Soil Quality and Grass Yield in a Mined Area under Poultry Litter Application in Minas Gerais State, Brazil

Research Article

Ann Agric Crop Sci.2016; 1(1): 1004.

Soil Quality and Grass Yield in a Mined Area under Poultry Litter Application in Minas Gerais State, Brazil

Oliveira DMS*, Mayrink GVC, Barreto MSC, Verburg EEJ, Almeida LFJ, Cruz RS and Silva IR

Departamento de Solos, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Colorado State University, United States

*Corresponding author: Oliveira DMS, Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, United States

Received: August 11, 2016; Accepted: October 10, 2016; Published: October 25, 2016

Abstract

Bauxite mining causes substantial changes in the environment, especially in its most fragile portion, the soils. Animal manures may enhanced the plant growth on degraded mined soils, due to (i) the release of plant nutrients and also (ii) improvements on soil organic matter, microbial activity, water retention and others soil properties. In the present study, we evaluated the short-term changes on soil quality and biomass production in a bauxite mined area under reclamation, fertilized with Poultry Litter (PL) (0, 10, 20 and 40 Mg ha-1) and cultivated with the grass Brachiaria brizantha. Stripping and stockpiling of top soil notably decreased soil fertility. Moreover, the Carbon Management Index (CMI) drastically decreased after mining. PL application presented a positive effect in emergent soil properties, such as N and P contents, cation exchange capacity and CMI. The application of high doses of PL was associated with short-term improvements in soil quality, which yielded to a high B.Brizantha biomass production, reaching 24 Mg ha-1 (dry mass) when soil was fertilized with 40 Mg ha-1 of PL. Finally, we recommend the application of 34 Mg ha-1 of poultry litter in bauxite mined areas in Minas Gerais State, Brazil.

Keywords: Land Reclamation; Animal Manure; Carbon Management Index; Soil Quality Indicators; Topsoil; Bauxite Mining

Abbreviations

PL: Poultry Litter; SOM: Soil Organic Matter; CEC: Cation Exchange Capacity; CMI: Carbon Management Index; SOC: Soil Organic Carbon; LC: Labile Carbon

Introduction

Surface mining is often associated to environmental impacts and land degradation [1]. In Brazil, the third biggest bauxite producer in the world, the surface mining of bauxite causes notably environmental disturbance. Despite of its substantial economic benefits, a single bauxite mine can be responsible for the degradation of up to 100 ha of land per year [2]. In this case, land degradation is mainly caused by vegetation and topsoil removal, besides drastic changes on topography and hydrologic regime. In Minas Gerais State, Brazil, the recent mining disaster reiterated the need of strategies to decouple the mining activity of environmental negative impacts [3].

The first goal of reclaiming severely degraded areas is to promote fast plant cover of the area in order to protect the soil from erosion, and to input new biomass/carbon to the system [4]. Particularly for bauxite mined sites in Minas Gerais State, considering the slopes of these areas and the negative effects of erosion processes during land reclamation [5], the use of fast growing plants with high biomass yield, such as grasses, is one of the best options. Moreover, most of these areas were previously used as pastures for beef and dairy cattle production.

During the land reclamation, the topsoil removed before mining is redistributed over the area, since this material is supposed to being a better option to grass establishment comparing to the remaining substrate [6]. However, this practice by itself it is not enough to ensure environmental recovery after mining activities, mainly because the nutrients and C losses during the stripping and stockpiling of topsoil [7]. In this context, the application of animal manures has emerged as a feasible alternative to soil reclamation in disturbed lands.

Animal manures may enhanced the plant growth on degraded mined soils, due to (i) the release of plant nutrients and also (ii) improvements on Soil Organic Matter (SOM), microbial activity, water retention and others soil properties [8]. In Brazil, Poultry Litter (PL) is quite available in some regions with large areas degraded by mining activities, such as Minas Gerais State. The use of PL in mined areas presents not only the benefits discussed above, but also represents an alternative disposal for this residue, preventing environmental pollution.

The mining companies have the legal and social commitment of returning the areas for the owners with the same production level previously observed before mining. The deadline for land reclamation varies between 3 to 6 years, a short period when considering the severe disturb associated to the bauxite extraction. The periodic evaluation of reclamation process is essential to development of effective strategies to recovery the plant production in degraded soils. In this sense, this study aimed to evaluate the first year of reclamation process in bauxite-mined areas cultivated with Brachiaria brizantha under different rates of PL application. Specifically, we wanted (i) to compare some soil quality indicators, such as N and P contents, C management index and cation exchange capacity during the land reclamation; and (ii) evaluated the grass yield in the first year after reclamation in a bauxite mined-area in Minas Gerais State, Brazil.

Materials and methods

Site characterization and experiment design

The study was carried out in Minas Gerais State, Brazil. The experiment was set up in an area of bauxite that had been strip-mined in 2009. Before mining, any soil above the ore (topsoil) was stripping and stockpiling; returning one year later during the topographic reconfiguration of to the original site. Later, soil decompaction down to 60 cm deep was carried using a ripper pulled by a bulldozer. The original soil was classified as an Oxisol [9], dystrophic and clayey (580 g kg-1 clay, 90 g kg-1 silt, and 330 g kg-1 sand).

