Hand Burns

Special Article - Burns

Austin J Emergency & Crit Care Med. 2015;2(4): 1026.

Hand Burns

Bailey JK¹*, Zomerlei TA², Coffey R¹ and Jones LM¹

¹Department of Surgery, Ohio State University, USA

²Department of Plastic Surgery, Ohio State University, USA

*Corresponding author: Bailey JK, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, N748 Doan Hall, 410W, 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA,

Received: May 13, 2015; Accepted: July 06, 2015; Published: July 10, 2015

Abstract

The incidence of burns to the hand may be much more common than reported in medical literature. The hand is such an important means of interacting and exploring our environment that these burns need to be treated carefully. Fortunately, most burns are relatively minor, so that only more severe injuries present for evaluation and treatment. Optimal outcomes require a coordinated effort early on in the course of recovery for the burn patient.

Keywords: Hand burns; Management; Blisters; Escharotomy

Introduction

The hands and upper extremity are involved with thermal injury about forty percent of the time in published series, but this number is probably even higher if smaller burns that present to primary care physicians and clinics are included [1]. Fortunately, most of these injuries are self-limited and typically cared for at home, or heal uneventfully with only basic care. However, more severe injury (either from extent of local injury or associated injuries) can lead to substantial disability and require subspecialty care [2,3]. As with other mechanisms of hand injury, ideal care requires a team approach. Optimal outcome requires an early focus on maintaining as much mobility and function as possible, rather than allowing disability to develop.

Anatomy and pathophysiology

Thermal injury to the skin is proportional to the intensity of the noxious insult (how high the temperature and for how long) and ameliorated by protective factors such as the presence of protective garments and the relative thickness of the skin [4]. Injury can be first noted by the presence of simple hyperemia or 1st degree burn. This is analogous to uncomplicated sunburn which does not blister. Blistering or separation at the dermal-epidermal interface is a sign of deeper injury, at least a 2nd degree burn. Epithelial cells are also located in hair follicles and sweat glands. These epithelial cells function as a reservoir that can repopulate the injured surface of a burn. The relative density of these reservoirs as well as their orientation (that is how deeply they extend into the dermis) can both contribute to the likelihood of an area of burn injury healing (Figure 1). The repopulation of the epidermis is thought to modulate healing and curb inflammation with concomitantly less scar production [5]. If enough of the reservoir fails to survive the injury (either from the initial insult or from poor wound care), then the wound will close secondarily with granulation tissue (that is some degree of scar formation). When the skilled examiner inspects the initial injury, the main focus of description is the extent of injury (that is the size of burn) and predicted chance of healing (that is the depth of burn). From a burn surgeon's perspective, there are partial-thickness injuries and full-thickness injuries. Partial-thickness injuries are first-degree burns and second-degree burns, cases in which there is a sufficient reservoir of epithelial cells to allow healing to progress over 2-3 weeks. Full-thickness burns are 3rd degree burns or very deep second-degree burns. In other words, there may be viable dermis, and perhaps even a few scatter reservoirs of epithelial cells, but the wound cannot be expected, to heal by simple migration of epithelial cells (Figure 2). Unfortunately, this classification system sometimes includes descriptions such as superficial partial thickness and deep partial thickness, which may be confusing.