Multilevel Barriers to Access Health and HIV Care Among African, Caribbean, and Black Men and Youths in Ottawa, Ontario: A Qualitative Study

Research Article

Austin J Public Health Epidemiol. 2022; 9(3): 1131.

Multilevel Barriers to Access Health and HIV Care Among African, Caribbean, and Black Men and Youths in Ottawa, Ontario: A Qualitative Study

Gebremeskel AT¹*, Kakuru DM² and Etowa JB³

¹PhD Candidate, School of International Development and Global Studies Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ottawa, 120University Private, Canada

²Associate Professor, School of Child and Youth Care Faculty of Human and Social Development University of Victoria, Canada

³Professor & OHTN Chair in Black Women’s HIV Prevention and Care School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences University of Ottawa, Canada

*Corresponding author: Gebremeskel AT, PhD Candidate, School of International Development and Global Studies Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ottawa, 120University Private, Social Sciences Building, Room 8005, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Received: September 06, 2022; Accepted: October 10, 2022; Published: October 17, 2022

Abstract

Background: Ontario is home to the largest proportion of African, Caribbean, and Black (ACB) people living in Canada. This group isdisproportionately affected by the HIV pandemic. However, there is limited evidence on how multilevel barriersintersect and mutually reinforce each other to restrict access to health and HIV care. This paper examines multilevel barriers to access health and HIV carebased on the lived experiences of ACB people in Ottawa and Ontario.

Method: We conducted community based qualitative study with selfidentified ACB men aged 16 and over, living in Ottawa. Our approach is informed by intersectionality theory and Socio-Ecological Model (SEM). A purposive sampling technique was used to recruit participants. We conducted six Focus Group Discussions and 16 In-depth Interviews. Sixty-three people participated in this study. N Vivo software was used for data management and thematic analysis.

Results: Six major themes were identified including barriers to access health and HIV care among heterosexual ACB men in Ottawa and Ontario, which is the focus of this paper. This theme is discussed through three subthemes:( 1)individual level low economic, knowledge,and racial identity;(2) community-level lack of culturally responsive services, few community leaders and lack of neighbourhood resources;and (3) system-level embedded discriminatory policies and practices, anti-Black racism, and traumasand legacies of colonialism.

Conclusion: Addressing health inequality and enhancing the accessibility and provision of healthcare for ACB populations in Ontario is critical for their health and well-being. An inter sectionality lens and SEM should be given priority to guide understanding of the causes of inequities and the complex ways multilevel barriers to access healthcare relates, intersects, and mutually reinforces one another. Multiple level strategies with strong emphasis at a systemic level, and culturally appropriate approaches are crucial to address barriers while enhancing collaboration among multilevel stakeholders including heterosexual ACB men’s and ACB organizations.

Keywords: Multilevel barriers; Healthcare access; African; Caribbean; Black men; Heterosexual; Ottawa/Ontario

Abbreviations

ACB: African, Caribbean and Black; AIDS: Acquired Immuno Deficiency Syndrome; FGDs: Focus Group Discussions; HIV: Human Immuno Virus; IDI: Individual In-Depth Interviews; SEM: Socio Ecological Model; PHA: People Living with HIV/AIDs

Background

In North America, the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) pandemic has evolved over the past four decades. It is now concentrated in socially marginalized communities, and is endemic in the poorer sections of society [1]. WhileCanada has not seen a decrease in new HIV infections in recent years the long-standing systemic and social inequities have put many racialized people at increased risk of getting sick and dying [2]. Despite ongoing efforts, Canada has not seen a decrease in new HIV infections in recent years and further work is needed to meet all of the United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS)90-90-90 targets [3]. The 2020 data from the Public Health Agency of Canada reveals that the number of new HIV cases in Canada has increased by 25.3% since 2014 [3,4]. The African, Caribbean, and Black (ACB) population in Canada represents over 25% of new HIV diagnoses, despite the fact that ACB constitute less than 5% of Canada’s population [5]. We argue that despite Ontario being home to the largest proportion of ACB living in Canada (52.4%) [6], their disproportionate vulnerability to HIV is not well documented [7].

