Supplementation of a B Mannanase Enzyme Improves Feed Efficiency in Palm Kernel Expeller Rich Swine Diets

Vangroenweghe F; Thas O

Research Article

Austin J Nutr Metab. 2022; 9(1): 1123.

Supplementation of a β-Mannanase Enzyme Improves Feed Efficiency in Palm Kernel Expeller Rich Swine Diets

Vangroenweghe F^1,2,* and Thas O^3,4,5

¹Elanco, BU Food Animals, Plantijnen Moretuslei 1 – 3^rd Floor, 2018 Antwerpen, Belgium

²Department of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium

³Department of Applied Mathematics, Hasselt University, Belgium

⁴Department of Applied Mathematics, Ghent University, Faculty of Sciences, Belgium

⁵Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Wollongong, Australia

*Corresponding author: Frédéric Vangroenweghe, BU Food Animals, Elanco Benelux, Plantijn en Moretuslei 1A, 2018 Antwerpen, Belgium

Received: June 16, 2022; Accepted: July 20, 2022; Published: July 27, 2022

Abstract

β-Mannans are strongly anti-nutritive polysaccharide fibres found in most vegetable feed ingredients. Estimated content of soluble β-mannans in common grow-finishing diets is only 0.15-0.35%, and in vitro studies have demonstrated that as little as 0.05% soluble β-mannan in feed can elicit a strong innate immune response. This innate response is referred to as a Feed Induced Immune Response (FIIR). Hemicell™ HT (Elanco) is a β-mannanase enzyme for animal feeds breaking down β-mannans, thereby preventing economic losses from this wasteful immune response to β-mannans. The objective was to investigate whether β-mannanase improves feed efficiency in grower/finisher pigs fed diets containing high amounts (5-15%) of Palm Kernel Expeller (PKE). A 3*2 factorial design was applied consisting of 3 treatments (control, PKE, PKE+β- mannanase (PKE+)) and 2 sexes (barrows, gilts) and 2 subsequent batches. Groups were divided over 80 pens resulting in 13-14 repeats per group. Pigs were fed pelletized starter (0-28 d), grower (28-63 d), and finisher diets (63- 99 d). Body Weight (BW) was recorded on days 0, 28, 63, and 99. Feed was offered ad libitum and recorded by pen. For each phase, Average Daily Gain (ADG), Average Daily Feed Intake (ADFI), and Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) were calculated. Data analysis was performed in R. FCR improved significantly (P=0.004) the first four weeks PKE+ (2.07) compared with Control (2.13). During grower/finisher phases, ADG and ADFI were significantly (P<0.05) higher on PKE and PKE+ compared with Control. Overall, both PKE and PKE+ performed significantly better than Control, which PKE and PKE+ performed similarly. Feeding 10-15% PKE increased ADG and ADFI (potentially due to overestimated energy content of the PKE) both with and without β-mannanase, and resulted in similar FCR. Thus, β-mannanase may improve FCR on high PKE diets from 21 to 39 kg BW.

Keywords: β-Mannanase; Fattening pigs; Feed efficiency; Palm kernel expeller

Abbreviations

ADFI: Average Daily Feed Intake; ADWG: Average Daily Weight Gain; FCR: Feed Conversion Rate; NSP: Non-Starch Polysaccharide; PKE: Palm Kernel Expeller; SBM: Soybean Meal

Introduction

Polysaccharides, polymers of monosaccharides linked by glycosidic bonds, are major components of all vegetable feed ingredients used in common swine diets. Starch, a polymer of glucose units linked by a-(1-4) with a few a-(1-6) bonds, is digested in the small intestine of pigs through endogenous enzyme activity. Non-Starch Polysaccharides (NSPs) are fibrous materials found in plant cell wall which include celluloses, hemicelluloses, pectins and oligosaccharides. Monogastric animals such as pigs do not produce endogenous enzymes needed to digest β-linked NSPs like β-mannans [23]. Beta-mannans in swine diets have been suggested to hinder the utilization of nutrients [36]. Positive effects of supplementing β-mannanase to maize-soybean meal (SBM)-based diets on nutrient digestibility and growth performance have been studied [34]. Palm Kernel Meal (PKM) and Palm Kernel Expellers (PKE), co-products from oil extraction of the African oil palm nuts, Elaeisquineesis Jacq., are available in large quantities in many countries [33]. They are considered an inexpensive source of energy and nutrients and therefore, PKM and PKE have received increasing attention as an alternative protein source for swine [2,38] and poultry diets [1,3,24,29-32]. PKM and PKE contain moderate levels of protein and a high levels of fibre, which explains why, until now, they mainly have been used in feeds for ruminants [11,13,42] and rabbits [7]. A wide variation in crude fibre from 120 to 270 g per kg of PKM have been reported [12] and may be influenced by the variety of tree, growth conditions, and processing method used. Water-soluble dietary fibers, such as β-mannans, are very high in PKE [8], and several studies have reported that the utilization of glucose and protein is hampered by mannans in swine diets [36].

