Research Article
Austin J Forensic Sci Criminol. 2015; 2(3): 1031.
Comparison of SNP Polymorphism of Alcohol Metabolizing Related Enzyme Genes in Intoxicated Individuals and Nonalcoholic Population
Li Li*, Ping Xiang, Yan Liu, Yan Shi, Yuan Lin and Zhenmin Zhao
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Institute of Forensic Science, China
*Corresponding author: Li Li, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Justice, 200063, China
Received: July 16, 2015; Accepted: August 08, 2015; Published: August 11, 2015
Abstract
Objective: To compare the distributions of SNP allele and genotype about alcohol dehydrogenase 2 (ADH2), aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) and CYP2E1 in intoxicated individuals and nonalcoholic population.
Methods: 100 individuals who were penalized duo to intoxicated driving were genotyped for 40 SNPs of ADH2,ALDH2 and CYP2E1 using multiplex PCR and Iplex chemistry on a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer and compared with a reference group of 99 blood donors. Allele frequencies and genotype frequencies of 40 SNP loci were calculated and compared in the two groups.
Results: Among the 40 SNP loci, seven SNPs (e.g. rs698, rs2241894, rs1789915, rs13306164, rs671, rs28371746 and rs2515641) were polymorphic in the intoxicated population, but only six SNPs (e.g. rs698, rs2241894, rs13306164, rs671, rs28371746 and rs2515641) were polymorphic in the control individuals. Two SNP loci (rs671 in and rs2515641) were found to have a significant difference in frequency distribution between the two populations (p<0.01).
Conclusion: Among the above 40 SNP loci of ADH2,ALDH2 and CYP2E1 genes, rs671 and rs2515641 in the intoxicated population were found to differ in allele and genotype frequency distribution from the nonalcoholic population and may be related to alcohol intoxication.
Keywords: ADH; ALDH; CYP2E1; Single nucleotide polymorphism; Genetic polymorphism
Introduction
The metabolism of drug shows inter-individual variation and inter-ethnic variation. Because of the difference of Drug-Metabolizing Enzyme (DMEs) activity, the individuals can be divided into Poor Metabolizers (PMs), Extensive Metabolizers (EMs) and Ultra-Rapid Metabolizers (UMs) [1,2]. Therefore, it is usually a hard work to interpret drug related poisoning or death in forensic science [3]. Now punitive measures against people who drink and drive have been strictly enforced. In china, current standard for judging drunk drinking and drunken drinking is mainly based on the concentration of ethanol in blood. The driver whose alcohol concentration above 0.2mg/mL in blood is convicted of drunk drinking and the driver whose alcohol concentration above 0.8mg/mL in blood is convicted of drunken drinking, but, except for alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) and cytochrome P450 2E1 enzyme (CYP2E1) has also been found to be involved in alcohol metabolism [4-7], which means that ALDH2 and CYP2E1 with gene polymorphism may also play dominant role in alcohol metabolism. Individuals with distinct genotypes are different in alcohol tolerance and show unequal behavioral responses after drinking [8]. Because of high concentration of acetaldehyde in blood transformed from ethanol, poor metabolism of acetaldehyde may lead to traffic accident even if the individual’s alcohol concentration below 0.2mg/mL in blood. The individual differences are mainly caused by the gene polymorphisms of ADH, ALDH and CYP2E1. It was confirmed that the presence of the less-active form of alcohol dehydrogenase- 1B encoded by ADH1B*1/*1 and active form of ALDH2 encoded by ALDH2*1/*1 increases the risk of alcoholism in East Asians [9]. SNPs were found to be related to the polymorphism of enzyme activity [8], base deletions, insertions, substitutions or transversions in genes of ADH, ALDH2 and CYP2E1 may lead to changes of amino acid sequences and result in enzyme activities lost or decreased or increased. In order to investigate SNP polymorphism of alcohol metabolizing- related enzyme genes in Chinese Han population, we genetyped 40 SNPs of ADH2, ALDH2 and CYP2E1 based on multiplex amplification and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization timeof- flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) [10,11] and compared the SNP polymorphism in intoxicated population and nonalcoholic population.
