Factors Associated with Anxiety Disorders in Chinese Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in Hong Kong

Research Article

Austin J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2023; 9(1): 1089.

Factors Associated with Anxiety Disorders in Chinese Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in Hong Kong

Luk JS¹*; Tang CP²; Yu YW²

¹Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong

²Kwai Chung Hospital, Hong Kong

*Corresponding author: Luk JS, Department of Psychiatry, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Lok Man Road, Chai Wan, Hong Kong.

Received: February 01, 2023 Accepted: March 27, 2023 Published: April 03, 2023

Abstract

Background: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a pervasive neurodevelopment disorder characterised by impairment in social communication and presence of restricted, repetitive patterns of behaviour, interests, or activities. A growing body of research has shown that children with ASD experience significantly greater anxiety levels than typically developing children. Anxiety disorders have been found to be one of the most prevalent psychiatric comorbidities in this population of children and are associated with debilitating psychosocial impairment.

Objective: This study aimed to examine factors associated with anxiety disorders among Chinese children diagnosed with ASD in Hong Kong.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a child and adolescent psychiatry outpatient clinic from August 2019 to April 2020. The sample consisted of one hundred thirty-two subjects aged 6 to <12 years who had a diagnosis of ASD. Structured interviews and questionnaires including the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Parenting Stress Index-Short Form, Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire and a socio-demographic questionnaire were administered for the assessment of anxiety disorders and their associated factors.

Results: Greater qualitative deficits in reciprocal social interaction skills, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and maternal mood disorder were found to be significantly associated with anxiety disorders in children with ASD.

Conclusion: Anxiety disorders are prevalent among children with ASD. Early recognition and identification of comorbid anxiety disorders are necessary in the diagnostic process of ASD. This study enriches our understanding of the factors associated with anxiety disorders in this population of children. For future research directions, furthering our understanding on the aetiological pathways, course of illness, and outcome of anxiety disorders in autistic children is highly warranted.

Keywords: Autism spectrum disorder; Anxiety disorder; Chinese children; Hong kong children

Introduction

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a pervasive neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by impairment in social communication and presence of restricted, repetitive patterns of behaviour, interests, or activities [2]. A growing body of research has shown that children with ASD experience significantly greater anxiety levels than typically developing children, as well as children with other developmental disorders [19,29,32,34,41,67]. A meta-analysis revealed that 39.6% of autistic young people were comorbid with at least one anxiety disorder [66]. Anxiety in autistic children has been associated with debilitating impairments such as aggression, irritability, depressive symptoms and self-injurious behaviour [16,31]. To facilitate our clinical understanding and local service development, it is important to explore and recognise the factors associated with anxiety disorder in this population of children.

Social Communication Deficits and Anxiety

Social communication deficits are a central and debilitating element of ASD. Evidence has shown that deficits in social skill are significantly associated with anxiety in autistic children [7,10,15,62]. At different phases of development, social competence plays a critical role in navigating a child through social encounters. Deficit in social functioning, such as difficulty in interpreting and understanding other’s emotions, could significantly affect the quality and quantity of social interactions. Failure in social integration could be a stressful and anxiety provoking experience for children.

In the presence of social functioning deficits, the likelihood of negative peer interaction has been found to increase [8,64]. Bullying victimisation rate among autistic children was shown to be twice as high as those found in the general population [8]. Children who experienced high levels of bullying victimisation were found to have higher levels of anxiety than children who experienced low level or no victimisation [8].

Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Anxiety

ADHD is among the most common psychiatric comorbidities in autistic children with prevalence rates ranging from 28% to 83% [13,20,30,35,3,40,45,53,57]. Anxiety disorders are common among children with ADHD. As shown in the Multimodal Treatment study of children with ADHD, 33.5% of the subjects met the DSM-III-R criteria for an anxiety disorder [39], while a local study yielded a comparable rate of anxiety disorders (27.5%) in school-age children with ADHD [55]. Autistic children and comorbid ADHD, as compared to children with a sole diagnosis of ASD, have been found to have higher levels of anxiety and lower quality of life [3,12].

Parenting, Parenting Stress and Children’s Anxiety

Theoretical models of anxiety disorders have hypothesised the role of parenting in the development and maintenance of childhood anxiety [11,74]. Parenting plays an important role in shaping a child’s early environment and the emotional climate within a parent-child dyad. A high level of parental warmth, responsiveness and autonomy granting are proposed to cultivate children’s perception of mastery and internal locus of control, which fosters anxiety reduction [11,44,60,74].

