Impact of Anthelmintic Treatment on the Burden of Helminth Infections in Primary Schoolchildren in Biyela Health Zone in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Review Article

Austin J Public Health Epidemiol. 2022; 9(1): 1121.

Impact of Anthelmintic Treatment on the Burden of Helminth Infections in Primary Schoolchildren in Biyela Health Zone in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Linsuke S1,2*, Matangila J3, Doua JY2, Lutumba P3 and Van Geertruyden J-P2

¹Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Biomedical Research (INRB), Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo

²Global Health Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

³Department of Tropical Medicine, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo

*Corresponding author: Linsuke S, Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Biomedical Research (INRB), Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Received: February 11, 2022; Accepted: April 06, 2022; Published: April 13, 2022

Abstract

Background: The study evaluated the impact of anthilminthic treatment, given as non-investigational drugs, on helminth infections, anaemia, and hemoglobin (Hb) level in the context of a malaria clinical trial in which Sulfadoxine Pyrimethamine (SP) and SP+Piperaquine (PQ) were also evaluated as an intermittent preventive treatment strategy in schoolchildren in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

Methods: In a nested cohort study, 616 malaria asymptomatic children attending primary schools of Biyela health area were enrolled and follow-up from November 2012 to November 2013. The control group for the nested study was the negative on helminth infections. They received one dose of PZQ and ALB at baseline and then 2 doses of ALB at 4 months intervals. During the 12-months of follow-up, stool and urine samples were collected for helminth infections and finger prick blood for Hb level. Paired test analyses were used to compare the status before and after treatment, and confounding variables for Hb level were tested by multiple linear regression analysis.

Results: At baseline, the prevalence of helminth infections and anaemia were 39.2% (95% CI: 34.7-43.7), and 41.8% (95% CI: 37.3-46.3), respectively. Mean Hb level was 11.6g/dl (SD±1.3). After 12-months post-anthelminthic treatment, the prevalence of helminth infections reduced to 7.2% (p<0.001). There was no change in Hb level and anaemia in the control which received only the anthelminthic drug (p=1.00 and p=0.26, respectively) at 12-months postintervention, compared to those who received active antimalarial SP (p=0.02 and p=0.09, respectively) and PQ (p=0.01 and p<0.001, respectively). Similarly, no difference in Hb level was observed among the infected and uninfected schoolchildren with helminths at 12-months after anthelminthic treatment.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that anthelminthic treatment reduces significantly the prevalence of helminth infections. There was no impact on anaemia and Hb level due to the use of anthelmintic drugs.

Keywords: Helminth; Malaria; Anthelminthic treatment; Hemoglobin level; Schoolchildren; The Democratic Republic of the Congo

Abbreviations

SCH: Schistosoma spp; STH: Soil-Transmitted Helminths; SSA: Sub-Saharan Africa; SAC: School-Aged Children; PZQ: Praziquantel; ALB: Albendazole; MBZ: Mebendazole; DRC: The Democratic Republic Of The Congo; MDA: Mass Drug Administration; RCT: Randomized Clinical Trial; IPTsc: Intermittent Preventive Treatment in Schoolchildren; SP: Sulfadoxine Pyrimethamine; PQ: Piperaquine; Hb: Hemoglobin

Background

In 2019, 236.6 million and 1.5 billion people were worldwide chronically infected with helminth infections caused by Schistosoma spp (SCH) and soil-transmitted helminths (STH) respectively [1]. Most cases were found in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). The burden of disease caused by these helminth infections is estimated to 1,627,844 and 2,748,420 disability-adjusted life years for SCH and STH respectively in 2019 [2].

SCH and STH are among the most frequent health problems affecting school-aged children (SAC) living in tropical areas, where low hygienic and environmental conditions allow their transmission [3-5]. Approximately 1282 million SAC are estimated to be at risk for SCH and 7464 million for STH [1]. SAC is an important highrisk group for infections because they are traditionally responsible for water-related household chores in endemic countries, like spending free time swimming, and living in the poorest sanitation environment. Chronic (co-) infection with these helminths has health consequences such as anaemia, nutritional troubles, alteration of growth, impaired cognitive abilities, and irreversible consequences in adulthood [6-8]. Concomitant infections with other parasites such as P. falciparum are frequently observed and may have additional effects or worsen the health status [9,10]. Therefore, preventive and curative interventions are needed in SAC.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the main aim of SCH and STH control is to reduce or prevent related morbidity and transmission [11]. The control strategy is based on a periodic deworming of the at-risk population in the endemic area using praziquantel (PZQ) 40mg/Kg and albendazole (ALB) 400mg or mebendazole (MBZ) 500mg, respectively for SCH and STH control. This approach is used in many national control programs against SCH and STH across SSA with positive effects on health status [12,13].

Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is one of the countries in SSA most affected by SCH and STH (A. lumbricoides, T. trichiuria, hookworm) infections [3,14]. Recent data in DRC showed a high prevalence of these parasitic infections, especially among SAC [15-18]. The Ministry of Health of DRC throughout the National Schistosomiasis and Intestinal Parasitic Infections Control Program has adopted the periodic mass drug administration (MDA) of PZQ and ALB. However, this strategy has only been implemented in children attending schools, and little is known about the impact of this school-based deworming program on children’s health.