Materials and Methods
Selection of SNP loci and design of primers
Corresponding to sequences of genes coding for ADH2, ALDH2 and CYP2E1, 40 SNP loci (Table 1) were selected via NCBI website: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/. Forty groups of primes were designed via Mass ARRAY Assay Design software (Sequenom, Inc.). Each group has three primes, including a pair of PCR primes and a single base extension prime (Table 2). Primers were synthesized by Shanghai Biological Engineering Technology Corporation.
Gene
SNP Loci
Variation
Gene
SNP Loci
Variation
ADH2
rs2066702
C/T
CYP2E1
rs35844228
C/G
rs55882921
C/T
rs72559710
A/C/G
rs41275697
C/T
rs28371740
A/G
rs1126440
C/T
rs60719153
C/T
rs41275699
A/G
rs56864127
A/G
rs67420531
A/G
rs60452492
A/G
ADH3
rs56247447
C/T
rs56040284
A/G
rs698
A/G
rs28371743
C/T
rs1042756
C/G
rs41299426
A/G
rs55717907
A/G
rs61710826
A/G
rs2241894
A/G
rs28371746
A/C
rs1789915
A/G
rs61644766
C/G
rs6490301
C/T
rs41299434
C/G
ALDH2
rs1064903
C/G
rs59981143
A/G
rs13306164
C/T
rs55897648
A/G
rs58280059
A/G
rs60207639
A/G
rs1062136
A/T
rs59656378
C/G
rs1064933
A/G
rs57702102
A/G
rs671
A/G
rs2515641
C/T
rs59868347
A/G
rs55982231
A/G
Table 1: 40 SNPs in Alcohol Metabolizing Related Enzyme Genes.
SNP_ID
Forward primer (5’→3’) for PCR
Reverse primer (5’→3’) for PCR
Primer for extension reactions
rs2066702
ACGTTGGATGGCATGTGGGTTGTCTAAATG
ACGTTGGATGCTCTATTGCCTCAAAACGTC
gCTTCTTTCCTATTGCAGTATC
rs55882921
ACGTTGGATGAAGAGTAAAGAAGGTATCCC
ACGTTGGATGCATGGGTTATTAACGCATCC
cccccAACTTGTGGCTGATTTTAT
rs41275697
ACGTTGGATGCAGTGGCCAAAATTGATGC
ACGTTGGATGGACCCATAACCAGTCGAGAA
AAAATTGATGCAGCCTC
rs1126440
ACGTTGGATGTGAACCTCCTGGTGCCATC
ACGTTGGATGAACCCGGAGAGCAACTACTG
TCCTGCAGGGTCCCCCG
rs41275699
ACGTTGGATGAACACTCTCCACGATGCCG
ACGTTGGATGATGACCACGTGGTTAGTGGC
CTGCCTCATGGCCTAAA
rs67420531
ACGTTGGATGTGTCTCTTCTTTCCTATTGC
ACGTTGGATGCTACAAGGGAAGGCATCTGT
TTCTTTCCTATTGCAGTATC
rs56247447
ACGTTGGATGATAAATGAAGGATTTGACC
ACGTTGGATGCGCTACTGTAGAATACAAAG
AGGATTTGACCTGCTTC
rs698
ACGTTGGATGAAGAAGTTTTCACTGGATGC
ACGTTGGATGAGAGCGAAGCAGGTCAAATC
CACTGGATGCATTAATAACAAAT
rs1042756
ACGTTGGATGCCAGTGAAAACTTCTTAGCC
ACGTTGGATGCTTCTTTTCAGGCTTTAAGAG
AAAGTCAGCCACAAGTTT
