Challenges in Effluents Treatment Containing Dyes

Special Article - Dyes

Adv Res Text Eng. 2022; 7(2): 1075.

Challenges in Effluents Treatment Containing Dyes

Sharma P and Qanungo K*

Division of Chemistry, University Institute of Science, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali, Punjab-140413, India

*Corresponding author: Kushal Qanungo, Division of Chemistry, University Institute of Science, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali, Punjab- 140413, India

Received: August 30, 2022; Accepted: September 30, 2022; Published: October 07, 2022

Abstract

The textile industry uses various types of synthetic dyes and releases a number of hazardous industrial pollutants which are highly coloured, toxic and carcinogenic. Wastewater containing such pollutants leads to an increase in the biochemical and chemical oxygen demand of the wastewater bodies and causes various diseases in humans, animals and plants. Different wastewater treatment techniques such as physical, chemical and biological processes are in vogue. The different dyes used in textile industries and their removal techniques from wastewater streams are broadly reviewed in this monograph.

Introduction

Industrial development is very important for the economic growth of a country. Improper treatment of wastewater from industries before disposal poses severe environmental as well as health issues to the surrounding communities [1,2]. Most pharmaceutical, textile, food, paper & pulp and cosmetic industries use synthetic dyes for colour [3].

Textile dyeing is as old as the civilization itself. With the advent of the modern textile industry, this field has developed into a separate area of study. Water is principally used in dyeing and product finishing procedures [4]. One of the biggest challenges that the textile industry is facing is that of effective and low-cost treatment of the large number of coloured effluents that the industry produces. Discharge of these effluents without effective treatment, into the environment, poses a serious threat to human health as well as to other living organisms [5,6,7]. Apart from dyes effluent is loaded with various detergents, chlorides, nitrates, suspended solid materials, organic and inorganic pollutants, acid, bases, mordants and heavy metal ions which are highly polluting [8,9].

Classification of Dyes

Dyes can be defined as complex unsaturated organic compounds which have diverse chemical structures. The dyes which are generally used in textile industries may be categorized into a number of classes such as Direct dye, Acid dye, Basic dye, Mordant dye, Azo dye, Reactive dye, Disperse dye, Sulphur dye and vat dye [10,11]. Non-biodegradable, toxic and carcinogenic nature of some of these dyes makes them harmful, even in small concentrations. Discharge of dyes contaminated water in the environment causes substantial health concerns such as skin rashes, headaches, dizziness, breathing difficulty, nausea, body fatigue, lack of concentration, irregular heartbeat, seizures and it may even lead to cancer [12].

There are three different types of fibers used in the manufacture of various textile products: cellulose fibers, protein fibers and synthetic fibers. Each type of fiber is dyed with different types of dyes. Cellulose fibers are used to dye fabrics such as cotton, rayon, linen, hemp and lyocell and the dyes used are Reactive dyes, direct dyes, naphthol dyes and indigo dyes. Protein fibers include fabrics such as wool, angora, cashmere, silk and mohair and the dyes used for such fibers are Acid dyes and Lanaset dyes. Fabrics such as nylon, acrylic, acetate, Ingeo, polyester, spandex and polypropylene come under the class of synthetic fibers and these are dyed using Disperse dyes, Basic dyes and Direct dyes.

Techniques for Colour Removal

To reduce the environmental impact of dyes, a variety of methods to treat wastewater has been established and are currently in use. Based on the mode of dye removal and the types of dye to be removed, the techniques may be broadly categorized as physical, chemical and biological methods (including the use of algae, bacteria and fungi species) [22,23]. All technologies have their own merits and demerits.

Physical Methods

Various dye removal methods such as adsorption, membrane filtration, nanofiltration, ultrafiltration or microfiltration, ion exchange, irradiation electrokinetic, coagulation-flocculation and reverse osmosis are included in the physical category of classification. Adsorption is considered one of the most efficient and frequently used decontamination methods for the treatment of effluentcontaining wastewater [24]. The process of adsorption due to its cost-effectiveness, and eco-friendly nature applies to a number of dyes. Different materials like activated carbon, fly ash, red mud, rice husk, clay, ground nut shells charcoal, sawdust, bentonite, zeolite and siliceous materials can act as adsorbents [25,26]. Membrane filtration is one of the physical methods which are applicable for wastewater treatment due to its low space requirement. Processes like reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, ultra-filtration or microfiltration are also based on membrane processes [27].

