Editorial
Adv Res Text Eng. 2016; 1(1): 1002.
Super-Hydrophobic/Oleophobic Textiles
Karapanagiotis I*
Department of Management and Conservation of Ecclesiastical Cultural Heritage Objects, University Ecclesiastical Academy of Thessaloniki, Greece
*Corresponding author: Ioannis Karapanagiotis, Department of Management and Conservation of Ecclesiastical Cultural Heritage Objects, University Ecclesiastical Academy of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54250, Greece
Received: September 06, 2016; Accepted: September 28, 2016; Published: September 30, 2016
Editorial
The term hydrophobe comes from the Ancient Greek word ὑδρόφοβος and is a combination of the words ὕδωρ and φόβος which mean “water” and “fear”, respectively. Consequently, the net interaction between a water droplet and a hydrophobic surface is repulsive and this is described by the large contact angle [1] which ranges from 90o to typically 120o. Intrinsic hydrophobic materials that have been used for decades in various applications and the textile industry are polymers of low surface energy such as, for instance, fluoropolymers and polysiloxanes and other smaller, mostly organic, molecules. Super hydrophobicity refers to much higher contact angles (>150o). This extreme non-wetting state is achieved on micro/ nano-structured rough surfaces of usually [2] (but not necessarily [3]) intrinsic hydrophobic materials.
Super hydrophobic structured surfaces are often observed in nature. For example, the surfaces of the lotus leaf and rose petal have been extensively used as model surfaces to fabricate biomimetics materials of special and controlled wet abilities. Both biological surfaces exhibit super hydrophobic properties, implying that the contact angle of water droplets resting on these surfaces is >150o. However, it is stressed that the two plant surfaces show different dynamic wetting: water droplets can effortlessly roll off the surface of a lotus leaf (lotus effect) [2] whereas they stay pinned to the surface of a red rose petal (petal effect) [4]. Consequently, we must recognize that super hydrophobicity is not always accompanied by dynamic water repellence which corresponds to low tilt contact angle and low contact angle hysteresis [4, 5].
The textile industry has a special interest on super hydrophobicity and water repellence as these can lead to the production of waterproof, self-cleaning and stain-resistant clothing and other textiles, as highlighted in several review articles e.g. [6, 7]. Researchers in textile engineering, including A.B.D. Cassie who was a Director of Research for the “Wool Industries Research Association”, have significantly contributed to our understanding of the origin of super hydrophobicity and water repellence since the 1940s [8-11], that is several decades before W. Barthlott, C. Neinhuis published their famous paper for lotus and other plants in 1997 [2] which is usually considered as a reference point by the recent literature. Interestingly, Cassie and Baxter were clearly aware of the interdependence between surface roughness and water repellence since 1944 when they wrote [8]: “The duck is generally regarded as having attained perfection in water repellence, and it is usually taken for granted that the duck uses an oil or similar coating with larger contact angles than any known to man. In actual fact, the duck obtains its water-repellence from the structure of its feathers.” The aforementioned argument of Cassie and Baxter was inarguably confirmed in 2008, when systematic SEM studies revealed a multi scale structure on duck feathers [12]. Finally, to further appreciate the significant early contribution of Cassie and Baxter it should be noted that they provided the fundamental theoretical basis to the field of superhydrophobicity, as they correlated the elevated apparent contact angle observed on a super hydrophobic surface of augmented roughness with the (Young [2]) contact angle measured on a smooth surface [8]. This correlation has become the famous “Cassie and Baxter equation” used extensively in the literature.
The emergence of nanotechnology offered new tools to manipulate the matter on an atomic and molecular scale. Therefore, in the last two decades several methods have been developed to produce super hydrophobic and water repellent textiles including, for instance, solgel [13-15], electro spinning coupled to chemical and photo-induced treatment [16,17], plasma treatment [18] and controlled deposition of nanoparticles which are usually embedded into polymer matrices [19-23]. The latter is an easy process of low cost, as it can be implemented using common polymers and nanoparticles, leading to very large contact angles of water droplets (>160o) [22] and very small tilt contact angles (< 5o) [22]. Examples of super hydrophobic cotton and silk surfaces, which were produced by depositing a polysiloxane coating enriched with silica nanoparticles onto the fabrics, are shown in Figure 1 [20-22]. Super hydrophobicity is evidenced by the apparent large contact angles of the resting water droplets. Likewise, large contact angle is observed for the resting oil droplet on the treated silk (Figure 1), thus suggesting that super oleophobicity was induced by the deposition of the polysiloxane-nanoparticle composite coating onto the silk surface.