rs55717907
ACGTTGGATGCAGACCCATAACCAGTCGAA
ACGTTGGATGCCAAAATTGATGCAGCCTCG
CCATAACCAGTCGAAAATCCACA
rs2241894
ACGTTGGATGTCGGCGTCAGCACCTTCTC
ACGTTGGATGCGAGGCTGCATCAATTTTGG
CGGCGTCAGCACCTTCTCCCAGTACAC
rs1789915
ACGTTGGATGGTGATAAAGTCATCCCGCTC
ACGTTGGATGAAGCAGTAGTTGCTTTCTGG
TGTGGAAAATGCAGAATTTG
rs6490301
ACGTTGGATGTGACAAGAGGCGGCGGCCCA
ACGTTGGATGTCCGCTAGCCCGCTGCGAT
acggtGCCCGAAGCGGGCGGCAGC
rs1064903
ACGTTGGATGCTAGCCCGCTGCGATGTTG
ACGTTGGATGTGGCGGCGGCTGACAAGAG
TGCCGCCGCTTCGGGCCCCGCCTGG
rs13306164
ACGTTGGATGCATGGACGCATCACACAGG
ACGTTGGATGTAGGTCCGGTCCCGCTCGAT
ACGCATCACACAGGGGCCGGCTG
rs58280059
ACGTTGGATGCACGTTTCCAGTTGCCAAGG
ACGTTGGATGGCTGTTGTTTGTTGCAGTGG
CCATGCTTGCATCAGGAG
rs1062136
ACGTTGGATGAGGAGGACATCTATGATGAG
ACGTTGGATGTATCAAAGGGGTTCCCGAC
ggCATCTATGATGAGTTTGTGG
rs1064933
ACGTTGGATGTGTATGCCTGCAGCCCGTA
ACGTTGGATGACCCTTTGGTGGCTACAAGA
CCGTACTCGCCCAACTCCCGGCCACT
rs671
ACGTTGGATGCAGGTCCCACACTCACAGTT
ACGTTGGATGAGTTGGGCGAGTACGGGCTG
AGGTCCCACACTCACAGTTTTCACTT
rs59868347
ACGTTGGATGTTCCTCCTGCTGGTGTCCAT
ACGTTGGATGATGATGGGAAGCGGGAAAGG
gtTGTCCATGTGGAGGCAG
rs35844228
ACGTTGGATGCTTCCTTCACCGCCTTGTAG
ACGTTGGATGTTCGGGCCGGTGTTCACG
ATCACCACCATGCGCTGCGAGCCCA
rs72559710
ACGTTGGATGCTTCCTTCACCGCCTTGTAG
ACGTTGGATGGGCCGGTGTTCACGCTGTA
GTAGCCGTGCATCACCACCATG
rs28371740
ACGTTGGATGAAGGAAGCGCTGCTGGACTA
ACGTTGGATGTGTCCCTGTGCGCATGGAAC
GGACTACAAGGACGAGTTCTC
rs60719153
ACGTTGGATGATAATGGACCTACCTGGAAG
ACGTTGGATGTTTCCCCATCCCATAGTTCC
CCTACCTGGAAGGACATC
rs56864127
ACGTTGGATGTTTCCCCATCCCATAGTTCC
ACGTTGGATGATAATGGACCTACCTGGAAG
GTGGTCAGGGAAAACCGC
rs60452492
ACGTTGGATGGTTTTGTAGGCCAGCCTTTC
ACGTTGGATGGAAGAGGATGTCGGCTATGA
ACCCCACCTTCCTCATC
rs56040284
ACGTTGGATGGTTTTGTAGGCCAGCCTTTC
ACGTTGGATGGAAGAGGATGTCGGCTATGA
GACCCCACCTTCCTCATCGGCTGC
rs28371743
ACGTTGGATGTGATGAGAAGTTTCTAAGGC
ACGTTGGATGAGGGAGTGCTGAGTAGGTG
TAAGGCTGATGTATTTGTTTAA
rs41299426
ACGTTGGATGGTTGCATCCAGAAAAAAGTAG
ACGTTGGATGAAGTAGTGTAGAAAGCTGGG
ggTTCCCTCTCTAGCTTTAC
rs61710826
ACGTTGGATGAAAGAACAGGTCGGCCACAG
ACGTTGGATGCGGTATCACAGGAAAAGCAC
CACAGTCACGGTGATAC
rs28371746
ACGTTGGATGGAGAATCAGGAGCCCATATC
ACGTTGGATGTGTGGCCGACCTGTTCTTTG
AGCCCATATCTCAGAGTTGTGCTGGT
rs61644766
ACGTTGGATGAATTGACAGGGTGATTGGGC
ACGTTGGATGACCACAGCATCCATGTAGGG
AGCCGAATCCCTGCCAT
