of degradation and the extent of fermentation, followed by better nutrient availability and utilization efficiency for rumen microorganisms [6]. The association between fermented nutrients from grass and legume mixtures may also lead to synergistic effects on the dominant microbial populations and shifts in the microbial community composition [5], and different metabolic pathways might be simultaneously driven through niche compartmentalization and functional dominance between abundant bacteria [4]. Higher fiber content means a lower degradation rate and longer fermentation time [3], and indigestible fiber, e. g , ADL, in particular, is the main physical barrier interfering with microbial attachment and degradation, and this is negatively correlated with fiber digestibility [2].
Conclusion and Recommendation
Conclusion
Leguminous forages cultivation not only provides high-quality and quantity feed for livestock, but by fixing nitrogen, they could maintain and improve soil fertility and reduce the cost of chemical fertilizers, in which prices are increasing rapidly from time to time. The compatibility of legumes forages with grasses depends on the morphology and physiological characteristics of the legume and grass, in combination with the response of the management imposition, climate, soil, and biotic conditions under which the crop was growing. Considerable variations were existed among the tested seed ratios, indicating the potential for selecting higher-performing forage biomass yield and quality. The highest forage yield in the oats – alfalfa intercrop was obtained from the seed ratio (50% oats + 50% alfalfa) and (75% oats + 25% alfalfa).
However, the highest seed yield was obtained from oats in pure stands. The analysis of variance also showed a great variation in the chemical composition (DM, Ash, OM, CP, NDF, ADF, ADL and IVDMD) of the tested treatments. The OM% and CP% content in the pure stand of alfalfa were significantly higher than those in pure stand oats and oats-alfalfa inter cropped. The crude protein content of the intercropped groups increased as seed ratio of alfalfa increased in the combination of forage. Even though the NDF content of sole oats was higher than that of other treatments, all treatments were observed to be below the critical level (55%) of NDF, which indicates higher digestibility and intake.
The crude protein and neutral detergent fiber were the most important nutrients that determine the quality of forages. Due to this, the highest total nutrient yields of CP% and NDF% were obtained in mixed treatments compared to pure stands. Generally, in the present study, the oats-alfalfa mixture increased forage biomass yield, and improved chemical compositions.
Recommendations
Based on the results of the present study, the following recommendations are proposed: The mixture of (50% oats + 50% alfalfa and 75% oats +25% alfalfa) seed ratio combinations performed the best in most agronomic parameters like biomass yield, and chemical compositions. It is recommended for fodder production in the studied area and related agro-ecologies to enhance dry season feed shortage and improve livestock productivity. When rowing oats for seed purposes, it is preferable to use oats in a pure stand as it gives a comparatively higher seed yield. Furthermore, the impact of oats and alfalfa inter cropping on animal performance should be investigated (feeding trial).
Author Statements
Credit Authorship Contribution Statement
Daniel Wana: writing – review and editing, performed the experiment, and methodology. Metikia Tamiru: advising – review and editing. Jane Wamatu: advising – review and editing.
Data Availability
Data will be made available on request
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge Oromia Agricultural Research Institute for providing the fund for the research.
References
- Adesogan AT, Salawu MB, Williams SP, Fisher WJ, Dewhurst RJ. Reducing concentrate supplementation in dairy cow diets while maintaining milk production with pea-wheat intercrops. Journal of dairy science. 2004; 87: 3398-3406.
- Buxton DR, Redfearn DD. Plant limitations to fiber digestion and utilization. The Journal of Nutrition. 1997; 127: 814S-818S.
- Diaz A, Carro MD, Palacios C, Mateos I, Saro C, Tejido ML, et al. Nutritive value for ruminants of winter oats–legume intercrops in organic cultivation. Animal Production Science. 2014; 54: 1791-1795.
- Hart EH, Creevey CJ, Hitch T, Kingston-Smith AH. Meta-proteomics of rumen microbiota indicates niche compartmentalization and functional dominance in a limited number of metabolic pathways between abundant bacteria. Scientific Reports. 2018; 8: 10504.
- Pandit RJ, Hinsu AT, Patel SH, Jakhesara SJ, Koringa PG, Bruno F, et al. Microbiota composition, gene pool and its expression in Gir cattle (Bos indicus) rumen under different forage diets using metagenomic and metatranscriptomic approaches. Systematic and applied microbiology. 2018; 41: 374-385.