Despite the achievements in HIV treatment and care in North America, HIV is still an issue of concern as it is disproportionately impacting socially marginalized communities, including ACB [1]. These disproportionately impacted marginalized groups include Black (African-Americans, Canadians of African and Caribbean descent) and other sexual and gender minorities. While ACB made up only 13% of the United States’ (US) population, they accounted for 43% of HIV-related deaths in 2018 [8]. In the US Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is the third leading cause of death among Black men and women between ages 35 to 44 [1]. HIV-related deaths are decreasing in the US, however the number of cases are up in Canada [9].

In Canada, HIV overwhelmingly affects already marginalized groups and communities such as men who have sex with men, people who inject drugs, and racialized populations, including Indigenous people [9]. Evidence released in late 2019 by the Public Health Agency of Canada indicated that there were 2,561 HIV diagnoses in 2018, which was an 8% increase from the previous year and which represented an overall increase of 9% in the last decade [9]. In 2018, the prevalence of HIV among heterosexuals accounted for 33.4% of all people with HIV in Canada. Additionally, ACB men have one of the highest HIV prevalence rates in Canada and, compared to others, they might be more vulnerable to HIV [10].

The devastating impact of health inequalities has been exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic, but this issue is by no means new. The disproportionate effect of HIV on ACB and Indigenous people in Canada is largely due to the systemic health disparities that exist which act as a barrier to care [9]. In Ontario, like the rest of Canada, HIV is concentrated in minority populations: Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM), Black communities, Indigenous communities, People Who Inject Drugs (PWID), and atrisk women, in particular Tran’s women [11].

HIV transmission is, therefore, a biological event that is entirely dependent on social context and behavioral practices. It has been shown in the literature that HIV transmission is a function of four concomitant interrelated multilevel factors local HIV prevalence, individual behaviors, biological factors, and social conditions [1]. The unmet needs for the health care of ACB people in Ontariomay are caused by racial and ethnic inequality that is reinforced by systemic barriers and anti-Black racism in the health care system [12-14].

Extensive research has been conducted on the barriers minority groups face to receiving health and HIV care [12-14]. However, there is limited granular analysis of heterosexual ACB men’s lived experiences and perspectives as to how the multilevel barriers intersect and mutually reinforce each other to negatively affect access to health and HIV care particularly in Ottawa and Ontario. This paper aimed to examine the multilevel barriers to accessing equitable health and HIV care to inform policy interventions that reduce ACB health/ HIV outcome inequalities in Ottawa and Ontario. We conducted a community based qualitative study to investigate heterosexual ACB men’s vulnerability and resilience while engaging in HIV/AIDS programming in Ottawa in a project nicknamed ‘weSpeak’. weSpeak was a five-year community based participatory research program with a goal of reducing HIV vulnerabilities and promoting resilience through active engagement of self-identified heterosexual ACB men in community HIV responses. In this article, we report on one of the major themes emerging from the weSpeak qualitative study that is barriers to access health and HIV care. These barriers are presented under three sub-themes (1) individual level; (2) community level; and (3) system and societal level. Our findings are relevant for various public health actors and professionals interested in addressing the multilevel barriers to access health and HIV care among ACB in Ontario guided by an intersectionality lens and the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM).

Theoretical Framework

The weSpeak research was supported by the principles of intersectionality theory that posits that the intersection of individual’s social and political identities tends to expose them to either privilege or experiences of marginalization [15]. In this regard, experiences of poor health outcomes by oppressed and underprivileged populations, including ACB men, can be explained by the intersections of their social and political identities [16]. According to intersectionality theory, limiting ACB men’s HIV vulnerability solely to their behavioral attributes may be problematic. This is because it excludes persistent systemic and structural barriers in their daily encounters and how these encounters overlap with other lived realities such as racism, stereotypes, discrimination, poverty, and general social oppression in predisposing them to HIV. We used SEM [17] to inform the description of the multiple levels of determinants of ACB men’s to access health and HIV care.

Methods and Materials

Reporting

It is being reported in accordance with the reporting guidance provided in the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR), see file 1.

Study Design and Settings

We used descriptive qualitative methods informed by community-based participatory research to explore the perspective of men in the ACB community. Individual In-Depth Interviews (IDIs) and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were used to collect the data. The qualitative data collection took place between June 2016 and April 2017 with self-identified ACB men in Ottawa, Ontario.