rs41299434
ACGTTGGATGTGCATGAGATTCAGCGGTTC
ACGTTGGATGCTCTGAAAATGGTGTCTCGG
cGTTCATCACCCTCGTGCCCT
rs59981143
ACGTTGGATGGGTATCCTCTGAAAATGGTG
ACGTTGGATGGAGATTCAGCGGTTCATCAC
GAAAATGGTGTCTCGGG
rs55897648
ACGTTGGATGTCAGGAAATTCTTGGTTGTC
ACGTTGGATGGTCTTTGTTTCTCCTAGGGC
tagcGTCCAGAGTTGGCACTA
rs60207639
ACGTTGGATGCTGGATCAGGAAATTCTTGG
ACGTTGGATGCTTTGTTTCTCCTAGGGCAC
GGTTGTCATACAAAACAGAG
rs59656378
ACGTTGGATGCTGGATCAGGAAATTCTTGG
ACGTTGGATGCTTTGTTTCTCCTAGGGCAC
agaacTTCTTGGTTGTCATACAAAA
rs57702102
ACGTTGGATGGTTTAAGCCAGAACACTTCC
ACGTTGGATGTCTCACCTGTGGAAAATGGC
cGAACACTTCCTGAATGAAA
rs2515641
ACGTTGGATGGCCAGAACACTTCCTGAATG
ACGTTGGATGTCTCACCTGTGGAAAATGGC
CCTGAATGAAAATGGAAAGTT
rs55982231
ACGTTGGATGTCATGAGCGGGGAATGACAC
ACGTTGGATGTATCGACCTCAGCCCTATAC
gcggtGAATGACACAGAGTTTGTAA
Table 2: 40 groups of primes used for SNP genotyping.
DNA extraction
Blood samples were collected from 100 unrelated Han individuals who were penalized duo to intoxicated driving. Another 99 blood samples for control were collected from nonalcoholic males. DNA was extracted according to the instructions of the blood genomic DNA Mini Kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China).
Multiplex PCR amplification
Aliquots of 1 μL DNA were amplified in a total volume of 5μL. Each reaction contained 0.625μL PCR buffer (10×) (Qiagen GmbH), 0.325μL 25 mmol/L MgCl2, 1μL dNTP (2.5mmol/L) (Tatara Inc.), 0.1μL of HotStarTaq polymerase (5U/μL), 0.95μL H2O, and 1μL the designed primers at their optimized concentrations. Using a Gene Amp PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems, Norwalk, CT), the reaction mixtures were incubated at 94°C for 15 min and then cycled 45 times through desaturation at 94deg;C for 20 s, annealing at 56deg;C for 30 s and extension at 72deg;C for 60 s and finally incubated at 72deg;C for 3 min. No-template controls were carried along in every plate to exclude contaminations.
SAP process
After PCR, the products were treated with hrimp alkaline phosphatase (SAP) to remove excess dNTPs. This dephosphorylation reaction contained 0.3μL SAP (1U/μL), 0.17μL SAP buffer (10×), 1.53μL H2O (Sequenom, Inc.) was carried out at 37deg;C for 40 min, and 85deg;C for 15 min.