Chemical Methods

Chemical dye removal methods involve the use of chemicals in the dye removal processes. Methods like electrochemical destruction, electro floatation, use of Fenton reagent, Ozonation, advanced oxidation, electrokinetic coagulation, photochemical and ultraviolet irradiation are some of the examples of chemical methods. These techniques are efficient in dye removal however, high running cost, use of chemicals, secondary pollution, the requirement of proper equipment, high electricity consumption in some of the processes and sludge disposal are some of the drawbacks of these techniques [28,29,30].

Biological Methods

Biological removal methods are generally known as conventional methods of wastewater treatment. This is a low-cost, environmentally safe method which generates less amount of secondary pollutants as compared to other techniques. Biological techniques involve the degradation of dyes into less toxic compounds using biological materials like algae, bacteria, yeast as well as fungi [29]. The ability of bacteria to survive in both aerobic and anaerobic conditions helps to break down the bonds present in complex dye molecules (e.g-N=N-). Bacterial species like Bacillus subtilis, Clostridium perfringens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumonia, and Escherichia coli can degrade harmful dyes. Algae species such as Chlorella pyrenoidosa, Spirogyra Rhizopus, Cosmarium sp., Nostoc muscorum (blue green algae), Ulva lactuca, Sargassum, are effective degradation of azo dyes and compounds containing -OH, RCOO, -NH2, and PO43- into simple compounds [31,32,33]. Some studies reported that biological methods perform well in reducing the chemical oxygen demand and turbidity of the solution but are less efficient to remove colour [34].

Among different methods, physical methods due to their least usage of chemicals, simplicity and efficiency are most used for wastewater treatment when compared with chemical and biological methods.

Factors Affecting the Removal Process

The applicability of each pollutant removal technique is always governed by several factors. A number of factors like pH, time, polarity, suspended solids, chemical oxygen demand, biochemical oxygen demand, adsorbent/adsorptive interaction, particle size and temperature are there which determine the technical and economic feasibility of any dye removal technique. Therefore, it is crucial to observe and compare reaction factors with the standard parameters as many chemicals used in the textile industry cause problems with the ecosystem and human health [35,36].

Each pollution removal method has its limitations. Complete dye decolourization cannot be sufficiently achieved by one single process. A dye removal method should be simple, low cost, and easy to operate with fewer chemical requirements. The dye removal method must be able to efficiently remove a number of dyes from wastewater in a short period without producing secondary pollution. Therefore, to overcome these problems, dye removal strategies in industrial settings essentially consist of a combination of diverse techniques [48,49,50].

Conclusion

The purpose of different treatment methods used in the textile industry is to give the lowest water pollution and enhance environmental safety. Since there is no single technique which is fully capable or can be completely adaptable for all types of textile effluents containing dyes. Therefore, a combination of different methods like physical, chemical and biological methods are used to treat pollutionloaded water. Treatment of textile effluent containing a small volume of pollutants is effective using physical and oxidation methods. Due to low cost and less sludge production, biological methods have more preference than chemical methods. Therefore, to reduce the effect of toxic compounds, the research on pollution control should also focus on quantitative description of combination processes instead of only qualitative discussion.

