Fungal Mycotoxins Reduction by Gamma Irradiation in Black and White Pepper

Research Article

Austin J Nutr Metab. 2024; 11(1): 1132.

Fungal Mycotoxins Reduction by Gamma Irradiation in Black and White Pepper

Hamdy A Shaaban

Department of Chemistry of Flavors & Aroma, NRC, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt

*Corresponding author: Hamdy A Shaaban Department of Chemistry of Flavors & Aroma, NRC, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt. Email: hamdy_asn@yahoo.com

Received: March 27, 2024 Accepted: April 30, 2024 Published: May 07, 2024

Abstract

Gamma ray was applied to reduce mycotoxins, i.e. Ochratoxin A (OTA) and aflatoxins B1, B2, G1 and G2 (AFB1, AFB2, AFG1 and AFG2) in black and white pepper. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of gamma radiation for decontaminating ochratoxin) and aflatoxins residues in artificially contaminated black and white pepper samples. The moisture content of the pepper samples was set at 10% or 16%, and the applied gamma dose ranged from 5 to 20 kGy. Mycotoxin levels were determined by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) after Immune Affinity Column (IAC) chromatography. Both the gamma irradiation dose and moisture content showed significant effects (p<0.05) on mycotoxin reduction. The maximum toxin reductions, found at16%moisture content and 20 kGy, were 57.2%, 53.4%, 40.4%, 48.6% and 44.2% for OTA, AFB1, AFB2, AFG1and AFG2, respectively.

Keywords: Black and white pepper; Mycotoxins; Gamma ray

Introduction

Mycotoxins are naturally-occurring toxins produced by certain fungi that can grow on foods such as cereals, nuts, dried fruits, spices and legumes under certain environmental conditions. The most commonly observed mycotoxins include the aflatoxin (B1, B2, G1 & G2) and ochratoxin A. Aflatoxins have been shown to cause cancer of the liver in laboratory animals and to directly damage DNA. They are also considered to cause liver cancer in humans, particularly in a number of developing countries, where high levels of aflatoxins are found in some staple foods [20].

For spices there are two groups of mycotoxins of concern, Aflatoxins (AFs) and Ochratoxin A (OTA). Aflatoxins are the most toxic group of mycotoxins that are produced by some Aspergillus species (Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus parasiticus and the rare Aspergillus nomius). Several types of AFs are produced in nature belonging to a group called the difuranocoumarins, but only four, Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), Aflatoxin B2 (AFB2), Aflatoxin G1 (AFG1) and Aflatoxin G2 (AFG2) are naturally found in foodstuffs. AFB1 is the most potent genotoxic and carcinogenic AFs and amongst the most commonly found in agricultural products [18]. AFB1 and naturally occurring mixtures of AFs have been classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as Group I (carcinogenic to humans) [19], with a role in aetiology of liver cancer, notably among subjects who are carries of hepatitis B virus surface antigens [14].

Ochratoxin A is a kidney toxin, produced mainly by Penicillium verrucosum in temperate climates and Aspergillus ochraceus and the rare Aspergillus carbonarius inwarm and tropical countries that can contaminate agricultural products prior to harvest or more commonly during storage. This compound has been shown to have nephrotoxic effects on all mammalian species and has been associated with fatal human kidney disease, referred to as Balkan Endemic Nephropathy and with an increased incidence of tumours of the upper urinary effect (EFSA, 2006). The IARC has classified OTA as a probable human carcinogen (Group 2B) based on sufficient evidence for carcinogenicity in animal studies and inadequate evidence in humans [14].

Due to the high toxicity of mycotoxins, many methods have been used to reduce or eliminate them from different foods. These methods can be classified as: (1) biological method by applying nontoxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus or other nontoxigenic moulds [7]; (2) chemical method such as treatment with ammonia, sodium bisulfite, calcium hydroxide, formaldehyde and other common chemicals [5,21,23,24]; (3) physical method such as heating, extraction, adsorbing by adsorption agent [27] and radiation. The reduction using chemical method usually produces undesirable toxic residues and causes changes in nutritional, sensory and functional properties of food [22]. By far, physical method has been the most effective method for the reduction of mycotoxins from contaminated commodities. However, this technique is limited due to high cost of equipment and it needs additional management for the disposal of the toxic extracts.