β-Mannan is an antinutritive factor found in many common feed ingredients [9], which has received increasing attention in recent years. β-Mannans are linear polysaccharides composed of repeating units of β-1,4-mannose and a-1,6-galactose and/or glucose units attached to the β-mannan backbone [14,19]. High concentrations of them are considered unsuitable in monogastric diets because of their antinutritive properties, mainly due to stimulation of the innate immune response. The innate immune cells identify pathogens using distinct molecules, called Pathogen Associated Molecular Patterns (PAMP), expressed on the pathogen surface [10]. Binding of PAMP to Pathogen Recognition Receptors (PRR) present on innate immune cells, result in the release of innate defense molecules such as reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, bacteriolytic enzymes, antimicrobial peptides and complement proteins [39]. These PAMP include complex polysaccharides that resemble β-mannans [10]. Therefore, β-mannans from feed can create a false signal about the presence of pathogens in the gut that elicits an unwarranted immune activation [4,25], also known as a Feed-Induced Immune Response (FIIR) [5]. This recognition mistake leads to a futile immune response that causes energy and nutrients to be wasted [14]. Hydrolysis of these β-mannans through inclusion of exogenous β-mannanase enzymes can reduce and potentially eliminate their ability to induce FIIR.

In poultry, the inclusion of dietary β-mannanase has been shown to improve daily gain and feed efficiency, while decreasing digesta viscosity [6], and to upregulate a broad range of metabolic functions related to digestion, metabolism, and immunity [5]. Moreover, the beneficial effects of β-mannanase addition in chickens, challenged with Eimeria sp. and Clostridium perfringens, were observed with improved performance and reduced lesion scores in diseasechallenged birds [18].

Recently, supplemental β-mannanase has been reported to improve the digestibility of dry matter and energy in PKE-containing diets fed to growing pigs [27]. Moreover, no interaction on apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients and energy has been observed for a combined supplementation of phytase and β-mannanase in a diet containing 100 g/kg PKE for growing pigs [27]. Supplementation of β-mannanase to low- and high-mannan diets has the potential to improve the performance of growing pigs [22]. Moreover, Palm Kernel Meal (PKM) may partially replace corn and SBM without reducing pig performance if β-mannanase is supplemented to the diet [22]. The improved overall performance following supplementation of β-mannanase to corn-SBM-PKM based swine diets might be due to increased adjusted ileal digestibility of different amino acids, which may most likely be due to the reduced innate immune activity [20,27,40]. Others concluded that β-mannanase improved growth performance in both weanling and growing-finishing pigs on corn- SBM diets [21,26,34] with minimal effects on nutrient digestibility [34].

Additionally, β-mannanase supplementation to corn-SBM diets reduced the population of fecal coliforms and tended to reduce the NH3 concentration of fecal slurry after 24 h fermentation [41]. The reduction of fecal coliforms might impact the environmental infection pressure from coliforms, related to clinical problems of Post Weaning Diarrhea (PWD). Another study demonstrated in vivo anti-inflammatory activity of mannanase-hydrolyzed copra meal in a porcine colitis model, with decreased expression of mRNA for ileal IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17 and TNF-a [17]. Innate immune activation is accompanied by down-regulation of anabolic functions [15], which translates into a reduced performance capacity. This may partially explain why addition of a combination of β-mannanase and phytase to PKE-containing diets fed to growing pigs has been shown to improve the digestibility of P and partially of amino acids [27]. Another study demonstrated no significant effect of increasing inclusion levels from 20 to 40% of palm kernel cake on performance parameters in growing pigs [37], whereas carcass characteristics, such as dressing percentage, eye muscle area and weights of joints and cuts were significantly decreased with increasing PKC levels.