Primer extension reactions
The PCR products were used as templates for the primer extension reactions. Extension reactions (final volume, 9μL) contained 0.2μL iPlex buffer (10×), 0.1μL iPlex termination mix, 0.0205μL iPlex enzyme, 0.7395μL H2O (all from Sequenom, Inc.), and 0.94μL extension primers at optimized concentrations. On a Gene Amp PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems, Norwalk, CT), extension reactions were performed at 94deg;C for 30 s followed by 40 cycles (94deg;C for 5 s, followed by 5 cycles of 52deg;C for 5 s, 80deg;C for 5 s); and finally 72deg;C for 3 min. The final nucleotide extension products were treated with a cationic exchange resin (AG® 50W-X8 Resin; Bio-Rad Inc.) for 30 min to remove salts. All reactions, including PCR amplification, shrimp alkaline phosphatase treatment, and base extension, were performed in 384 microtiter plates (Sequenom Inc.).
MALDI-TOF-MS
The reaction products were spotted onto the Mass ARRAY SpectroCHIP with an auto-spot arm (Sequenom, Inc.). The target plate was then inserted into the MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer of Mass ARRAY compact System (Sequenom, Inc.), and analysis was performed with 180 nitrogen laser shots for each sample. The mass range of the MS instrument was set at 3920–12023 Da. SNP loci was genotyped by Mass ARRAY Type Analyzer software version 4.0 (Sequenom, Inc.).
Statistical analysis
The data were analyzed with SPSS 13.0. The statistical information included genotype frequency, allele frequency and p values.
Results and Discussion
Evaluation of the MALDI-TOF MS genotyping assay
To evaluate the established SNP genotyping assay, we analyzed 100 genomic DNA samples from individuals of Chinese origin who had previously been genotyped for some of the SNPs by TaqMan assay and got consistent results.
Polymorphisms of SNPs
Among the 40 SNP loci in intoxicated population, three SNPs (rs698, rs2241894, rs1789915) in ADH3 gene, two SNPs (rs13306164, rs671) in ALDH2 gene, two SNPs (rs28371746, rs2515641) in CYP2E1 gene were found to be polymorphic, i.e. the minor allele frequency(MAF) of each SNP locus was above 1%, while others were not ( the MAF of them was below 1%). Among the 40 SNP loci in control population, the seven SNPs except rs1789915 were found to be polymorphic. The observed genotype and allele frequencies in intoxicated population and control population were shown in table 3 and 4 respectively.
Gene
SNP Loci
Variation
Genotype frequencies in intoxicated population
Genotype frequencies in control population
ADH2
rs2066702
C/T
CC:1.0000
CT: 0.0000
TT:0.0000
CC:1.0000
CT: 0.0000 TT:0.0000
rs55882921
C/T
CC:1.0000
CT: 0.0000
TT:0.0000
CC:1.0000
CT: 0.0000 TT:0.0000
rs41275697
C/T
CC:1.0000
CT: 0.0000
TT:0.0000
CC:1.0000
CT: 0.0000 TT:0.0000
rs1126440
C/T
CC:0.0000
CT: 0.0000
TT:1.0000
CC:0.0000
CT: 0.0000 TT:1.0000
rs41275699
A/G
AA:1.0000
AG:0.0000
GG:0.0000
AA:1.0000 AG:0.0000
GG:0.0000
rs67420531
A/G
AA:0.0000
AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
AA:0.0000 AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
ADH3
rs56247447
C/T
CC:0.9900
CT:0.0100
TT:0.0000
CC:1.0000 CT:0.0000
TT:0.0000
rs698
A/G
AA:0.8400
AG:0.1500
GG:0.0100
AA:0.8889 AG:0.1111
GG:0.0000
rs1042756
C/G
CC:1.0000
CG:0.0000
GG:0.0000
CC:1.0000 CG:0.0000
GG:0.0000
rs55717907
A/G
AA:0.0000
AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
AA:0.0000 AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
rs2241894
A/G
AA:0.0400
AG:0.9600
GG:0.0000
AA:0.0505 AG:0.9495
GG:0.0000
rs1789915
A/G
AA:0.9800
AG:0.0200
GG:0.0000
AA:0.9899 AG:0.0101
