Circulating 25-Hydroxyvitamin D levels and Risk of Incident Stroke: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Special Article – Vitamin D

Austin J Nutri Food Sci. 2019; 7(3): 1119.

Circulating 25-Hydroxyvitamin D levels and Risk of Incident Stroke: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Jong-Myon Bae*

Department of Preventive Medicine, Jeju National University College of Medicine, Korea

*Corresponding author: Jong-Myon Bae, Department of Preventive Medicine, Jeju National University College of Medicine, 102 Jejudaehak-ro, Jeju-si, 63243, Jeju Province, Korea

Received: May 06, 2019; Accepted: June 18, 2019; Published: June 25, 2019

Abstract

A recent systematic review that selected 19 relevant articles that were published up until September 30, 2017 showed that vitamin D deficiency was associated with Ischemic Stroke (IS) but not Hemorrhagic Stroke (HS). However, heterogeneity would be introduced when comparing the lowest and highest categories of vitamin D. The aim of this article was to conduct an Updated Meta-Analysis (UMA) that involved searching for relevant articles published up until March 31, 2019. An interval collapsing method was applied for information extraction to decrease heterogeneity among studies. Additional articles were selected from cited lists from 19 selected articles using citation discovery tools. The random effect model was applied if the I-squared value exceeded 50%. A funnel plot and Egger’s test were used to detect publication bias. After the addition of five new studies, the relative risks [and their 95% confidence intervals] (and I-squared value) were 1.52 [1.33-1.74] (0.0%) for IS and 2.44 [1.34-4.46] (69.7%) for HS. This UMA supported the hypothesis that serum vitamin D deficiency was associated with an increased risk of HS as well as IS. Diverse public health programs targeting vitamin D deficiency are needed for higher-risk groups, such as the older population.

Keywords: Vitamin D; Stroke; Risk factors; Systematic Review; Metaanalysis

Abbreviations

25(OH)D: 25-Hydroxyvitamin D; CDT: Citation Discovery Tools; CI: Confidence Interval; FES: First-Ever Stroke; HLM: Highest Versus Lowest Method; HS: Hemorrhagic Stroke; ICM: Interval Collapsing Method; IS: Ischemic Stroke (IS); logRR: Logarithm Relative Risk; OS: Overall Stroke; RR: Relative Risk; SElogRR: Standard Error of Logarithm Relative Risk; sRR: Summary Relative Risk

Introduction

As stoke is a leading case of mortality and disability globally [1], the economic burden is substantial [2,3]. Although hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and stroke are well known as important risk factors of stroke, the exploration of unknown risk factors is still needed [2,4].

Several studies reported that the incidence of First-Ever Stroke (FES) is higher in winter and spring [5]. Similar to tuberculosis [6] or suicide [7] that show seasonal variation of occurrence, the hypothetical association between vitamin D deficiency and risk of FES has been suggested [8-10]. Zhou et al. [4] conducted a quantitative systematic review of 19 relevant articles [11-29] published up to 30 September 2017, and concluded that vitamin D level was associated with Ischemic Stroke (IS), but not Hemorrhagic Stroke (HS).

However, the following two issues were identified with the study by Zhou et al [4]. First, they did not specify the method by which vitamin D was measured from blood sampling or intake amounts. Among the 19 selected articles, Kojima et al. [15] and Ford et al. [22] evaluated the vitamin D level of subjects using a food frequency questionnaire and supplement intake data, respectively. The remaining articles assessed vitamin D levels by measuring serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH) D]. Second, Michos et al. [16] having the outcome as mortality was selected for meta-analysis, even though the aim of Zhou et al. [4] was to verify the association between vitamin D level and the ‘incidence’ of stroke. Thus, it is necessary to perform an Updated Meta-Analysis (UMA) to clarify the results in Zhou et al [4]. The aim of this UMA was to evaluate the hypothesis that lower level of circulating 25(OH) D are associated with an increased risk of stroke.

Materials and Methods

As Zhou et al. [4] selected relevant articles that were published up to September 30, 2017, it is necessary to add relevant studies that have been published up until 31 March 2019. A search list was created through the Citation Discovery Tools (CDT) of “cited by” provided by PubMed [30] from the 19 articles selected by Zhou et al [4]. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were as same as the study by Zhou et al [4]. In other words, the selection criteria were analytic epidemiological studies that measured the circulating 25(OH)D levels of cohort participants and identified the risk of HS as well as IS and Overall Stroke (OS).

Instead of the ‘highest versus lowest’ method (HLM) used by Zhou et al. [4], an ‘Interval Collapsing Method’ (ICM) was used to extract information from each selected article to make full use of the information in the selected articles [31,32]. The Logarithm Relative Risk (log RR) and the standard error of log RR (SE log R) for each article were calculated from the extracted Relative Risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

The heterogeneity of articles was assessed by the I-squared value (%). A random effect model was used when the I-squared value exceeded 50%, whereas if this value was below 50% a fixed effect model was used [33]. Subgroup analyses were conducted by study design, such as cohort and case-control. Publication bias was evaluated by funnel plot and Egger’s test. If a publication bias was confirmed, sensitivity analysis was performed with limiting SElogRR. The level of statistical significance was set to 0.05.

Results

A total of 359 studies were retrieved from the 19 studies selected by Zhou et al. [4] using PubMed’s CDT. Five studies were additionally selected [34-38]. Zhang et al. [34] and Manouchehri et al. [35] were published after 30 September 2017. With the addition of 16 studies [11-14,17-21,23-29], 21 studies were finally selected for meta-analysis (Table 1). These included 14 cohort studies [11-14,17,19-21,23- 26,28,34] and 7 case-control studies [18,27,29,35-38].