Relationship between Ankle Muscle Strength and Pain and Calcaneal Spur Length in Individuals with Exercise Habit: A Pilot Study

Research Article

Ann Yoga Phys Ther. 2017; 2(1): 1020.

Relationship between Ankle Muscle Strength and Pain and Calcaneal Spur Length in Individuals with Exercise Habit: A Pilot Study

Buyukturan O¹*, Sezgin H², Yetis M², Ulcay T4 and Buyukturan B1

¹School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Ahi Evran University, Turkey

²Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ahi Evran University, Turkey

³Department of Anatomy, Ahi Evran University, Turkey

*Corresponding author: Öznur Büyükturan, School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Ahi Evran University, Terme Street No:14, Kirsehir, Turkey

Received: January 16, 2017; Accepted: January 25, 2017; Published: January 26, 2017

Abstract

Background: A Calcaneal Spur (CS) is an osteophytic outgrowth just anterior to the tuberosity of the calcaneus. CSs are common causes of heel pain, which can affect the ankle muscle strength. In spite of the many treatment alternatives available for CSs, the associations between the CS length and pain and muscle strength have not yet been sufficiently researched.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the CS length and the pain and muscle strength of the ankle in individuals who exercise habit.

Materials and Methods: The sociodemographic characteristics, duration of symptoms, activity and resting pain, and dorsal and plantar flexor muscle strength of the ankle were evaluated. Computer-aided linear measurements were conducted to determine the spur length (mm) from the tip to the base. The pain intensity was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), while the muscle strength was determined using a hand-held dynamometer.

Results: Twenty individuals (13 females and 7 males) diagnosed with CSs were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 45.25±10.16 years old (range 30–65), while the mean CS length was 3.45±3.12 mm (range 0.5–12.2). The CS length was significantly correlated with the age (p=0.012), activity pain (p=0.015), resting pain (p=0.021), dorsal flexor muscle strength (p=0.034), plantar flexor muscle strength (p=0.041), and body mass index (BMI) (p=0.001).

Discussion: Our results indicate that the CS length is significantly correlated with the age, BMI, dorsal and plantar flexor muscle strengths, and activity and resting pain.

Conclusion: In light of the study results, the CS length is an important parameter that is correlated with ankle pain and muscle strength.

Keywords: Calcaneal spur; Pain; Muscle strength

Introduction

Bone spurs, also described asenthesopathy, can be seen in most bone attachment surfaces. These are bone projections that extend to the soft tissue [1], with spurs forming spindle-like structures at the locations where the muscles attach to the bone [2]. Bone spurs develop on the edges of the fibrocartilaginous attachment sites of the entheses, and usually form on the dorsal or plantar side of the calcaneus [3]. The formation of a bony projectile on the plantar side of the calcaneus was first defined as a Calcaneal Spur (CS) in 1900 by Plettner [4], and is a common cause of heel pain in adults. A plantar CS is a bony formation of the plantar fascia and muscles at the plantar insertion points, while a dorsal CS is an exostotic bony formation at the insertion point of the Achilles tendon. A dorsal CS is less common and usually asymptomatic. Both dorsal and plantar CSs can present in the same person [5].

Anatomically, the plantar fascia originates from the tubercle of the medial calcaneus [4]. The apex of the spur is located on the superior aspect of the plantar fascia, inside the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle [6]. Repetitive microtraumas are important in the pathogenic formation of a CS. In addition, other risk factors, such as obesity, aging, structural foot deformities (pes planus and pes cavus), or exercise habits (e.g., sports like running or ballet that put the feet in stressful anatomical positions), are factors that can accelerate the formation of a CS [7]. Because 80% of the total body weight is transferred to the heel while walking normally, based on biomechanical walking analyses, obesity is another factor that can accelerate CS formation. Weight gain with repetitive traumas and ligamentous problems can contribute to this condition, while structural problems, such as pes planus and pes cavus, can play a role in relation to load transfer and mobilization. Moreover, a CS might develop after the neovascularization and ossification of scarred tissue [7].

In some previous studies, it has been shown that CSs do not always present with heel pain, but recent studies have reported CS pain rates of 75.9–89% in individuals with CSs [8,9]. However, these studies did not evaluate the relationship between the spur length and pain. In their study, Kuyucu, et al. evaluated the relationship between the spur length and foot functions, and their results showed that the size of the spur might affect those functions [10]. The above-mentioned studies have not explained the relationship between the CS length and the pain and muscular force of the ankle; therefore, the current literature is unclear with regard to this relationship. Although many different techniques have been used in the management of a CS, the relationship between the CS length and pain and muscular force is not well-defined. It is essential to analyze this relationship with regard to clinical parameters; therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the CS length and the muscle strength and pain of the ankle in individuals who exercise intensively.

Materials and Methods

Thirty-two cases presenting with heel pain to the Orthopedics and Traumatology Outpatient Clinic of Ahi Evran University Training and Research Hospital between September 2015 and March 2016 were diagnosed with CSs by an orthopedist, based on their medical history, risk factors (structural foot deformities, aging, obesity, sedentary lifestyle, etc.), and physical examinations. Four of these patients chose not to participate, so a total of 28 cases were considered for inclusion in this research. When we evaluated these cases based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria shown in (Table 1), we identified four cases of inflammatory joint disease, two cases of Achilles tendinopathy, and two cases of lumbar radiculopathy. Therefore, this study was initiated with a total of 20 cases. Written and verbal consents were obtained from all of the participants before the study began. This research was conducted in accordance with Helsinki declaration.