GG:0.0000
rs6490301
C/T
CC:1.0000
CT:0.0000
TT:0.0000
CC:1.0000 CT:0.0000
TT:0.0000
ALDH2
rs1064903
C/G
CC:0.0000
CG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
CC:0.0000 CG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
rs13306164
C/T
CC:0.9200
CT:0.0800
TT:0.0000
CC:0.8788 CT:0.1212
TT:0.0000
rs58280059
A/G
AA:0.0000
AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
AA:0.0000 AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
rs1062136
A/T
AA:1.0000
AT:0.0000
TT:0.0000
AA:1.0000 AT:0.0000
TT:0.0000
rs1064933
A/G
AA:0.0000
AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
AA:0.0000 AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
rs671
A/G
AA:0.0000
AG:0.1000
GG:0.9000
AA:0.0404 AG:0.4141
GG:0.5455
rs59868347
A/G
AA:0.0000
AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
AA:0.0000 AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
CYP2E1
rs35844228
C/G
CC:0.0000
CG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
CC:0.0000 CG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
rs72559710
A/C/G
AG:0.0100
CG:0.0000
GG:0.9900
AG:0.0101 CG:0.0101 GG:0.9798
rs28371740
A/G
AA:0.0000
AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
AA:0.0000 AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
rs60719153
C/T
CC:1.0000
CT:0.0000
TT:0.0000
CC:1.0000 CT:0.0000
TT:0.0000
rs56864127
A/G
AA:0.0000
AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
AA:0.0000 AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
rs60452492
A/G
AA:0.0000
AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
AA:0.0000 AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
rs56040284
A/G
AA:0.0000
AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
AA:0.0000 AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
rs28371743
C/T
CC:0.0000
CT:0.0000
TT:1.0000
CC:0.0000
CT:0.0000
TT:1.0000
rs41299426
A/G
AA:1.0000
AG:0.0000
GG:0.0000
AA:1.0000 AG:0.0000
GG:0.0000
rs61710826
A/G
AA:0.0000
AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
AA:0.0000 AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
rs28371746
A/C
AA:0.0000
AC:0.0200
CC:0.9800
AA:0.0000
AC:0.0606
CC:0.9394
rs61644766
C/G
CC:1.0000
CG:0.0000
GG:0.0000
CC:1.0000 CG:0.0000
GG:0.0000
rs41299434
C/G
CC:1.0000
CG:0.0000
GG:0.0000
CC:1.0000 CG:0.0000
GG:0.0000
A/G
AA:0.9900
AG:0.0100
GG:0.0000
AA:1.0000 AG:0.0000
GG:0.0000
rs55897648
A/G
AA:0.0000
AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
AA:0.0000 AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
rs60207639
A/G
AG:0.0000
GG:0.0000
AA:1.0000 AG:0.0000
GG:0.0000
rs59656378
C/G
CC:0.0000
CG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
CC:0.0000 CG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
rs57702102
A/G
AA:1.0000
AG:0.0000
GG:0.0000
AA:1.0000 AG:0.0000
GG:0.0000
rs2515641
C/T
CC:0.6200
CT:0.3600
TT:0.0200
CC:0.6566 CT:0.3333
TT:0.0101
rs55982231
A/G
AA:0.0000
AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
AA:0.0000 AG:0.0000
GG:1.0000
Table 3: Genotype frequencies of 40 SNPs in intoxicated population (n=100) and control population (n=99).
Gene
SNP Loci
Variation
Allele frequencies in intoxicated population
Allele frequencies in control population
ADH3
rs698
A/G
0.9150/0.0850
0.9444/0.0556
rs2241894
A/G
0.5200/0.4800
0.5253/0.4747
rs1789915
A/G
0.9900/0.0100
0.9949/0.0051
ALDH2
rs13306164
C/T
0.9600/0.0400
0.9394/0.0606
rs671
A/G
0.0500/0.9500
0.2475/0.7525
CYP2E1
rs28371746
A/C
0.0100/0.9900
0.0303/0.9697
rs2515641
C/T
0.8000/0.2000
0.8232/0.1768
Table 4: Allele frequencies of seven polymorphic SNPs in intoxicated population (n=100) and control population (n=99).