This nested study aimed to assess the added value of anthelminthic while schoolchildren received in a randomized trial design whether antimalarial drugs in intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) strategy using either SP or SP/PQ. We assessed and compared the baseline data with the 12-months follow-up data regarding the helminth infections, anaemia, and difference in hemoglobin (Hb) level.

Methodology

Ethics statement

This study is a secondary analysis of a RCT evaluating the efficacy and safety of IPTsc with Sulfadoxine Pyrimethamine (SP) and SP+Piperaquine (PQ) on anaemia and malaria morbidity in Congolese schoolchildren. Trial Registration Number: NCT01722539; https:// clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01722539 [19]. Ethical clearance was sought and obtained from the Ethical Committee of the School of Public Health, Kinshasa; DRC, and the University of Antwerpen, Belgium before the launch of the study. Written informed consent was also obtained from parents or legal guardians of all children before their enrollment [20].

Study area and period

The study was conducted from November 2012 to November 2013 in Mokali health area of Biyela Health Zone in Kinshasa, RDC. This urban-rural health zone is one of the health zones of Kinshasa endemic for SCH and STH [17,18] but no MDA was ever implemented. The administered population of Biyela health zone was 182,421 inhabitants distributed over nine health areas, and approximately 15% of this population lives in Mokali health area. The climate is tropical with a rainy season from September to May, followed by a short dry season. Biyela’s population has no access to tap water. The three rivers that cross the area: Mokali, Mango, and Nsanga represent the main source of water for household duties and children’s baths. Moreover, most households do not have toilets leading to poor sanitary conditions (archive report of Health Zone, unpublished data).

Study design and procedures

This was a nested cohort study from schoolchildren enrolled in the RCT study. This study enrolled malaria asymptomatic schoolchildren from the first to 5th primary school year in two schools (EP Boyambi and EP Likabo) in Mokali health area and randomly allocated them to three treatment arms: SP given alone, SP combined with PQ, and the control group without malaria prevention. Details on procedures and results of this RCT are largely described by Matangila et al in 2019 [20].

Study subjects

All participants were enrolled irrespective of helminth infections status.

Helminth infections assessment

Stool and urine samples were collected at the enrollment and 12-months later for STH and SCH diagnosis. Blood samples were collected at baseline, at months 4, 7, and 12, for for Hb assessment. Plasmodium detection was done at the baseline and month 12 [19].

Stool samples were processed using the Kato-Katz technique (2x25mg) for the presence of intestinal helminth infections [21]. Two slides were performed and examined microscopically within 24h of preparation by two different technicians. Results were expressed as eggs per gram of feces (epg/gr). To obtain helminth infections intensities, the number of eggs found on duplicate Kato Katz slide was multiplied by factor 20, and intensities were classified into low, moderate, and heavy infection per WHO criteria [22].

Urine samples were tested using urine reagent strips (Combur7 Test®, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Manheim, Germany) to the detected presence of microscopic hematuria. The results were recorded semiquantitatively: negative, positive with (+), (++) and (+++). Moreover, all urine samples positive for urine reagent strips were processed by the centrifugation technique for the detection of S. haematobium eggs in urine [23]. The intensity of infection was estimated according to the number of eggs per 10ml of urine and classifying per WHO criteria [22].

Helminth infections were defined as a presence of any helminth either in the stool or urine samples.

Measuring Hb level and determination of anaemia

Blood samples were obtained from each child by the finger prick and the Hb level was determined using the portable photometer (HemoControl®, EKF Diagnostics, Germany) per manufacturer’s instructions [24]. Anaemia was defined by Hb concentration <11g/dl for children aged under 5 years, <11.5g/dl for children 5-11.9 years, and <12g/dl for children aged 12-14.9 years [25].

Helminth treatment

After sample collection for baseline assessment, all participants were treated twice with PZQ (40mg/kg) and ALB (400mg) per WHO protocol [22]. The first dose of PZQ was given at baseline and a second at the 12-month follow-up survey. While for ALB, the first dose was given at baseline and 2 consecutive doses were given at an interval of four months after baseline. PZQ and ALB used in this study were supplied by the IDA Foundation, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Data management and statistical analysis

Survey data were double entered in Epi-Info 3.5.1 version (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA) and imported into StataIC 11.1 software (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA) for statistical analysis.

Statistical analysis for the impact of anti-helminth treatment on helminth infections was restricted to schoolchildren who provided a stool and urine samples at month 12. While analysis of the impact of anti-helminth treatment on Hb level or anaemia was done on all schoolchildren who provided a blood sample at month 12 irrespective the presence of a stool and urine samples after 12-months (Figure 1). To control for the influence of antimalarial treatment on the Hb level, we stratified the groups randomized to an active antimalarial (SP, SP+PQ) and the control group not receiving an antimalarial. A descriptive analysis summarized the data. Paired tests analysis compared the prevalence of helminth infections, anaemia, and the mean Hb level before and 12-months after treatment delivery. Likewise, a stratified analysis was done to evaluate the effect of treatment in infected and uninfected subjects at baseline. The influence of the antimalarial intervention on the boost of the Hb level at 12-months post-treatment was explored using multiple linear regression analysis. The significant level was set at a P-value <0.05.