Clinical Activity of Sirolimus in Classic Kaposi s Sarcoma Patients: Long-Term Remission of Lesions

Research Article

Sarcoma Res Int. 2022; 7(1): 1050.

Clinical Activity of Sirolimus in Classic Kaposi’s Sarcoma Patients: Long-Term Remission of Lesions

Zhimin Su1#, Fang Li1#, Hexia X Gan1, Jingmei Zheng2, Zhiming Wang1,3* and Yuhong Zhou3

1Department of Medical Oncology, Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xiamen, 361015, China

2Department of Pathology, Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xiamen, 361015, China

3Department of Medical Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China

#These authors have contributed equally to this work

*Corresponding author: ZhimingWang, Department of Medical Oncology, Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xiamen, 361015, China, 668 Jinhu Road, Huli District, Xiamen, 361015, China

Received: May 17, 2022; Accepted: June 20, 2022; Published: June 27, 2022

Abstract

Introduction: Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS) is a multicentric angiomatous neoplasm of lymphatic endothelium-derived cells that leads to angioproliferative diseases and affects the skin and internal organs. Currently, the main treatment options include radiotherapy, chemotherapy and targeted treatment. However, due to the low incidence rate and high malignancy, prognosis remains dismal and thus novel strategies are warranted.

Methods: We treated 3 cases of KS with sirolimus, and evaluated the effectiveness and related side effects. Two were not suitable for chemotherapy, andone refused chemotherapy.

Results: In this study, three patients all achieved symptom relief within three days. One patient died of pulmonary infection, and the overall survival time was 12.0 months. The other two patients had not reached disease progression, and the progression free survival time (PFS) of one patient was more than 18 months. The main adverse reaction was grade 1-2 oral mucositis, which was well controlled and well tolerated.

Conclusion: This study shows the long-term remission of lesions and satisfactory safety of oral sirolimus in KS patients who are unsuitable for chemotherapy or refuse chemotherapy.

Keywords: Classic Kaposi’s Sarcoma; Sirolimus; mTOR Inhibitors; Clinical Activity; Long-Term Remission

Introduction

Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS) is a multicentric angiomatous neoplasm of lymphatic endothelium-derived cells [1,2]. The level of Immunosuppression and HHV-8 infection are the most commonly implicated etiological factors affecting the development and progression of KS [2]. It is generally categorized into four subtypes: classic (sporadic initially described by Kaposi), endemic (observed in African), iatrogenic (immunosuppressive related) and epidemic (AIDS related) [2,3]. KS usually presents with purple, red or dark brown macules, patches, papules or nodules, involving the lower limbs, and may be bleeding, ulcer, verrucous and hyperkeratosis [2,4]. Lymphoedema and oral involvement are commonly seen and can precede maculopapular lesions [4]. Besides, visceral involvement, for example, lung, gastrointestinal tract, bone and liver, most frequently occurs in epidemic type. It is usually manifested as slow progression and indolent biologic behavior, whereas epidemic and iatrogenic KS may be extensive and life threatening. According to the research of the Italian cancer registry, the 5-year and 10-year survival rates of KS are 69% and 46% respectively with a median survival of 9. 4 years [5]. One hundred and thirty-nine were men (median age 70 years) and 65 were women (median age 72). One, 5 and 10 year survival rates were 0. 92, 0. 69 and 0. 46 respectively. Survival did not vary according to sex and tumor sites. Owing to its slow progression, KS aims to control disease progression and improve quality of life.

At present, based on the European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline, the treatments of KS mainly include local therapies, radiotherapy, surgical excision, cryosurgery and laser, interferon and chemotherapy [6]. Radiotherapy is feasible for early localized lesions, and surgical resection is another option, but it is only limited to small superficial lesions, and the recurrence rate is high. In addition, most chemotherapeutic drugs have potential serious side effects, and lack sufficient evidence. Due to the low incidence rate and comorbidities, there is no standard therapy for KS patients who do not tolerate chemotherapy or refuse chemotherapy.

The mTOR is a serine threonine protein kinase, which plays a central regulatory role in gene transcription, protein synthesis, apoptosis and other important processes [7]. Sirolimus is a typical inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway. Recently, it has become a new treatment for KS because it blocks the tumor formation of G protein coupled receptor (vgpcr) encoded by KS herpesvirus in vivo and in vitro [8]. The effectiveness of oral administration has been confirmed in the treatment of renal transplant KS patients [9]. However, so far, it has not been used in the treatment of KS who refuse chemotherapy or chemotherapy intolerance. Here, we report 3 patients who achieved long-term disease control after oral sirolimus.

Patients and Methods

Patient Preparation

We treated 3 cases of classic KS with sirolimus, and evaluated the effectiveness and related side effects. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient. Participants’ demographics, clinicopathological data were collected from hospital electronic medical records and follow-up phone inquiries.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The Ethics Committee of Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Biomedical Research Department provided ethical approval. This study was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki declaration and informed consent for collecting and preserving samples and details was obtained from each patient.

Efficacy Evaluation

The efficacy was evaluated according to recist1. 1, which was divided into complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and disease stable (SD) and disease progression (PD). The progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients were counted.

Results

Baseline Characteristics of Patients

The features of the patients are shown in (Table 1). Two were not suitable for chemotherapy, andone refused chemotherapy.