The experiment was set up under a completely randomized design, with four replicates. The plots (12 m2 each) were fertilized with PL at 0, 10, 20, or 40 Mg ha-1 (dry basis). The chemical composition of the PL was (g kg-1): C: 365; N: 21.7; P: 17.8; K: 2.1; Ca: 9.2; Mg: 1.8; Na: 1.6; Cu: 0.12; Mn: 0.97; Fe: 16.4; and Zn: 0.99. All the plots also received lime (1.5 Mg ha-1). The PL and lime were incorporated into the 0-20 cm soil layer by hand hoeing.

Twenty days after PL application, Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu (C4 African grass) was seeding in 0.25 m spaced furrows (50 kg viable seeds ha-1). Weed control was done using selective herbicides as required. The above-ground biomass production was evaluated within 6, 9 and 12 months after the field experiment establishment. The biomass samples were taken from a 1 m2 plot, always at least 0.5 m from the borders. A subsample was dried in a forced-air circulation oven (62°C for 72 h) in order to obtain the dry matter. After sampling, the plants that remained in the plots were trimmed with a mower and left on the soil surface.

Soil samplings and analysis

Soil sampling was performed in three different intervals: before mining, after the topsoil was applied and redistributed over the disturbed area and one year after the field experiment had been established. Soil samples were taken from eight different points of each subplot using a probe at 0-0.1, 0.1-0.2 and 0.2-0.4 m depth. Finally, all the soil samples were air dried, mixed and sieved through a 2 mm sieve for subsequent laboratorial analyses.

The soil pH was determined in water (soil/solution ratio 1:2.5 v/v). Al3+, Ca, and Mg were extracted with a 1 M KCl solution. P, Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, Na and K were extracted by Mehlich I. Total acidity (H+Al) was extracted with calcium acetate at pH 7.0. H+Al and Al3+ were quantified by titration with a 0.025 M NaOH solution. Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn, Cu and Mn soil contents were quantified by atomic absorption spectroscopy. P was quantified by colorimetry and Na and K soil contents by flame photometry. The soil N was quantified by Kjeldahl distillation [10]. For more details about these procedures, see [11].

The Carbon Management Index (CMI) [12] was calculated using the follow equation:

CMI= SOCaf SOCbf * LCaf NLCaf LCbf NLCbf *100 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaam4qaiaad2eacaWGjbGaeyypa0ZaaSaaaeaacaWGtbGaam4taiaadoeacaWGHbGaamOzaaqaaiaadofacaWGpbGaam4qaiaadkgacaWGMbaaaiaacQcadaWcaaqaamaalaaabaGaamitaiaadoeacaWGHbGaamOzaaqaaiaad6eacaWGmbGaam4qaiaadggacaWGMbaaaaqaamaalaaabaGaamitaiaadoeacaWGIbGaamOzaaqaaiaad6eacaWGmbGaam4qaiaadkgacaWGMbaaaaaacaGGQaGaaGymaiaaicdacaaIWaaaaa@5506@

Where,

CMI = Carbon Management Index

SOCaf = Total organic carbon in the soil after mining

SOCbf = Total organic carbon in the soil before mining

LCaf = Labile carbon in the soil after mining

NLCbf = Non-labile carbon in the soil after mining

LCaf = Labile carbon in the soil before mining

NLCf = Non-labile carbon in the soil before mining

The Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) was assessed using wet oxidation with external heating [13], whilst the Labile Carbon (LC) quantification was carried out using the oxidation by KMnO4 (33 mmol L-1), according to [14]. The Non-Labile Carbon (NLC), which is equivalent to the residual C not oxidizable by KMnO4 was determined by subtraction (NLC = SOC – LC). As pointed in the equation, we used the soil C contents before mining as reference (CMI=100). For further details and discussion about SOC and LC in this area, see [15].

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis of data was performed in a completely randomized design (four replicates per PL rate). All the data from this experiment was combined and analyzed using analysis of variance by the statistic F test, considering a 5% level of significance. When achieving significant statistical values, the means were then analyzed through Tukey’s test (α = 5%). Statistical regression analysis was used to investigate the effect of different PL doses on soil indicators and grass yield (data not shown).

Results and Discussion

Soil fertility indicators

The comparison of soil quality indicators before and after mining showed that the stripping and stockpiling of topsoil notably decreased the soil fertility (Table 1). During a mining operation, the vegetation is removed, so the topsoil can be pushed aside in stockpiles until post mining reclamation. The removal and storage remarkably alter topsoil properties, being associated to C and nutrient losses, drastically decreasing on microbial activity, disruption of soil structure and pH shifts [7]. In this sense, a proper handling and storage of topsoil materials can decrease the quality loss and foment the land reclamation process. Moreover, these changes reiterate the need of additional strategies besides the topsoil use in bauxite-mined areas.

Citation:Oliveira DMS, Mayrink GVC, Barreto MSC, Verburg EEJ, Almeida LFJ, Cruz RS, et al. Soil Quality and Grass Yield in a Mined Area under Poultry Litter Application in Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Ann Agric Crop Sci. 2016; 1(1): 1004. ISSN:2573-3583