In contrast, excessive parental control is hypothesised to limit children’s sense of mastery and development of autonomy, contributing to high trait anxiety [11,74]. A meta-analysis supported that a higher level of warmth and autonomy-granting were associated with lower levels of anxiety in children, whereas a higher level of parental control and aversiveness were associated with higher levels of anxiety in children [44].

Comparing the different parenting styles, authoritarian parenting, characterised by a low level of warmth and a high level of control, is found to be associated with higher levels of anxiety in youth [73].

Parents of autistic children are burdened with specific stresses in raising their children, commonly contributed by social stigma, coordination of their children’s care, their children’s behavioural and emotional problems, and concerns towards their children’s future development [24,28,33,69,77]. Compared to parents of typically developing children and children with other disabilities, parents of autistic children are found to have significantly higher levels of parenting stress [23].

Parenting stress is found to share a significant association with children’s anxiety and internalising symptoms [51,61,68] such association is also observed in autistic young people [31].

Parental Psychiatric Disorders and Children’s Anxiety

Psychiatric disorders are common among parents of autistic children, with higher prevalence rates than parents of typically developing children [27,77]. The relationship between parental and offspring psychopathologies is well established in literature. Growing evidence has suggested familial predisposition in anxiety disorders; offspring of parents with anxiety or depressive disorders have been shown to have a heightened risk of developing internalising problems and anxiety disorders themselves [6,21,72]. A longitudinal examination has shown that the offspring of depressed parents, compared to those of non-depressed parents, have a threefold increase in risk of developing anxiety disorders [71]. Whereas offspring of mothers with a lifetime history of anxiety disorder compared to offspring of mothers without anxiety disorder, are at doubled risk of developing anxiety disorders [43].

Objective

This study aimed to examine the factors associated with anxiety disorders in Chinese school-age children diagnosed with ASD in a child and adolescent psychiatry out patient clinic in Hong Kong.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study examining the prevalence of anxiety disorders among Chinese school-age children diagnosed with ASD. This study was conducted at the Yaumatei Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (YMTCAMHS) from August 2019 to April 2020. The YMTCAMHS is a regional specialist outpatient clinic serving children and adolescents under the age of 18 years in the Kowloon West and Kowloon Central Clusters of Hong Kong; these regions have a total population of 2.4 million, which is approximately one third of the total population in Hong Kong [9].

Potential eligible Chinese subjects aged 6 to <12 with a diagnosis of ASD determined by psychiatrists, who fulfilled the exclusion criteria and had attended YMTCAMHS from July 2018 to June 2019, were identified from electronic databases via Clinical Management System and Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System. Subsequently, subjects were selected via computer-generated simple random sampling to be recruited into the study. Written informed consent and assent were obtained from the subjects’ parents and the subjects, respectively. All recruited subjects’ parents were interviewed by the principal investigator with the Developmental, Dimensional and Diagnostic Interview (3Di) to confirm the subjects’ diagnosis of ASD.

A further assessment was conducted on the same day using the Chinese version of the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children- Version 5 (NIMH DISC-5), parent version for the assessment of comorbid anxiety disorders and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Subjects’ parents were invited to complete the Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSDQ), Parenting Stress Index-Short Form (PSI-SF), and a sociodemographic data questionnaire. The principal investigator was blinded to the results of the questionnaires prior to the completion of the 3Di and NIMH DISC-5. Ethics approval was obtained from the Kowloon West Cluster Research Ethics Committee.

Subjects

The inclusion criteria include children who are ethnic Chinese, age 6 to <12 years, and have a diagnosis of ASD determined by a psychiatrist and confirmed by the 3Di. Subjects with known severe mental illnesses (such as psychosis, mania), intellectual disability, severe neurological disorders, chromosomal abnormalities, severe medical disorders that required long-term treatment, active substance abuse, or parents who are unable to comprehend Chinese are excluded from the study.