The objective of the current study was to evaluate the effects of β-mannanase supplementation of growing-finishing pig diets with increasing levels of palm kernel meal from 5 to 15% on performance under field conditions.

Materials and Methods

Description of Experimental Farm

The field trial was performed on a conventional fattening unit with 10 compartments of 8 pens each in the Netherlands. Compartments were ventilated through mechanical ventilation with a door air inlet. All pens had partially slatted plastic floors. Water was distributed through a nipple in the feeder. Each pen was equipped with a dry feeder. Pelleted feed was weighed upon distribution to each individual feeder.

Experimental Design

Treatment groups: A 3 * 2 factorial design was applied consisting of 3 treatments (Control, Palm Kernel Expeller (PKE) and palm kernel expeller + Hemicell HT (PKE+)) and 2 sexes (barrows and gilts). Groups were blinded to the farm personnel and only distinguished by color codes (red, green, and blue). The 3 groups were evenly allocated over the 10 compartments and 80 pens (containing each 8 to 9 pigs at a stocking density of 0.8 m²), resulting in 13 to 14 repeats per treatment group. In an individual pen, all animals were either barrows or gilts.

Experimental diets: The pigs were fed a pelleted 3-phase diet consisting of starter (0-28 d), grower (29-63 d) and finisher (64-99 d) diets in each treatment group. The main difference between the diets for the two PKE groups and Control was the substitution of wheat bran by PKE. In the PKE+ group, a β-mannanase enzyme (Hemicell HT; Elanco, Indianapolis; IN) was added at 300 g per tonne of feed, according to the manufacturer’s instructions for use. All other enzymes (xylanase and phytase) in the diets remained at the same levels in the three treatment groups.

Details on diet composition and calculated nutrient values are given in Table 1 & 2, respectively. Nutritional composition and presence of the β-mannanase enzyme (Hemicell HT; Elanco, Indianapolis, IN) were confirmed for the specific diets through laboratory analysis (Eurofins, Barcelona, Spain).

Table 1: Composition of the trial diets.




  
    
    Starter    (0-28 d) 
    
    
    Grower    (29-63 d) 
    
    
    Finisher    (64-99 d) 
    
    
  
  
    Ingredient, % 
    Ctrl 
    PKE * 
    PKE+ * 
    Ctrl 
    PKE 
    PKE+ 
    Ctrl 
    PKE 
    PKE+ 
  
  
    Wheat 
    27.4 
    27.1 
    27.1 
    29.4 
    28.6 
    28.6 
    31.6 
    30.1 
    30.1 
  
  
    Barley 
    25.0 
    25.0 
    25.0 
    20.0 
    20.0 
    20.0 
    15.0 
    15.0 
    15.0 
  
  
    Triticale 
    10.0 
    10.0 
    10.0 
    15.0 
    15.0 
    15.0 
    15.0 
    15.0 
    15.0 
  
  
    Soybeanmeal 
    9.4 
    9.5 
    9.5 
    3.1 
    3.8 
    3.8 
    0.0 
    0.0 
    0.0 
  
  
    Corn 
    7.5 
    7.5 
    7.5 
    7.5 
    7.5 
    7.5 
    7.5 
    7.5 
    7.5 
  
  
    Rapeseedmeal 
    7.5 
    7.5 
    7.5 
    7.5 
    6.2 
    6.1 
    6.4 
    6.3 
    6.3 
  
  
    Wheatbran 
    6.2 
    1.7 
    1.6 
    9.1 
    1.0 
    1.0 
    15.0 
    3.4 
    3.3 
  
  
    Sunflowermeal 
    2.5 
    2.5 
    2.5 
    5.0 
    5.0 
    5.0 
    5.0 
    5.0 
    5.0 
  
  
    Palmkernel expeller 
    0.0 
    5.0 
    5.0 
    0.0 
    10.0 
    10.0 
    0.0 
    15.0 
    15.0 
  