- Kiran D, Krishnamoorthy U. Rumen fermentation and microbial biomass synthesis indices of tropical feedstuffs determined by the in vitro gas production technique. Animal feed science and technology. 2007; 134: 170- 179.
- Chen L, Li J, Dong Z, Shao T. Effects of lactic acid bacteria inoculants and fibrolytic enzymes on the fermentation quality, in vitro degradability, ruminal variables and microbial communities of high-moisture alfalfa silage. Grassl Sci. 2019; 65: 216–225.
- Bai S, Cao ZJ, Cao BB, Yang HJ, Li SL, Liu JX. Effects of different forage combinations in total mixed rations on in vitro gas production kinetics, ruminal and milk fatty acid profiles of lactating cows. Anim Sci J. 2018; 89: 1261–1270.
- Chen L, Guo G, Yuan XJ, Zhang J, Wen AY, Sun XH, et al. Effect of ensiling whole crop oats with lucerne in different ratios on fermentation quality, aerobic stability and in vitro digestibility on the Tibetan plateau. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2017; 101: e144–e153.
- Pizzol JGD, Ribeiro-Filho HMN, Quereuil A, Le Morvan A, Niderkorn V. Complementarities between grasses and forage legumes from temperate and subtropical areas on in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2017; 228: 178-185.
- Ninama SD, Shroff JC, Mehta PV. Effect of different row ratios on yield and quality of oats (Avena sativa L.) and Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) intercropping. 2020; 8: 2817-2821.
- Bosworth SC, Cannella MP. Assessing on-farm pasture availability and forage quality for dairy feed planning. In The 2007 Joint AFGC and NEBCSA Conference. 2007.
- Jahanzad E, Sadeghpour A, Hosseini MB, Barker AV, Hashemi M, Zandvakili OR. Silage yield and nutritive value of millet–soybean intercrops as influenced by nitrogen application. Agronomy Journal. 2014; 106: 1993-2000.
- Paulson J, Jung H, Raeth-Knight M, Linn J. Grass vs. Legume Forage for Dairy Cattle. In: Proc. Minnesota Nutr Conf. 2008: 119-133.
- Bakhashwain AAS. Fodder yield and quality of Rhodes grass-Alfalfa mixtures as affected by sowing rates in Makkah region. JKAU: Metorol. Environ. Arid Land Agric Sci. 2010; 21: 19-33.
- Karadag Y, Buyukburç U. Effects of seed rates on forage production, seed yield and hay quality of annual legume-barley mixtures. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2003; 27: 169-174.
- Diriba G, Vaars R. Productivity of panicum coloratum under varying stages of harvest, low level of nitrogen fertilizer and in combination with stylosanthes during establishment year. M.Sc. thesis, Alemaya University, Ethiopia. 2000.
- Capstaff NM, Miller AJ. Improving the Yield and Nutritional Quality of Forage Crops Front. Plant Science. 2018; 9: 535.
- Wang X, Ma YX, Li J. The nutrient content and main biological characteristics of alfalfa. Pratacultural Science. 2003; 10: 39–41.
- Gezahegn K, Getnet A, Alemayehu M, Fekede F. Forage nutritive values of vetch species and their accessions grown under nitosol and vertisol conditions in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Livestock research for rural development. 2013.
- Jukenvicius S, Sabiene N. The content of mineral elements in some grasses and legumes. Ekologija. 2007; 53: 44–52.
- Yehalem D. Effect of stage of harvesting on botanical composition of selected natural pasture for optimum hay production at Andassa, North Western Ethiopia. M.Sc. thesis, Alemaya University, Ethiopia. 2004: 78.
- Tesfaye Belayneh. Evaluation of biomass yield, seed yield and chemical composition of vetch and oats grown in pure stand and in mixture in mareka district, southern Ethiopia. MSc. thesis. 2020.
- Ganvit VC, Vaishali H, Surve Seema Sharma, Ganvit JB. Forage production potential of Oats – Lucerne intercropping under sole and intercropping systems. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2018; 7: 705-707.
- Surve VH, Patil PR, Arvadia MK. Performance of fodder-based intercropping of sorghum (sorghumbicolorl.), maize (zeamaysl.) and cowpea (vigna unguiculata (l.) walp. under different row ratio. Agricultural science digest. 2012: 32.
- Kumar S, Rawat CR, Melkania NP. Forage production potential and economics of maize (Zea mays) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) intercropping under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 2005; 50: 184-186.
- Patel JR, Rajagopal S. Nitrogen management for production of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculatd) forage under intercropping system. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 2003; 48: 34-37.