Figure 1: Photographs of droplets of water on treated cotton (above) and droplets of water and olive oil on treated silk (below). For demonstration purposes water and oil were enriched with a blue and a red pigment, respectively.
The development of strategies to produce super oleophobic surfaces can be considered as the natural sequence of the extensive research which has been carried out on super hydrophobicity. The same processing scheme described above to achieve super hydrophobicity on textile surfaces, is followed in the methods which were developed to induce super oleophobicity: both surface geometry and chemical composition of the textile surface are altered to obtain the desired wetting properties. Consequently, the same techniques described above to achieve super hydrophobicity are roughly used to produce super oleophobic textile surfaces and are, for instance, plasma treatment [24, 25], controlled, Vapour-phase and doping polymerization [26-28] and nanoparticle deposition [22-30]. An example of a super oleophobic silk surface which was treated using nanoparticles was shown in Figure 1.
(i) Super omniphobic textiles that can repel not only water but virtually any liquid thrown on them, offer new perspectives for the textile industry. However, the production of such advanced textiles is a difficult task as liquids of low surface tension (e.g. oil, alkanes etc) tend to easily spread onto surfaces. Hence, the appropriate selection of The materials used to treat textiles and
(ii) The processing conditions, is of enormous importance to extend the range of liquids which dewed from the textile surfaces [22- 26].
In principle, the micro/nano-structured surface topography, which is essential for super-hydrophobicity/oleophobitiy, can be easily destroyed by friction. Consequently, the mechanical durability of the materials with special wetting properties is an important issue that several studies attempted to address in the past. A fascinating route that has been recently suggested is the fabrication of materials with self-healing wetting properties induced by externally imposed (mechanical, thermal etc) stimuli [31, 32].
Super-hydrophobic/oleophobic textiles accompanied by water/ oil-repellent, self-cleaning and stain-resistant properties have the potential to make an enormous impact on our everyday life. Consequently, the development of strategies to produce these advanced textiles deserves the attention of the scientific community. Some research avenues were briefly presented in this short Editorial Note thus describing, in brief, a major impact of nanotechnology on the textile engineering.
References
- Young T. An Essay on the Cohesion of Fluids. Philo. Trans R Soc Lond. 1805; 95: 65-87.
- Barthlott W, Neinhuis C. Purity of the Sacred Lotus, or Escape from Contamination in Biological Surfaces. Planta. 1997; 202: 1-8.
- S Herminghaus. Roughness-Induced Non-Wetting. Europhys Lett 2000; 52: 165-170.
- Feng L, Zhang Y, Xi J, Zhu Y, Wang N, Xia F, et al. Petal Effect: a Superhydrophobic State with High Adhesive Force. Langmuir. 2008; 24: 4114-4119.
- Karapanagiotis I, Manoudis PN. Superhydrophobic Surfaces. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials. 2012; 21: 21-32.
- Eadie L, Ghosh TK. Biomimicry in Textiles: Past, Present and Potential. An Overview. J R Soc Interface 2011; 8: 761-775.
- Park S, Kim J, Park CH. Superhydrophobic Textiles: Review of Theoretical Definitions. Fabrication and Functional Evaluation. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics 2015; 10: 1-18.
- Cassie ABD, Baxter S. Wettability of Porous Surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc. 1944; 40: 546-551.
- Cassie ABD, Baxter S. Large Contact Angles of Plant and Animal Surfaces. Nature 1945; 155 : 21-22.
- Bartell FE, Purcell WR, Dodd CG. The Measurement of the Effective Pore Size and of the Water-Repellence of Tightly Woven Textiles. Discuss Faraday Soc. 1948; 3: 257-264.
- Schuyten HA, Reid DJ, Weaver JW, Frick JG. Imparting Water-Repellency to Textiles by Chemical Methods: A Review of the Literature. Text Res J 1948; 18: 490-503.
- Liu YY, Chen XQ, Xin JH. Hydrophobic Duck Feathers and their Simulation on Textile Substrates for Water Repellent Treatment. Bioinspir Biomim 2008; 3: 046007.
- Shirgholami MA, Khalil-Abad, MS, Khajavi R, Yazdanshenas ME. Fabrication of Superhydrophobic Polymethylsilsesquioxane Nanostructures on Cotton Textiles by a Solution Immersion Process. J Colloid Interf Sci. 2011; 359: 530-535.