  
    Soybeanoil 
    1.6 
    1.3 
    1.3 
    1.0 
    0.5 
    0.5 
    1.5 
    0.5 
    0.5 
  
  
    Oathulls 
    0.0 
    0.0 
    0.0 
    0.0 
    0.0 
    0.0 
    1.0 
    0.0 
    0.0 
  
  
    Syntheticaminoacids 
    1.08 
    1.10 
    1.10 
    1.01 
    1.06 
    1.07 
    0.91 
    0.97 
    0.97 
  
  
    Premix 
    1.90 
    1.87 
    1.88 
    1.38 
    1.36 
    1.36 
    1.41 
    1.22 
    1.22 
  
  
    Xylanase 
    0.003 
    0.003 
    0.003 
    0.003 
    0.003 
    0.003 
    0.003 
    0.003 
    0.003 
  
  
    Phytase 
    0.011 
    0.011 
    0.011 
    0.009 
    0.011 
    0.011 
    0.004 
    0.004 
    0.004 
  
  
    HemicellHT 
    0 
    0 
    0.03 
    0 
    0 
    0.03 
    0 
    0 
    0.03 
  
  
    *Dietrich    in palm kernel expeller (PKE)

      *PKE-rich    diets supplemented with β-mannanase.*



Table 1: Composition of the trial diets.

Table 2: Expected nutrient content of the trial diets.




  
     
    Starter (0-28 d)
    Grower(29-63d)
    Finisher(64-99d)
  
  
    Content, g/kg
    Ctrl
    PKE1
    PKE+ 2
    Ctrl
    PKE
    PKE +
    Ctrl
    PKE
    PKE+
  
  
    Moisture
    114
    112
    112
    115
    110
    110
    115
    109
    109
  
  
    Crudeash
    48
    47
    47
    42
    40
    40
    42
    39
    39
  
  
    Crudeprotein
    171
    172
    172
    156
    157
    156
    142
    146
    146
  
  
    Crudefat
    35
    35
    35
    30
    31
    31
    35
    35
    35
  
  
    Crudefiber
    46
    50
    50
    50
    58
    57
    55
    66
    66
  
  
    Starch
    422
    414
    414
    443
    426
    426
    439
    412
    412
  
  
    Energy(EW)
    112
    112
    112
    111
    111
    111
    110
    110
    110
  
  
    Lysine3
    10.3
    10.3
    10.2
    9.0
    9.0
    9.0
    7.8
    7.8
    7.8
  
  
    Methionine
    3.5
    3.5
    3.5
    3.0
    3.1
    3.1
    2.6
    2.6
    2.6
  
  
    Methionine+cysteine
    6.2
    6.2
    6.2
    5.5
    5.5
    5.5
    5.0
    4.8
    4.8
  
  
    Threonine
    6.7
    6.7
    6.7
    6.0
    6.0
    6.0
    5.4
    5.4
    5.4
  
  
    Tryptophan
    1.9
    1.9
    1.9
    1.7
    1.7
    1.7
    1.5
    1.5
    1.5
  
  
    Isoleucine
    5.5
    5.5
    5.5
    4.8
    4.8
    4.8
    4.1
    4.1
    4.1
  
  
    Arginine
    9.0
    9.2
    9.2
    7.9
    8.3
    8.3
    7.0
    7.7
    7.7
  
  
    *Diet    rich in palm kernel expeller (PKE)

      *PKE-rich    diets supplemented with β-mannanase.

      *All    amino acids are given as standardized ileal digestible (SID) amino acids.



Table 2: Expected nutrient content of the trial diets.

Experimental animals: TopigsNorsvin 70 * PIC408 barrows and gilts were obtained from a conventional commercial sow farm in the Netherlands. Piglets were vaccinated to protect against Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Porcine Circovirus type 2 (PCV-2) using a one-shot commercial vaccine (Ingelvac Combo-Flex; Boehringer Ingelheim). Two different groups of pigs were obtained (batch 1 and 2, respectively) for the feed trial.

Performance Data Collection

Pig body weight (BW) at pen level was measured at 0, 28, 63 and 99 days after arrival on the finisher farm. Feed provision (ad libitum) was recorded daily at pen level. For each respective phase (starter, grower, finisher), Average Daily Weight Gain (ADWG; expressed as g/d), Average Daily Feed Intake (ADFI; expressed as g/d) and Feed Conversion Rate (FCR; expressed as kg feed per kg of weight gain) were calculated.