- Papadopoulos YA, McElroy MS, Fillmore SAE, McRae KB, Duyinsveld JL, Fredeen AH. Sward complexity and grass species composition affect the performance of grass-white clover pasture mixtures. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 2012; 92: 1199-1205.
- Singh M, Singh A, Singh S. Compatibility, productivity and economics of medicinal and vegetable crops intercropped with menthol mint. Tropical Agriculture. 2012; 89: 50-54.
- Deore SM, Patel MR, Patel PM, Patel HK, Patel UJ. Production potential of forage maize (Zea mays L.)-cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) intercropping system as influenced by row ratios. Advance Research Journal of Crop Improvement. 2013; 4: 110-112.
- Sharma RP, Raman KR, Singh AK. Fodder productivity and economics of pearlmillet (Pennisetum typhoides) with legumes intercropping under various row proportions. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 2009; 54: 301-305.
- Kumar S, Rawat CR, Melkania NP. Forage production potential and economics of maize (Zea mays) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) intercropping under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 2005; 50: 184-186.
- Mosebi PE, Matebesi-Ranthimo PA, Ntakatsane MP, Ratsele R. Forage potential of alfalfa with oats and barley in intercropping system. Asian Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry. 2018; 1: 1-11.
- Dawit Abate, Meseret Tilahun, Nabi Husen, Daniel Wana. Effect of Seeding Ratios of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and Rhodes Grass (Chloris gayana) Mixtures on Dry Matter Yield and Nutritive Quality of the Fodder. Journal of Scientific and Innovative Research. 2022; 11: 31-35.
- Walton PD. Annual forages seeding rates and mixtures for central Alberta. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 1975; 55: 987-993.
- Singh KA, Rawat GS, Gupta S, Patil D, Prajapati N. Production and profitability assessment of clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L. Taub.) based intercropping systems under different row arrangement. Legume Research. 2017; 40: 916-919.
- Bhagat S, Gupta M, Banotra M, Sharma A, Kumar S, Sharma A. Production potential and economics of fodder maize (Zea mays) varieties sown under varying intercropping systems with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2017; 6: 4082-4087.
- Osman AE, Nersoyan N. Annual legumes for integrating rainfed crop and livestock production. In Proceedings. XVth International Grassland Congress. 1985; 5: 123-125.
- Eskandari H, Ghanbari A, Javanmard A. Intercropping of cereals and legumes for forage production. Notulae Scientia Biologicae. 2009a; 1: 07.
- Sengul S. Performance of some forage grasses or legumes and their mixtures under dryland conditions. European Journal of Agronomy. 2003; 19: 401-409.
- Hay RK, Walker AJ. Introduction to the physiology of crop yield. Longman Group UK Limited. 1989.
- Arturi M, Aulicino M, Ansín E, Gallinger G, Signorio R. Combining ability in mixtures of prairie grass and clovers. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2012; 3: 10.
- Befekadu C, Yunus A. Evaluation of biomass yield and growth performance of alfalfa and oats cultivars in the High Land of Arsi, Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 2015: 27.
- Luscher A, Mueller Harvey I, Soussana JF, Rees RM, Peyraud JL. Potential of legume based grassland–livestock systems in Europe: a review. Grass and forage science. 2014; 69: 206-228.
- Albayrak S, Turk M. Changes in the forage yield and quality of legume–grass mixtures throughout a vegetation period. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2013; 37: 139-147.
- Iqbal A, Ayub M, Zaman H, Ahmad R. Impact of nutrient management and legume association on forage qualitative traits of maize forage. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2018; 38: 1079-1084.
- Verma AK, Jeengar KL. Impact of balanced fertilization and legume mixture on fodder oats (Avena sativa L.). International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 2015; 5: 01-05.
- Atif ElsadigIdris, Alaeldin Idris H khairy, Yassin Mohamed Ibrahim. Evaluation of Intercropping of Rhodes Grass with Alfalfa under Irrigation at Shambat. Advances in Environmental Biology. Caballero. 2012; 6: 100-102.
- Yildirim E, Guvenc I. Intercropping based on cauliflower: more productive, profitable and highly sustainable. European Journal of Agronomy. 2005; 22: 11-18.
- Can M, Acar Z, Ayan I, Gulumser E, Mut H. Tarla Bitkileri/Field Crops Arastirma Makalesi/Research Article Igdir Universitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu Dergisi. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology. 2020; 10: 3076- 3083.