Population comparison
The allele frequencies of seven polymorphic SNPs (rs698, rs2241894, rs1789915, rs13306164, rs671, rs28371746, rs2515641) in intoxicated population were compared to the data about the control population. It’s found that two SNPs (rs671 in and rs2515641) with a significant difference in frequency distribution between intoxicated population and control population (p<0.01, (Table 5) might be related to alcohol intoxication.
Population
Numbers of allele 1
Numbers of allele 2
Total of alleles
X2
P value
rs698(A/G)
intoxicated population
183
17
200
1.3189
0.2508
control population
187
11
198
rs2241894(A/G)
intoxicated population
104
96
200
0.0110
0.9165
control population
104
94
198
rs1789915(A/G)
intoxicated population
198
2
200
0.0000
1.0000
control population
197
1
198
rs13306164(C/T)
intoxicated population
192
8
200
0.8852
0.3468
control population
186
12
198
rs671(A/G)
intoxicated population
10
190
200
30.7291
<0.0001
control population
49
149
198
rs28371746(A/C)
intoxicated population
2
198
200
1.1791
0.2775
control population
6
192
198
rs2515641(C/T)
intoxicated population
160
40
200
4.6574
0.0309
control population
163
35
198
Table 5: Comparison of allele frequency of seven polymorphic SNPs in intoxicated population (n=100) and control population (n=99).
References
- Sim SC, Risinger C, Dahl ML, Aklillu E, Christensen M, Bertilsson L, et al. A common novel CYP2C19 gene variant causes ultrarapid drug metabolism relevant for the drug response to proton pump inhibitors and antidepressants. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006; 79: 103-113.
- Meyer UA, Zanger UM. Molecular mechanisms of genetic polymorphisms of drug metabolism. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1997; 37: 269-296.
- Shi Y, Xiang P, Li L, Shen M. Analysis of 50 SNPs in CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP3A4 and CYP1A2 by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in Chinese Han population. Forensic Sci Int. 2011; 207: 183-187.
- Zhong Y,Cao J, Zou R, Peng M. Genetic polymorphisms in alcohol dehydrogenase, aldehyde dehydrogenase and alcoholic chronic pancreatitis susceptibility: A meta-analysis, 2014; S0210-5705: 00304-5.
- Wall TL. Genetic associations of alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase with alcohol dependence and their mechanisms of action. Ther Drug Monit. 2005; 27: 700-703.
- Chai YG, Oh DY, Chung EK, Kim GS, Kim L, Lee YS, et al. Alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase polymorphisms in men with type I and Type II alcoholism. Am J Psychiatry. 2005; 162: 1003-1005.
- Toselli F, Booth Depaz IM, Worrall S, Etheridge N, Dodd PR, Wilce PA, et al. Expression of CYP2E1 and CYP2U1 proteins in amygdala and prefrontal cortex: influence of alcoholism and smoking. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015; 39: 790-797.
- Yokoyama A, Mizukami T, Matsui T, Yokoyama T, Kimura M, Matsushita S, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of alcohol dehydrogenase-1B and aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 and liver cirrhosis, chronic calcific pancreatitis, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension among Japanese alcoholic men. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013; 37: 1391-1401.
- Iyer-Eimerbrink PA, Nurnberger JI Jr. Genetics of alcoholism. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014; 16: 518.
- Petkovski E, Keyser-Tracqui C, Hienne R, Ludes B. SNPs and MALDI-TOF MS: tools for DNA typing in forensic paternity testing and anthropology. J Forensic Sci. 2005; 50: 535-541.
- Tost J, Gut IG. Genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms by MALDI mass spectrometry in clinical applications. Clin Biochem. 2005; 38: 335-350.