Veterinary Treatments

Individual antibiotic treatments were performed as needed due to the critical state of the piglet and in case of a broader health issue in the barn, group treatment could be performed. The same veterinary products and dosages (ml/kg) were used throughout the entire study period. Individual antibiotics treatments or group treatments were recorded daily by date, product, dose, ID number of treated piglets, presumed cause of treatment, and number of times the treatment was repeated.

Data Management and Statistical Analysis

Data were hand-recorded by the farm personnel and stored in MS Excel on OneDrive at the end of each day. Following the end of the finisher phase, data were extracted from Excel into R 3.6.1 [28] and the blinded color-coded treatments were unblinded to reveal the respective treatment groups. Calculations, exploratory data analysis and quality review, and subsequent statistical analysis were all performed in R 3.6.1 [28]. Effect of sex, diet, and their interaction on parameters (BW, ADWG, ADFI, FCR) during each of the dietary phases (starter, grower, finisher, and overall) were estimated using a linear mixed model using pen nested within compartment as random effect. Batch (1, 2) was added to the model as a co variable to correct for effects of age group. If required, normalization of residuals was performed using a logarithmic transformation. All data are presented as (back-transformed) estimated marginal means with their respective pooled standard error of the mean (SEM). All means were tested for significant differences (P < 0.05), using a post-hoc T-test with Tukey’s adjustments to correct for multiple comparisons.

Results

Pig weight and Average Daily Weight Gain

Data on pig weight are given in (Table 3). The pigs arrived at the finisher facility at an average weight of 21.2 kg (± 0.9). No significant differences (P > 0.05) were present in the start weight (d0) between treatment groups or sex. At d28, pigs in PKE+ were slightly, but not significantly (P > 0.05) heavier with 39.7 kg (± 1.4 kg) as compared to PKE (37.9 kg) and Control (39.1 kg). At d63, the pigs in PKE+ were again slightly but not significantly (P > 0.05) heavier with 73.8 kg (± 1.7) comparison to PKE (72.2 kg) and Control (72.7 kg). At d99 at the end of the finisher phase, the bodyweight of the PKE+ pigs averaged 109.9 kg and tended (P = 0.07) to be heavier than the pigs in PKE (108.4 kg) and Control (106.8 kg). Throughout the entire trial, no significant interaction (P > 0.05) between treatment and sex could be observed. However, a significant difference (P < 0.001) in body weight at d99 was observed between barrows and gilts, with the barrows between 1.4 and 7.5 kg heavier than the gilts in the respective treatment groups. The biggest difference (7.5 kg) was observed in the PKE group.

Table 3: Effects of treatment (Control, PKE and PKE+) on body weight by sex. Data are presented as estimated marginal means with pooled standard error of the means (SEM).




  
     
    Barrows
    Gilts
     
    Both sexes *
     
    P-values *
  
  
     
    Ctrl
    PKE *
    PKE+ *
    Ctrl
    PKE
    PKE+
    SEM
    Ctrl
    PKE
    PKE+
    SEM
    Trt*sex
    Trt
    Sex
  
  
    BW    D0, kg
    21.0
    21.2
    21.2
    21.3
    21.0
    21.2
    0.9
    21.2
    21.1
    21.2
    0.9
    0.88
    0.96
    0.84
  
  
    BW    D28, kg
    40.3
    38.0
    39.7
    37.9
    37.8
    39.7
    2
    39.1
    37.9
    39.7
    1.4
    0.34
    0.19
    0.25
  
  
    BW    D63, kg
    73.4
    74.0
    74.2
    72.0
    70.5
    73.4
    1.9
    72.7
    72.2
    73.8
    1.7
    0.45
    0.43
    0.06
  
  
    BW    D99, kg
    108.5
    112.2
    110.6
    105.2
    104.7
    109.2
    1.8
    106.8
    108.4
    109.9
    1.5
    0.07
    0.07
    <0.001
  
  
    *Pooled    performance for barrows and gilts, superscript syndicate differences between treatments    solely.

      *Model-established    P-values.

      *Palm    kernel expeller (5–10–15 % in starter, grower, and finisher diets, respectively).