Despite much public debate on the safety of irradiated foods, WHO, in September 1997, concluded that foods treated with doses greater than 10 kGy can be considered safe and nutritionally adequate when produced under established Good Manufacturing Practice [4].

Spice irradiation is used to achieve some beneficial effects include disinfestations, improvement of shelf life and safety of spices [32]. There are a number of contrasting reports. Some researchers found that gamma ray treatment was effective in reducing mycotoxin concentration in different foods. [12,28,30,34]; however, some found it was not effective [10,11,13,26].

The present study was investigated the effect of gamma irradiation dosages and moisture content on the reduction of OTA, AFB1, AFB2, AFG1 and AFG2 in black and white pepper.

Materials and Methods

Sample Preparation and Irradiation

To investigate the effect of gamma doses and moisture content on mycotoxin reduction, samples of black and white pepper were spiked with AFB1, AFG1 and OTA at 60ng/g and with AFB2 and AFG2 at 18ng/g based on dry weight of pepper. The moisture content of pepper (8%–10%) was adjusted to 10% or 16% by the direct addition of a weighed amount of sterilized water. The moisture content in each sample was confirmed by the standard method of the AOAC (1990). Following thorough mixing, each sample was divided into 25g sub-samples, each of which was placed in a transparent plastic bag. The samples were irradiated at 5, 10, 15 or 20 kGy at 28±2C in a gamma chamber, which has 60Co as the radiation source (Atomic Energy Authority, Cairo, Egypt). The experiments were conducted twice and triplicate samples were irradiated with the same dose each time.

Reagents and Materials

Methanol and acetonitrile used for sample preparation and mobile phase were HPLC-grade. Sodium chloride, potassium chloride, sodium hydroxide, Monobasic potassium phosphate and sodium phosphate dibasic were obtained from Sigmae Aldrich, while acetic acid, nitric acid and potassium bromide were from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). In all analytical steps, ultrapure water produced by Direct-Q3 water purification system was used (Millipore). The immune affinity columns (Afla Test® and Ochra Test™) from Vicam (Water-worn, MA, USA). GF/A glass microfiber filter (125 mm) were from Whatman International (Kent, UK).

Standards

The mixed standards of AFB1, AFB2, AFG1 and AFG2 were provided from Supelco® (Bellefonte, PA, USA). The mixture in each ampoule consists of 1μg AFB1, 0.3μg AFB2,1 μg AFG1 and 0.3 μg AFG2 in 1 ml of methanol. A series of working standards (1-20 ng ml-1 for AFB1 and AFG1, and 0.3-6ng ml-1 for AFB2 and AFG2) were prepared freshly in LC mobile phase consisting of Water-acetonitrile-methanol (6/2/3, v/v/v).

The OTA standard was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich as a crystalline powder form. A series of working standards from 1 to 30 ng OTA ml-1 was prepared in LC mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile-water-acetic acid (47/51/2, v/v/v). The working standards of AFs and OTA were renewed every 2 weeks. They were used to calibrate the LC detector response and recovery studies.

AFs Analysis

Sample Extraction and IAC Clean-up

The samples were extracted and cleaned-up according to the AOAC Official method [31], with slight modifications. Fifty grams of spice samples were extracted with 300 ml methanol-water (8/2, v/v) and 5g NaCl using a Waring Blender (Waring Products Co., Connecticut, USA) at high speed for 1 min. The sample extract was filtered through Whatman no. 4 filter paper. Then, a 10 ml aliquot of filtrate was diluted with 60 ml Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS) and filtered once more through a glass microfiber filter and passed through an AflaTest® IAC attached on to a vacuum manifold (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The column was washed two times with 10 ml of ultrapure water and dried with air. Subsequently, the AFs bound to the specific antibody were eluted by passing twice 0.5 ml of methanol through the IAC at a flow rate of 1-2 drops/s and collected in HPLC vials. The elute was evaporated until dryness at 45°C under N2 stream and the residue was reconstituted in 1 ml of water-acetonitrile-methanol (6/2/3, v/v/v). The samples were stored at 4°C until analysis by HPLC-FD after post-column derivatisation.

