Epidemiological Analysis of Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) Outbreak in 2014 in Sri Lanka

Review Article

Austin J Vet Sci & Anim Husb. 2024; 11(4): 1153.

Epidemiological Analysis of Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) Outbreak in 2014 in Sri Lanka

Kumarawadu PL¹*; Perera DRK¹; Perera KLHS²

¹Animal Health Division, Department of Animal Production and Health, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka

²University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka

*Corresponding author: Kumarawadu PL Animal Health Division, Department of Animal Production and Health, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. Email: pradeep_lakpriya@yahoo.co.uk; roshaniperera1919@gmail.com

Received: July 27, 2024 Accepted: September 18, 2024 Published: September 25, 2024

Abstract

Sri Lanka faced a massive Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) outbreak in 2014, which was initiated in Jaffna district in December 2013, and lasted for a period of more than a year, until January 2015. The disease spread throughout the country, affecting 68895 domestic animals, and causing 2007 deaths. The aim of this study was to epidemiologically analyze the data of 2014 FMD outbreak in order to understand the pattern and determinants of the massive disease distribution. Data were collected regarding the number of cases and deaths in relation to the time and location. Data in Disease Outbreak Reports, Follow-up Reports, Disease Investigation Reports and Laboratory Investigation Reports were reviewed, and descriptive and simple statistical analyses were carried out concerning the 57 epidemiological week study period. Disease Incidence, Period Prevalence, Mortality Rate, and Case Fatality Ratio of the disease were determined to be 68895, 6.11%, 0.18% and 2.91%, respectively. Seasonal animal movements and unauthorized livestock transportation appeared to be the main causes for the extensive spreading of the disease, while inadequate vaccination and poor awareness seemingly facilitated the development of three epidemic curves during the outbreak period. Newly identified causative agent, the sub-lineage O/ME-SA/Ind-2001d has led to a more severe FMD outbreak in 2014 compared to the previous outbreaks occurred in Sri Lanka.

Keywords: Disease Distribution; Disease Incidence; Fatality; Mortality; Prevalence

Introduction

Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) is a highly contagious animal disease caused by the virus Foot and Mouth Disease Virus (FMDV), which belongs to the genus Aphthovirus (Family: Picornaviridae). It is a non-enveloped, encapsulated, positive sense single-stranded RNA virus with icosahedral symmetry. The virus consists of seven immunologically distinct serotypes, viz. O, A, C, South African Territories (SAT) 1, SAT 2, SAT 3, and Asia 1. Due to its highly contagious nature and the ability to infect both wild and domestic cloven-hoofed mammals, FMD is considered as the most economically important disease of livestock in most of the countries [1].

FMD is an endemic disease to Sri Lanka, since the mid-nineteenth century. According to the history of FMD in the island, epidemics have occurred every 4-6 years [10]. Therefore, FMD has been ranked as a highest-priority livestock disease in Sri Lanka, and had been aimed to control and eradicate by 2020 [12].

In Sri Lanka, FMD outbreaks are mainly controlled by vaccination programs, which include both preventive and ring vaccination [10]. Earlier, preventive vaccination was carried out biannually, and was able to immunize over 70% of the susceptible population in the country. However, currently ‘Risk base Vaccination Program’ is conducted instead of Mass Vaccination programs. Susceptible animals in and around the identified ‘endemic foci’ are biannually vaccinated against the disease. Based on the epidemiological data of past FMD outbreaks in Sri Lanka, endemic foci have been identified and considered as risk spots to initiate FMD outbreaks.

Serotype ‘O’ of FMD virus is the only existing serotype in Sri Lanka. Therefore, a monovalent killed vaccine which is produced locally is used for immunization. Causative agent of FMD in Sri Lanka belongs to the lineage O/ME-SA/Ind-2001 of topotype ME-SA of serotype ‘O’. Nevertheless, it was revealed that O/ME-SA/Ind-2001d was the causative agent of the massive FMD epidemic occurred in 2014, which was identified as a mutated version of the previous lineage. The Ind-2001d virus was circulating in India during 2013, and was introduced to Sri Lanka on two different occasions [1].

The aim of this study was to perform a descriptive epidemiological analysis on the data of 2014 FMD outbreak in Sri Lanka to study the determinants of the spatial and temporal distribution of the outbreak and to estimate the magnitude of the disease outbreak.

Methodology

This observational study was carried out for a period of 57 epidemiological weeks, starting from the 50th (from December 2013 to January 2015). The primary data on the number of infected cases and deaths due to the FMD outbreaks were retrieved from Preliminary Disease Outbreak Reports and Weekly Follow up Reports prepared by field Veterinary Surgeons, and Field Investigation Reports of Department of Animal Production and Health, Sri Lanka. The secondary data were obtained from Livestock Statistical Bulletin of 2014 and Annual Reports of Department of Animal Production and Health (from 2013 to 2014) [2,3].

Descriptive statistics regarding Disease Prevalence, Case Fatality Ratio (CFR) and Mortality Rate of FMD during the study period were used to analyze the pattern of the outbreak. Furthermore, ‘Q GIS’ computer software was utilized to demonstrate spatial distribution and spreading of the disease.

Samples from the clinical cases in different locations were collected and subjected to Enzyme Linked

Immunosorbent Assay (ELIZA) at the Animal Virology Laboratory of the Department of Animal Production and Health for disease confirmation. Further, virus isolation and characterization were performed by the World Reference Laboratory, Pirbright Institute of United Kingdom by viral genome sequencing and phylogeographical reconstruction.

Period Prevalence: The total number of cases or outbreaks of a disease that have occurred in a population at risk, in a particular geographical area, at a specified point of time or during a given time period.

Mortality Rate: The number of deaths due to a particular cause during a particular period of the time among a particular group

Case Fatality Ratio (CFR): An epidemiological measure of the deadliness or severity of an infectious disease. The CFR is the ratio between the total number of deaths and the total number of officially confirmed (diagnosed) cases over a certain period of time, expressed as a percentage.

Results

The index case of the outbreak was detected from a cattle herd husbanded in a military base in Palali (Thellipalai veterinary range of Jaffna district, Sri Lanka), on the 11th of December, 2013, which spread out of the premises. Initially, two adjoining veterinary ranges (Kopay and Vaddukodai) were affected in Jaffna District. Simultaneously, the disease appeared in Mullathivu district, and Vavuniya North Veterinary Range in Vavuniya district. Around 248 infected cases and 7 deaths in Jaffna district, and 7 infected cases and 1 death in Vavuniya district were reported during December 2013, due to this outbreak.

At the beginning of 2014, the disease started to spread southwards from Vavuniya, affecting Mullathivu, Anuradhapura, Puttalam and Ampara districts (Figure 1). Despite the animal movement restrictions and vaccination programs implemented in and around the infected areas, the disease continued to spread to other districts as well, affecting the whole country. The most likely cause for this havoc seemed to be the uncontrollable movement of animals and animal products, which did not comply with the health measures recommended by the authorities. By the mid-2014, all the districts except Nuwara Eliya became affected, reporting 11808 infected cases and 360 deaths during June. Gradually, the disease incidence declined by October, reporting 1946 affected cases and 20 deaths. However, it was increased again by mid-November. During the one-year period from 2014 January to 2014 December, the entire country was affected, showing three significant epidemic curves (Figure 2).