      *Addition of    0.03% β-mannanase (Hemicell HT; Elanco).



Table 3: Effects of treatment (Control, PKE and PKE+) on body weight by sex. Data are presented as estimated marginal means with pooled standard error of the
means (SEM).

Data on ADWG are given in Table 4. In the starter phase, pigs in PKE+ had a significantly higher (P < 0.05) ADWG (630 g/d ± 12) compared to PKE (595 g/d), while Control pigs gained intermediately to the two other treatments (P > 0.05) (609 g/d). A significant interaction (P = 0.05) between treatment and sex could be observed for ADWG in the starter phase. In the subsequent grower phase, both PKE and PKE+ had a higher ADWG compared to Control. The ADWG significantly differed (P = 0.04) between PKE (949 g/d ± 11) and Control (913 g/d), and PKE+ (642 g/d) was intermediate and not significantly different from the two other treatments (P > 0.05). Moreover, a significant effect (P < 0.001) of sex on ADWG was observed. During the finisher phase, PKE+ pigs had (1009 g/d ± 12) significantly higher (P = 0.02) ADWG compared to Control (968 g/d), with PKE (977 g/d) being intermediate. Both a significant effect of sex (P = 0.01) and an interaction between treatment and sex (P = 0.05) was observed in the finisher phase. Overall, ADWG was significantly higher (P < 0.001) for PKE+ (871 g/d ± 7) compared to Control (833 g/d), with PKE without β-mannanase supplementation (858 g/d) being intermediate and only significantly different (P < 0.001) from Control (833 g/d). A significant effect (P < 0.001) of sex was observed on overall ADWG with gilts generally having a lower ADWG than the barrows.

Table 4: Effects of treatments (Control, PKE and PKE+) on performance by sex. Data are presented as estimated marginal means with pooled standard error of the means (SEM). Superscript letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) within a row.




  
     
     
    Barrows
    Gilts
     
    Both sexes *
     
    P-values *
  
  
     
     
    Ctrl
    PKE 3
    PKE+ 4
    Ctrl
    PKE
    PKE+
    SEM
    Ctrl
    PKE
    PKE+
    SEM
    Trt*sex
    Trt
    Sex
  
  
    Starter

      0 - 28d
    ADWG
    642 b
    602 ab
    627 ab
    578 a
    588 ab
    633 ab
    16
    609 xy
    595 x
    630 y
    12
    0.05
    0.06
    0.07
  
  
    ADFI
    1,349b
    1,315b
    1,311b
    1,245a
    1,288ab
    1,294ab
    18
    1,296
    1,301
    1,302
    14
    0.02
    0.55
    0.002
  
  
    FCR
    2.10
    2.19
    2.09
    2.15
    2.19
    2.04
    0.04
    2.13 ab
    2.19 b
    2.07 a
    0.03
    0.35
    0.004
    0.93
  
  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
  
  
    Grower

      28 - 63d
    ADWG
    930
    996
    965
    896
    904
    919
    15
    913*
    949*
    942 *
    11
    0.15
    0.04
    <0.001
  
  
    ADFI
    2,278
    2,406
    2,384
    2,039
    2,085
    2,182
    33
    2,155*
    2,240*
    2,281*
    25
    0.14
    <0.001
    <0.001
  
  
    FCR
    2.45
    2.42
    2.47
    2.27
    2.31
    2.37
    0.03
    2.36
    2.36
    2.42
    0.02
    0.35
    0.06
    <0.001
  
  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
  
  
    Finisher

      63 - 99d
    ADWG
    979
    1,014
    1,009
    958
    942
    1,008
    16
    968*
    977 *
    1,009*
    12
    0.05
    0.02
    0.01
  
  
    ADFI
    2,776
    2,964
    2,919
    2,497
    2,601
    2,721
    45
    2,633*
    2,777*
    2,818*
    32
    0.18
    <0.001
    <0.001
  
  
    FCR
    2.83
    2.92
    2.90
    2.60
    2.76
    2.70
    0.03
    2.72 *
    2.80 *
    2.84 *
    0.02
    0.47
    <0.001
    <0.001
  
