Early Versus Late Post-Traumatic Venous Thromboembolism; An Elapsed Time Controversy and Risk Factors

Special Article - Trauma

Thromb Haemost Res. 2019; 3(3): 1031.

Early Versus Late Post-Traumatic Venous Thromboembolism; An Elapsed Time Controversy and Risk Factors

Elsayed YMH1*

Critical Care Unit, Fraskour Central Hospital, Egypt

*Corresponding author: Yasser Mohammed Hassanain Elsayed, Critical Care Unit, Fraskour Central Hospital, Damietta Health Affairs, Egyptian Ministry of Health (MOH), Damietta, Egypt

Received: October 11, 2019; Accepted: October 14, 2019; Published: October 21, 2019

Editorial

Unfortunately, after reviewing literatures over the past twelve years, the author found that there was no fixed definition for either “early” or “late” post-traumatic Pulmonary Embolism (PE). Indeed, post-traumatic Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) that includes both PE and Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) remains a major problem and a large challenge in cardio-pulmonary diseases. PE remains relatively common after trauma [1]. PE is a well-recognized potentially fatal complication after trauma [1]. Despite compliance with prophylactic measures, PE remains a threat to post-injury recovery [2]. Posttraumatic pulmonary embolic events are associated with significant morbidity [3]. The reported incidence of PE after trauma has more than doubled in recent years. But, the PE-accompanied mortality has remarkably decreased, suggesting that we are identifying a different disease entity or stage [2]. PE is also well-known to cause significant morbidity and mortality after injury [4]. There are higher frequency of DVT in post-traumatic critically ill patients [5]. Despite the high frequency of DVT in post-traumatic critically ill patients, symptomatic PE remains, although not frequently observed, because systematic screening is not performed [5].

Currently, an early PE after trauma may occur with variant underlying pathophysiology than previously thought [6]. In fact, the inflammatory process that is initiated by a chest trauma may be forced by a coexisting tissue hypoxia and systemic inflammation (usually associated with severe injury) leading to pulmonary endothelial damages and in situ thrombosis of pulmonary arteries [7]. In addition, severe trauma increases the levels of pro-inflammatory pro-coagulant cytokines, leading to an inflammatory reaction [7]. Although early acute traumatic coagulopathy has received much recent attention, the procoagulopathy that often follows appears less appreciated [8]. In the more advanced studies using thromboelastography indicate that patients are at risk for hypercoagulability early after injury4. Hypoxia early after injury is often ascribed to other causes [1]. Indeed, Knudson et al. [2], had postulated the ability of a major chest trauma in stimulating inflammation which lead to the direct formation of PE by direct inflammation of pulmonary vessels. This theory may explain why chest injury is associated with PE, but not significantly with DVT. In fact, only 20% of the patients with PE had an associated DVT event [2]. Knudson et al. [2] agree with this interpretation and their hypothesis [7].

PE is generally thought to occur days after the acute injury [1]. In 2007, Menaker et al. [1] hypothesized that PE often occurs early after injury. They sought to elucidate the timing of PE after trauma. From 2007 to 2018 literature publications, there were five large posttraumatic venous thromboembolism studies [3,4,6,9,10]. (Table 1). All the five studies signify the difference between early and late pulmonary embolism [3,4,6,9,10]. Otherwise, Kazemi et al. [9] study that conducted in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), all studies were done in Level I trauma center [3,4,6,10].

Citation: Elsayed YMH. Early Versus Late Post-Traumatic Venous Thromboembolism; An Elapsed Time Controversy and Risk Factors. Thromb Haemost Res. 2019; 3(3): 1031.