- Solomon M, Tekalign Y, Kidane D, Brehanu M, Gezahagn K, Fekede F, et al. Evaluation of Alfalfa (Medicago Sativa L). varieties yield under Irrigation in Medium and Low- Altitudes of Ethiopia. Eastern Africa Agricultural Productivity Project (EAAPP). 2018.
- Kulkarni KP, Tayade R, Asekova S, Song JT, Shannon JG, Lee JD. Harnessing the potential of forage legumes, alfalfa, soybean, and cowpea for sustainable agriculture and global food security. Front Plant Sci. 2018; 9: 1314.
- Baruah L, Malik PK, Kolte AP, Bhatta R. Methane mitigation potential of phyto-sources from Northeast India and their effect on rumen fermentation characteristics and protozoa in vitro. Veterinary World. 2018; 11: 809–818.
- Maxin G, Andueza D, Le Morvan A, Baumont R. Effect of intercropping vetch (Vicia sativa L.), field pea (Pisum sativum L.) and triticale (X Triticosecale) on dry matter yield, nutritive and ensiling characteristics when harvested at two growth stages. Grass and Forage Science. 2017; 72: 777-784.
- Zhang J, Yin B, Xie Y, Li J, Yang Z, Zhang G. Legume cereal intercropping improves forage yield, quality and degradability. PLOS One. 2015; 10: e0144813.
- Muck RE, Kung L. Effects of silage additives on ensiling in silage: field to feed. 1997; 99: 187-199.
- Phelan P, Moloney AP, McGeough EJ, Humphreys J, Bertilsson J, Riordan EG, et al. Forage legumes for grazing and conserving in ruminant production systems. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2015; 34: 281–326.
- Belayneh T, Ali AM, Nebiyu A, Tigistu T. Evaluation of Biomass Yield, Seed Yield and Chemical Composition of Different Varieties of Vetch and Oats Grown in Pure Stand and Mixture in Mareka District, Southern Ethiopia. Seed Yield and Chemical Composition of Different Varieties of Vetch and Oats Grown in Pure Stand and Mixture in Mareka District, Southern Ethiopia. 2021.
- Befekadu C, Yunus A. Evaluation of biomass yield and growth performance of alfalfa and oats cultivars in the High Land of Arsi, Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 2015: 27.
- Salem M, Zamir M, Haq I, Irshad M, Khan M. Yield and Quality of Forage Oats (Avena sativa L.) Cultivars as Affected by Seed Inoculation with Nitrogenous Strains. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2015; 6: 3251-3259.
- Tesfaye Belayneh. Evaluation of biomass yield, seed yield and chemical composition of vetch and oats grown in pure stand and in mixture in mareka district, southern Ethiopia. MSc. thesis. 2020.
- Gemiyo D, Hassen A, Kocho T, Birhanu T, Bassa Z, Jimma A. Chemical composition and digestibility of major feed resources in mixed farming system of southern Ethiopia. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2013; 26: 267-275.
- Astatqe Haile. Results of experiments in forage crops and pasture management in the highlands of Ethiopia (1971-1976). IAR Forage and Range Bulletin No 1. 1977.
- Brink GE, Sanderson MA, Casler MD. Grass and legume effects on nutritive value of complex forage mixtures. Crop Sci. 2015; 55: 1329–1337.
- Chaudhry AS. Forage based animal production systems and sustainability, an invited keynote. RevistaBrasileira de Zootecnia. 2008; 37: 78-84.
- Fekede F, Getnet A, Gezahagn K, Alemayehu M, Diriba G. Cultivated Forage Crops Research and Development in Ethiopia. In: AlemuYami, GetnetAssefa and Lemma Gizachew (eds.). Pasture and Rangeland Research and Development in Ethiopia. 2015a.
- Adugna T. Feed resources for producing export quality meat and livestock in Ethiopia, examples from selected Woredas in Oromiya and SNNP regional states. Ethiopia Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards and Livestock and meat Marketing Program (SPS-LMM). USAID, Ethiopia. 2007.
- Spring P, Taylor-Pickard J, Jacques KA, Hower JM. Biotechnology in the feed industry and animal nutrition: harnessing microbes to provide natural solutions. In Poultry and pig nutrition: Challenges of the 21st century. Wageningen Academic Publishers. 2019; 10: 833-839.
- Andrea Formiagoni. Optimizing dairy cow farming Efficiency through feed efficiency. University of Bologna, Italy. 2021.