  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
  
  
    Overall

      0 - 99d
    ADWG
    854 yz
    888 z
    881 z
    812 x
    829 xy
    861 yz
    9
    833 a
    858 b
    871 b
    7
    0.09
    <0.001
    <0.001
  
  
    ADFI
    2,192
    2,300
    2,276
    1,974
    2,049
    2,125
    26
    2,080a
    2,171b
    2,199b
    19
    0.11
    <0.001
    <0.001
  
  
    FCR
    2.57
    2.59
    2.58
    2.43
    2.47
    2.47
    0.03
    2.50
    2.52
    2.53
    0.02
    0.89
    0.19
    <0.001
  
  
    *Pooled    performance for barrows and gilts, superscripts indicate differences between treatments    solely.

      *Model-established    P-values.

      *Palm    kernel expeller (5–10–15% instarter, grower, and finisher diets, respectively).

      *Addition of    0.03% β-mannanase (Hemicell HT; Elanco).



Table 4: Effects of treatments (Control, PKE and PKE+) on performance by sex. Data are presented as estimated marginal means with pooled standard error of the
means (SEM). Superscript letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) within a row.

Average Daily Feed Intake and Feed Conversion Rate

Data on ADFI and FCR are given in Table 4. The ADFI did not significantly differ (P > 0.05) between the treatment groups in the starter phase. Nevertheless, a significant effect (P = 0.002) of sex and a significant interaction (P = 0.02) between treatment and sex could be observed during the starter phase. In the grower phase, ADFI in PKE+ (2281 g/d ± 25) and PKE (2240 g/d) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) ADFI than Control (2155 g/d). Gilts had significantly lower (P < 0.001) ADFI than barrows in the grower phase, and ADFI in both PKE+ (2818 g/d ± 32) and PKE (2777 g/d) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than in Control (2633 g/d). Again, a significant effect (P < 0.001) of sex was observed. The overall ADFI in both PKE+ (2199 g/d ± 19) and PKE (2171 g/d) group was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than in Control (2080 g/d). Overall, there also was a significant effect (P < 0.001) of sex on ADFI, with ADFI ranging between 1974 and 2125 g/d for gilts and 2192 and 2300 g/d for barows.

During the starter phase, pigs fed in PKE+ had significantly (P = 0.004) better FCR (2.07 ± 0.03) compared to PKE (2.19). FCR on Control pigs (2.13) was intermediate. During the grower phase, FCR did not differ significantly between treatments (2.36, 2.36 and 2.42 for Control, PKE and PKE+ group, respectively). However, gilts had a significantly better FCR (range: 2.27 – 2.37) than barrows (range: 2.42 – 2.47) in the grower phase. During the finisher phase, pigs in both PKE+ (2.84 ± 0.02) and PKE (2.80) had significantly higher (P < 0.001) FCR than Control pigs (2.72). A significant effect (P < 0.001) of sex was also observed FCR, with gilts having lower (2.60 – 2.76) FCR compared to barrows (2.83 – 2.92). Overall, no significant difference (P > 0.05) in FCR between treatment groups was observed. Nevertheless, a significant overall effect (P < 0.001) of sex was observed for FCR, with gilts being more efficient (2.43 – 2.47) than barrows (2.57 – 2.59).

Antimicrobial Treatment

During the starter phase (16-26 d), several pigs suffered from respiratory disease. Therefore, water medication with aspirin (4 days, 16-19 d) and subsequently with an antimicrobial (doxycycline, 6 days, 21-26 d) was administered to all pigs. The pigs recovered following the medication, so the study was continued as initially planned.

Discussion

In the current study, a substantial amount of wheat bran was in starter diet and additionally an amount of rapeseed meal in grower and finisher diets was replaced by PKE, resulting in a step-wise increased PKE inclusion of 5 – 10 – 15% from starter over grower to finisher diet, respectively. Palm kernel expeller is known to contain a high amount of NSPs, such as β-mannans, a known antinutritive factor [3], which may stimulate an innate immune response through their resemblance with PAMPs [6]. This activation has been called FIIR (Feed Induced Immune Response; [10] and leads to an unnecessary immune activation, causing energy and nutrients to be wasted [4]. Therefore, 300 g/tonne of an exogenous β-mannanase enzyme (Hemicell HT; Elanco, Greenfield, IA) was added to hydrolyze these antinutritive β-mannans in the trial feed.