References

  1. Adane T, Adugna AT, Alemayehu E. Textile industry effluent treatment techniques. J Chem. 2021; 2021: 1-14.
  2. Bustos-Terrones YA, Hermosillo-Nevárez JJ, Ramírez-Pereda B, Vaca M, Rangel-Peraza JG, Bustos-Terrones V, et al. Removal of BB9 textile dye by biological, physical, chemical, and electrochemical treatments. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2021; 121: 29-37.
  3. Shindhal T, Rakholiya P, Varjani S, Pandey A, Ngo HH, Guo W, et al. A critical review on advances in the practices and perspectives for the treatment of dye industry wastewater. Bioengineered. 2021; 12: 70-87.
  4. Karaboyaci M, Uysal M, Sencan A, Kilic M. Chemically color removal from textile waste water with oxidizing and reducing agents. Eur J Eng Nat Sci. 2017; 2: 217-21.
  5. Choudhary M, Peter CN, Shukla SK, Govender PP, Joshi GM, Wang R. Environmental issues: a challenge for wastewater treatment. Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World. 2020; 38: 1-12.
  6. Vikrant K, Giri BS, Raza N, Roy K, Kim KH, Rai BN, et al. Recent advancements in bioremediation of dye: current status and challenges. Bioresour Technol. 2018; 253: 355-67.
  7. Shindhal T, Rakholiya P, Varjani S, Pandey A, Ngo HH, Guo W, et al. A critical review on advances in the practices and perspectives for the treatment of dye industry wastewater. Bio engineered. 2021; 12: 70-87.
  8. Sharma S, Kaur A. Various methods for removal of dyes from industrial effluents-a review. Indian J Sci Technol. 2018; 11: 1-21.
  9. Egan J, Salmon S. Strategies and progress in synthetic textile fiber biodegradability. SN Appl Sci. 2022; 4: 1.
  10. D’Antoni BM, Iracà F, Romero M. Current treatment technologies and practical approaches on textile wastewater Dyes Removal. Panta Rei Srlwater Solutions. 2017; 1-10.
  11. Ghaly AE, Ananthashankar R, Alhattab MVVR, Ramakrishnan VV. Production, characterization and treatment of textile effluents: a critical review. J Chem Eng Process Technol. 2014; 5: 1-19.
  12. Sharma J, Sharma S, Soni V. Classification and impact of synthetic textile dyes on Aquatic Flora: a review. Reg Stud Mar Sci. 2021; 45: 101802.
  13. Gürses A, Açikyildiz M, Günes K, Gürses MS. Dyes and pigments: their structure and properties. Springer Briefs in Molecular Science. 2016; 13-29.
  14. Dhodapkar R, Rao NN, Pande SP, Kaul SN. Removal of basic dyes from aqueous medium using a novel polymer: Jalshakti. Bioresour Technol. 2006; 97: 877-85.
  15. Yavuz Ö, Aydin AH. Removal of direct dyes from aqueous solution using various adsorbents. Pol J Environ Stud. 2006; 15: 155-161.
  16. Schuler MJ. Dyeing with dispersedyes. Text Chem Colorist. 1980; 12.
  17. Morin JF. Recent advances in the chemistry of vat dyes for organic electronics. J Mater Chem C. 2017; 5: 12298-307.
  18. Ding YI, Freeman HS. Mordant dye application on cotton: optimisation and combination with natural dyes. Color Technol. 2017; 133: 369-75.
  19. Lewis DM. Developments in the chemistry of reactive dyes and their application processes. Color Technol. 2014; 130: 382-412.
  20. Tian X, Zhu H, Meng X, Wang J, Zheng C, Xia Y, et al. Amphiphilic calcium alginate carbon aerogels: broad-spectrum adsorbents for ionic and solvent dyes with multiple functions for decolorized oil–water separation. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng. 2020; 8: 12755-67.
  21. Božic M, Kokol V. Ecological alternatives to the reduction and oxidation processes in dyeing with vat and sulphur dyes. Dyes Pigments. 2008; 76: 299-309.
  22. Kandisa RV, Saibaba KN, Shaik KB, Gopinath R. Dye removal by adsorption: a review. J Biorem Biodegrad. 2016; 7.
  23. Mohan SV, Bhaskar YV, Karthikeyan J. Biological decolourisation of simulated azo dye in aqueous phase by algae Spirogyra species. Int J Environ Pollut. 2004; 21: 211-22.
  24. Piaskowski K, Swiderska-Dabrowska R, Zarzycki PK. Dye removal from water and wastewater using various physical, chemical, and biological processes. JAOAC Int. 2018; 101: 1371-84.
  25. Abdelwahab O, El Nemr A, El Sikaily A, Khaled A. Use of rice husk for adsorption of direct dyes from aqueous solution: a case study of Direct F. Scarlet. Egypt J Aquat Res. 2005; 31: 1-11.
  26. Kaykhaii M, Sasani M, Marghzari S. Removal of dyes from the environment by adsorption process. Chem Mater Eng. 2018; 6: 31-5.