OTA Analysis

Sample Extraction and IAC Clean-up

The samples were extracted according to Ahn et al. (2010), with some modifications. In detail, a portion of 25 g of spice samples was extracted with 200 ml of acetonitril-ewater solution (6/4, v/v), using high-speed blending for 1 min and then the extract was filtered through filter paper. A 5 ml aliquot of filtrate was mixed with 50 ml PBS solution and again filtered through a glass microfiber filter. The clean-up of samples was carried out with OchraTest™ IAC attached onto a vacuum manifold. After the final filtrate had passed through the IAC, the column was washed twice with 10 ml of ultrapure water and air was forced through the column. OTA was eluted from the column with 1 ml (2×0.5 ml) of methanol. The elute was evaporated until dryness at 45°C under N2 stream and the residue was reconstituted in 1 ml of acetonitrile-water-acetic acid (47/51/2, v/v/v) for HPLC-FD analysis.

HPLC-FD Analysis

The HPLC apparatus was performed using a Shimadzu (Tokyo, Japan) liquid chromatographic system coupled to a fluorescence detector (Shimadzu RF-20AXL) equipped with an LC-20AD pump, a SIL-20AHT auto sampler, a DGU- 20A3 online degasser and a CBM-20Alite system controller. Shimadzu LC solution software was used for data acquisition and processing. Chromatographic separations were achieved using a reversed-phase InertsilODS-3column (5 μm, 250 × 4.6 mm i.d.) supplied by GL Sciences Inc, Tokyo, Japan. The column temperature was maintained at 35°C.

The mobile phase consisted of the mixed solution of water-acetonitrile-methanol (6/2/3, v/v/v) containing 0.12 g l-1 potassium bromide and 350 μl l-1 nitric acid (4 M) and was isocratically delivered at 1 ml min-1. The injection volume was 100 μl. A post-column derivatisation with electrochemically generated bromine in Cobra cell (Coring System Diagnostics GmbH, Gernsheim, Germany) using a reaction tube of 340× 0.25 mm i.d. PTFE was used to enhance the fluorescence intensity of AFB1 and AFG1. Detection of AFs was carried out by fluorescence with excitation and emission wavelengths of 360 and 440 nm, respectively. The OTA content was quantified using HPLC with fluorescence detection system described for AFs. However, the column temperature was set at 45°C. An isocratic mobile phase of acetonitrile- water-acetic acid (47/51/2, v/v/v) was used with a flow rate of 1 ml min-1. Detection of OTA was carried out using excitation and emission wavelength of 333 and 460 nm, respectively.

Statistical Analysis

Analysis of Variances (ANOVA) was used to investigate the significant effects of moisture content and gamma dose on the reduction of mycotoxins in black and white pepper. Significant differences (p<0.05) of means were calculated using Duncan’s multiple range tests. Data analysis and optimization procedures were performed using the Minitab v.14 statistical package.

Results and Discussion

The data presented in Tables (1) and (2) show the effect of gamma ray doses (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 kGy) at two different levels of moisture content (10,16%) on the percent reduction of AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, AFG2 and OTA in black and white pepper. Statistical analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the reductions of the evaluated mycotoxins in black and white pepper after irradiation. However, the results obtained from two-way ANOVA showed that the effects of the independent variables, gamma dose and moisture content, were significant (p<0.05). Irradiation of high moisture peppers did not cause any visual changes in product quality and the appearance of both samples (10% and 16% moisture content) was the same.

Citation: Shaaban HA. Fungal Mycotoxins Reduction by Gamma Irradiation in Black and White Pepper. Austin J Nutr Metab. 2024; 11(1): 1132.