Developmental, Dimensional and Diagnostic Interview (3Di)

The Developmental, Dimensional and Diagnostic Interview (3Di) is a standardised computer-based parent-report interview, developed and validated [58]. The pervasive developmental disorder module of the 3Di is primarily designed to assess dimensions of autistic traits in children with normal intelligence. It generates dimensional scores on domains of qualitative abnormalities in reciprocal social interaction skills, qualitative impairments in language and communication skills, and repetitive and stereotyped behaviours, as well as categorical diagnosis. The 3Di has excellent test–retest and interrater reliabilities. The sensitivity and specificity were 1.0 and >0.97, respectively [58]. The translated Chinese version of the 3Di pervasive developmental disorder module has a sensitivity of 0.95 and specificity of 0.77 [36]. With the changes in the diagnostic criteria of ASD in the DSM-5 [2], Mandy and colleagues (2012) tested the 3Di subscales using confirmatory factor analysis and concluded that the two-factor model of the DSM-5 was well represented in the 3Di.

National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Parent Version (NIMH DISC)

The National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (NIMH DISC) is a highly structured respondent-based diagnostic interview designed to assess psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents. There are a total of six modules assessing thirty-four common childhood psychiatric disorders upon a one-year time frame. The interview has parallel parent and youth reported versions, designed for individuals in the age ranges of 6 to 17 years, and 9 to 17 years, respectively.

The parent version was adopted in the present study as it is designed for children within the age range of our sample (6 to <12 years), as well as its better test-retest reliability than that of the youth version [26]. Multiple symptoms are assessed, and the scoring programme combines the symptom responses to determine whether a disorder criterion is fulfilled. Recommendations by the DISC Development Group are followed for the impairment criteria; an impairment score of three is considered to be clinically significant. Literature has supported the reliability and validity of the NIMH DISC, including a translated Chinese version for the use in Hong Kong [26,54], which has been widely adopted in local studies. Over the years, various versions of NIMH DISC have been generated to match the evolving classification systems. The latest version- NIMH DISC-5 was developed based on the DSM-5 classification [2].

Parenting Stress Index- Short Form (PSI-SF)

The Parenting Stress Index- Short Form (PSI-SF) is a self-reported questionnaire designed for caregivers to assess parenting stress [1]. The questionnaire comprised thirty-six items, rated on a five-point Likert scale. It consists of three subscales (parental distress, parent-child dysfunctional interaction and difficult child) and a total stress score. Parents with a total stress score at or above the 90th percentile are considered to be experiencing clinically significant levels of stress and are recommended for professional assistance. The Chinese version of the PSI-SF has demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties and good reliability coefficients [75].

Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSDQ)

The Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSDQ) is a self-reported questionnaire developed for parents of preschool and school-age children to evaluate parenting styles [50]. The questionnaire comprised sixty-two items, rated on a five-point Likert scale. Three parenting styles and eleven subdimensions are assessed. Each parenting style contains several subdimensions. The mean score of all items within a subdimension is calculated. Each parenting style is measured by taking the mean score of all it’s subdimensions. The questionnaire shows good reliability and has been used by researchers internationally. Cronbach’s alpha values for authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive parenting are 0.91, 0.86 and 0.75, respectively [50]. The Chinese version of the PSDQ demonstrated good reliability and validity [18]. The subscale scores correlate with each factor significantly with a coefficient of correlation between 0.732 and 0.951. Confirmatory factor analysis shows good construct validity.

Sociodemographic Data

Through a structured questionnaire and subject’s case record, information regarding the subject’s sociodemographic background, medical and psychiatric history, schooling history, and bullying history, as well as the family’s sociodemographic background and psychiatric history were obtained.

Sample Size

Referencing overseas literature with study designs resembling the present study, specifically studies that were based on clinical samples and used standardised diagnostic interviews, the prevalence estimates of anxiety disorders among autistic children ranged from 43.5% to 84.1% [13,45-47]. Taking the average value of 66% as the estimated prevalence with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) and a 9% margin of error, the sample size required for the present study was estimated to be 107 subjects.

Data Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Program for Social Sciences 26.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA computer software).

Results

A total of 150 subjects selected via computer-generated simple random sampling were invited to participate in the study. Of these subjects, 9 refused to participate due to time constraints and privacy concerns, and 9 failed to reach the diagnostic cut-offs of all three subscales in the 3Di.

The final sample consisted of 132 subjects. Comparing the enrolled subjects with the subjects who did not participate in the study, no statistically significant differences in age, sex, or school year were found. The sample recruitment process is summarised in (Figure 1).