No effect of treatment (control vs. PKE and PKE+) on body weight of the pigs could be demonstrated throughout the entire trial. Only a marginal, non-significant effect of treatment (P = 0.07) could be observed on the body weight of the pigs at d 99 of the trial. At d 99, pigs in the PKE+ group were heavier (109.9 kg ± 1.5) as compared to pigs in the PKE group (108.4 kg) and the control group (106.8 kg). At the end of the trial, barrows were significantly heavier (P < 0.001) as compared to gilts in all treatment groups.

Addition of β-mannanase (Hemicell HT) significantly improved ADWG in the grow-finisher phase and in the overall trial. Barrows grew significantly faster than gilts during grow-finisher phases and overall. Pigs fed the PKE supplemented diets consumed significantly more feed during grow-finisher phases and overall as compared to control pigs, resulting in a less favorable FCR, especially during the finisher phase (P < 0.001). Moreover, the effect of sex on ADFI and FCR was significant (P < 0.001) in grower and finisher phases and overall during the trial. Overall, increasing levels of PKE significantly increased ADWG and ADFI with no significant impact on FCR (P = 0.19). No significant difference could be observed between the both PKE supplemented diets. However, in the starter phase, inclusion of PKE supplemented with β-mannanase resulted in a significantly (P = 0.004) better FCR as compared to the PKE group.

The obtained overall results are in line with other studies [28] demonstrating no effect of β-mannanase supplementation on energy utilization in PKE fed to pigs through a standardized corn-soybean meal diet. Another study, with addition of PKE at 40% as the only protein source, concluded that obtained values for digestibility of crude protein and amino acids from PKE were sufficient to consider PKE as a useful ingredient in swine diet formulation [38]. Moreover, inclusion of PKE may help to reduce diet costs in swine production [22,38].

In other species, different strategies have been explored to improve PKE digestibility. The effect of fermentation of PKE by Paenibacilluspolymyxa ATCC 842 has been explored in broilers on digestibility, intestinal morphology and gut microbiome at inclusions rates up to 15% [3]. Other physicochemical modifications of PKE, such as water-soaked, microwave-irradiated or a combination of both, have been explored on growth and feed utilization of Nile tilapia [23]. The best results on growth and FCR were obtained with the combination of both microwave-irradiated, water-soaked pretreatment of PKE. In the current study, no additional pre-treatment of PKE was performed to further optimize the nutrient digestibility of this protein source.

Conclusions

The current study results suggest that the use of an exogenous heat-tolerant β-mannanase allowed inclusion of at least 5% of PKE as a protein source to replace more expensive protein sources such as SBM with little to no effect on pig performance during the fattening period. Addition of a β-mannanase enzyme resulted in improved FCR during the first stage of fattening (d 0-28), whereas no significant effect on the overall fattening performance was present.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Field trial with an EFSA approved feed supplement for use in swine. No additional ethical approval needed. Consent to participate was obtained following full information of farmer on the protocol to be carried out.

Availability of Data and Material

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no other competing interests.

Funding

The study was funded by Elanco Animal Health, which facilitated the conduct of the field trial.

Author’s Contributions

FV was involved in study design, data collection, data analysis and manuscript preparation. OT was involved in data analysis and manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author’s Information

FV is currently a Principal Technical Advisor Swine and Nutritional Health for Benelux / UK&ROI within Elanco Animal Health. He holds a DVM, a Master in Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, a PhD in Veterinary Sciences, a PhD in Applied Biological Sciences and an EBVSTM European Specialist in Porcine Health Management. He is a resident in the American Board of Veterinary Practitioners – Swine Health Management and has a specific interest in swine intestinal health and specific approaches to improve intestinal health through non-antibiotic solutions.

Acknowledgements

The authors greatly acknowledge the swine farmer for his participation in the study and technical staff for their assistance in randomization, weighing and data collection.

References

Download PDF

Citation: Vangroenweghe F and Thas O. Supplementation of a β-Mannanase Enzyme Improves Feed Efficiency in Palm Kernel Expeller Rich Swine Diets. Austin J Nutr Metab. 2022; 9(1): 1123.

Home

Journal Scope

Editorial Board

Instruction for Authors

Submit Your Article