The weSpeak study team included a broad range of stakeholders with demonstrated expertise and experience in healthcare, research, program and policy development, and advocacy with ACB communities in Ontario. The research team for the weSpeak study consisted of experienced male ACB members, community-based academic researchers and service providers. Participant recruitment and data collection was conducted by trained research assistants who had lived experience with ACB, qualitative research experience, and a university degree. The analysis was conducted by the study’s leadership, including Josephine Etowa, the Principal Investigator, AG and DK (both of whom were the research coordinators at different times in the research process), and the authors of this manuscript.

Context: Research Project Description of the weSpeak Study

This manuscript reports some findings of the weSpeak qualitative study of the Ottawa site. weSpeak was a five-year research program with a goal of reducing HIV vulnerabilities and promoting resilience through active engagement of self-identified heterosexual ACB men in community HIV responses.

weSpeak was implemented in four cities (London, Windsor, Ottawa, and Toronto) in Ontario to understand HIV vulnerability and resilience among heterosexual ACB men and youth (age 16 and over). The focus on heterosexual ACB men’s HIV-related health needs and challenges became necessary as evidence suggested that there were devastating impacts of rising HIV infection among heterosexuals in this population. To further situate their degree of vulnerability, the research focused on access to both primary and preventive health care, particularly HIV-related services. Given the intersectional and social determinants of the health care perspective of the study, the research also focused on the influence of the lived experiences of racism and how these experiences informed ACB men’s access and willingness to use preventive health care services. The study was launched in 2015 with funding from the Ontario HIV Treatment Network (OHTN) and the Canada Institute of Health Research (CIHR).

Recruitment: Sampling Strategy

Purposive sampling and the snowball technique were used to recruit different groups of participants to ensure maximum variation [18]. According to Patton [19], this kind of sampling technique is widely used in qualitative research for the identification and selection of information-rich cases for the most effective use of resources.

Study Population Characteristics

The study’s participants were self-identified ACB men and youth who live in Ottawa, Ontario.

Eligibility criteria for participation in the FGDs and IDIs included individuals self-identifying as heterosexual ACB males (including transmen who identify as heterosexual), and who were at least 16 years old, ACB men and youth People living with HIV (PHAs), or non-PHA including service providers, who were able to communicate in English or French, and who resided in Ottawa. Data collection was preceded by a community engagement campaign.

Data Collection

Data were collected using FGD and IDIs as guides, at a mutually convenient time and place. FGDs lasted 60 minutes to 90 minutes, on average, and IDIs, lasted 45 minutes to 90 minutes, on average. At the beginning of each FGD and IDI, the research coordinator briefly described the purpose of the study for the participants.The FGDs explored heterosexual ACB men’s perspectives on their HIV vulnerabilities, as well as strategies to engage our target population in community HIV responses. The IDIs drew from insights and critical issues that emerged from FGDs. The participants were enabled to discuss issues related to vulnerability, relationships, sex/ sexuality, and other sensitive or personal issues that could not be effectively captured from FGDs. The FGDs and IDIsalso assessed how vulnerability, resilience, heterosexuality, and masculinity emerged in everyday experiences. All responses were audio recorded, and handwritten field notes were taken during data collection to capture any non-verbal cues.

Data Analysis

We followed Braun and Clarke’s [20] six step thematic analysis. SEM and the intersectionality lens guided the data analysis and interpretation. This is in keeping with the understanding that social identities and inequities such as gender, heterosexuality, unemployment, and racism, overlap and simultaneously interact with individual, community, and structural level factors to deter access to health care and reduce opportunities [16,21]. In order to address the HIV and health needs of the ACB sub-population, it is important to understand the multilevel layers of factors that influence access and utilization of health services. These theoretical perspectives informed coding and interpretation of key patterns in the raw data, to understand the factors that influence access to health and HIV care for ACB heterosexual men in Ottawa.

All FGDs and IDIs audio files were transcribed verbatim, and the typed versions were edited for analytical clarity. All French audio-recorded interviews were transcribed into English. Verbatim transcription was done by listening to audio-recorded material and was carried out by two research assistants.