- Shi Y, Wang Y, Feng X, Yue G, Yang W. Fabrication of Superhydrophobicity on Cotton Fabric by Sol–Gel. Appl Surf Sci 2012; 258: 8134-8138.
- Shirgholami MA, Shateri-Khalilabad M, Yazdanshenas ME. Effect of Reaction Duration in the Formation of Superhydrophobic Polymethylsilsesquioxane Nanostructures on Cotton Fabric. Text Res J. 2013; 83: 100-110.
- Cakir M, Kartal I, Yildiz Z. The Preparation of UV-Cured Superhydrophobic Cotton Fabric Surfaces by Electrospinning Method. Text Res J. 2014; 84: 1528-1538.
- Jin S, Park Y, Park CH. Preparation of Breathable and Superhydrophobic Polyurethane Electrospun Webs with Silica Nanoparticles. Text Res J. 2016; 0040517515617417.
- Kwon S, Kim J, Moon M-W, Park CH. Nanostructured Superhydrophobic Lyocell Fabrics with Asymmetric Moisture Absorbency: Moisture Managing Properties. Text Res J. 2016; 0040517516639832.
- Zhang M, Wang S, Wang C, Li J. A Facile Method to Fabricate Superhydrophobic Cotton Fabrics. Appl Surf Sci 2012; 261: 561-566.
- Chatzigrigoriou A, Manoudis PN, Karapanagiotis I. Fabrication of Water Repellent Coatings Using Waterborne Resins for the Protection of the Cultural Heritage. Macromol Symp 2013; 331-332: 158-165.
- Liu, F, Ma M, Zang D, Gao Z, Wang C. Fabrication of Superhydrophobic/Superoleophilic Cotton for Application in the Field of Water/Oil Separation. Carbohydr Polym 2014; 103: 480-487.
- Aslanidou D, Karapanagiotis I, Panayiotou C. Superhydrophobic, Superoleophobic Coatings for the Protection of Silk Textiles. Prog Org Coat 2016; 97: 44-52.
- Jeong SA, Kang TJ. Superhydrophobic and Transparent Surfaces on Cotton Fabrics Coated with Silica Nanoparticles for Hierarchical Roughness. Text Res J .2016; 0040517516632477.
- Artus GRJ, Zimmermann J, Reifler FA, Brewer SA, Seeger S. A Superoleophobic Textile Repellent Towards Impacting Drops of Alkanes. Appl Surf Sci .2012; 258: 3835-3840.
- Saraf R, Lee HJ, Michielsen S, Owens J, Willis C, Stone C, Wilusz E. Comparison of Three Methods for Generating Superhydrophobic. Superoleophobic Nylon Nonwoven Surface. J Mater Sci. 2011; 46: 5751-5760.
- Wang H, Xue Y, Lin T. One-Step Vapour-Phase Formation of Patternable Electrically Conductive, Superamphiphobic Coatings on Fibrous Materials. Soft Matter 2011; 7: 8158-8161.
- Hayn RA, Owens JR, Boyer SA, McDonald RS, Lee HJ. Preparation of Highly Hydrophobic and Oleophobic Textile Surfaces Using Microwave-Promotedsilane Coupling. J Mater Sci. 2011; 46: 2503-2509.
- Zhou X, Zhang Z, Xu X, Men X, Zhu X. Fabrication of Super-Repellent Cotton Textiles with Rapid Reversible Wettability Switching of Diverse Liquid. Appl Surf Sci. 2013; 276: 571-577.
- Hoefnagels HF, Wu D, de With G, Ming, W. Biomimetic Superhydrophobic and Highly Oleophobic Cotton Textiles. Langmuir 2007; 23: 13158-13163.
- Leng BX, Shao ZZ, de With G, Ming WH. Superoleophobic Cotton Textiles, Langmuir 2009; 25: 2456-2460.
- Liu Y, Liu Y, Hu H, Liu Z, Pei X, Yu B, et al. Mechanically Induced Self-Healing Superhydrophobicity. J Phys Chem C. 2015; 119: 7109-7114.
- Xue C-H, Bai X, Jia S-T. Robust, Self-Healing Superhydrophobic Fabrics Prepared by One-Step Coating of PDMS and Octadecylamine. Nature, Scientific Reports 2016; 6: 27262.