  27. Kumar P, Agnihotri R, Wasewar KL, Uslu H, Yoo C. Status of adsorptive removal of dye from textile industry effluent. Desalin Water Treat. 2012; 50: 226-44.
  28. Lahkimi A, Oturan MA, Oturan N, Chaouch M. Removal of textile dyes from water by the electro-Fenton process. Environ Chem Lett. 2007; 5: 35-9.
  29. Ruan W, Hu J, Qi J, Hou Y, Zhou C, Wei X. Removal of dyes from wastewater by nanomaterials: a review. Adv Mater Lett. 2019; 10: 9-20.
  30. Dang TH, Mai TP, Truong MT, Dao LT, Nguyen TAN. Optimization of the photochemical degradation of textile dye industrial wastewaters. ASEAN J Sci Technol Dev. 2016; 33: 10-7.
  31. Aruna, Bagotia N, Sharma AK, Kumar S. A review on modified sugarcane bagasse biosorbent for removal of dyes. Chemosphere. 2021; 268: 129309.
  32. Bhatia D, Sharma NR, Singh J, Kanwar RS. Biological methods for textile dye removal from wastewater: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2017; 47: 1836-76.
  33. Waqas R, Arshad M, Asghar HN, Asghar M. Optimization of factors for enhanced phycoremediation of reactive blue azo dye. Int J Agric Biol. 2015; 17: 1560-8530.
  34. Lewinsky AA. Hazardous materials and wastewater: treatment, removal and analysis. Nova Publishers; 2007.
  35. Kalivel P. Treatment of textile dyeing waste water using TiO 2/Zn electrode by spray pyrolysis in electrocoagulation process. In: Dyes and pigments-novel applications and waste treatment. Intech Open; 2021.
  36. Kerkez D, Becelic-Tomin M, Milidrag GP, Gvoic V, Mandic AK, Macerak AL, et al. Treatment of waste water containing printing dyes: summary and perspectives; 2020.
  37. Bashir A, Malik LA, Ahad S, Manzoor T, Bhat MA, Dar GN, et al. Removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous system by ion-exchange and biosorption methods. Environ Chem Lett. 2019; 17: 729-54.
  38. El Haddad M, Regti A, Laamari MR, Mamouni R, Saffaj N. Use of Fenton reagent as advanced oxidative process for removing textile dyes from aqueous solutions. J Mater Environ Sci. 2014; 5: 667-74.
  39. Venkatesh S, Venkatesh K, Quaff AR. Dye decomposition by combined ozonation and anaerobic treatment: cost effective technology. J Appl Res Technol. 2017; 15: 340-5.
  40. Mojsov KD, Andronikov D, Janevski A, Kuzelov A, Gaber S. The application of enzymes for the removal of dyes from textile effluents. Adv techn. 2016; 5: 81-6.
  41. Gayathiri E, Prakash P, Selvam K, Awasthi MK, Gobinath R, Karri RR, et al. Plant microbe based remediation approaches in dye removal: a review. Bioengineered. 2022; 13: 7798-828.
  42. Iqbal HMN, Bilal M, Rodriguez-Couto S. Smart nanohybrid constructs: concept and designing for environmental remediation. Chemosphere. 2022; 301: 134616.
  43. Popli S, Patel UD. Destruction of azo dyes by anaerobic–aerobic sequential biological treatment: a review. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2015; 12: 405-20.
  44. Naje AS, Chelliapan S, Zakaria Z, Ajeel MA, Alaba PA. A review of electrocoagulation technology for the treatment of textile wastewater. Rev Chem Eng. 2017; 33: 263-92.
  45. Nidheesh PV, Zhou M, Oturan MA. An overview on the removal of synthetic dyes from water by electrochemical advanced oxidation processes. Chemosphere. 2018; 197: 210-27.
  46. Silva CG, Wang W, Faria JL. Photocatalytic and photochemical degradation of mono-, di-and tri-azo dyes in aqueous solution under UV irradiation. J Photochem Photobiol A. 2006; 181: 314-24.
  47. Berradi M, Hsissou R, Khudhair M, Assouag M, Cherkaoui O, El Bachiri A, et al. Textile finishing dyes and their impact on aquatic environs. Heliyon. 2019; 5: e02711.
  48. Bharathi KS, Ramesh ST. Removal of dyes using agricultural waste as lowcost adsorbents: a review. Appl Water Sci. 2013; 3: 773-90.
  49. Robinson T, McMullan G, Marchant R, Nigam P. Remediation of dyes in textile effluent: a critical review on current treatment technologies with a proposed alternative. Bioresour Technol. 2001; 77: 247-55.
  50. Raffatulah M, Sulaiman O, Hashim R, Ahmad A. Adsorption of methylene blue on low-cost adsorbent: a review. Chem Eng J. 2010; 177: 7080.

Download PDF

Citation: Sharma P and Qanungo K. Challenges in Effluents Treatment Containing Dyes. Adv Res Text Eng. 2022; 7(2): 1075.

Home
Journal Scope
Editorial Board
Instruction for Authors
Submit Your Article
Contact Us