We used NVivo software for data management and analysis, and conducted thematic analysis guided by the six-step process of Braun and Clarke [20]. The analysis included development of a coding framework informed by questions from the interview guides and a systematic approach that involved (1) familiarization with the data; (2) generating initial codes; (3) developing a coding tree to guide the coding of transcripts; (4) identifying themes; (5) reviewing, defining, and naming themes; (6) interpreting the narratives and stories; and (7) producing the report —a concise, coherent, logical, and non-repetitive account supported by vivid examples [22]. These iterative processes, which are typical of qualitative analysis, ensure that to gain new insights, preliminary themes and interpretations are tested and revised upon further data collection. During data analysis, preconceptions and assumptions were challenged, and a consensus was reached in terms of the data’s interpretation. Thematic analysis was considered an appropriate modality for this study as it is participatory, accessible, and enhances collaborative data analysis and interpretation [20]. The qualitative working group composed of investigators and research staff, refined, defined, and named specific themes. Finally, we developed the qualitative report using vivid, compelling quotes of the participants to convey key ideas and issues to the audience [18].

Trustworthiness of data

Several measures were taken throughout the research process to establish the credibility of the data. Validation strategies used by Creswell and Pothwere employed [18]. These strategies included member-checking, peer debriefing, external auditing, and triangulation. It is important to ensure the assessment of fit between constructed realities of the informants and the reconstruction attributed to them. Peer-debriefing among members occurred during our regular qualitative workgroup meetings, to analyse data and discuss themes as they emerged [23]. Other measures taken to assure the trustworthiness of the research findings included designing the project to be led primarily by ACB community members, academics, researchers, and community members. The study team was organized at two levels prior to the actual study start up to involve community members, researchers, and policymakers’ perspectives.

Team one was organized as a local advisory committee composed of volunteer heterosexual ACB community members and leaders to give feedback on the planning, data collection, knowledge translation, and creation of the final report of the study. They met quarterly to review the process and ensure the community’s perspective was respected. The second team encompassed the Principal Investigator, Co- Investigators, and community collaborators along with the academic researcher and knowledge use and policymaking experiences. This team met every month and led the overall administrative and technical process of the study. They provided a detailed critical review of the data collection process, the categories deriving process, and the decision-making process throughout. All of the research teams have experience in conducting and consulting qualitative research. Theassigned research coordinators have graduate level education and assistants have university level education, and both have significant experience in ACB community work and community-based research. Next, the team developed and pre-tested the interview guide. Following this the data were collected from diverse study participants recruited from different settings that have relevant experience. These processes facilitated meaningful engagement of the people being studied and ensured that the findings presented in this study are truly grounded in the realities of the individuals being studied.

Ethical Considerations

Prior to the commencement of the study, we obtained ethical clearance from Ottawa Public Health and the University of Ottawa’s Research Ethics Board (REB). During data collection and analysis, we obtained informed written consent and assured participants of the confidentiality of their data. Participants were informed of their right to withdraw their consent at any time. Participants were also provided with the contact details of the University of Ottawa and Ottawa Public Health Ethics Committee for onward reporting of any possible ethical concerns and complaints. All respondents were informed of the right to refuse to answer any question posed by the interviewer and that they could withdraw from the study prior to having approved the interview transcript. Written consent was obtained from all participants after orientation. All interviews and discussions were recorded after obtaining the participants’ permission. Anonymity was maintained throughout.

All typed records were kept on a password-protected computer and a back-up drive.

Results and Discussion

Sociodemographic Characteristics of Study Participants

Sixty-three people participated in this study. We conducted six FGDs (47ACB heterosexual men and youth participated) and 16 IDIs. The sociodemographic characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1: In terms of language, French speakers equalled 21 (33%) and English speakers equalled 42 (67%); of these, 15 (27%) were PHA and 48 (73%) were non-PHAs as detailed in table 1 below.

Citation: Gebremeskel AT, Kakuru DM and Etowa JB. Multilevel Barriers to Access Health and HIV Care Among African, Caribbean, and Black Men and Youths in Ottawa, Ontario: A Qualitative Study. Austin J Public Health Epidemiol. 2022; 9(3): 1131.